No

ID sylw: 87971

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Jo Meakin

Inappropriate use of green belt. Area already impacted by HS2

Yes

ID sylw: 87974

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Yes due to being on the edge of an urban area with good existing infrastructure due to be on the edge of a city centre

Yes

ID sylw: 87977

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

Yes as its on the edge of an urban area with good existing infrastructure.

Yes

ID sylw: 88061

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs vivien bryer

Could provide a lot of student accommodation, freeing up housing in nearby towns. Would be more environmentally friendly as they would not have to travel, and they would probably enjoy living nearer to the uni.

No

ID sylw: 88063

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jeanette Ray

This looks like green belt land .
The infrastructure of kenilworth is not sufficient to carter for more houses .
Roads are not adequate to cope with more traffic

Yes

ID sylw: 88130

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Parry

Support in view of its sustainable location and connectivity to existing road and rail infrastructure, education and health provision.

Yes

ID sylw: 88161

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris

SG01 is either already in or directly adjacent to a highly populated area. The road infrastructure is already in place

Yes

ID sylw: 88226

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Excellent sensible location to not only create and expand an innovation and technology hub of new businesses, close access to Warwick University with improving road infrastructure and good access for north and south of UK. Ideal for housing, affordable and student. This is ideal for Coventry. Coventry should be a city where the UK should seek to regenerate - urban regeneration and improve the city.

No

ID sylw: 88314

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Browne

This will destroy green belt between Coventry and Kenilworth and effectively conjoin them. This is contrary to one of the key roles of green belt.

No

ID sylw: 88532

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kathryn Lawry Kennedy

It's important to keep a clear distance between Coventry and Kenilworth.

Yes

ID sylw: 88614

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

Close to current employment areas.

No

ID sylw: 88627

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Laura Grive

This is an egregious proposal . In the last few years we have seen an enormous amount of housing estates popping up
and filling the land between Shipston and Chipping Campden . And also in Shipston on the London Road . Surely these sites have already fulfilled the need for extra housing ? With a proposal this vast getting in and out of Shipston, an historic and ancient market town, will become impossible

No

ID sylw: 88677

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Gillian Browne

I object to SG01 on the grounds that it is green belt land and one of the purposes of green belt land, as per the government's own guidelines, it that it should be used to provide a gap between conurbations. Building on this land will remove the space between Coventry and Kenilworth.
The new build houses that have currently been built in Kenilworth have not been sold implying there is less demand for houses in Kenilworth. The site of the old school has not been built on yet either.
The local transport provision and hospitals are also at capacity.

Other

ID sylw: 88678

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Crispin Passmore

Broadly yes but I'd need to better understand what is envisaged here. Hopefully a mix of expansion of university, housing and local employment. Then I would support it.

No

ID sylw: 88693

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Browne

SG01 is an area of green land which lies in between Coventry and Kenilworth. One of the principal values of green belt land is to provide space between cities, towns, and villages. Developing SG01 will effectively remove any divisions between two urban areas, destroying habitats and depriving residents easy access to green spaces. If this government want healthier citizens they might reflect on the health benefits access to green spaces confers. I wasn't surprised to see the Tories whack a train track through green space. As a life long Labour voter I'll be crushed to see you follow suit.

No

ID sylw: 88781

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Roopa Lentini

Ruin rural landscape and cause bottlenecks to infrastructure

No

ID sylw: 88784

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Lentini

Building new houses in north Leamington is not only going to cause more traffic than we already have and the infrastructure won’t handle it. But more disappointingly it will ruin the countryside we have and that up market feel. Look at Warwick gates development it’s ruined and the traffic is colossal and the place looks like a tip. Leamington has been ruined enough without you building more trash in the best part of leamington.

Yes

ID sylw: 88878

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Helena Flisowski

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 89023

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sara Bird

Near to existing infrastructure, facilities and sustainable transport

No

ID sylw: 89355

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs C Hollis

SG01 is mostly Green Belt and is good quality agricultural land which has been inappropriately assessed.
SG01 is much too small to meet the requirements for sustainable development and this location does not service South Warwickshire.
There is no planned and budgeted infrastructure (schools, healthcare, roads etc) to support this development.
There are developments within Solihull that should be considered alongside.

No

ID sylw: 89429

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Brooks

I believe that the Green Belt land included in this section of the map should be excluded for development.

No

ID sylw: 89440

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Brooks

We have little enough Green Belt areas as it is and building more housing on green sites only exaserbates the problem.

No

ID sylw: 89511

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

This is mostly green belt land! There is also a beautiful nature reserve called Tocil Wood! Please do not build on this land. I once saw a very beautiful dragonfly there and it is teeming with nature.

No

ID sylw: 89604

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Stella Moore

There is already enough development and HS2mayhem in this zone. Enough is enough

No

ID sylw: 89618

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Smith

Hatton Park has already created a blotch on the landscape that side of Warwick - this is greenbelt land and is creating the sprawl of Warwick town into the countryside.

Yes

ID sylw: 89619

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Smith

This is an obvious choice for growth, however in greenbelt land and an obvious merging of Coventry and Kenilworth - this surely goes against NPPF for use of greenbelt land.

No

ID sylw: 89662

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

I think it is important to maintain a clear green space between the conurbations of Kenilworth and Coventry, to help retain the distinctive small town feeling of Kenilworth

Yes

ID sylw: 89710

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Dodd

I think the South of Coventry Group is a good idea in order to expand the housing stock in a sensible way as it would be well connected by bus routes and other forms of sustainable transport. The only concern that I would have about is the amount of woodland and whether this would be damaged by development near the site either for housing or employment.

Yes

ID sylw: 89723

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

n/a

Yes

ID sylw: 89981

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kulbir Birak

Is able to take advantage of existing infrastructure (major roads, developed shopping for large populations etc).