Yes

ID sylw: 85944

Derbyniwyd: 10/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

Relunctantly yes, as it effectively merges Kenilwrth with Coventry. However, given the housing numbers required and the proximity of employment areas and reasonable communications it seems a sensible choice.

Yes

ID sylw: 85953

Derbyniwyd: 10/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Darrell Muffitt

Extension of existing similar development

No

ID sylw: 86013

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Pashley

The proposed location covers green belt land, so I consider this location inappropriate for development.

Yes

ID sylw: 86043

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 86190

Derbyniwyd: 15/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Professor Paul Bywaters

.

Other

ID sylw: 86227

Derbyniwyd: 16/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alice Hobson

I am in favour of this, as long as you have carefully considered how much traffic there already is during rush hour on Stoneleigh Road, and you have a clear plan to avoid this getting worse (eg building a new train line in the area for sustainable travel)

No

ID sylw: 86261

Derbyniwyd: 18/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Ruth Buckley

We reject the idea of what amounts to Coventry overspill being used in the South Warwickshire calculations.

Yes

ID sylw: 86549

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Focussing development around existing more densely developed areas is a good approach and reduces travel time and pollution as people move to work.

Yes

ID sylw: 86551

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Reduces travel time and pollution by keeping development to the borders of already developed areas.

Yes

ID sylw: 86643

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Swan

Close to transport links and good local infrastructure

No

ID sylw: 86714

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Vincett

This area is part of Warwickshire, not Coventry.

No

ID sylw: 86785

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Nina Bailey

I have not been made aware of this nor seen any information so I would suggest purposing the information to be mae available to all first.

No

ID sylw: 86799

Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Baker

Wildlife is suffering. We need to keep the green belt and reduce pollution

Yes

ID sylw: 86807

Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr GERALD KELLY

Near to the city for employment

No

ID sylw: 86966

Derbyniwyd: 01/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carys Bains

Having moved to the area recently, one of the biggest benefits is the fact that it is quiet, calm and we’re surrounded by nature. The current doctors schools and amenities do not have the capacity to take on the amount of houses which have been provided, and there are no plans to extend these. Additionally more houses (including inevitable social housing) will bring the value down of the existing houses in the local area and will likely push others out.

No

ID sylw: 86991

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

The plan does not take into account the scale of development in the area and need for infrastructure to be significantly up graded, including the expansion needed to schools. Plus, the growth area covers an huge area of green land and buts onto the greenway, which doesn’t align with your other strategic goals of protecting green spaces for people and communities. To enjoy. It also removes much needed green corridors between major urban areas, which allows wildlife to move around large urban areas, Furthermore, if this area of land is utilised, kenilworth will eventually lose its distinct separation from Coventry.

No

ID sylw: 86994

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

Not enough consideration has been given to existing communities, the impact on infrastructure and also wildlife corridors, the size of this allocation directly contradicts many of the straight points and also significantly impacts the greenway and green spaces.

No

ID sylw: 87131

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Karen Blake

Those of us who live in Burton Green have suffered enough, thanks to the waste of public funds, HS2. This was a beautiful village, we moved here for a quiet life and for the nearby countryside and it has been destroyed, to the detriment of our health and well-being. To find out that the "powers that be" wish to turn us into a suburb of Coventry and destroy even more nature and wildlife is infuriating. I support the addition of the almshouses, in principle, but adding extra dwellings is not acceptable.

No

ID sylw: 87143

Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Suman Geeves

HS2 has disrupted my life, without any foreseeable benefits to anybody in this country. I have no wish to see any further developments to be thrust upon Burton Green against our wishes.

No

ID sylw: 87216

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Arina Cirstea

The SG01 provides not just a vital green belt but also a well used recreation and sustainable travel route (for cyclists, horse riders and pedestrians) for University of Warwick campus and the Kenilworth/Coventry community. Already some of ecosystem has been disrupted by HS2 construction work; therefore I think it is important at least some of it is preserved.

Other

ID sylw: 87221

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Rusbridge

The Group is in a sensible location but extends too far south. For various reasons including preserving the identity of Kenilworth and keeping a distance from HS2, the area should stay north of Crackley Lane and Cryfield Grange Road.

No

ID sylw: 87282

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Heather HOLMES

I do not live in this area, however I am against any destruction of the green belt, whilst other options are available.

Yes

ID sylw: 87332

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

This site supports sustainable communities

Yes

ID sylw: 87489

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I agree

No

ID sylw: 87514

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

Yes

ID sylw: 87682

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr justin kerridge

yes

No

ID sylw: 87730

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Atherley

I believe the land earmarked - SG01 is not suitable if chosen by WDC
Strongly believe burton green should be kept as an independent village.

No

ID sylw: 87823

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Susan Duhaut

Objections: 1. Flooding in the Crackley Gap between HS2 and Cryfield Grange road will cause serious subsequent problems.
2. Encroachment on the greenbelt between Coventry and Kenilworth will seriously affect the town's independent status and is opposed by the people of Kenilworth massively.
3. Wildlife present in this area is critical and once destroyed, is not present anywhere else in the Kenilworth area, thus altering the nature of Kenilworth as a town literally.
Please note that it is not the whole area that I object too at all, as I do accept the need for housing, but just Crackley area.

Yes

ID sylw: 87881

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nicholas Sears

plenty of road infrastructure and access to Coventry job market

Yes

ID sylw: 87904

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Ellerington

This area can be supported by local infrastructure and amenities.