No

ID sylw: 90078

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson

Broadwells Wood and Black Waste Wood Local Wildlife Site (LWS) and Wainbody and Kenilworth Road Woods LWS, Kenilworth Common LWS and River Sowe & Finham Brook & lakes

Yes

ID sylw: 90132

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Oliver Ashford

Close to already built up area and amenaties

Yes

ID sylw: 90279

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Liz Stone

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 90377

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

I previously lived in this area for nearly 30 years, and know the infrastructure exists to support this.

Yes

ID sylw: 90398

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart

Adds to existing well established infrastructure and as a large town, it already provides employment with significant further opportunity for expansion. Business owners do not want to come to a brand new site with no facilities, it is too risky for them in an already challenging economy.

No

ID sylw: 90621

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Kennedy

The development of this area will in effect remove the last strand of greenbelt between Coventry and Burton Green / Kenilworth. The greenbelt has already been severely damaged and curtailed by the construction of HS2, and any further reduction in the area will mean that Kenilworth becomes a suburb of Coventry. The University of Warwick is planning an Eco Park on their portion of this land. Connecting this up with the existing areas of woodland on the site into new habitats to enhance nature would both increase biodiversity and ensure the essential greenbelt corridor between Coventry and Kenilworth remains.

No

ID sylw: 90671

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Elkins

This area is not being appropriately assessed, is mostly in Green Belt and should not be considered as part of the Strategic Growth Plan. The current weighting of 6% appears very low and not an effective well performing area of Green Belt.
This area comprises of good quality agricultural land and the value this plays should play a bigger part in the assessment. The wider economic issues means we should not be removing land which we use to grow our food locally. Avoiding this category of land for housing development is advised in the National Planning Framework.
Lack of infrastructure.

Yes

ID sylw: 90679

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Averil Stewart

makes better sense to use land already supporting housing with ready made facilities, shops and infrastructure than manu of the small villages already struggling for these

Yes

ID sylw: 90760

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr N Ledger

Worthy of more detailed consideration

Yes

ID sylw: 90998

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree. Logical location and very much want to see Coventry re-urbanised and developed to make Coventry a great place to live and work. Work should be done on re-urbanising run down areas to stimulate investment, growth and job opportunities and safe places to live

Other

ID sylw: 91109

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs liz jackson

yes, to the extent not within the greenbelt or other protected area

Yes

ID sylw: 91198

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

-

No

ID sylw: 91416

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact upon the following important Local Wildlife Sites: Broadwells Wood and Black Waste Wood Local Wildlife Site (LWS) and Wainbody and Kenilworth Road Woods LWS, Kenilworth Common LWS and River Sowe & Finham Brook & lakes

Yes

ID sylw: 91487

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Beth Palmer

I believe there is more scope for development in this area without scarring the countryside whilst good transport links are more easily accessible

No

ID sylw: 91735

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms miranda maloney

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 91908

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Bernard Davis

This area provides the biggest residential capacity in Coventry & Kenilworth.
It is close to major employment centres at Warwick University and Coventry
It is 3.6 times larger than SG04 (land South of Kenilworth).
The northern portion is outside the green belt.
It has significant existing infrastructure.
HS2 has already damaged green belt, reducing value and attractiveness in this area.

Yes

ID sylw: 91923

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James OShea

This is a suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with

Yes

ID sylw: 92121

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ted and Zbigniew Jasinski

Provides the biggest residential capacity in Coventry and Kenilworth.
Provides approximately 3 times the capacity of SG04.
Northern portion is outside green belt.
There is a significant existing infrastructure.
HS2 has already damaged green belt reducing attractiveness in the area
Close to major employment centres at Warwick University and Coventry.

No

ID sylw: 92196

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Gibb

Too much and too big a development, starting to join Kenilworth to Coventry. They are SEPARATE. There should be NO development on the Kenilworth side of HS2. Traffic in this area is already congested and road infrastructure is not suited to further vast increases in traffic.

Yes

ID sylw: 92288

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Harbury Parish Council

Yes this is an appropriate location, given the proximity to Coventry, and the University of Warwick.

Yes

ID sylw: 92884

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Molloy

We should preserve Green belt.

We are aware that South Warwickshire is bounded by Coventry and Redditch and there may be unmet needs from those areas that have to be accommodated. However, it is clear from comments on this matter in the previous inspector's Report (2017), that development to meet the unmet needs of Coventry will need to be located adjoining Coventry, rather than the edge of Leamington and other villages. The same principle would apply to Redditch.

Better for transport and sustainability

Yes

ID sylw: 93014

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nichole South

Room for development, strategic growth. Rail and road already in place.

Yes

ID sylw: 93057

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cathy Kennedy

It seems a logical place to grow.

Yes

ID sylw: 93094

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Waters

Good motorway (M40/A46, M6, M69 etc) and close-by rail link

No

ID sylw: 93110

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Christine Orton

Kenilworth will be a suburb of Coventry, especially as land off Beehive Hill and Hollis Lane is already at risk of development. Loss of green space around Hollis Lane, Cryfield Grange Road and Crackley Lane.

Yes

ID sylw: 93127

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Redhead

The area of SG01 has many plusses for residential capacity development, in that the employment sectors are so near, with far easier transport links to the road network. The northern portion lies outside Green belt, and HS2 has already carved a noisy corridor through existing Green belt which can be somewhat regenerated along with new infrastructure build to mitigate impact. The total area of this land is more than 3 times larger than SG04, and will more than satisfy the strategic growth requirements between Kenilworth and Coventry. This land could be considered in part, retaining some areas of Green belt.

Yes

ID sylw: 93131

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jean Nixon

This site includes Warwick University land. Already lots of development in this area and as the councils are in favour of developing land for the university it seems lots of damage has already been done to this area. There must be some brownfield site within SG01. The University is a large employer and to add additional development to the area is probably less destructive to the green belt than creating a new site.

No

ID sylw: 93179

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jean Gill

The area is mainly green belt land (and what has been withdrawn from green belt shouldn’t have been) and is good quality agricultural land that should be used for food production. It does not score well as a sustainable development option using council methodology and SG01 is much smaller than it seems given that a good proportion of it is in the University of Warwick site giving zero housing. A lack of infrastructure is identified by the Sustainability Assesment, our roads cannot cope with more population nor can our schools or health care facilities. The area has suffered enough development.

No

ID sylw: 93183

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Gill

High harm, low sustainability scoring compared to other options.
The green belt has been inappropriately assessed, performs well and should not be considered for housing as is quality agricultural land needed for local food production and UK self sufficiency.
Insufficient infrastructure (schools, roads/ primary care planned, insufficient budget. Previously assessed as unsuitable for housing.
No consideration to very close large Solihull developments over 1000 houses also assessed as high performing green belt.
Solihull, Coventry & Warwick have overestimated the number of houses needed for for the region.

Yes

ID sylw: 93308

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick District Council

Most suitable area in WDC area, and can meet the need for Coventry overspill.