Yes

ID sylw: 85947

Derbyniwyd: 10/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Winters

We would like to see more retirement homes built around the village of Bishops Tachbrook.

No

ID sylw: 85957

Derbyniwyd: 10/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Claire Broader

Traffic along Lionheart Avenue, Europa Way and Oakley Wood Road is already at capacity and will only increase as the number of students at Oakley School increases. Building in this location will also hem in the proposed country park, destroy already limited wildlife habitats and is against the agreement of the residents of Bishops Tachbrook village.

Yes

ID sylw: 86160

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Winters

We do have an interest as we own land at Lowhill, south of Oakley Wood Road.
Our land is less than 400 metres from St. Chad's Church which used to be the Centre of the Parish of Bishops Tachbrook.
I would like to question why Village development is allowed to the North and West, towards Warwick and Leamington, but not towards the South and East.
I have previously suggested more Retirement Homes within the Village.
Bishops Tachbrook will no longer be a Village in the Parish of St .Chad's it will become a suburb of Warwick and Leamington.

No

ID sylw: 86248

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Michelle McHugh

This development is unsustainable - there has already been significant development in this area in recent years. The road network cannot cope and the public services cannot cope. SG10 is land that is opposite the Bishop Tachbrook Country Park which will significantly limit the environmental and social benefits of the Country Park. It will also significantly affect a Grade II listed building and see land than has been farmed since the Doomsday Book being developed on. It would be far better for the Country Park to be extended onto the other side of the Brook.

No

ID sylw: 86541

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Rory Hawkins

Leamington and the surrounding areas simply don't have the road infrastructure to cope with additional housing so close to the town centre. A significant amount of housing has already been added in the south of Leamington/Warwick which has caused a significant increase in congestion in getting in/out/around the the local area during peak hours/weekends. Given the location of the M40, getting in/out of south Leamington is already quite challenging at those time as well, without adding more traffic. New housing would be better suited in new the new settlement format where it won't add to the already overloaded infrastructure.

Yes

ID sylw: 86557

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Reduces travel time and pollution by keeping development to the borders of already developed areas.

No

ID sylw: 86811

Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr GERALD KELLY

Consider travel and the effect on rural environment

No

ID sylw: 87029

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Sonia Takyar

Not happy due to concern for Flooding, Facilities being overstretched and Anti Social Behaviour

Yes

ID sylw: 87343

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

Oakley Wood Road should be the eastern boundary of this proposed site. This provides a clear edge to the development that reflects the use of the farm land, enabling a cohesive community development that is not split by a busy road.

Significant contribution should be made to the extension of the Tach Brook Country park, respecting the BTNDP. The TBCP extension to include Windmill Hill and all land on southern bank of the brook up to established east / west public footpath.

Yes

ID sylw: 87498

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

Land here is the correct side of leamington for the supermarkets, train station and motorway links.

No

ID sylw: 87525

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 87646

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Grey

This proposal represents urban sprawl over a vast area making Bishops Tatchbrook a suburb within a huge area of low density development on open farmland around much of Warwick and Leamington. There is also no rail connection here encouraging much growth in road transport and resultant congestion.

Yes

ID sylw: 87906

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Ellerington

This area can be supported by local infrastructure and amenities.

No

ID sylw: 87923

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Rothwell

- Development/Housing will destroy the historic nature of this area. The largest white area contained within SG10 includes privately owned woodland, fields and 3 historic houses several hundred years old. One house is listed and is the only surviving Tithe Barn in Warwickshire
-North of SG10 is the new Country Park, building on SG10 will then mean the Country Park will then surrounded on ALL sides by development/housing thereby removing any countryside views for park visitors
-SG10 has been farmed since the Domesday book (1086) and includes 1000 year-old public footpath
-Badgers set on north boundary of SG10

Yes

ID sylw: 87991

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

Yes as its urban.

Yes

ID sylw: 87999

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

Yes as urban

No

ID sylw: 88136

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Parry

Significant harm to the character of the landscape and increasing traffic congestion to JLR and Aston Martin on B4100 with additional traffic impacts on neighbouring villages. Lack of rail connectivity.

No

ID sylw: 88170

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris

Although SG10 benefits from being close to the main road network it is already a nightmare to travel into Leamington this way. This has only become more difficult with the ongoing new build locations on the south of Leam. Its a no go driving area at peak times.

Yes

ID sylw: 88242

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Yes as per my comments on SG09

No

ID sylw: 88343

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Hayles

The Planning Inspectorate dismissed an appeal to build on land south of Mallory Road, Bishop's Tachbrook in 2014, stating there would be serious harm to the character and appearance of the village, and it would undermine much work of the PC/Neighbourhood Plan Group. The identity of Bishop's Tachbrook as a compact rural settlement would be eroded. Subsequent to the Planning Inspector's Decision, considerable building development has taken place in accordance with the parish local plan. There should be no attempt to contradict the Planning Inspector's decision concerning this land.

Yes

ID sylw: 88625

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

No

ID sylw: 88729

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Darren Quinney

Bishops Itchington is already heaving under pressure of lack of investment. Council's only priority is to keep building (I'd wager none of councillors will be effected themselves or local areas). It's so disheartening to the damage you do to local area all in the name of greed.

No

ID sylw: 88922

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Joanne Bailey

It is already difficult to pull out of the B4087 onto the B4100 & similarly the volume of traffic using the B4087 into Wellesbourne at peak periods often sees traffic queuing beyond the village boundary - this will further add to the congestion.

Yes

ID sylw: 89037

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sara Bird

Good access to existing infrastructure and transport options

Yes

ID sylw: 89520

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

Non green belt so please go ahead!

Yes

ID sylw: 89729

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

n/a

No

ID sylw: 90087

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson

River Avon and tributaries LWS

Yes

ID sylw: 90351

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nico Devocelle

Access to motorway

No

ID sylw: 90384

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

This area is at risk of merging with other devleopment, and if distinction needed, no further devleopemtn

No

ID sylw: 90583

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick Town Council

Constitutes overdevelopment and should not be expanded further.