No

ID sylw: 99194

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Rawlings

There will be not enough access to GP surgeries.
There will not be enough access to hospitals.
There will not be enough school places. The local schools are already at capacity and have no space for development.
The increase in traffic will create more wear and tear on the roads, cause longer delays getting into Leamington and put more strain on parking facilities in Leamington.

No

ID sylw: 99296

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Phelps

This development would swamp the historic village of Bishops Tachbrook; no nearby rail links

Yes

ID sylw: 99429

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Tibbles

Appears to be have mediocre service by existing Road Network, Transportation hubs, Healthcare facilities and Education establishments, but with some improvements in capacity and provision, might be suitable

Yes

ID sylw: 99680

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Sabrina Hasnaoui

In support for development due to this area being non green belt land.

Yes

ID sylw: 99778

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

Yes

ID sylw: 99783

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

No

ID sylw: 99792

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Cooper

Local roads already far too busy to support any further development. Additional traffic to new school will add to this.

Yes

ID sylw: 99897

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil Eaton

Support required development on non green belt land

Yes

ID sylw: 100044

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Wall

Development should prioritise brownfield sites over Green Belt land. Urban and previously developed areas already have infrastructure in place, reducing pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare. These sites are closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. Using brownfield land prevents environmental damage, protects biodiversity, and preserves historic landscapes. It also helps maintain community identity by preventing urban sprawl. Additionally, brownfield areas are often better suited for flood mitigation. By focusing on these locations, new housing can be delivered responsibly without harming the countryside or overburdening local services.

No

ID sylw: 100184

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Immad Mor

Significant loss of privacy and sunlight, significant disturbance and noise, effect on character and appearance of the area including the setting of the village, the grade 2 listed 17th century barn, additional traffic from proposed development.
Holt Avenue is mostly retired residents and residents looking for quiet rural life. This proposal will have a major impact on our quality of life, causing disturbance over the development period, and permanent loss of privacy.
I moved into (redacted as house number provided) Holt Avenue after going through severe anxiety and depression, looking for quiet, private and rural life. This proposal is already making my condition worse.

Yes

ID sylw: 100190

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Michelle Booth

Reasons why the development proposed in harmful to our local area including the threat to wildlife and protected bird species which use the area to mate (barn owls)

Yes

ID sylw: 100281

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Deborah Carter

New development should focus on previously developed sites, not destroy protected Green Belt land. Urban and repurposed areas already have infrastructure in place, preventing additional strain on roads, schools, and healthcare. These locations are also closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. Using non-Green Belt land prevents irreversible environmental harm, safeguards biodiversity, and preserves important landscapes. It also protects communities from urban sprawl and helps to prevent flooding. By focusing on these sites, new housing can be delivered in a responsible way—without sacrificing the countryside or placing unbearable pressure on already stretched local services.

Yes

ID sylw: 100373

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Aimee Carter

New housing should be developed on land that has already been built on, not on protected Green Belt land. Urban areas and brownfield sites already have the infrastructure to support new developments, reducing the pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare.
Building in non-Green Belt areas also means:
• Less environmental damage and better protection for wildlife.
• More sustainable transport options, reducing long commutes and carbon emissions.
• Preventing towns and villages from merging and losing their unique identities.
• Reducing flood risks caused by overdevelopment.
Destroying the Green Belt isn’t the answer—there are much better options available.

Yes

ID sylw: 100590

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South

Support housing development on non-green belt land.

No

ID sylw: 100600

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Campaign to Protect Rural England - Warwickshire

SG10 around Bishops Tachbrook would if developed absorb Tachbrook into the Leamington urban area, ending its village character and setting. The land SE of Europa Way is the last block left as rural land between Leamington and the A452. Making it a strategic growth location would mean building on Windmill Hill which has an ancient mound (Scheduled).
There are limited services at Bishops Tachbrook and the school has no spare capacity.

No

ID sylw: 100784

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Hills

Prevention of coalescence, Loss of village identity, rural outlook, green space. Too much traffic already - our area cannot cope with more housing.

Yes

ID sylw: 101765

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates

Asiant : Marrons

Catesby Estates support the inclusion of land South East of Europa Way, Bishop’s Tachbrook (part of SG10) within the Plan. The Site is in a sustainable location, in accordance with the emerging Spatial Strategy. South East of Europa Way can deliver around 1,000 homes, primary school, community and retail facilities, and a substantial extension to Tachbrook Country Park. Sustainable transport connections to neighbouring areas and the towns can be achieved. The Site can deliver an environment sensitive development to meet a wide range of local housing needs. Development could come forward separately or in coordination with other parts of SG10.

No

ID sylw: 101823

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Site SG10 – Bishop’s Tachbrook Group would have major adverse impacts, including increased carbon footprint, harm to listed buildings and loss of high-quality agricultural land. It contradicts the SWLP’s evidence-led strategy, as it is open countryside, lacks sustainable travel links and is not in an area of deprivation. The site’s multiple ownerships raise delivery concerns. Its development would lead to coalescence between Bishop’s Tachbrook and South Leamington and conflict with the Country Park policy in the Bishop’s Tachbrook Neighbourhood Plan. While it provides housing/employment land, its allocation is unsustainable and inconsistent with national and local planning policies.

Yes

ID sylw: 102195

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon

Non Green Belt. Served by local employment areas. Sustainable. Connections to Leamington.

Yes

ID sylw: 102463

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Deeley Homes Dean Weldon

Deeley Homes supports the inclusion of SG10 as a location for Strategic Growth. This represents a logical extension to the north of the village. The land that Deeley Homes controls (Land North of Bishops Tachbrook) would include a large area of land to be gifted to the Parish Council to help facilitate the connectivity and delivery of the Tachbrook Country Park.

No

ID sylw: 102537

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Val Sassall

This area is becoming rapidly overdeveloped.

Yes

ID sylw: 102574

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Andrews

Development on non-green belt land should be prioritised over development on green belt. Total housing needs can be met without developing on green belt so morally not right to remove green belt without exceptional cause.
These areas are better supported with existing infrastructure and transport network without requiring major investment on more remote, less connected areas.
The opportunity in terms of yield is higher in these areas so there is a duty to fulfil the housing needs in the most responsible way considering this and the green belt obligations.

Yes

ID sylw: 102709

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Liz Churchill

I prefer to see all non Green-belt sites being used.

Other

ID sylw: 102752

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Severn Trent Water

This development will likely require treatment at Warwick - Longbridge (STW) Treatment Works, this Wastewater Treatment Works has medium capacity and high environmental constraints. Due to the size of the development, it is recommended that network upgrades will be required, alongside hydraulic modelling and engagement with STW. Overall this development site is considered a medium/high risk location, there is some capacity however in order to accommodate growth, infrastructure upgrades will be required and we would need to work closely to understand build timelines, in order to plan accordingly.

No

ID sylw: 102853

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ellen Gardiner

The demand for new employment sites is recognised, but the overwhelming development of Greenfield land in this area is considered to be inappropriate and unjustifiable. It is not sustainable to continue developing Greenfield sites in rural areas at the rate that has been occurring in recent times.

No

ID sylw: 103043

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Charlotte Scott

The proposed developments will lead to merging of our parishes which is at odds with protecting and enhancing our environmental assets a key objective 12 in SWLP assets. Bishops Tachbrook would virtually be subsumed and this appears to be at odds with SWLPs Strategic Objective 12 - protecting and enhancing our environment assets

Yes

ID sylw: 103100

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Appleton

Whilst the aim is for people to live close to where they work and for Active Travel to be a priority, it must be acknowledged that people often choose to reside and work in different places. Commuting is the norm and the SWLP must accommodate this. Settlement expansion and locations of new settlements must be supported by transport infrastructure.

Yes

ID sylw: 103191

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Pike

An area such as this , not green belt designated and close to major road infrastructure seems more appropriate.

Yes

ID sylw: 103262

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jack Casey

SG10 must be supported. A critical factor is the location of the allocation alongside the M40, but also adjoining Leamington Spa. The allocation lies within Road Opportunity 8, identified by the West Midlands Strategic Employment Sits Study 2024 with the all-important combination of being on the strategic road network and having assess to a skilled labour force. Indeed, it is this combination employment and residential in this location that makes the case for the allocation of SG10 so compelling when set against the aims of the Plan and government policy.

Yes

ID sylw: 103270

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Keith Allan

If building of new houses is to go ahead then building on non-Green belt land is more appropriate