BASE HEADER

Potential Settlement Question A1

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 151 i 161 o 161

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106883

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Redditch Borough Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

A1 and A2 are identified in the SWLP Preferred Options as among the 'least preferred' of the potential new settlements based on the evidence base. These comments are provided given the proximity of A1, A2, and SG22 to the Redditch Borough Council (RBC) boundary.

RBC is reviewing its Local Plan. Growth Options are not confirmed. The potential of Redditch's infrastructure to accommodate Redditch's growth and potential impacts from residents of A1, A2, and SG22 has not yet been established. RBC acknowledges the methodology of locating A1 and A2 close to the A435 due to proximity to strategic road and rail links. The New Settlement Background paper identifies potential settlements with good access to both the road network and the main settlements in South Warwickshire. If A1 and A2 come forward RBC would need clarification on how they would meet SWLP need given their distance from the main SWLP settlements. The A435 severs potential for active travel links between A1 and A2 for short 'day to day' journeys. Even with local centres it is likely these settlements would generate significant numbers of short car journeys to Redditch.

RBC will work with the SWLP authorities if these proposals are advanced. Evidence would need to be provided that non-Green Belt sites are unsuitable before these sites come forward. As the evidence base identifies delivery challenges, RBC would require clarification on infrastructure delivery to ensure no adverse impacts on Redditch District should they come forward without full infrastructure in place due to development phasing. RBC would welcome further engagement on SG22 to confirm the details of this proposal given its proximity to Redditch.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106931

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Historic England

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

CONCERNS: potential harm to the setting of the Tanworth-in-Arden Conservation Area (CA) & Listed Buildings (LBs) (including GI Church of St. Mary Magdalene). Would result in a major change to the setting of Tanworth-in-Arden.

No Scheduled Monuments (SMs) affected, but if progressed there is a well preserved medieval moated site at Orchard Hill, Forde Hall Lane that will need to be considered regionally important. Recommend: Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prior to allocation.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 107195

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Analysis this far suggests that New Settlement Options at South of Tamworth in Arden and East of Wood End that are in close proximity to the conurbation are less suitable, albeit potentially linked to the rail network. It is assumed that these will be considered further before a further iteration of the plan is published.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 107317

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford-on-Avon District Social Inclusion Partnership

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

New but well connected - BW/A1/A2 – Good train links, will require community builder capacity for enhanced development of community.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 107436

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Moreton Morrell Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

capacity 9720 homes: areas of green belt and significant harm to character of landscape. Important to keep a green separation distance from Solihull and avoid urbanisation sprawl. One of the worst options for employment.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 107675

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Shakespeare Line Rail User Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

A1 Land south of Tanworth-in-Arden Not Suitable
A2 Land east of Wood End Not Suitable

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 107820

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Martin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Site A1 and A2 could develop links to Danzey station, again offering non-car access to the same destinations. Similarly, site C1 could use Lapworth station, site B1 could use Hatton station.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 108125

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Evelyn Gould

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 108136

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Northwood

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 108424

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Landowner Site A1

Asiant : Morgan Elliot Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Tamworth in Arden (TiA) new settlement is within an optimum location for future growth and can be delivered in conjunction with the development strategy of the Plan. The details of the TiA new settlement are exciting and will have the ability to provide an exemplar in new settlement growth within the region.
The allocation of this site is consistent with national planning policy and local development objectives. We therefore endorse the South Warwickshire Local Plans development strategy as proposed in the Preferred Options and look forward to working more closely with the Council in the delivery of the TiA new settlement.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 108429

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Landowner Site A1

Asiant : Morgan Elliot Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We confirm that land shown in Plan 1 below will be made available by our client for the delivery of Site A1, Land south of Tanworth-in-Arden as a new settlement.
• The site comprises approximately 32 hectares
• The site is owned entirely by our client and promoted as part of the A1 new settlement by Morgan Elliot Planning Limited.
• The site is currently accessed from Forde Hall Lane.
• Part of the site is occupied by Mockley Woods.
• The site is located in flood zone 1 which has the lowest probability of flooding.