No

ID sylw: 95371

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Julian Hobbs

The proposed development at Danzey Green is unsuitable due to highway constraints, environmental impact, and infrastructure strain.
Danzey Green, and the area surrounding it, is of prime rural importance, with rare wildflower meadows, left fallow for long periods. Orchids are finally returning to the area.
Being so close to conurbation areas it is important to retain such buffers.
At present, the local rural roads are used by cyclists, ramblers, horse riders, as well as the many tractors etc. This would not be possible if traffic inevitably increased.
The site is Green Belt too, contravening NPPF Paragraphs 142-144.

No

ID sylw: 95382

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Linda Synge

I wish to object to the proposed developments around our villages. I live in Kineton but have strong links to Tanworth-in-Arden and Wellesbourne. While I've seen new housing benefit local shops and communities, these developments would transform our villages into towns without the necessary services. The increased traffic, especially in Kineton, would create significant issues at narrow junctions. Additionally, the Labour Party's manifesto promised housing on brownfield sites, yet these proposals target green fields, which would permanently damage the natural environment. I urge a reconsideration of land around existing towns for housing, as South Warwickshire's villages should remain distinct.

Yes

ID sylw: 95455

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Better to put an isolated hole in the Green Belt near transport links than induce sprawl of larger towns towards each other.

No

ID sylw: 95525

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Allan Stewart

The land is clay and holds a very high water content for at least 3 months of the winter. Building on this land would have a considerable impact on the water table and run off during the winter months and/or periods of heavy rain.

Yes

ID sylw: 95528

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stoford Developments Ltd

Location has the potential for rail station connectivity. Additional land adj to the M42 could be allocated to serve strategic employment needs. Site A1 could also assist in meeting unmet housing needs from Redditch/Bromsgrove.

No

ID sylw: 95628

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanne Hotten

Unnecessary development on Green belt land

No

ID sylw: 95633

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

The Government and local authorities should be developing policies to bring under-used existing dwellings (ABNBs, second homes, etc) into the housing market rather than developing on green belt and rural land.

Other

ID sylw: 96015

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: mr william tansey

Possibly - if no other land to the west of Redditch can be identified which sits outside of the greenbelt.

Yes

ID sylw: 96268

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Coughlan

This site is with in commuter distance to Birmingham and Redditch where there are many amenities and work opportunities.

No

ID sylw: 96705

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Weekes

I strongly object to the proposed A1 housing development in Henley-in-Arden, particularly over Mockley Wood, due to legal, environmental, and infrastructure concerns. The area is home to Great Crested Newts, a protected species under UK law, making development legally challenging and financially unviable, as mitigation measures cost millions of pounds. Additionally, ancient trees listed on the Ancient Tree Register would be lost, violating conservation laws. The road network, including Gentleman’s Lane and Forde Hall Lane, is inadequate, and local schools and healthcare are already under strain. This unsustainable, costly, and damaging proposal must be firmly rejected.

Other

ID sylw: 96775

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

No

ID sylw: 96794

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Le Page

Site within Green Belt

No

ID sylw: 96891

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Impact on Green Belt

No

ID sylw: 97434

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Gaston-Ferrett

Not suitable due to infrastructure, location and better sites

No

ID sylw: 97462

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Renata Astle-Lunt

Any planning proposal for the countryside south of Tanworth in Arden threatens important green belt land and wildlife habitats. This area, valued for its natural beauty should be protected. Development here would harm local wildlife and negatively overwhelm infrastructure of the ancient village community. The SWLP should prioritise brownfield and greyfield sites or even areas of flat land that do not provide an aesthetic or environmental benefit, instead of irreversibly destroying beautiful areas of countryside. It is important to preserve the beauty and wildlife of this area for the health, wellbeing and enjoyment of the local community and future generations.

No

ID sylw: 97840

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Situated in green belt

No

ID sylw: 97912

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jonathan Lunt

Any planning proposal for the countryside south of Tanworth in Arden threatens important green belt land and wildlife habitats. This area, valued for its natural beauty should be protected. Development here would harm local wildlife and negatively overwhelm infrastructure of the ancient village community. The SWLP should prioritise brownfield and greyfield sites or even areas of flat land that do not provide an aesthetic or environmental benefit, instead of irreversibly destroying beautiful areas of countryside. It is important to preserve the beauty and wildlife of this area for the health, wellbeing and enjoyment of the local community and future generations.

No

ID sylw: 98174

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Mary Cardwell

The size of this development is disproportionate to the surrounding villages and amenities and roads.. Access from settlement A1 will lead to dangerous use of narrow country lanes/ villages as cut through;, lanes used by horses, cyclists and walkers. This parcel of land includes Mockley Wood, an outstanding area of English bluebells with associated wildlife. A MUCH smaller development should be considered instead.

No

ID sylw: 98343

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Daine Davis

This area is far to small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. It is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"

Yes

ID sylw: 99176

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Natalie Wride

Proximity to areas of business and transport links into Birmingham and Worcester. New infrastructure would be built - unlike with G areas.

No

ID sylw: 99245

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Rawlings

Green Belt land should not be developed.

Yes

ID sylw: 99253

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

This is a logical area for a new settlement given the provision of new housing in this site, and the availability and suitability of Site 758. It already has committed landowners and is not reliant on call for sites. Part would be highly attractive to B2/B8 businesses. It has no known constraints. It already has 2 bus services and 2 railway stations. Its proximity close to Tanworth in Arden and nearby villages will help support services and facilities. It is close to the conurbation, and for commuting, in addition to public transport, also has easy access to the motorway network.

No

ID sylw: 99428

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

See previous comments

Yes

ID sylw: 100088

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

No

ID sylw: 100304

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jules Way

The site is ecologically significant and contributes to Green Belt objectives, with sensitive terrain unsuitable for development. Located less than 2 km from Tanworth in Arden. It lacks adequate infrastructure and utilities. Danzey Station's hourly train service will not support a large settlement. The area includes listed buildings, a Conservation Area, and narrow flood-prone roads needing upgrades that could affect wildlife habitats. Woodland beneficial to wildlife is present. Bearley and Wilmcote provide more sustainable options with better transport links, canal towpaths, A34 access, and proximity to major roads.

No

ID sylw: 100572

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Pauline James

A1 at Tanworth in Arden is excessive in size and will ruin the character of the rural area, and encourage dormitory suburbs.

Hamlet Way CV370AL has 140 dwellings in 0.86ha: this density could achieve 8000 dwellings in 50 hectares including roads and open spaces.

Such huge swathes as A1 are not needed to house 20-40 year olds in their early career, many of whom may not want a whole house and garden to look after- much less afford that! Low rise flats and maisonettes can look like houses. Please build them into rural villages.

Yes

ID sylw: 100621

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Catherine Hogarth

Located near a train station and main road, enabling travel, but not on top of another town so limited conflictions

Yes

ID sylw: 100762

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

No

ID sylw: 100822

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs CAROLINE KING

Poor road connections leading to congestion around historic Henley in Arden - the High Street and crossroads are already a traffic bottleneck. We need farmland for food. We should not be turning villages into towns, we will lose our national rural characteristics.

Yes

ID sylw: 100838

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Lawrence

If houses are going to be built I think Tanworth in Arden is a better place to build
It has great roads to link with the motorway network
Birmingham with all its city attractions
Redditch with major employers and large industrial estates ,many units sitting empty
Great golf courses for recreation
This would allow Birmingham to grow organically and allow its inhabitants to spread out without breaking into new areas.