BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Stratford upon Avon District Council
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question A2
ID sylw: 105243
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
A2 – Land east of Wood End – OBJECT - capacity 5860 homes: areas of green belt and significant harm to character of landscape. Important to keep a green separation distance from Solihull and avoid urbanisation sprawl. One of the worst options for employment.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question B1
ID sylw: 105244
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
B1 – Land at Hatton – SUPPORT - capacity 8156 homes: proposed new settlement has excellent rail and road connections to Warwick, Leamington Spa, Coventry and Birmingham with easy access to the A46 and M40
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question C1
ID sylw: 105245
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
C1 – Land south of Kingswood – SUPPORT - capacity 4960 homes: proposed new settlement has excellent rail connections to Birmingham, Solihull, Warwick and Leamington via Lapworth Station and is ranked the best performing option for transport and accessibility.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question E1
ID sylw: 105246
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
E1 – Long Marston Airfield – SUPPORT - capacity 9350 homes: proposed new settlement benefits from areas of brownfield, lacks rail connectivity and road capacity connections to Stratford – however, support in principle
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question F1
ID sylw: 105247
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
F1 – Land to the west of Ufton – OBJECT - capacity 6720 homes significant harm to character of landscape, unsustainable location with lack of public transport links.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question F2
ID sylw: 105248
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
F2 – Land south of Deppers Bridge – OBJECT - capacity 4840: impact on neighbouring Southam which has already expanded considerably and suffers from impact of HS2 construction. Further significant harm to character of landscape.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question F3
ID sylw: 105249
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
F3 – Land north east of Knightcote – OBJECT - capacity 6300 homes: significant harm to character of landscape, situated in Flood Zone 2 area, lack of rail connectivity and is the worst performing option for transport and accessibility and is one of the worst for employment.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question G1
ID sylw: 105250
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
G1 – Land west of Knightcote – OBJECT - capacity 5360 homes: too close to GLH, urbanising area and causing harm to character of landscape, lack of rail connectivity
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question X1
ID sylw: 105251
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
X1 – Land south of Leamington/north of Wellesbourne/east of Barford – OBJECT - capacity 6520 homes:
1) Significant harm caused to the character of the landscape and urbanization of neighbouring villages
2) Loss of best and most versatile farmland
3) Lack of rail connectivity
4) Significant harm caused by major pollution and air quality caused by increased vehicle movements on A429 from Wellesbourne, UoW Innovation Campus and mineral extraction site at Barford/Wasperton
5) Lack of capacity at education and health facilities in Wellesbourne, Barford and Bishops Tachbrook
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question X2
ID sylw: 105252
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
X2 – Land south of Leamington Spa/Whitnash and west of B4455 Fosse Way – SUPPORT - capacity 6480 homes as this option provides a natural expansion to LSpa and evidence shows it has no significant impacts on landscape character.