BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Shipston Town Council
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG17 Question
ID sylw: 96536
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
SG17 should NOT be considered as a Strategic Growth location. It is remote from other growth areas and has none of the characteristics considered as necessary by the SWLP. It has no rail service adjacent and very limited bus connections to rail stations at Banbury, Moreton and Stratford. It is not close to any transport corridors such as the M40 and A46. Its economic future will rely on tourism and the associated special landscape areas of the Cotswolds and Feldons. As such these assets to its future must be carefully protected and not overdeveloped. Ref. Draft Policy Direction 48.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 96537
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
Supportive of the proposals in the introduction. However, locations detailed in fig 6 & table 5 appear to be driven by Call for Sites data rather than by determining where growth is desirable and then researching land availability. For example growth is not desirable in SG17 as it does not fit any of the attributes of 'Growth Corridors'. The infrastructure is not capable of supporting the last ten years growth let alone future growth. Yet, as a large area of green field land has been offered for sites it seems as though this has driven its SG designation.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- I- Water Supply and Wastewater Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 96538
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
overview and background required
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Delivering Homes that Meet the Needs of all our communities chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 96539
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
Subject to previous comments
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-43b- Registered Parks and Gardens?
ID sylw: 96540
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-40 Green and Blue Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 96541
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
ID sylw: 96542
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 96543
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?
ID sylw: 96544
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-34-Vale of Evesham Control Zone?
ID sylw: 96545
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council
yes
