BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio IM Land 1 Limited
Chwilio o’r newyddOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
ID sylw: 102200
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
74. IM Land broadly supports Draft Policy Direction 25. As stated previously, IM Land are concerned with the use of the phase “attractive” which is subjective and could lead to a difference of approach to design across the authorities.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
ID sylw: 102203
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
75. IM Land supports Draft Policy Direction 26 so long as it accords with national guidance, including the National Design Guide and the National Model Design Code.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-38 - Biodiversity Net Gain?
ID sylw: 102219
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
79. Consideration should be given to increasing the requirement for BNG above statutory 10% and any implications this may likely have for development delivery and viability.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain?
ID sylw: 102227
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
Consideration will need to be given to how any additional requirements would impact site deliverability and viability, with sufficient evidence provided to demonstrate and justify the need to go above and beyond national standards.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-40 Green and Blue Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 102238
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
The wording for Draft Policy Direction 40 is too vague and lacks clearly defined and quantifiable metrics for the proposed “Greening Factor” at present. Clarity on how the greening factor will be calculated for an area should be provided and the methodology for developing this should also be consulted upon as part of the emerging plan.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-42-Trees, Hedges and Woodland?
ID sylw: 102242
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
87. The presumption in favour of retaining trees is supported by IM Land.
88. There may be an instance outside agricultural reasoning where a tree needs to be removed to provide a specific requirement of development, such as to facilitate an access. The loss of trees with regards to the planning application is also a matter of planning judgement as part of the overall planning balance. Policy wording should be updated to reflect this.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43c- Open Spaces?
ID sylw: 102248
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
89. IM Land note that the intent of the policy is positive. The definition of open space should be included in policy wording and so that is clear for everyone, reducing ambiguity and potential disputes. The first bullet point should be updated to the following,
“Development involving the loss of open space of public value will not be permitted unless significant public benefits outweigh the loss.”
90. IM Land would welcome an opportunity to review and comments on the future guidance referred to within Draft Policy Direction 43c.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43d-Urban Parks and Play Areas?
ID sylw: 102253
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
91. IM Land supports a policy regarding play provision. The Vision Document for the site includes opportunities ranging from children’s play to equipped fitness spaces to ensure that all members of the community are able to participate.
92. IM Land would welcome the opportunity to review and comment on the future guidance referred to within Draft Policy Direction 43d.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?
ID sylw: 102340
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
IM Land agrees with Draft Policy Direction 31 in respect of the land off Rumsbush Road.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 102441
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
IM Land is broadly supportive of the Vision and Strategic Objectives in respect of the Land South of Westwood Heath.
