Yes

Representation ID: 86071

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

Representation ID: 86342

Received: 21/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Noel Davis

na

Yes

Representation ID: 86659

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

The Wellesbourne agricultural research site is small and it's ownership by the University of Warwick should not be relied on too much.

Any development on Wellesbourne airfield should focus on providing local employment (rather than logistics hubs creating traffic) because Wellesbourne has a great deal of housing and not much employment.

Other

Representation ID: 86840

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Fossett

All the new housing developments are going to be dormitory towns as there is no work locally particularly around Shipston where the majority have work out of the area requiring a car to get there. The roads are already crowded and adding 3000 more cars going to and from work will not help.

No

Representation ID: 86911

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

Other

Representation ID: 87018

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

You are not showing enough ambition or vision, Stoneleigh could easily be turned into a sports and activity centre for the south Warwickshire region, as a regional hub, ie, skateboard park, multipurpose pitches, etc, this could be achieved with the support of Sport England and DCMS, plus national governing bodies, there is no sport and active hub in south Warwickshire and this must be included in this plan, and involved think active and the actIvation project IN its development, THIS COULD BE A HUGE ASSET AND BRING INVESTMENT INTO THE AREA

Yes

Representation ID: 87055

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

All areas agreed, housing could also be built on or near these sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 87390

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87572

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

No

Representation ID: 87812

Received: 11/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Godson

While development in the Stoneleigh area is encouraged, it must be considered alongside the extensive housing and employment growth planned in the South Coventry and North Leamington areas. These developments will significantly impact local infrastructure. Both sites, adjacent to major roads, are already affected by HS2 and other transport projects, which offer no direct benefits to local communities. The increase in traffic from both developments could worsen congestion, particularly on the A46 and surrounding roads. Transport improvements must address the cumulative impact of these projects to ensure the area can accommodate this growth without overwhelming existing infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 88156

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

Agree with this approach and support the development of the University of Warwick Innovation Centre however the traffic management in and out of the facility needs to be carefully managed to avoid rat runs through Charlecote and Hampton Lucy.

In addition it is vital that the flying functions of Wellesbourne Airfield are maintained and enhanced and there is no interruption to the training of new pilots and the helicopter facility is equally protected.

Yes

Representation ID: 88323

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: British Film Institute

Agent: Ms Giulia Bunting

BFI is the UK’s lead organisation for film and the moving image.
BFI’s storage facility at Lighthorne forms an integral part of the BFI’s National Archive. BFI is currently looking at options to expand its operations at this long-established brownfield site.
The BFI facility is a nationally significant cultural asset in South Warwickshire. BFI supports the draft Policy Direction 14. The site should be formally recognised as one of the other major economic assets identified in the Local Plan alongside Major Investment Sites.
This approach is supported by NPPF para 86(a) and Footnote 43.

Yes

Representation ID: 88411

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

The opportunity for road rail infrastructure development is more viable and cost effective. Long Marston will be able to gain its own identity as they are already under expansion.

Yes

Representation ID: 88413

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Annette Pharo

The road, rail and infrastructures will support the investment and these sites are already developed to a certain extent.

Yes

Representation ID: 88669

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

I agree with the draft policy but one hopes "Rachel in Accounts" has not killed off business investment by the time this rolls out.

Other

Representation ID: 88760

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 88818

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Yes but would hope that at Wellesbourne Airfield the aviation function of the airfield would continue to be secured.

Yes

Representation ID: 89028

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

In respect of Wellesbourne Airfield the plan should make representation to the viability and sustainability of the Airfield

Yes

Representation ID: 89203

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Suzanna Hughes

I think this is a sensible approach to development

Yes

Representation ID: 89398

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

Other

Representation ID: 89664

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

I have concerns about further development of the university of Warwick site - there are major traffic congestion issues already around there at peak times

Yes

Representation ID: 89754

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

It is noted that there is no planned improvement to road infrastructure around Wellesbourne despite the planned development. This area is already problematic for example when the market is on.

Yes

Representation ID: 89833

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lina Rodriguez

excellent work/ education opportunities in the area

Yes

Representation ID: 89883

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Stephen Browett

I agree with the above policy direction.

Yes

Representation ID: 89891

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Holly Whittaker

I agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 14 - Major Investment Sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 90011

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Macvie

Yes.

Yes

Representation ID: 90170

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maria Giblin

I agree. Major investment needs to come to the areas identified

Yes

Representation ID: 90193

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Hind

Important for jobs and investment

Yes

Representation ID: 90217

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Williams

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 90239

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Giblin

I agree with the proposal