Yes

Representation ID: 93663

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire STEWART

I agree, this makes sense to me

Yes

Representation ID: 93733

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr George Power

These sites are all good proposals.

Yes

Representation ID: 93888

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Wellesbourne airfield must be protected in its current format if two runways. Agri-tech should be prioritised at Wellesbourne

Yes

Representation ID: 93941

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor

I agree due to the proposals are not on green belt land.

Yes

Representation ID: 94091

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

Yes, i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 94113

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Kelly

These would meet the needs of our communities.

Yes

Representation ID: 94391

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Blandamer

Agree as long as there is no impact on green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 94524

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd

Agent: Stansgate Planning

In order to be consistent with SG13, AML recommends “Draft policy 14 (Major Investment Sites (MIS)” MIS.1 - Gaydon – JLR/AML final sentence is amended to read as follows:

The existing Aston Martin Lagonda (AML) 4.5ha. allocation in the adopted SDC Core Strategy will be retained within the SWLP and expanded, subject to further discussion with AML on their future plans for the site.

AML also supports the release of the existing “100 ha. JLR restricted allocation” to the wider market for manufacturing and small-scale logistics. Some of this land may be suitable for AML manufacturing.

See additional report

Yes

Representation ID: 94595

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

in principle

No

Representation ID: 94614

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd

Agent: Turley

It is Rainier’s strong view that other potential locations outside of MIS, but within the Core Opportunity Area, need to be considered with additional allocations made within Warwick to ensure needs are satisfied in full. Only focussing new employment development at MIS would fail to recognise market signals, which show demand for employment land and floorspace outside of these locations.

No

Representation ID: 94849

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

MIS. 1 appears elsewhere as SG13 for which comment has already been provided as follows:
The increase in the size of JLR land (currently used as a test track) would lead to access requirements from Lighthorne Road. This would be totally inappropriate given the road network within the centre of Kineton to the south, which cannot be altered. To the north the junction with The Fosseway is a location with frequent vehicle accidents and significant highway reconfiguration would be required. The Lighthorne Road is also narrow and, again, would require major widening

No

Representation ID: 94856

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

See responses to to DP12 & 13. Also response to New Settlements DP2, and F3/G1.

Yes

Representation ID: 94926

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Strongly agree

Yes

Representation ID: 94981

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Darren Downes

Locate the developments next to the investment sites - for obvious environmental reasons. Unless you are planning to build cycle route to these locations from the Bearly proposal!! In these instances, I you truly believe these investment sites will create many jobs, NONE of these are conveniently served by Wilmcote or Bearly rail stations, so all you are doing is adding further pressure to the road infrastructure and congestion and gridlock in surround villages as drivers with inevitably look for rat runs to the M40.

Yes

Representation ID: 95161

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Adam Redfern

I agree with this policy direction, particularly MIS.8 and MSI.9

Yes

Representation ID: 95288

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Lee Tallen

It makes sense that settlements are then built around these major investment sites which bring transport links, job opportunities and infrastructure investment

Yes

Representation ID: 95452

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Goodman

It is important to maintain these sites as the are major employers in the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 95848

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

I agree with the approach laid out for MIS

Yes

Representation ID: 95921

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96037

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall

this is a good use of available and appropriate land.

Yes

Representation ID: 96319

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

No

Representation ID: 96418

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Satterly

JLR / AML proposal will cause major problems :
Lighthorne Road will need major widening, which is not possible in Kineton. Fosse Way additional traffic undesirable on road with high accident record.
Potential loss of bridleways & footpaths around fields in question.
Serious adverse effect on wildlife, & significant bat habitat, amongst others. Loss of food production.
Risk of polluted water run off from hard surfaces into adjoining lakes & watercourses.
Adverse impact on residents of Nancherrow

Yes

Representation ID: 96565

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 96690

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96879

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

This is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Representation ID: 96924

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

No

Representation ID: 97026

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Roger Horsfall

MIS4 South of Coventry: no extra parcels of land should be included in this whilst allocations in place are underutilised.

Yes

Representation ID: 97038

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 97140

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 97352

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Guy Morris

Much better impact on the environment and local infrastructure than developing existing settlements over greenbelt land