Yes

Representation ID: 90438

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

no comments

Yes

Representation ID: 90488

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

I agree- but no consideration for how those in rural areas (SG17) can get to these areas

Yes

Representation ID: 90521

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jason Lupton

I agree with these sites, providing adequate infrastructure is included with the proposals - this includes; cycle, pedestrian, rail, bus connections as the priority with other vehicles secondary to this.

Yes

Representation ID: 90549

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Gavin Simpson

Growth is to be encouraged to provide for the local community and benefit residents by invetsment in infrastructure projects which is current woefully poor

No

Representation ID: 90578

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Terry Simmonds

As with all the employment policies, the far South of South Warwickshire is neglected.

Spread the Major Investment sites out more fairly

Yes

Representation ID: 90731

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Goodwin

It is obvious and sensible to focus new house building adjacent to Major Investment Sites that are most likely to provide the shortest commutes to work opportunities, reducing traffic, journey times and associated negative environmental impacts.

Yes

Representation ID: 90845

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 90863

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Morris

Major Investment Sites are so designated due to the opportunities and growth that are present within them. As a former employee of the University of Warwick, for example, I am all too aware of the expansion plans and desires of those within the University and the good that such expansion and investment would do.

Yes

Representation ID: 91153

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council agree with the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91163

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

yes, for those outside the greenbelt

Yes

Representation ID: 91260

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

Representation ID: 91512

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Donna Goodwin

Where new builds are located next to Major Investment Sites, they are the most likely to provide the shortest commutes to work opportunities, reducing traffic, journey times and associated negative environmental impacts. It is obvious and sensible to focus new house building adjacent to these sites.

No

Representation ID: 91952

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Priestman

The development of major investment sites at Long Marston Airfield (MIS.2) and Long Marston Rail Innovation Centre (MIS.3) should be made dependent on the improvement of highway infrastructure in the local area and to and around Stratford.
Improvements will be needed to Station Road to provide access to the Rail Innovation Centre and new housing development.
Employment land and a local centre and town centre uses at the Long Marston Airfield site as previously approved is supported.

Other

Representation ID: 91968

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

On page 79 MIS.8/MIS.9 there appears to be a lack of synergy with the plan identified in MIS8 and MIS 9 on page 81 to develop the sites of the campus and the airfield to be mutually beneficial with the idea of further industrial development of storage on the airfield site. It also is not fully compatible with Draft Policy Direction 16- Airfields. Wellesbourne Airfield second bullet point. Airfield related development.
We agree that linking MIS8 and MIS9 would have additional benefits in the creation of high value employment opportunities at the airfield site.

Yes

Representation ID: 92120

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: General Aviation Awareness Council and Airfield Operators Group

The identification of MIS9 and linkages to MIS8 is entirely in line with the best approach to medium-long term economic development and the protection of Wellesbourne Airfield to support this initiative is evidence of the highly competent strategic planning needed and proposed for South Warwickshire.
MIS7 is similarly supported and more information is attached.
Whilst fully protecting its aviation activities and infrastructure, Wellesbourne Airfield has the potential to accommodate further research and related facilities that would support the University of Warwick’s Wellesbourne Campus and businesses in the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 92213

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

yes, utilising these sites is far preferable.

Yes

Representation ID: 92378

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 92418

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Christine Slaughter

Less of a negative impact on existing communities.

No

Representation ID: 92594

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Do not agree with any building or business development on green belt

Yes

Representation ID: 92810

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

More long term sustainability

Yes

Representation ID: 92824

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr JAMES STEWART

I agree with this policy

Other

Representation ID: 92899

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Meon Vale Residents Association

The development of major investment sites at Long Marston Airfield (MIS.2) and Long Marston Rail Innovation Centre (MIS.3) should be made dependent on the improvement of highway infrastructure in the local area and to and around Stratford.
Improvements will be needed to Station Road to provide access to the Rail Innovation Centre and new housing development.
We welcome further dedicated employment land and a local centre and town centre uses at the Long Marston Airfield site.

Yes

Representation ID: 92937

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

I would support Wellesbourne Airfield being developed for research and technology. What it doesn't need is more logistics warehousing, there are vast numbers of lorries arriving and departing already

Yes

Representation ID: 92978

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 93086

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Martina Hunt

I agree with the potential MIS sites laid out for economic development.

Yes

Representation ID: 93174

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gordon Sharp

Major investment sites are essential to the financial well being of the area

Yes

Representation ID: 93217

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kim Salmon

The release of 100ha from JLR appears plausible for reallocation recognising the development designation in place saving the need to look for other virgin land in the area. However,J12 appears to have attracted greater volumes than expected with traffic from local roads towards the junction. Poor transport integration remains challenging, the strategy should be to align freight over rail and utilisation of the DIRFT Hub and exploit land opportunities closer to the hub and Coventry Airport.

Yes

Representation ID: 93292

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs MEGHNA BELSHAW

The development of major investment sites at Long Marston Airfield (MIS.2) and Long Marston Rail Innovation Centre (MIS.3) should be made dependent on the improvement of highway infrastructure in the local area and to and around Stratford.
Improvements will be needed to Station Road to provide access to the Rail Innovation Centre and new housing development.
Employment land and a local centre and town centre uses at the Long Marston Airfield site as previously approved is supported.

No

Representation ID: 93346

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

MIS.7 - UW main campus. While the site should be understood and in general developed with the SPD, further development in the south of the site erodes the Green Belt between Coventry and Kenilworth and should not be explored. The University of Warwick plans to create an EcoPark in this region, which would provide vital green infrastructure and safeguard part of the Green Belt, and a link road as stated would cut that EcoPark in two.

Other

Representation ID: 93586

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

The approach should be highly disciplined to avoid the loss of productive agricultural land. Maximum use should be taken of brown field sites and redevelopment of existing sites.