Yes

Representation ID: 90887

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Emma Barber

Stratford is such a historic area and we must make sure we preserve it for future generations to be able to enjoy. Losing these landscapes will mean we're losing our history and culture.

Yes

Representation ID: 90890

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Jason Lupton

Heritage assets and the historic environment shold be preserved and protected, not relocated or buried and marked on a map.

Yes

Representation ID: 90914

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

I agree

No

Representation ID: 91034

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Erica Downes

The Wilmcote site would destroy an area of Shakespeare's heritage. The sight of thousands of sprawling, modern houses will surely shock and put off tourists coming into our beautiful historic town and villages. More houses than were deemed necessary have already been built around Stratford (which was a scandal in itself), and ruined the historic image.
The mortar in very old buildings has been known to crack over time from traffic vibrations and the inevitable huge traffic increase through Wilmcote will threaten the stability of Mary Arden's House. This is already apparent with the old railway bridge.

Yes

Representation ID: 91191

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91527

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Donna Goodwin

Historic sites are not only vital for the local community and local economy but also the wellbeing of residents and visitors alike. They must not be diminished or encroached upon in such sites as the Clopton Corner part of SQ18. Once we have lost any such asset, it is lost forever.

Yes

Representation ID: 91691

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

Representation ID: 91856

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Hanno Kirner

We should not build close to heritage sites

Yes

Representation ID: 92219

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

Absolutely. Stratford's wealth comes from being a well known historic and famous town, with historic buildings and some beautiful green spaces. These should be protected for the people who live here, and for our global visitors who want to see Stratford's history, heritage, charm and beauty.

Yes

Representation ID: 92424

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Christine Slaughter

Ref Clopton Quarter of SG18 objection: Little Clopton House is Grade II Listed. Development here would change the surroundings of this listed building.

Yes

Representation ID: 92479

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree

No

Representation ID: 92634

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Not if it involves developing green belt

Other

Representation ID: 92673

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Fairburn

I agree that protecting heritage assets is important. But we shouldn't let that get in the way of making them greener. If York Minster can have solar panels, then we ought to be able to allow the older buildings in Stratford to have them.

Yes

Representation ID: 92813

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

Urban sprawl is a threat to South Warwickshire's rural heritage and character

Yes

Representation ID: 92832

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr JAMES STEWART

I agree with this policy

Yes

Representation ID: 92982

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Stratford must be protected and enhance heritage and historical importance.

Yes

Representation ID: 93011

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Preserving our heritage is important

Yes

Representation ID: 93090

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Martina Hunt

This is so important for Stratford Upon avon's heritage. It attracts International visitors and the heritage of its buildings, streets and theatre connections should be safeguarded. Clopton House is also of historic importance and is a key part of the SG18 landscape and connection to the Welcombe Hills.

Yes

Representation ID: 93469

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Vivien Haggarty

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 93543

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Penny Gray

Sounds reasonable

Yes

Representation ID: 93667

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire STEWART

Yes I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 93704

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, but note the often perceived clash between retrofitting for energy efficiency and preservation of heritage assets. I would welcome specific guidance around double glazing, insulation etc that specifies what is allowable and not, and supports retrofitting where there is clear energy efficiency benefit and the change to appearance is minor.

Yes

Representation ID: 93749

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr George Power

We live in one of the most famous towns in the world and preservation of historical sites is vital both to current and future generations.

Yes

Representation ID: 93803

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

Strongly agree

Yes

Representation ID: 94098

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

Yes i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 94118

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Kelly

As with culture, protecting heritage is important in our historic towns.

Yes

Representation ID: 94385

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Blandamer

Very important to protect and enhance local Heritage Assets and the surrounding environments.

Yes

Representation ID: 94933

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Heritage assets such as the Clopton Nature Reseve and Grae 2 listed Clopton House.

No

Representation ID: 95004

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Darren Downes

Bearly/Wilmcote proposal: the hug increase in traffic through Wilmcote that would arise would be a direct threat to the tranquil, heritage site of Mary Arden's house. This should be a proud part of the Shakespeare Trust key historic properties and the proposed development would swallow any rural/heritage appeal the supports this building. It would be irrevocable and would severely reduce the site as a public attraction in the future, almost eliminating any chance of it reopening to the public.

Yes

Representation ID: 95028

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Grimes

We have to maintain and protect our heritage otherwise within several generations there will be no memories of what we had and protected