Yes

Representation ID: 95220

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 95302

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Lee Tallen

Obviously the historic environment should be protected - however this does not appear to have been considered in the preferred options assessment - perhaps this comes later in the process?

Yes

Representation ID: 95467

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Goodman

Heritage and Historical sites should always remain protected from development.

Yes

Representation ID: 95670

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jon Redhead

Yes, our existing Heritage assets is a must, and also keeping the views that remain green, and uncluttered by housing development to 'blight' that view, this means protecting green belt land that allows the Arden wood view to remain.

Yes

Representation ID: 95753

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

Draft Policy Direction 27, which remains largely unchanged from previous policies in the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy and the Warwick District Council Local Plan, is supported and aligns well with the Framework.

Yes

Representation ID: 95769

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

Protection of the historic areas of South Warwickshire should be paramount.

Yes

Representation ID: 95824

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

I hope that these Policy Directions are not simply words. They must be used, applied and enforced.

Yes

Representation ID: 95850

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

I agree with the approach

Other

Representation ID: 95949

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. Conservation Areas need to be included as a specific item.

Yes

Representation ID: 96007

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall

I support this stategy.

Yes

Representation ID: 96344

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Representation ID: 96518

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Conservation Areas need to be included as a specific item.

Yes

Representation ID: 96589

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Nixon

I agree with this policy especially when this is concerning a large and historically important asset like Warwick and Kenilworth Castles. Preserving their original settings and aspects to enhance the grandure and importance of these monuments.

Yes

Representation ID: 96718

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Janet Gee

no further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 96730

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs G Wood

Essential to everything that is being put into these plans

Other

Representation ID: 96903

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Wilmcote station is Grade 2 listed and would need replacing to provide adequate rail service for settlement BW

Yes

Representation ID: 97004

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Where developments are near to Heritage Assets, developers should contribute to the upkeep of those assets. Especially if the assets are in public ownership.

Yes

Representation ID: 97042

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

This approach is supported by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Representation ID: 97116

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 97190

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 97266

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Draft Policy Direction 27, which remains largely unchanged from previous policies in the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy and the Warwick District Council Local Plan, is supported and aligns well with the NPPF.

Yes

Representation ID: 97361

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Guy Morris

We'll miss it when it's gone. Places are loosing their soul

Yes

Representation ID: 97402

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Peter Lewin

It is important that people experience and share all aspects of the history of the district in which they live. It can readily contribute to their sense of belonging in the region where they live.

Yes

Representation ID: 97623

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Winter

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 97786

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Wilmcote station would need to be replaced by a new facility in order to serve the proposed settlement at BW. However, the existing station is Grade 2 listed and its demolition/significant alteration would not preserve the historic environment for its inherent value.

Yes

Representation ID: 97857

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

The historic town of Stratford would be much enhanced and made safer by pedestranisation of the centre of the town and by making sure that heavy goods vehicles no longer cross Clopton Bridge. I hope the half completed relief road between Evesham and Alcester road can be completed soon to give these vehicles an alternative route round town.

Yes

Representation ID: 97864

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

Protecting heritage assets and environment is very important to maintain ecosystems and the view of the land for local and wider communities

Yes

Representation ID: 97960

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Charlotte Careless

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 98113

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

Draft Policy Direction 27, which remains largely unchanged from previous policies in the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy and the Warwick District Council Local Plan, is supported and aligns well with the Framework.

Yes

Representation ID: 98308

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Barry Elkington

In particular with reference to the fact that plots 140 (Land at Oaks Farm) and 183 (Land South West of Rounds Hill) should not be included. The area is on top of the hill and a housing estate there would be clearly visible from Kenilworth Castle, destroying the view and significantly impacting the setting of the Castle – a major tourist attraction. The land falls within the site of 'the Olde Parke' to the Southwest of the Castle. Earthworks are still visible and any housing development would destroy these and any other historical remains in the area.