Other

Representation ID: 102434

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hill Residential

Agent: Turley

Broad support, subject to comments.

Yes

Representation ID: 102539

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sue Cole

Public appreciation of heritage and the historic environment should be promoted wherever possible through sensitive design, plaques etc.

No

Representation ID: 102614

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Carl Barthorpe

No I dont agree, the green space and fields are the most important parts of our heritage, retain nature around Kenilworth. Build in big towns and brownfield sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 102674

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Penelope Beswick

Our Heritage assets are very precious and should be protected from over development and poor design as much as possible.

Yes

Representation ID: 103077

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Marrons

Draft Policy Direction 27, which remains largely unchanged from previous policies in the Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy and the Warwick District Council Local Plan, is supported and aligns well with the Framework.

Yes

Representation ID: 103254

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Elizabeth Simpson Yates

As a historic market town, Shipston-on-Stour must be included under the Historic Townscapes and Street Scenes.

Yes

Representation ID: 103321

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jenny Stevens

Always!!! Who want to be a concrete jungle-protect our assets

Other

Representation ID: 103539

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon

Agent: Turley

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Other

Representation ID: 103540

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Other

Representation ID: 103542

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton

Agent: Turley

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Other

Representation ID: 103547

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton

Agent: Turley

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Other

Representation ID: 103549

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Other

Representation ID: 103554

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Other

Representation ID: 103560

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Yes

Representation ID: 103622

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Laura Nicholas

Heritage assessment and environments should be protected

Yes

Representation ID: 103704

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Wall

Kenilworth castle is a grade 1 heritage property and alongside arden forest must be protected.

Yes

Representation ID: 103766

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Deborah Carter

By prioritising sustainable, non-Green Belt sites, housing can be delivered responsibly—without destroying the countryside, harming biodiversity, or overwhelming local services.

Yes

Representation ID: 103913

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Amarjit Gill

These sites are important to our cultural heritage

Yes

Representation ID: 103990

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Potter

I agree, but this should be done by creating a buffer zone around heritage sites and there approaches. The needs to be specific criteria as to what is a heritage site.

Yes

Representation ID: 104160

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Norrie

Yes, this seems reasonable.

Other

Representation ID: 104291

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Elizabeth White

Await Part 2...

Yes

Representation ID: 104507

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neal Appleton

_

No

Representation ID: 104576

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Nickie Charles

Site SG04 can be seen from the castle, a grade 1 listed building, and should not go ahead. If it did it would have a damaging impact on the cultural heritage of the historic town of Kenilworth and be an eyesore visible from the castle.

Yes

Representation ID: 104758

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Ann Colley

agree

Yes

Representation ID: 104772

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs L Beeson

Definitely agree:

‘It is important that these heritage assets are preserved and where possible enhanced so that residents, and visitors can continue to enjoy their inherent value.’

Yes

Representation ID: 104810

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Joe Rukin

I agree with this.

However, if you also agree with this, then SG04 would be rated 'red' for Cultural Heritage.

Other

Representation ID: 104887

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Burton

With regards to the land west of Knightcote (G1) this is a place enjoyed by many as part of the view from the Burton Dassett hills. It is part of a leisure drive.. and absolutely should be protected, left alone and not built on.

No

Representation ID: 104959

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Clarke

Historic monuments should be valued and protected at all costs.

Yes

Representation ID: 105029

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon Town Council

Preserving the historic centre of Stratford is our highest priority. In particular this means repurposing buildings of historical importance or architectural merit, even if they are not listed. Also it means reducing traffic volumes and air pollution in the town centre and pollution in the river.

Yes

Representation ID: 105630

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr Eileen Edwards

Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets

Support the policies to protect and enhance all heritage assets – SUPPORT