No

Representation ID: 99452

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Tibbles

The area is predominantly rural, with poor access to existing Road Networks, Transportation hubs, Healthcare facilities and Education establishments. A development of this scale would overwhelm the local road networks and requires significant investment in all areas of basic services such as Water, Sewage & Power (no gas supply!) There are insufficient primary and secondary schools to serve the population, let alone with a significantly increased population, there is insufficient Healthcare provision both for basic GP services and hospitals - The nearest hospitals have insufficient capacity already. Emergency services such as Police, Fire and Ambulances are many miles away.

No

Representation ID: 99542

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

The sites within the cluster perform very badly on the objective scoring system and should be eliminated. In detail, my reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP (S01, S04, S05, S06, S011 and S012) with which I broadly agree. I reference those objectives.

Yes

Representation ID: 99698

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Sabrina Hasnaoui

Large area which would meet a significant proportion of required housing needs. In support due to this being non green belt land. new infrastructure and amenities could be incorporated into the site to increase sustainability ,given the size of the plot available.

Yes

Representation ID: 99797

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Goo connectivity to motorway, supporting JLR plant for employment opportunities.

No

Representation ID: 99826

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper

Area covered is huge, local roads already at a standstill at times. This can only damage Carbon targets.

Yes

Representation ID: 99871

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neil Eaton

Support required development on non green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 99877

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

This area has good road connections from the M40, etc, and there is potential for a new Chiltern line station nearby according to plans. Good employment opportunities nearby from JLR and associated industries and these developments can be derived from strategic opportunities in the area and not just land availability.
These areas could deliver the required housing numbers without using greenbelt land. There would be less chance of urban sprawl from existing settlements. It would also take the congestion pressure away from Stratford town area.

Yes

Representation ID: 99909

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neil Eaton

Support required development on non green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 100008

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Evan Bailey

AML, JLR and museum site should be allowed to grow but the village of Gaydon should be protected with a rural buffer around it.

Yes

Representation ID: 100071

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neil Brooker

If more houses are needed this Location is more suitable for development than others in the district.

No

Representation ID: 100078

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sangeet Kalyan

The area is saturated with development with no consideration to local wildlife. There are rare newts and bats. Additionally there are concerns with flooding and a lack of infrastructure to accommodate additional housing. There would be significant harm to listed properties and the character of the landscape. It is clear that it would be over development of the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 100097

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Wall

Development should prioritise brownfield sites over Green Belt land. Urban and previously developed areas already have infrastructure in place, reducing pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare. These sites are closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. This site is particularly attractive due to its proximity to significant housing and industrial development, concentrating construction in a single area and minimising the impact on other locations. With 838 Ha available, it offers substantial capacity for growth. Using brownfield land prevents environmental damage, protects biodiversity, and preserves historic landscapes while ensuring responsible, sustainable development without harming the countryside.

Yes

Representation ID: 100164

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anna Taylor

The alternative sites provide superior infrastructure and better long-term sustainability. These areas offer strong employment prospects, well-established road networks, and the potential for a new Chiltern Line railway station, improving commuter accessibility. HS2’s links to key employment hubs make these locations more suitable for housing expansion without increasing congestion in Stratford. Unlike Green Belt land, these sites support growth with minimal environmental impact while avoiding urban sprawl that overwhelms local services. New communities should be driven by strategic opportunity rather than just land availability, ensuring housing developments enhance infrastructure rather than overburdening existing settlements.

Yes

Representation ID: 100288

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Deborah Carter

New development must prioritise previously developed sites rather than destroy the Green Belt. Urban and repurposed land already has infrastructure in place, reducing pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare. This location is particularly suitable due to its proximity to housing and industrial areas, ensuring that construction is focused in a single area rather than spreading into untouched landscapes. With 838Ha available, it provides ample space for new housing without causing further environmental destruction. Using non-Green Belt land protects biodiversity, preserves historic landscapes, and ensures responsible development without harming the countryside.

Yes

Representation ID: 100378

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Aimee Carter

New housing should be developed on land that has already been built on, not on protected Green Belt land. Urban areas and brownfield sites already have the infrastructure to support new developments, reducing the pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare.
Building in non-Green Belt areas also means:
• Less environmental damage and better protection for wildlife.
• More sustainable transport options, reducing long commutes and carbon emissions.
• Preventing towns and villages from merging and losing their unique identities.
• Reducing flood risks caused by overdevelopment.
Destroying the Green Belt isn’t the answer—there are much better options available.

Yes

Representation ID: 100594

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South

Support housing development on non-green belt land.
This site provides the spatial capacity to develop new amenities to support the increased housing which is more sustainable.

Yes

Representation ID: 100854

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Collyer

Linking housing to employment options makes a lot of sense as does building near major road networks.

No

Representation ID: 100873

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades

Disagree, it should not be included

No

Representation ID: 101003

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Colin Mathews

SG13 is inappropriate development
• Planned quantity of housing is not needed here, and constitutes a massive development in rural location
• Not adjacent to employment requiring travel for work contrary to local and national Net Zero Policies, increasing pressure on local roads
• Workers living closer to jobs raise output by 8%; location is contrary to national growth objectives.
• No facilities available locally
• Existing services (health, education, waste etc.) will be overwhelmed
Location is open countryside so productive farmland will be lost impacting national food security, biodiversity reduced and detracts from enjoyment of local landscape

Other

Representation ID: 101109

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Pauline James

Due to JLR Gaydon, SG13 is a more appropriate place for some housing. Please build at 160 dwellings per hectare, sparing as much as possible of the 838.15 for farmland and future generations. Do not build luxury houses. Low rise flats and maisonettes can look like houses. Please build them into rural villages.

Hamlet Way CV370AL has 140 dwellings in 0.86ha: this density could achieve 8000 dwellings in 50 hectares including roads and open spaces. This suits 20-40 year olds in their early career, who often dont want a whole house and garden to look after- and can't afford that!

Yes

Representation ID: 101326

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Zoe Leventhal

Huge site outside GB suitable for housing to extend existing settlements. To be preferred over GB and other sites

Yes

Representation ID: 101598

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-on-Avon Town Council

In line with the spatial growth strategy in Chapter 4, STC supports SG13 and SG14 as suitable locations for strategic greenfield development alongside expanding larger towns. With strong transport links and nearby employment, growth must be infrastructure-led, ensuring sustainable communities with schools, healthcare, community facilities, shops, parks, and transport links.

No

Representation ID: 101709

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs MIchele Gill

That area has already had large scale development with minimal increase in infrastructure to support it. It needs no more.

No

Representation ID: 101712

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs MIchele Gill

That area has already had large scale development with minimal increase in infrastructure to support it. It needs no more.

Yes

Representation ID: 102064

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Nixon

Major car industry employers, close to M40 junction and NON GREEN BELT. Ideal for new housing area. Will discourage existing commuter traffic from other moa re northern SWLP areas. If considered alongside SG14 the two areas would be well suited to provide one large site. Larger sites are more able to be devloped to provide better facilities for residents.

Yes

Representation ID: 102239

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Niall Shimmin

Allow expansion of existing businesses and potential co-location of supplying businesses.
Continues to be developed so good location to increase opportunities for local residents.

Yes

Representation ID: 102373

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover

Agent: Marrons

JLR agree with the inclusion of land south and west of JLR Gaydon being within a strategic growth location at Gaydon Lighthorne Heath. This area is already home to major employers and planned for 3,000 homes and community infrastructure and services within the lifetime of the Plan. It is a sustainable location for growth and within the Priority Area.

Please refer to the attached PDF's of formal representations and a vision document.

Yes

Representation ID: 102411

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Fraser Trewren

Not a special interest site in terms of history and wildlife habitat.
Decent access by road

Yes

Representation ID: 102579

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Andrews

Development on non-green belt land should be prioritised over development on green belt. Total housing needs can be met without developing on green belt so morally not right to remove green belt without exceptional cause.
These areas are better supported with existing infrastructure and transport network without requiring major investment on more remote, less connected areas.
The opportunity in terms of yield is higher in these areas so there is a duty to fulfil the housing needs in the most responsible way considering this and the green belt obligations.

Yes

Representation ID: 102598

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Phoebe Withnall

SG13 is a more suitable site for development because it is outside the Green Belt, meaning its inclusion will not contribute to the loss of protected countryside and habitats and make South Warwickshire worse for everybody.