Yes

Representation ID: 94693

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bill Garrad

Chance to develop extensively rather than add on to already overloaded restricted area of Stratford town.

Other

Representation ID: 94705

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Jackson

N/A

No

Representation ID: 94727

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

The increase in the size of JLR land (currently used as a test track) would lead to access requirements from Lighthorne Road. This would be totally inappropriate given the road network within the centre of Kineton to the south, which cannot be altered. To the north the junction with The Fosseway is a location with frequent vehicle accidents and significant highway reconfiguration would be required. The Lighthorne Road is also narrow and, again, would require major widening

Yes

Representation ID: 94751

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

We suggest a new settlement between the M40 and Chiltern Rail Line. This location would include a hotel, major high tech employment within the M40 employment corridor, and provide the most sustainable connectivity. Expansion of Warwick University onto this new settlement would provide a further anchor employment.

Further, a substantial well designed new settlement at this location would accord with the expected recommendations from the Sir Michael Lyons New Settlement Task Force expected in the summer.

Yes

Representation ID: 94879

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Good road connections, potential for new rail connection and woudkltake preseure of traffic congestion for Stratford. This area can meet ALL housing needs wihotu taking greeenbelt land. Good job possibilties nearby.

Yes

Representation ID: 94883

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Good roads already in place, job s close by and can meet all housing needs without taking greenebelt and possible new rail line close by.

Yes

Representation ID: 95029

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Renny Wodynska

Makes sense near good transport links

Yes

Representation ID: 95120

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

This site will offer good job opportunities nearby which will support local communities as well as having good existing road connections. The development will improve transport links including potential from new stations and links to key commenting areas.
New settlements can be driven by strategic opportunities not land availability to limit impact on the local ecology.
The site would take the congestion pressure off Stratford and meet all housing needs with least impact on the environment, preserving greenbelt land.

Yes

Representation ID: 95229

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Lee Tallen

Makes more sense to develop for reasons of strategic growth that allies with potential expansion of JLR, with the potential jobs, transport links etc that would go with that. A new settlement could grow organically and logically with an infrastructure designed to meet its needs rather than overwhelming and permanently changing the character of existing settlements. The the growth of a new settlement would be driven by a strategic opportunity and result in urban sprawl, - a more logical approach rather than prioritising development because land owners have an area of land they wish to sell for personal gain.

Yes

Representation ID: 95426

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Not Green Belt - good to expand around JLR

Yes

Representation ID: 95433

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Goodman

Good potential for employment. Good existing and potential new road/rail network. Potential to ease congestion in Stratford. using this site would also avoid urban sprawl which strains existing infrastructure.

Other

Representation ID: 95491

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Holliday

This is farmland so would depend on the productivity of the farms in this area. I would prefer any brown field sites in the area to used as a preference.

No

Representation ID: 95551

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gordon Ashley

As with SG 14 bUT EVEN LESS SUITABLE. This area is being over developed and loosing any of its rural appearance. The views from Burton Dassett hills will be spoilt. No rail links & road links very poorm The road from Bishops Itchington is already under too much pressure with long queues developing to and from the M40 junction. The character of the landscape will be destryed for ever.

Yes

Representation ID: 95559

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

Development in this location is adjacent to pre-existing development and does not undermine green belt policy that has served the country well for many years. It is accessible to the M40.

Yes

Representation ID: 95574

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bishops Itchington Parish Council

Bishop’s itchington Parish Council (BIPC) does not object to the inclusion of this site in the SWLP.
While subjectively a point of concern for Gaydon, developments to the south of Bishop’s Itchington are preferable to those north of it due to the as they do not bring M40 bound traffic through the village.
Gaydon and Lighthorne Heath is already established as a mixed-use new settlement, however BIPC recognises and wishes to draw attention to the Preferred Options Sustainability Appraisal which assesses this location to be among the least sustainable locations.

No

Representation ID: 95793

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan. The sites within the cluster perform very badly on the objective scoring system and should be eliminated. In detail, the reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP.

Yes

Representation ID: 95802

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

would take the congestion pressure off stratford

Yes

Representation ID: 95811

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jane Dodge

SG13 should be considered a suitable parcel of land amalgamated with G1, F3 and SG14 to create a new settlement.
Gaydon already has high quality employment and transport infrastructure, including the possibility of a railway station on the existing line.

No

Representation ID: 96140

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Morgan

Destruction of Greenbelt. Extreme harm to wildlife (including rare species - great crested newt, otter, GS woodpecker all spotted recently) and the environment. Inappropriate development in a rural environment. Over-development of an area close to extensive new housing underway at Lighthorne. Insufficient infrastructure (GP's School, Shops, community centre or public service providers) and well beyond capacity of amenities and road network. Extinction of the existing village, vibrant community and great harm to the quality of life of existing residents. Great reduction in opportunity to view Edge Hill and battlefield from Gaydon area. Area covers current JLR/AM site - employment concerns?

Yes

Representation ID: 96195

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Sinclair

Large site with good access to road links which would provide employment opportunities.
Non green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 96227

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Pateman

Build housing on non-greenbelt land.

No

Representation ID: 96254

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andy Thomas

A rural area with a plentiful variety pof flora amnd faune. all at risk with this propsal.
Light pollution from an exposed location seen from as far away as Coventry
Narrow rural lanes which could not cope with traffic
No access to a railway or educational or medical needs without using motor transport

Yes

Representation ID: 96259

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Madeline Eaton McShane

Non green belt

Yes

Representation ID: 96443

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Christina Deakin

Development on non-green belt land offers a more favourable approach to sustainable growth, respecting the principles of environmental preservation and community planning.

Yes

Representation ID: 96494

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Colin Stewart

There is an excellent opportunity to create a 10,000 home New Settlement in approximately this location, spanning between the M40 and Chiltern Rail Line, with excellent existing and future high value employment, which could tick all the new settlement boxes in accordance with expected government task force guidance.
It would benefit from some of the best transport links once HS2 opens in 2033, the released capacity allowing for stopping at a new station on the site.
It could be an envious place to live - homes, jobs, and a community, with the shortest travel times to London in South Warwickshire.

Other

Representation ID: 96754

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

Yes

Representation ID: 96951

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Close to M40

Yes

Representation ID: 97012

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Morris

Better options for commuting, good existing road network and opportunities for rail expansion.

Yes

Representation ID: 97030

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Victoria Alcock

Yes I do think this is an excellent plan

Yes

Representation ID: 97306

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Guy Morris

New settlements take the strain off an already stretched town and have a lower environmental impact, not developing on greenbelt land. Better existing road connections.