Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
Search representations
Results for Individual search
New searchObject
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71285
Received: 11/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71286
Received: 09/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
a) Chapter 9, p151 - Traffic problems likely by having two access points. At peak times the flow of traffic past the indicated Leamington Rd junction is extremely heavy and the consequence of constructing a further traffic inflow at this point would add to the burden that drivers have to face during the weekday commute. Far better would be to use solely, the junction directly from the A46 roundabout, through the industrial sector and onto the spine road. Two junctions are unnecessary when one will suffice, remove the spine road junction onto the main Leamington bound main road.
a) Chapter 9, p151 - Traffic problems likely by having two access points. At peak times the flow of traffic past the indicated Leamington Rd junction is extremely heavy and the consequence of constructing a further traffic inflow at this point would add to the burden that drivers have to face during the weekday commute. Far better would be to use solely, the junction directly from the A46 roundabout, through the industrial sector and onto the spine road. Two junctions are unnecessary when one will suffice, remove the spine road junction onto the main Leamington bound main road.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71287
Received: 13/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Object
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71288
Received: 22/12/2018
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Object
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
5. Environmental quality
Representation ID: 71292
Received: 09/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
a) Agree entirely with Mr Kirwan's comments but would like to add that the loss of amenities to existing residents who are predominantly elderly in Thickthorn Close, would cause a great deal of stress. The increase in heavy traffic would obviously incur greater air pollution affecting residents with health problems.
a) Agree entirely with Mr Kirwan's comments but would like to add that the loss of amenities to existing residents who are predominantly elderly in Thickthorn Close, would cause a great deal of stress. The increase in heavy traffic would obviously incur greater air pollution affecting residents with health problems.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
1. Delivery of a mix of housing
Representation ID: 71295
Received: 01/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71300
Received: 08/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Object
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71303
Received: 10/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
Indicative Site Masterplan
Representation ID: 71307
Received: 14/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
a) Whilst no objection in principle to the development, do not agree with the main 'spine road' using a section of Glasshouse Lane instead of being contained within the new development, as was shown in the original scheme. I believe this will encourage the development of 'rat runs' through existing residential areas and will have a significant negative affect on the quality of life in those areas affected.
a) Whilst no objection in principle to the development, do not agree with the main 'spine road' using a section of Glasshouse Lane instead of being contained within the new development, as was shown in the original scheme. I believe this will encourage the development of 'rat runs' through existing residential areas and will have a significant negative affect on the quality of life in those areas affected.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
7. Creating a high quality designed urban environment
Representation ID: 71309
Received: 09/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
a) Endorse the points made by Mr E Kerwan.
b) Since their construction the rose bed borders to properties on Thickthorn Close have been tended by the householders, new roses bought as necessary, with all such labour and expense carried by themselves. These borders greatly improve safety and convenience for children and older pedestrians. Further, as your proposals implicitly accept you cannot possibly consider widening the road.
a) Endorse the points made by Mr E Kerwan.
b) Since their construction the rose bed borders to properties on Thickthorn Close have been tended by the householders, new roses bought as necessary, with all such labour and expense carried by themselves. These borders greatly improve safety and convenience for children and older pedestrians. Further, as your proposals implicitly accept you cannot possibly consider widening the road.
