Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
Search representations
Results for Individual search
New searchComment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71319
Received: 14/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
2. Delivery of high quality employment land
Representation ID: 71320
Received: 23/11/2018
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71326
Received: 18/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
a) The Council have always held strong on the view that Thickthorn Close is not a suitable access point due to it being a narrow road. It is clear that it is now a main access point for the new estate. There was a commitment that the amenity of residents in Thickthorn would not be impacted and this clearly does impact.
a) The Council have always held strong on the view that Thickthorn Close is not a suitable access point due to it being a narrow road. It is clear that it is now a main access point for the new estate. There was a commitment that the amenity of residents in Thickthorn would not be impacted and this clearly does impact.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
Walking and cycling
Representation ID: 71328
Received: 02/12/2018
Respondent: Individual
a) Currently no safe cycling route from Kenilworth to Abbey Park in Stoneleigh. There will be more vehicles on the road following development making it worse. Stoneleigh Park and the NAC is just across the A46 from Kenilworth with many businesses based there, now is the perfect time build a cycle way from Kenilworth to both business parks. With hundreds of workers and even more visitors to the NAC wouldn't it make a great showcase for Warwickshire to show how it's connecting people to their workplaces. It will have health benefits for employees too.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71329
Received: 12/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
1. Delivery of a mix of housing
Representation ID: 71330
Received: 12/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Object
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71331
Received: 09/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
a) Object to the access on Thickthorn Close. The close is unsuitable to take the type of traffic, well intentioned how it seems will only act in future as a main entrance. The primary route is very close to the island junction that carries fast moving traffic.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71332
Received: 14/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
Please see attached.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71334
Received: 13/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
a) Taking into account the sheer devastation that will be made to the surrounding area, especially the local wildlife, will I ever hear our owl again?
b) I am ready to sacrifice even Rocky Lane, the main haunt of dog walkers, for the spine road to continue through the new estate. How can it be considered sensible to keep it when all the traffic problems will be considerable and Glasshouse Lane, a quiet road will become the North Circular of the Town.
Please see attached.
Comment
Land East of Kenilworth Development Brief
3. Delivery of an effective and efficient transport system
Representation ID: 71335
Received: 14/01/2019
Respondent: Individual
a) Whilst no objection in principle to the development, do not agree with the main 'spine road' using a section of Glasshouse Lane instead of being contained within the new development, as was shown in the original scheme. I believe this will encourage the development of 'rat runs' through existing residential areas and will have a significant negative affect on the quality of life in those areas affected.
a) Whilst no objection in principle to the development, do not agree with the main 'spine road' using a section of Glasshouse Lane instead of being contained within the new development, as was shown in the original scheme. I believe this will encourage the development of 'rat runs' through existing residential areas and will have a significant negative affect on the quality of life in those areas affected.