BASE HEADER
Hampton Magna
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46216
Derbyniwyd: 09/06/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Underwood
I moved to the village of Hampton Magna 17 years ago. The location was chosen due to it's rural nature. Although the local plan only mentions 100 houses in the village, is this the thin end of the wedge? Where in the village will these new houses be? As I live on the edge of the village, there will be a significant affect on the value of my property and quality of life if other housing was to be built on the adjoining greenbelt areas.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46234
Derbyniwyd: 15/06/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Lodge
-Hampton Magna is unsuitable for development due to its location between two major roads and proximity to Warwick Parkway. These already cause over crowded roads. This proposal would worsen matters.
-Construction traffic will only be able to use the route through Hampton-on-the-Hill which is unacceptable. This is a village with a narrow road and chicanes. We already have buses, school buses, illegal heavy lorries (7.5 ton weight limit) and farm vehicles using the road through the village. Anything associated with housing construction would be unacceptable and illegal within the present weight limit.
-There is no compelling case for this proposal.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46303
Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Ray Wilson
I am sure you will be able to read 139 words and don't need a summary, but if essential, please advise
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46306
Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2012
Ymatebydd: ed boyle
schools
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46413
Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Tubbs
The process is flawed because Hampton Magna has been designated as Category 1 Village before any sites to take 100 houses have been identified.
The roads into and out of the village cannot take any more vehicles.
If the designation is confirmed it would be perverse of the Council to identify any land land to the south of the village because of high landscape value, existence of public footpaths and existing noise nuisance. Other areas of the village also have high landscape value
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46428
Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Louise Pearson
In Hampton Magna the existing amenities and infrastructure could not absorb another 100 + properties, which would add an additional 250 adults and children, or so. Budbrooke School which is already at capacity, and taking in more children than it has classroom space for in the future. Furthermore, Hampton Magna and Hampton on the Hill is an area of outstanding character, situated within the Green Belt
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46440
Derbyniwyd: 11/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Hampton-on-the-Hill Residents Association
Existing amenities and infrastructure in Hampton Magna and Hampton-on-the-Hill could not absorb another 100 plus dwellings. Budbrooke school is already at capacity. Given there is 'flexibility' (paragraph 7.22) in the Plan to remove some dwellings, we propose that you remove the 100 plus dwellings from the Plan.
There is also excessive commuter traffic currently using the only road though the villages as a 'rat run' and action nees to be taken now to deal with what has become a dangerous situation.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46480
Derbyniwyd: 15/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr John Lock
Existing amenities and infrastructure in Hampton Magna and Hampton on the Hill could not absorb another 100 dwellings. Budbrooke school is already at capacity. Given there is flexibility (para. 7.22) in the Plan to remove some dwellings, we propose that you remove the 100 plus dwellings from the Plan. There is also excessive commuter traffic currently using the only road through the villages as a "rat run" and action needs to be taken now to deal with what has become a dangerous situation.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46491
Derbyniwyd: 15/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Kay Lock
Existing amenities and infrastructure in Hampton Magna and Hampton on the Hill could not absorb another 100 dwellings. Budbrooke School is already at capacity. Given there is flexibility (Para 7.22) in the plan to remove some dwellings, I propose that you remove the 100+ dwellings from the plan. There is also excessive commuter traffic using the only road through the villages as a 'rat run' and action needs to be taken now to deal with what has become a dangerous situation.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46563
Derbyniwyd: 18/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Roger Mills
There is no demonstrated need for more than a handful of additional houses. The infrastructure (roads, sewers, school) cannot cope at the moment and the problem would be made far worse if another 100 houses were to be built. Hampton Magna is unique in having its envelope defined by the boundaries of the old army barracks. These boundaries should remain. Any significant development will encroach unacceptably on the Green Belt and will have a major adverse impact on the landscape.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46730
Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Victoria Connolly
As the infra-structure in Hampton Magna is already supporting a main line station and 2 large new developments which have been built within the parish within the last 15 years, I do not believe that the village could cope with 100 new homes. I also feel that the proposal to increase the number of homes in the village by around 17% is disproportionate against proposed development levels eslewhere in the region and projected opoulation growth. The B-road transport links in the rural west of the district would be insufficient to cope with the proposed distribution of new homes.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46852
Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Alexandra Davis
The residents do not want more homes to be built here. Greenbelt boundaries should not be changed to allow building. Large numbers of houses would change the nature of the village and the village could not support a large increase in population.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46990
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Keren Dawson
The proposed addition of 100 new dwellings in Hampton Magna and Hampton on the Hill would detrimentally inpack on the infrastucture and historical character of the villages. It would add about 250 adults and children. The school, Budbrook Primary is already at capacity.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47040
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: mrs jane hayward
Existing amenities and infrastructure in Hampton Magna and Hampton on the Hill could not absorb an additional 100 dwellings.Given there is 'flexibility' (para 7.22) in the Plan to remove some dwellings, I propose that you remove the 100 dwellings from the plan. There is also excessive commuter traffic currently using the only road through the villages as a 'rat run' and action needs to be taken now to deal with what has become a dangerous situation.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47080
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Dale
1 Proposed development in H/Magna w/be equivalent to size of Hampton on the Hill.
2 Risk of merger of these 2 settlements. Their different history and character s/be preserved.
3 Proposed development at H/Magna is contrary to local survey which showed little need locally.
4 Proposed 100 new homes is arbitrary allocation without proper assessment of local need.
5 H/Magna proposal w/be loss of valuable Green Belt.
6 Local roads, school/other facilities inadequate to cope with additional 200-300 people - more than size of Hampton on Hill.
7 H/Magna proposal s/be excluded from Local Plan.
8 Shortfall in housing numbers c/be made up on larger sites identified.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47300
Derbyniwyd: 29/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Lewis
The existing amenities and infrastructure could not cope with another 100 houses. It would mean another 200+ adults and children. Budbrooke school is already over subscribed and class sizes are too large! Traffic around school is really heavy Also because of Warwick parkway roads around village are far too busy and the bus service is inadequate. Given flexibility above I suggest you remove Hampton Magna from the plan
Cefnogi
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47546
Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2012
Ymatebydd: King Henry VIII Endowed Trust (Warwick)
Asiant : AMEC
The identification of Hampton Magna as a Category 1 Village, including the proposed development of 100 dwellings at the settlement over the period 2011-2029 within Policy PO4, is supported. Suitably scaled development at this location can help sustain and enhance local services, community facilities, businesses and public transport.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47776
Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Maxine Roberts
Object to development at Hampton Magna.
Strain on current infrastructure:roads and schools. Budbrooke school won't support.
Three roads access:
Main route through busy traffic lights. New houses will increase traffic from Warwick Parkway resulting in village parking, making it busier and causing safety issues.
Route through Hampton-on-the-Hill difficult due to on road parking and traffic calming. More traffic would put children cycling to school at risk.
The route over Ugly Bridge cannot take more traffic but people will use the lane resulting in accidents.
Best location would be ro Curleiu Close or field on Old Budbrooke Road by station.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48054
Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr David Bryan
Hampton Magna has had little infill. A Housing Needs Survey identified need for 5 houses in the Parish.
The need for further development is not locally required nor, supported.
Infrastructure has changed little from early 1970s.
Village is served by C class roads that link to Warwick/Birmingham road and Warwick/Henley Road.
Electricity and sewage supply unchanged.
School has been extended.
Roads become very busy at peak times. Locally generated traffic is increased by use of C roads as short cuts.
Inroduction of large number of houses into village would overload services.
The assumptions for the overall growth of the housing market in ...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48417
Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Sue Shirley
Development would seriously damage residents quality of life as village is grid locked in mornings attracting traffic to school, doctors, shops and Warwick Parkway. Roads are country roads and becoming dangerous.
School is oversubscribed and standards in danger of dropping.
Sewers constantly block.
Scheme looks like it has been put together to make numbers add up.
Why is Cubbington classed as a type 2 village?
Build new village on appropriate land along with proper infrastructure.
Cefnogi
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48691
Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2012
Ymatebydd: Landowners - Hampton Magna
Nifer y bobl: 2
Asiant : Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support Hampton Magna as a Categroy 1 village, but believe the village has the capacity to provode growth in excess of 100 homes.
Suggest a capacity of assessment of each village should be undertaken
See attachment
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48700
Derbyniwyd: 18/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Carl Stevens
Budbrooke has already seen significant increase in housing and Railway station built. This has created increase in traffic and diluted the the villlage character of Hampton Magna and Hampton on the Hill.
Existing ameneties will not be able to cope with extra housing without loosing the feel of the village.
Document scanned
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48747
Derbyniwyd: 13/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Mary Jones
Existing amenities and infrastructure could not absorb another 100 properties. Budbrook School is at capacity.
Remove additonal dwellings from our villages from the plan.
Document Scanned
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48761
Derbyniwyd: 13/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Joy French
Existing aminities and infrastructure of Hampton Magna could not absorb 100 houses. Budbrook school is full capacity. Given the flexibility mentioned above I propose that WDC remove the addtional dwellings to the cillages from the plan.
Document scanned.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48841
Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2012
Ymatebydd: Budbrooke Parish Council
Parish Councillors have encouraged residents to make their feelings known however people cannot easily understand the process or consultation as no real sites in rural areas have been identified. A low response rate should not therefore be taken as a lack of interest or green light for the proposals. The suggestion that 850 houses need to be spread across the district in rural locations is arbitrary. The reasoning that the category 1 villages should have 100 houses is inappropriate as each has unique circumstances, there is no more need in these locations as opposed to alternative category 2 and 3 villages, with additional infrastructure these would become less isolated and more socially cohesive. 550 new homes per year exceeds the annual number of properties developed during the boom years. 2011 census data is available so the projections should be revised downwards. Recent parish surveys show no support for further development. An independant survey by WRCC demonstrated a local need for 5 extra houses and the Parish Council doesnt have a mandate to exceed this. The PC agrees with the overall strategy to direct development to the three main towns, however the split of the rest of the housing is not consistent. Should refer to Parishes rather than villages to allow parishes to use local knowledge to suggest areas. The absence of Cubbington, Bubbenhall and Baginton as Category 1 villages seems inconsistent. Cubbington has a range of services and substantial employment opportunities compared with Budbrooke. It is assumed that infrastructure is capable of supporting the proposed extra housing however the Parish is already under great pressure from traffic, with many routes used as commuter ratruns and traffic on the Birmingham Road likely to increase if proposed development is approved impacting on the Stanks Island roundabout over the bypass. Budbrooke School is oversubscribed and school related traffic already cause problems. The school already takes pupils from outside and more children from additional housing will impact on the quality of provision. The sewerage system is below an acceptable standard and even small increases in the amount of housing has an impact on this. Before sites are proposed the cost of upgrading road and sewerage infrastructure must be identified. Electricity supply network hasnt been updated in 50 years and is subject to fluctuations. It would be better to put more infrastructure into the category 2 villages to bring them up to standard. Development should occur on brownfield sites first, there is far more land available in the towns than has been identified by officers. Proposals appear to be contrary to environmental policies and reduction of carbon emissions. The Parish Council believes that because any expansion of Hampton Magna would lead to severe problems with the traffic, sewerage and electricity infrastructure, it should not be considered as a Category 1 village.
Parish Councillors have encouraged resid...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 49276
Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Molloy
PO4: Exiting amenities and infrastructure would not absorb another 100+ properties. Local school is already at capacity. The development appears not to fully consider the negative impacts.
Scanned form
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 49286
Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Baylis
Existing amenities could not cope with more families and their needs for activities, jobs, schools etc and would be detrimental to existing community.
Scanned form
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 49540
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Betty Jackson
The village has attacted people with its rural setting and beauty. If development went ahaead the distinctiveness would be lost. The village should be removed from the plan.
As scanned.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 49544
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr William A. Jackson
Hampton on the Hill and Hampton Magna are within green belt and because of this should be removed from the plans.
Existing infrastructure could not cope with the increased demand.
If the plans are flexible then additional villages should be removed.
As scanned.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 49572
Derbyniwyd: 17/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Denis Hinchley
Existing infrastructure could not absorb additional 100 plus properties.
Budbrooke school is at its maximum intake.
The impact of the railway station and the fact that housing has already been developed at Chase Meadow and Hatton Park.
As scanned.
