BASE HEADER
1) Land to the east of Church Lane
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61599
Derbyniwyd: 15/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Nicola Lester
-This seems to be the site that would have the least impact on the village.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61600
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Simons
-The annihilation of what has been considered for many years as the 'village green' and it is the last open space in the village.
-Cause irreversible harm to open outlook and listen setting of the church and its surroundings.
-High visibility impact of over 100 similarly styled properties ruining the heritage and village identity (i.e. White Lion, thatched cottages)
-Outpouring of significant numbers of vehicles from the proposed development on to the Southam Road. Area is already pressurised and any increase to the 'standing traffic' could heighten the risk of accidents, particularly on the blind bend at Manor House.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61601
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Geoffrey Coop
-Will cause the least long term disruption to the village.
-Majority of functional, rather than aesthetic, objections will apply to the other potential sites and particularly surface water drainage which is already grossly inadequate for sites 2, 3 and 4.
-The new residents will have considerably safer vehicular and pedestrian access from Site 1.
-The aesthetic objections will apply to all sites for different reasons but will apply to fewer dwellings in site 1, than to other sites.
-The scenic views enjoyed at the moment will be enjoyed by a great number of new villagers, which ever site is chosen.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61612
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Diane H Aries
-Developing Site 1 would negatively impact the village's identity, heritage, landscape and setting of the church and other listed buildings.
-The A425 cannot accommodate additional traffic and many junctions have limited visibility creating danger for pedestrians and drivers.
-Site 1 provides flood relief and is an important habitat for bats and birds.
-The site has archaeological importance.
-Insufficient infrastructure exists in the village to support new housing.
-The A425 separates the site from the village and its services causing risk to pedestrians crossing and encouraging residents to travel to supermarkets.
-1994 Planning Inspectors Report rejected development of the site.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61622
Derbyniwyd: 15/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Brenda Woodhead
-The church would still be able to be seen over the green field from the main Leamington/Southam Road.
-The church would be integrated into the main village.
-There would be no linkage with Leamington.
-The development would only be seen as you enter the village from Leamington and would be partially hidden by the existing houses in Offchurch Lane.
-Traffic lights at the existing pedestrian crossing at Southam Road would work well ensuring pedestrian safety for school children.
-Proposed car park in Church Lane is an excellent idea.
-Development would all be contained within present village boundary.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61628
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Sutton
-This is the completely the wrong site chosen as it will inject over 200 added vehicles to be routed through the village confines.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61629
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Cathrine Clark
-If permission is given for the preferred site, it will be an accident waiting to happen as the Offchurch Lane/White Lion junction is already a hazard with one accident already in 2014.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61632
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Bishop
-It is important to try and limit development to within the village and the site meets this requirement.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61634
Derbyniwyd: 15/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Pauline Norton
-Need to protect the identity of the village as a district from Leamington Spa, the setting and countryside seclusion of the church, which is listed and the village's heritage of open fields.
-If future development to the village is necessary this site cannot be expanded.
-An additional road joining the A425 in this localised area will be a severe safety hazard.
-There are known sewage, drainage and flooding issues.
-Pollution and noise will impact on those of use living adjacent to the A425.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61635
Derbyniwyd: 16/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Norman Hyde
-Residents and tourists enjoy our history. Once it is gone, it is forever.
-Potential archaeological medieval remains are on the site.
-Loss of setting as summed in the 1994 Planning Inspector's report.
-Access and traffic. At peak times traffic on the Southam Road will be worsened. Access from Offchurch Lane will be most difficult leading to even more accidents at this dangerous junction.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61636
Derbyniwyd: 16/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Peter Stocker
-Road widening of Church Lane with removal of matured trees, without being a problem to WDC is in contradiction of a 65 year old Walnut Tree in the front garden of this address has a preservation order on it.
-Ruination of the open views across to the countryside, ruining the area close to the church, which according to established guidelines should be safeguarded.
-Traffic problems will be made worse wherever the access points are.
-Area is a natural rainwater holding area.
-The area should be a public open space, suitably landscaped.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61637
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Alwyn Jones
-The increase traffic would cause a great deal of congestion.
-The safety aspect in an already very dangerous junction would be greatly increased.
-The tail backs at busy times go right back to Leamington and the Fosse Way in the other directing. Standing traffic would cause a great deal more pollution.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61646
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs S. J Harvey
-Development will permanently ruin the setting of the church and other surrounding listed buildings. The area contributes to the identity of the village. Planners have a duty and responsibility to protect this.
-The site is of medieval interest.
-The proposed access is dangerous. Exiting from Offchurch Lane is already difficult and dangerous due to the blind junction for traffic approaching. More development and commuters would add to this congestion.
-The sited pedestrian crossing near Church Lane will add to congestion.
-The mix of types and density of the proposed housing is inappropriate to a rural site adjacent to listed buildings.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61654
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Jennifer Watson
-St Nicholas Church and the listed building nearby, together with Church Fields, represent the historic, medieval heart of the village. It is a source of solitude and tranquillity for residents, walkers and church goes.
-The view of the church is crucial to the village's identity. High density housing would be inappropriate for such an ancient and lovely spot.
-The traffic produced by the proposed dwellings would impact heavily on Southam Road.
-The Offchurch Lane junction can be dangerous and accidents have occurred. The White Lion pub is on a blind bend and has its dangers at peak times.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61668
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Miss Helen Aries
-The setting of the church should be protected and not spoilt by an inappropriate housing estate.
-The area gives Radford Semele its character as a village.
-The views from Offchurch Lane will be spoilt.
-The bus runs very infrequently and when it does run it is often full. The service cannot cope with more people.
-The traffic is already very dangerous and the roads make it difficult for me to see properly.
-Putting in a new junction opposite the pub or changing the layout of School Lane/Church Lane junction will make children's journey to the school very hazardous.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61676
Derbyniwyd: 16/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Deeming
-Lewis Road is now too overcrowded with parked and moving cars, it is an accident waiting to happen.
-The Southam Road is also very busy; any extra pressure from new home owners would increase this pressure greatly.
-The views across the church and countryside will be just another blot on the landscape.
-The local school is at capacity and there is no doctor's surgery. The local pub is too expensive that very few villagers use it.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61684
Derbyniwyd: 27/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Khai Tran
-Support the 100 houses proposed on Land east of Church Lane to the rear of Offchurch Lane.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61687
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Barry Trinder
Site 2 should not be developed on because:
-The site is outside of the village envelope and extends the village boundary.
-The layout/visual effect would be an urban spread.
-Development would cause habitat loss, an increase in flooding, loss of agricultural land, affect recreational users of the area and would impact the openness of the landscape.
-Developing Site 2 with the properties proposed would distort Radford Semele's housing mix balance.
-Access would be difficult and dangerous.
-Flooding would increase.
-The location is not suitable for families due to its proximity to the dangerous Southam Road.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61694
Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs A Wilson
Object to Site 1 due to its negative impact on village life:
-Traffic congestion.
-Negative impact on views of St Nicholas Church from the A425 and properties in this area.
-Increase flood potential as land acts as a natural drainage point.
-Accidents due to increased traffic at a critical point on the A425.
-
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61699
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Matthew Iredale
Object to the preferred option for housing due to:
-Heritage and setting
-Highways
-1994 Planning Inspectors Planning Report
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61700
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Yvonne Iredale
Objec to the preferred option due to:
-Heritage and Setting
-Visual Amenity
-Flooding
-Highways
-Access to Amenities
-1994 Planning Inspectors Report
-Traffic
-Heritage
-Destroy the Village
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61702
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr J C Clark
-Current open countryside would be replaced by a housing estate, in direct contravention of Council duty to protect the setting of a listed building in planning and against the PPG15 and PPG16.
-The type, allocation and density required are inappropriate for this setting. The site cannot meet the required levels and types of housing required.
-The extra traffic created by the new housing exiting onto the South Road/School Lane/Church Lane junction or opposite the White Lion on an already busy stretch of road would be dangerous, increasing accident risks to motorists and pedestrians using this stretch to get to/from school.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61704
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Owen David
-The development would damage the heritage of Radford by harming the outlook around the village.
-WDC has a statutory obligation to priorities other less harmful sites.
-Any new access road will cut across the setting of the Grade II Listed Buildings and this is against the duty of the council to protect the setting.
-The church fields are fundamental to the identity of the village and planners have a duty to heed this heritage. Building homes goes against this.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61721
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Val Gatfield
-Do not consider any of the sites as suitable for further development but where additional housing is compulsory, Site 1 would appear the most suitable.
-All sites will lead to traffic congestion in the village but there is already a pedestrian access across the Southam Road by controlled lights to allow school children to cross and other village amenities to be reached. There is no suitable crossing place for sites 2 or 3 and even widening the pavement would not be possible at the point between Hill Cottage and Apple Tree Cottage.
-Being a regular pedestrian on this stretch, I can vouch for the speed and volume of traffic, even within the 30mph limit.
-Site 1 is also an infill to the village without breaching current boundaries extending unnecessarily into the Green Belt. No further large development of the village is satisfactory in traffic safety terms.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61722
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs V Yardley
-Site 1 is the only site that has a plus side because it already has an absolute necessary controlled school crossing and easy walking access to the bus stops.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61734
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mrs Val Gatfield
-Site 1 is also an infill to the village without breaching current boundaries extending unnecessarily into Green Belt. No further large development of the village is satisfactory in traffic safety terms.
-All Sites will lead to traffic congestion in the village but there is already pedestrian access across the Southam Road by controlled lights to allow school children from Site 1 to cross and allow village amenities to be reached. There is no suitable crossing place on Sites 2 and 3. There is also a lot of traffic that travels very fast.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61744
Derbyniwyd: 15/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Jones
-The site is an iconic marker for the village and the open space on entrance/exit to the village is vital to maintain the village's identity.
-The church has been cherished since Anglo Saxon times.
-Congestion on to/from the Southam Road from Offchurch Lane, School Lane and Kingshurst creates delays. It is difficult to join these roads and frustration has caused errors of judgement and potential for accidents. Any access from the site would worsen these problems and impact the lives of existing villagers.
-There is not a worse place for development in the village.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61746
Derbyniwyd: 10/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Buckingham
-The proposal is aggressive, forceful, over ambitious and poorly communicated.
-Gladman are being bullish with their proposal.
-The volume of housing is too much compared to the existing local population density
-The Gladman proposal equates to a development that has more than 3 'Gladman -Homes' for every existing home in the area, this is not comparable or sympathetic.
-The proposal would destroy the character of the village.
-The proposal would worsen traffic in the village.
-There are many listed properties in the immediate area, which deserve better than to be crowded out by a mass-built densely packed, modern housing estate.
see attached
Cefnogi
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61747
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Roy Gatfield
-I support Site 1, it is an infill to the village within walking distance of the church, school, shops etc without extending further into greenbelt.
-I also feel the alterations to the road system required would have a calming effect on the traffic passing through the village as the existing 30mph limit is not adhered to.
see attached
Gwrthwynebu
Village Housing Options and Settlement Boundaries
ID sylw: 61751
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Clarke
-No agreement with the Highways department regarding access to the site. This cannot be considered the preferred site without access having been considered.
-Accessing Southam Road is already difficult, any plan to put another junction onto the road or change the Offchurch Lane junction will great total gridlock within the village.
-130 dwellings on the site would be a total eyesore on the village.
I understand that site no 1 which is the land between the houses on Offchurch Lane and the Church is the favourable site for Warwick DC.
Having looked at the plan which I believe is to put 130 houses of different size, types and tenures I have the following concerns:
From the plans that I have seen at this point there doesn't appear to be anything agreed wth th Highways dept for an exit road from this site.
At the moment you have Church Lane and Offchurch Lane feeding onto the main road. Having lived in Chance Fields for 20 years I understand what
a nightmare it is getting on to the Southam Road. Any plan to put another junction onto that road within the village or even try and change the Offchurch Lane junction will be an absolute nightmare, basically causing total gridlock within the village.
Also to put a 130 house estate at that point in the village will be a total eyesore.
There is another proposal I understand to put 60 houses on Southam Road which surely makes more sense.
Whatever you do will introduce more traffic and potentially more problems for the village but I cannot believe this will have the disastrous effect that the site on Offchurch Lane will have
Also why do we have to put 130 houses together why can they not be split in to a number of sites ie. use both sides of the Southam Road.
I cannot see how any Council can say that this is the favoured site when access has not even been considered.
Based on the points I have made I totally object to the Offchurch scheme.