BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 27 Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets/ the Historic Environment?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86104
Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86305
Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah Nash
We are fortunate to have two National Trust sites in Lapworth Area. Increasing houses in the area will destroy the countryside around these sites
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86337
Derbyniwyd: 21/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Noel Davis
Heritage assets and their immediate setting are an important part of the character of older settlements
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86687
Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater
Listed buildings and heritage requirements must not be allowed to overarch or outweigh climate change reduction needs.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86934
Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming
Given parts of Stratford-upon-Avon are derelict (due to the authorities policies and lack of action), there isn't much to preserve in some areas. Large areas already prone to flooding
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87082
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: S Gardner
But your proposals need to include the possibility that the maintenance of the historic buildings needs to be funded through other means, such as DMCS.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87176
Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Bryan Hay
I agree with the overall approach, and recommend that it includes canal heritage.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87415
Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day
More could be included in the policy to positively support the introduction of new technologies that make heritage properties more sustainable to heat and maintain. These buildings are very difficult and costly to heat and if new technologies are actively resisted, as suggested by this policy, then ultimately these buildings will be used less and be at risk, which would defeat the ultimate aim of the policy.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87594
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris
I agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88446
Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Joe Hibbert
New settlement locations should consider heritage assets and their settings. The proposed G1 new settlement would negatively impact on the registered Burton Dassett Hills Country Park and the village/hamlets of Knightcote, Northend and Burton Dassett including the listed buildings within and their setting in an open and agricultural landscape.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88666
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Tibbles
I am particularly concerned with the suggestion of sites in the immediate vicinity of Burton Dassett Country Park. The outlook from the park is already marked by light pollution from the recent motorway junction development. Adding another settlement (G1) to that mix would have a catastrophic effect on not only the character of this historic landscape but also the natural environment. Recent inundation flooding in the area would need to be addressed ( actions which would undoubtedly cause yet more damage to the landscape).
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88835
Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown
Agree in principle with the draft but you choose to blot the landscape of one of the districts historic towns with Strategic Growth SG23. Preservation of the historic town is a necessity in a country that will over time consume and swallow up these small towns. Promote infill in the surrounding areas / villages / hamlets to accommodate the necessary increase whilst providing people a choice of where to live. It is not all about the 20 minute neighbourhood.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89074
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
I agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89206
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanna Hughes
The Clopton parcel of land contains the historic Clopton House which is a grade 2 listed building and this area should be protected at all costs
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89346
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Hayles
With so much rapid development taking place across South Warwickshire, even more emphasis needs placing on safeguarding its heritage and character which is in great danger of being completely spoiled by over-development. The quality of life for existing residents needs higher priority than presently has been afforded.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89373
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Twynam
I have said yes but there is a big BUT - I really dont see evidence in the new building plans
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89494
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson
Can anything be done to protect historic buildings which are left vulnerable when a developer fails, or is unable, to devlop the site e.g. the King's High site in Warwick?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89568
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton
Please please please protect the beautiful historical buildings in our district! Don't make the same mistakes Coventry did after World War 2, that place is really [redacted] I dont want that!
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89839
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Lina Rodriguez
Should avoid increasing air pollution in Stratford as it is a beautiful town yet has a countryside feel that locals and tourists alike can enjoy
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89908
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Holly Whittaker
Yes I agree.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90014
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Fiona Macvie
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90222
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Williams
All our heritage & historic assets should be protected & enhanced. When it's gone it's gone forever.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90244
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Maria Giblin
Re Clopton Quarter SG18 we should protect Clopton house and surrounding land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90245
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Giblin
We should protect SG18 Clopton Quarter as it has a wide range of bio diversity
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90440
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheetal Tailor
No comment
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90504
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones
Villages like Honnington and Barcheston which were referenced in Domesday book and largely unchanged since Medieval times, will be detrimentally impacted by surrounding developments and increased traffic trying to avoid Shipston.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90551
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Gavin Simpson
We must protect hertigate for future generations to enjoy, observe and learn from.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90736
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Goodwin
Historic sites and heritage and vital for any town non more so than Stratfor upon Avon for the well being of residents and visitors alike. It is vital for the local community and local economy. It must not be diminished or encroached upon in such sites as the Clopton Corner part of SQ18. Once we have lost any such asset it is lost forever and future generations will ask why those in charge allowed it to happen?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90810
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Maria Sacristan
Heritage assets should be protected
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90870
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr James Morris
Stratford-upon-Avon is an historic town for multiple reasons. It's unique location within the country, it's world renowned reputation and of course it's historical significance within literature. Creating another overcrowded area that cannot sustain itself is short sided, when we should be looking to preserve out heritage and ecology.