Yes

ID sylw: 94784

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

We suggest a new settlement between the M40 and Chiltern Rail Line. This location would include a hotel, major high tech employment within the M40 employment corridor, and provide the most sustainable connectivity. Expansion of Warwick University onto this new settlement would provide a further anchor employment.

Further, a substantial well designed new settlement at this location would accord with the expected recommendations from the Sir Michael Lyons New Settlement Task Force expected in the summer.

Yes

ID sylw: 94802

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Emma Pearce

Plan ref 633 and 469 proposed development Cox Crescent. I am writing to object to the proposed development due to serious flood risks, increased traffic, slope concerns and overcrowding in the roads. There is a serious flood risk and I currently live on Cox Crescent so know the concerns and problems we have now. Please take this as an objection.

Yes

ID sylw: 94803

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Emma Pearce

Plan ref 633 and 469 proposed development Cox Crescent. I am writing to object to the proposed development due to serious flood risks, increased traffic, slope concerns and overcrowding in the roads. There is a serious flood risk and I currently live on Cox Crescent so know the concerns and problems we have now. Please take this as an objection.

Yes

ID sylw: 94806

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kash Tucker

Plan ref 633 and 469 proposed development Cox Crescent. I am writing to object to the proposed development due to serious flood risks, increased traffic, slope concerns and overcrowding in the roads. There is a serious flood risk and I currently live on Cox Crescent so know the concerns and problems we have now. Please take this as an objection.

Yes

ID sylw: 94807

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kash Tucker

Plan ref 633 and 469 proposed development Cox Crescent. I am writing to object to the proposed development due to serious flood risks, increased traffic, slope concerns and overcrowding in the roads. There is a serious flood risk and I currently live on Cox Crescent so know the concerns and problems we have now. Please take this as an objection.

No

ID sylw: 94896

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fenny Compton Parish Council

Site 318 (Land off Avon Dassett Road, Fenny Compton) has already been refused planning permission, including at appeal. It is outside the BUAB of Fenny Compton and would have a detrimental impact on a locally significant view and site of archaeological interest. There are road safety issues associated with access to the site. The village has already had to absorb more than 100 new dwellings in the last few years with no improvement to local infrastructure and the village is unable to absorb any more.

Yes

ID sylw: 94903

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Davis

REFID 573
This site is on green belt land. There are no exceptional circumstances provided to develop this land. If this plot was developed there would be no open space between Warwick and Hampton Magna.

Yes

ID sylw: 94905

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fenny Compton Parish Council

Site 416 (Northend Road) is outside the BUAB of Fenny Compton and in an area at risk of flooding. The village has already had to absorb more than 100 new dwellings in the last few years with no improvement to local infrastructure and the village is unable to absorb any more.

Yes

ID sylw: 94912

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Davis

REFID 715
This plot of land is Green Belt. There are no exceptional circumstances provided to justify development in this location.

Yes

ID sylw: 94916

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fenny Compton Parish Council

Site 275 (land east of ridge way) is outside the BUAB of Fenny Compton and is an area of land that plays an important role in absorbing run off from the hills. Any development would exacerbate existing flooding issues downstream of this land. The village has already had to absorb more than 100 new dwellings in the last few years with no improvement to local infrastructure and the village is unable to absorb any additional development.

Yes

ID sylw: 94921

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fenny Compton Parish Council

Site 110 (land south of Station Road) is outside the BUAB of Fenny Compton and is an area of land that plays an important role in absorbing run off from the hills. Any development would exacerbate existing flooding issues downstream of this land. The village has already had to absorb more than 100 new dwellings in the last few years with no improvement to local infrastructure and the village is unable to absorb any additional development.

Yes

ID sylw: 94924

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fenny Compton Parish Council

Site 500 (land off station road (south)) is outside the BUAB of Fenny Compton and is an area of land that plays an important role in absorbing run off from the hills. Any development would exacerbate existing flooding issues downstream of this land. The village has already had to absorb more than 100 new dwellings in the last few years with no improvement to local infrastructure and the village is unable to absorb any additional development.

Yes

ID sylw: 94928

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fenny Compton Parish Council

Site 302 (land off station road (north)) has already been granted planning permission following appeal

Yes

ID sylw: 94929

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Davis

REFID 233
This parcel of land is Green Belt. No exceptional circumstances have been provided to justify development on this site. It is not sustainable to keep taking land out of green belt every time a new local plan is produced.

Yes

ID sylw: 94934

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Davis

REFID 95
This area of land is Green Belt. No exceptional circumstances have been demonstrated to develop this land. It is not sustainable to keep taking land out of green belt every time a new local plan is produced.

Yes

ID sylw: 94942

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Davis

REFID 119
This land is green belt and is needed to stop the urban sprawl of Warwick. It is not sustainable to keep removing land from green belt every tine a new local plan is produced.

Yes

ID sylw: 94949

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Davis

REFID 55
This land is green belt. It is not sustainable to keep taking land out of green belt every time a new local plan is produced.

Yes

ID sylw: 94987

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Michael Metcalfe

These comments relate to Land Adjoining College Farmhouse, REFID 184.

The HELAA results for this site are at odds with the reasons for refusal of a recent planning application by Warwick District Council and the subsequent dismissal of an appeal. These reasons relate in particular to the character and appearance of the centre of Wasperton, which lies within a designated Conservation Area and is rated as a Limited Infill village with few sustainability facilities.

The supporting document provides more detail. The same basic concerns would apply to any future application of the type specified in the call for sites proposal.

Yes

ID sylw: 95023

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kathryn Greenwood

Reference: Site 712 - land on the east side of Church Lane Barford

I object strongly to the proposed site due to:
- access only possible through Church Lane and the considerable risk that traffic and works vehicles will cause to children and people using the park that have to walk on the road.

- destruction of historic conversation land which we can evidence has significant wildlife living there

- Disturbance of historic water courses and land drainage would cause flooding issues on the lower sites in the village along High Street.

Yes

ID sylw: 95033

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emma Hardman

Ref ID 193. Land adjacent to Field House, Ashow.
Site not suitable for development because:
1. Land is in green belt and conservation area, and is natural wildlife habitat.
2. Substantial increase in number of properties will affect village character and cause detrimental impact.
3. No public services (gas, sewage) or infrastructure.
4. Given the land is above a number of properties (primarily Long Row), development (i) would cause loss of privacy and (ii) could cause instability and increased risk of flooding.
5. Singular access narrow village roads do not enable access by vehicles required for that level of development.

Yes

ID sylw: 95035

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Julie Wiacek

REF ID-880
Horrendous flooding already in the village , loss of natural drainage. Loss of character and charm.
Loss of scenic views and no where for wildlife .
One main road through the village which is busy enough. Also larger vehicles such as tractors and Lorry's use this road. Listed building effected in close proximity to purposed sites. More through traffic, dangerous bend close to school. Green belt area and Local farmers land affected

Yes

ID sylw: 95041

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bubbenhall Parish Council

The five sites within Bubbenhall village - 155, 213, 636, would all suffer from very poor road access, essentially by old, narrow, and winding lanes, and it is difficult to seeing those routes accommodating the numbers of houses forecast.
The heritage features of the village, including a listed public house, would also be impacted to a greater or lesser degree.
The two sites on the edge of the village, 671 and its larger version 695, would overwhelm the village in numbers of properties by between 2 and 8 times, which would be incongruous.

Yes

ID sylw: 95117

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bubbenhall Parish Council

Further explanation of why 636, 671 and 695 are inappropriate proposals as the local road routes and village facilities cannot sustain the size of these developments.

Yes

ID sylw: 95134

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr aubrey roberts

SUMMARY

The principal objection concerns the viability of the development on the following grounds:

- the impossibility of providing suitable and safe access from Church Street
- the blocking of access for residents of Church Lane
- the likely prohibitive cost.

A further objection lies in the dangerous road junction between the road from Barford and the A429, the scene of recent fatal accidents The proposed development would increase the volume of traffic significantly and the risk of more accidents.The cost of constructing a necessary alternative road layout could be prohibitive.

Yes

ID sylw: 95173

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Mackenzie

HELAA part B site assessment as at Preferred Options: Land to North and South of Hill Wootton Road

This location is currently green belt and there is sufficient land available to build the SWLP without taking green belt. In addition it does not meet sustainability requirements as it will encourage car use.

Yes

ID sylw: 95175

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Mackenzie

HELAA part B site assessment as at Preferred Options: Land near Black Spinney
HELAA part B site assessment as at Preferred Options: Loes Farm, Warwick

The village has already accepted a 30% increase in houses and the proposed sites . The additional sites will not only blur the village boundaries and make it part of Warwick or Kenilworth suburbs. In addition this massive increase would change the whole character of the village.

Yes

ID sylw: 95181

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Mackenzie

HELAA part B site assessment as at Preferred Options: Land to North and South of Hill Wootton Road

This is high quality farm land and makes an important contribution to sustainability and security of food supply. It contributes to the principles of healthy, safe , inclusive and biodiverse and environmentally resilient. Building so close to the A46 will significantly increase noise pollution.

No

ID sylw: 95187

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lauren Giblen

I object to proposed building on land HELAA part A off Malthouse Lane.
This land provides habitats for deer, foxes, newts, bats and other various wildlife.
Malthouse Lane currently has various properties for sale which have been available and not sold for some months I believe the need is not there and property in this area is not affordable housing.
The sewage system is already struggling to cope with capacity.
Local rural schools are at full capacity.
Access across the lakes is problematic due to increase of vehicles and further traffic would cause significant disruption to the area.

Yes

ID sylw: 95188

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: The Hayes Management Company

We are writing as Directors of The Hayes Management Company on behalf of property owners at The Hayes, Leek Wootton, CV357QU. We object to the proposed inclusion of several sites in Leek Wootton within the South Warwickshire Development Plan as listed above. The proposed development would have severe and lasting impacts on the village’s character, infrastructure, and environment. We urge you to reconsider these plans, withdraw the above-mentioned sites and prioritize the protection of Leek Wootton’s unique identity and natural assets.

Yes

ID sylw: 95207

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Simple Planning Solutions Ltd

Langley Farm, owned by Stephen Proctor, is a 11.51-hectare brownfield site northwest of Stratford-upon-Avon. It is designated HELAA site 408 and is considered for SG18 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan, despite being in the Green Belt. A masterplan proposes mixed commercial and residential development. This includes doubling commercial space, providing parking, building 199 houses, strategic landscaping, site access, and open space with sustainable drainage. Existing trees are retained, and non-native conifers will be removed to enhance biodiversity.