No

ID sylw: 98608

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Butler

Objections to site 600
Access entry too narrow for vehicles, let alone 999/refuse appliances.
No nearby bus route
Tiny train station/platform/only 1 train per hour.
Earlswood lakes causeway unable to cope with additional traffic, single lane.
Impact on wildlife/trees.
Drainage issues on site
Area too small to cope with increased population
Area green belt
Intrusion/privacy aspect due to close proximity of existing properties
Excessive distance to all schools/shops
Impact on Earlswood lakes due to too close a proximity
Access route from surrounding area is mainly single lane roads
Loss of conservation
Sewerage unable to cope
Unsuitable land
Landscape sensitivity

Yes

ID sylw: 98638

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nicola Hambridge

Reference 603 Land near Black Spinney. I object to any development on this site as it is Green Belt land on the edge of the village of Leek Wootton and is adjacent to ancient woodland. How could we even consider this as an option? This village will not be a village if we push out the boundary, especially combined with the suggested "strategic growth location" to the south of Kenilworth. Isn't it the role of the council and the role of green belt to ensure towns and villages don't encroach on one another?

Yes

ID sylw: 98668

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nicola Hambridge

Reference 2: The Warwickshire Golf Club land. I object to any development on this land. It is Green Belt land on the edge of the village. I think it may also be on the edge of or in a conservation area. This is a prominent site on a hill and would fundamentally alter the conservation area. There has recently been development on adjacent land within the Warwickshire with 5 houses crammed in to a small parcel of land.

Yes

ID sylw: 98675

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates

Asiant : Mr Will Whitelock

Please refer to the accompanying extract from the Green Belt Review Stage 1 - with the site 445 marked up.

Yes

ID sylw: 98676

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Romy Bott

SITE 600
Site access between 87 and 91 Malthouse Lane too narrow for traffic/emergency/refuse vehicles/no space for a pathway to walk off access road
Green belt area
Excessive distance to schools, shops, amenities
Train station/1 train per hour/bus service inadequate
Earlswood lakes causeway unsustainable to increase in traffic
Surrounding roads all too narrow/single laned for increase in traffic
Impact on wildlife/trees
Loss of conservation area
Privacy loss
Drainage issues on site
Area too small to cope with population increase
Unsuitable land
Excessive destruction of trees/hedgerows/wildlife
Pollution to waterways/earlswood lakes
Additional noise disturbance
Too small an area
Flood risks

Yes

ID sylw: 98678

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kate Featherstone

Current building at Meon Vale causes gridlock on Campden rd.
no funding identified for raillink.
Need new secondary school other side of river to reduce traffic in town
Need relief rd m40 side of Stratford

Yes

ID sylw: 98679

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nicola Hambridge

Ref 116 land to the north and south of Hill Wootton Road. I object to any development on this land as it is Green Belt on the edge of the village. Green belt is there to protect the expansion and encroachment of villages and towns. This is a huge site and would more than double the size of the village. Are you trying to just merge Warwick and Leek Wootton? Green Belt is there for a reason. We should be protecting it not building on it.

Yes

ID sylw: 98713

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Makestone Strategic Land - Hampton Lucy

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

We raise into question the utility and methodology of a number of the HELAA results, as outlined.

Yes

ID sylw: 98717

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jenny Byerley

Site 172 Land East of Wellesbourne rd Barford CV358AQ
Not suitable for development-located adjacent to quarry site-maximum density for noise and traffic according to official hydrology/air quality reports submitted from quarry technical investigations-will not meet minimum distance requirements from quarry-high value agricultural land-not brownfield site-detrimental visual impact on approach to the village-Will alter land drainage to river and water table causing localised flooding and flooding further afield-already floods without heavy rainfall-Detrimental to wildlife/biodiversity-No local need for housing in this area as shown by most recent local housing needs survey - needs for the next 25 yrs have already been met.

Yes

ID sylw: 98734

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Makestone Strategic Land - Ashow

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

This is a Site that should clearly be allocated as part of the draft plan for circa 10 homes (subject to masterplanning) recognising that Sites such as this will be required to secure a deliverable supply of sites for housing for the first 5 years of the plan period. The Site constitutes grey belt, which should be considered following previously developed land, under the hierarchy established in NPPF148.

We raise into question the utility and methodology of a number of the HELAA results, as outlined.

Yes

ID sylw: 98770

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emily Sumerling

REFID16 Raising an objection:
The developments proposed in and around Ardens Grafton and Temple Grafton will have an irreparable impact on the rural village communities.
The sites are proposing to double the size of Ardens Grafton, a village with no local amenities including very limited public transport.
School in TG is already at capacity.
No local secondary school within 2km walking distance.
Roads are narrow, cannot cope with additional traffic.
A46 is already at capacity.
Houses are not on gas mains so new ones will require heat pumps.
Regular power cuts.
Many houses rely on septic tanks for sewage waste.

Other

ID sylw: 98789

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Old Milverton and Blackdown Parish Council

HELAA metrics indicate that SG06 should not be allocated for development. Much of the area was discounted at Stage A, leaving just two parcels in Stage B:
SG06 (west) scored 52 out of 82 (max), putting it well into the top half of ‘least suitable’ for development.
SG06 (east) scored 69 putting it in the top quarter.
SG06 is quality agricultural land. The development density between Coventry and North Leamington presented by SG01, 02, 03, 04, 06 risks joining these two historic settlements using Kenilworth as a bridge. This is precisely what the West Midlands Green Belt seeks to prevent.

Yes

ID sylw: 98800

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hayward Developments Ltd

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

The identification of Site 40, Land off Edgehill View, Kineton Road, Gaydon, is strongly supported. The site is highly sustainable and well connected, entirely suitable to meet future development needs.

Some of the scoring in the HELAA is inaccurate and if properly assessed the HELAA score will lower, confirming the suitability of the site to meet future development needs. We have supplied further documentation on the HELAA scoring.

Additional information is provided in a response to the Call for Sites 3, which addresses concerns raised by the recent planning decision, and provides a new indicative layout.

Yes

ID sylw: 98810

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Deeley Properties

Asiant : Delta Planning

Site Ref ID: 711

Land at Banbury Road, Gaydon (Site ID 711) was considered and assessed through both Part A and Part B of the HELAA. The constraint score afforded to it was 34.00 and therefore the site remains in consideration for the SWLP and forms part of the proposed Strategic Growth Location SG13.

Deeley therefore broadly supports the findings of the HELAA.

Yes

ID sylw: 98820

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Burton Green Parish Council

By over-focussing on Green Belt, where infrastructure is lacking and expensive to provide, Option 4 does not make sufficient provision for housing growth in and around Royal Leamington Spa, the main town in the district and where a significant proportion of key services and facilities, including employment opportunities, are located. It therefore does not seek to fully optimise the potential to promote sustainable travel patterns through a spatial synergy between access to service and facilities, jobs and housing.

Yes

ID sylw: 98856

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Roy Meacham

Site 600, Land off Malthouse Lane, please find attached document listing my objection to the development of this land and supporting document

Yes

ID sylw: 98871

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alice Free

SG17 and specifically Fell Mill sites (148 & 747) do not meet the SWLP principles and objectives, its withing the 3km buffer zone from CNL, has high flood and water run off risk (flood zones 2 & 3), is in open productive farm land, its outside Shipston town boundary, has sections within Area of Restraint, wholly within National Character Area 96 (Dunsmore and Feldon), traffic would use single track bridge with no pedestrian or cycle safety, has significant rights of way including Shakespeare Way running through it. SG17 ranks 20th out of 24 Strategic growth location making it totally inappropriate.

Yes

ID sylw: 98873

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Stringer

Site REFID 620- This site is known to flood. Potential access route has suffered multiple car accidents recently. The capacity at the village school is full and is already underperforming. The local high school is at capacity having to turn away students who live locally. Plots within the local Alcester employment area were for sale over 5 years and will take another 5 years to become economically productive. Appointments for the medical centre are difficult to access. The site is within Green Belt and other local potential sites are not. Development here would cause most disruption to traffic and environment.

Yes

ID sylw: 98876

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline Norton

Ref 749 Part of Elliotts Farm. Call for Site.
I object to the above.
Destroying agricultural land and hedge rows plus mature oaks.
Extreme danger when crossing the A429 and turning west when travelling south on the A429
This risk to reach limited facilities in Barford village.
Water table rising each year, monitored by a well and 2 pumps operating in both cellars for increasing periods, rising electrical costs and pump maintenance.
Pollution from increasing numbers of HGV traffic traffic especially particulates with unknown damage to health.
Warwick and Stratford hospitals overloaded, illustrated by longer appointments for blood tests.

Yes

ID sylw: 98887

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

*Our clients' land (Site Refs: 514 and 622) abuts the existing settlement boundary and would be seen as a natural extension of Kingswood. The existing watercourse and Grand Union Canal would provide a well-defined and natural limit to the physical extent of potential development. The land is within a highly sustainable location.
*Site Ref 622 has unreasonably been ‘sifted out’ in the HELAA Part A because of flood risk as it would be developed alongside adjoining property.
*Our clients are willing and prepared to work alongside other landowners of adjoining land through appropriate collaboration arrangements.

Yes

ID sylw: 98894

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Meacham

I am strongly opposed to the site being proposed as a preferred location for development for the South
Warwickshire Local Plan.
The HELAA Part A and B assessments for this site should to be reviewed.
My concern is that development in this location would conflict with planning policies made in the Tanworth in
Arden Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP), 12th December 2022, 2021 – 2031.
The site should not be in the Local Plan. My reasons are below.
HELAA Part A assessment:
Ownership:
• The owner of the Land, does not own sufficient land to provide a safe entry and exit to and from the
site.
Viability and Deliverability:
• Access is very restricted and there is no other alternative access, the ranking should be Red and not be included in Part B assessment.

• The site is located on land at the rear of properties on Malthouse Lane and The Maltings, down to the
boundary with Terrys Pool. Introducing a housing development down the slope into the area separating the lakes from distant existing development in this protected view would be detrimental to the sense of tranquillity characterising the area and the lakes.
• The proposed site, is in conflict with Tanworth in Arden NDP Policy H3.
• Development of the site conflicts with Policy NE1 of the NDP
Traffic Issues
• Additional traffic volumes will be generated putting further pressure on infrastructure, for example
Malthouse Lane is not gritted in Winter
• Access to Malthouse Lane is via a singletrack road across the causeway via Earlswood Lakes, not
suitable for increased volumes of traffic (there are regularly altercations and issues on the causeway)
• Small lane is a narrow road with passing places
• Springbrook Lane is a country lane that cannot sustain increased volumes of traffic
• Development would be out of character with Malthouse Lane (a ribbon development)
• The area is used for recreation, (i.e. walkers, joggers, cyclists, fishermen, horse riding), all use
Malthouse Lane. More traffic due to further development would put the participants in danger.
Erosion of the Natural Environment
• Earlswood is a Linear development consists of tightly packed houses arranged in a series of narrow
and deep plots lying perpendicular in coherent lines running parallel to the roadside. The
development of this land would be out of character with the rest of the area
• The proposed site sits in an area designated as green belt
• The Green belt is important to the local community of being in or near open countryside
Waste Disposal Capacity
• There are already problems with waste water disposal capacity. The system is overloaded to the point
that Sewage tankers regularly have to draw out sewage from the Severn Trent treatment station. The
system is overloaded and local residents complain about the build-up of noxious smells.
Transport Links
• Public Transport links are poor in Earlswood, this development would encourage further use of
Private Motor vehicles, thus putting addition pressure on the inadequate roads that serve the area.
• There is very poor bus service (once or twice a day)
• Train Service (1 train per hour) connects Earlswood to either Stratford or Birmingham. No sign of that
increasing.

Yes

ID sylw: 98924

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Douglas Gordon

810 Land south of Allimore Lane.
Part of green belt
No vehicle access from Allimore Lane which is not wide enough for 2 way traffic. (Old railway bridge)
Too many TPOs to take account of.

445 South of Allimore Lane.
As above

411 Land off Allimore lane.
As above

811 South of Allimore Lane
As above

Yes

ID sylw: 98930

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Robert Hadley

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

We raise into question the utility and methodology of a number of the HELAA results, as outlined.

Yes

ID sylw: 98940

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)

In area SG18, West of Stratford upon Avon some areas of strategic development could be brought forward, some parts are already developed. However thought must be given to limiting development to follow specific elevation contours at the foot of the hills surrounding the town to preserve connection to the hills. Developed areas should not be cut off from pedestrian and cycle access to the rest of the town.
Development should be phased across the period of the local plan and community infrastructure should occur in parallel with development including schools, doctors and dentists, roads, other transport connection, comunity halls, shops

Yes

ID sylw: 98948

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: AC Lloyd - Sites 152, 156 & 157

Asiant : Delta Planning

Site 152: Land north of Mallory Gardens, Bishops Tachbrook has capacity for approximately 145 homes.
The site is adjacent to two other call for sites submissions made by AC Lloyd. The Masterplan and Vision Document
included in the call for sites submission is reattached for ease and demonstrates how these sites could be brought forward together either as a group or as part of the wider SG10 growth opportunity. AC Lloyd broadly supports the findings of the HELAA B results and supports the conclusion in that the site remains in consideration for residential use in the SWLP.
See full response.

Other

ID sylw: 98950

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: MPTL

Asiant : Harris Lamb

We have concerns with the HELAA assessment of sites ID99 - Kingswood Business Park and ID:100 - Stoneleigh Park

Yes

ID sylw: 98953

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: AC Lloyd - Sites 152, 156 & 157

Asiant : Delta Planning

Site 156: Land west of Mallory Gardens, Bishops Tachbrook has capacity for approximately 60 homes.
The site is adjacent to two other call for sites submissions made by AC Lloyd. The Masterplan and Vision Document
included in the call for sites submission is reattached for ease and demonstrates how these sites could be brought forward together either as a group or as part of the wider SG10 growth opportunity. AC Lloyd broadly supports the findings of the HELAA B results and supports the conclusion in that the site remains in consideration for residential use in the SWLP.
See full response.

Yes

ID sylw: 98960

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: AC Lloyd - Sites 152, 156 & 157

Asiant : Delta Planning

Site 157: Land situated to the west of Bishops Tachbrook has capacity for approximately 350 homes.
The site is adjacent to two call for sites submissions made by AC Lloyd. The Masterplan and Vision Document
included in the call for sites submission is reattached for ease and demonstrates how these sites could be brought forward together either as a group or as part of the wider SG10 growth opportunity. AC Lloyd broadly supports the findings of the HELAA B results and supports the conclusion in that the site remains in consideration for residential use in the SWLP.
See full response.

No

ID sylw: 98970

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah-Jane Slack

ID 715
I object to the proposed housing development due to its significant impact on local infrastructure and the Green Belt. The rural road network, already under strain, cannot support increased traffic, risking safety and exacerbating congestion, particularly in Hampton-on-the-Hill. Any attempt to widen roads would disrupt the village’s character and environment. Additionally, this development conflicts with Green Belt policies, as it threatens the area’s openness and sets a dangerous precedent for further encroachment. Local services are already at capacity, and further development would overwhelm them. I urge the planning department to reject this application based on these concerns.

Yes

ID sylw: 98976

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cromwell Developments Limited

The site known as 'Land West of Radford Semele' (Site Reference 700) is subject to Policy RS12 of the Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan (RSNP). Policy RS12 was adopted to ensure that Radford Semele remains a distinct and separate settlement to Royal Leamington Spa, Sydenham and Whitnash. As such, we are of the opinion that the site is inappropriate as a new settlement location. Given its strategic location to the south of Radford Semele, we believe Valley Farm would be a more sustainable settlement location.