No

ID sylw: 86015

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Pashley

The proposed location covers green belt land, so I consider this location inappropriate for development.

Yes

ID sylw: 86153

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andy Smith

I support the various efforts to attract battery gigafactory investment to the area, but certainty should be provided to those aviation businesses still on site. Perhaps a strong commitment to aviation at Wellesbourne in perpetuity would give those businesses an alternative?

Yes

ID sylw: 86193

Derbyniwyd: 15/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Professor Paul Bywaters

.

Yes

ID sylw: 86228

Derbyniwyd: 16/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alice Hobson

If housing replaces the airport then I am strongly in favour as this is a more economical use of this land

Yes

ID sylw: 86262

Derbyniwyd: 18/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Ruth Buckley

We agree subject to this being used for South Warwickshire requirements and not Coventry.

Yes

ID sylw: 86291

Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Timothy Muggeridge

This would be a great use of a brownfield site in greenbelt land

Yes

ID sylw: 86550

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Reduces travel time and pollution by keeping development to the borders of already developed areas.

Yes

ID sylw: 86596

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Darrell Muffitt

Suggested development appears to be an extension of similar existing use.

Yes

ID sylw: 86644

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Swan

Close to transport links and good local infrastructure. Less impact on open countryside than some other options.

Yes

ID sylw: 86724

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Claire Whitehouse

If current land is unused, it’s more preferable to build there than on green belt land. Good access routes.

Yes

ID sylw: 86808

Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr GERALD KELLY

Perfect location for additional housing near to Coventry and businesses/employment.

No

ID sylw: 86996

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

What this would be designated for is unclear.

Yes

ID sylw: 87031

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless

good for small businesses, offices, industry. Also some housing. Road links have been improved in /coventry over the last few years.

Yes

ID sylw: 87335

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

Only for employment Investment Zone purposes

Yes

ID sylw: 87492

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

ID sylw: 87684

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr justin kerridge

yes

Yes

ID sylw: 87978

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

This is an established commercial area so it would be makes sense.

Yes

ID sylw: 87979

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

This is an established commercial area.

Yes

ID sylw: 88062

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs vivien bryer

People employed in the new high tech hub surrounding the airport would be nearer their place of work reducing travel stress and environmental damage.

No

ID sylw: 88066

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jeanette Ray

This is green belt land.
Kenilworth doesn’t have the infrastructure to cope with more houses and people.
Roads are inadequate and won’t be able to accommodate increased traffic

Yes

ID sylw: 88131

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Parry

Support in view of its sustainable location.

Yes

ID sylw: 88163

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris

SG03 is either already in or directly adjacent to a highly populated area. The road infrastructure is already in place.

Yes

ID sylw: 88228

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Absolutely 100%. Regeneration of land (brownfield) in an area in need of. To market and bring new businesses and housing. Having lived in Warwickshire all my life it has disappointed me how the City of Coventry has declined over the years when it was once a vibrant hub. It is time to regenerate Coventry over the next 25 years and make it a place to go - socially, to live and to work.

Yes

ID sylw: 88616

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

Currently industrial areas, allows easy access to employment and national road system.

Yes

ID sylw: 88680

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Crispin Passmore

without reservation this is a huge employment opportunity to be developed. But it has to be done jointly with Coventry

Yes

ID sylw: 88686

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Gillian Browne

This land is not designated green belt land, it has good infrastructure e.g. motorway links and has good employment opportunities.

Yes

ID sylw: 89024

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sara Bird

Brownfield site so should be priority area

Yes

ID sylw: 89377

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

This land is in my opinion prime land for inclusion due to the ex-airport use, proximity to Coventry and that road network.

Other

ID sylw: 89448

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Brooks

It would be beter to rewild this airport site and give nature some sort of fighting chance, however it is pretty much environmentally dead so may be less harmful to build on than some other proposed sites

No

ID sylw: 89512

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

This is green belt land. Avoid building on it wherever possible.