Other

ID sylw: 94711

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

we have insufficient knowledge of this location from which to make an informed comment

No

ID sylw: 94848

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Barleggs

I do not believe the existing local infrastructure is sufficiently capable of supporting the needs of additional development in this area, nor should green belt land be designated for the purposes of building when plenty of existing properties and brownfield sites are available. Nor are there any existing public transport links to help mitigate the inevitable additional emissions arising from the new private vehicles that will be required.

Other

ID sylw: 94866

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bubbenhall Parish Council

The current exclusive focus on a gigafactory covering this whole site is extremely disappointing and lacking in imagination, particularly when the whole EV sector is in an uncertain position.
As an example, this is potentially a very useful airport for advanced air mobility (AAM) technology, which is developing rapidly around the world. Allocation of some of the site for AAM could create interest in such developments for both battery powered and hydrogen-powered aircraft.
AAM development would not need the whole airport and it would be good to see it considered.

Yes

ID sylw: 95329

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Patricia Holliday

This area is already a commercial site and has the infrastructure to cope with further development.

Yes

ID sylw: 95412

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Close to industrial area and Coventry.

No

ID sylw: 95421

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs R Douce

The green belt is required to prevent urban sprawl and loss of character.

Yes

ID sylw: 95505

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dave Maxted

Better than building on designated green belt areas

Yes

ID sylw: 95986

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon

Although technically green belt it has significant industrial/commercial development already. Employment contribution for housing development in South and East Coventry would be welcome. Excellent connectivity to A45/A46/M40/M1/M69/M6.

Yes

ID sylw: 96279

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

Near employment at airport

Other

ID sylw: 96742

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

Yes

ID sylw: 96957

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

No

ID sylw: 96994

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Roger Horsfall

Retention of airport green belt status was to protect Baginton & Bubbenhall from large scale development yet outline permissions were granted for what was to be the UKs largest gigafactory. This emerging plan proposes that the airport site be retained specifically for a gigafactory of scale. Despite various project name changes and press releases of imminent deals there is no guaranteed occupier and amendments and variations already propose significant reduction in gigafactory size. The very special circumstance for building on this greenbelt site no longer exist and the site should not be considered for any other purpose.

Other

ID sylw: 97518

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Jill Andrews

SG01 SG02 And SG03 should combine to be a new settlement as there is potential for jobs and link to motorway and train stations, but need the additional infrastructure to go with this eg schools, doctors etc. Use of other 'infill' areas is just fudging the issue and detrimental to roads and facilities already at breaking point and beyond capacity - eg poor Clopton Bridge.

No

ID sylw: 97627

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Melanie Elkington

This area is in Green Belt and so should be protected

Yes

ID sylw: 97744

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

No

ID sylw: 98253

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Teed

Green belt land. Trees, hedgerows and farmland destroyed.

No

ID sylw: 98256

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Elkington

No. In particular plots 140 and 183 should not be included:
-The land is Green Belt and retains all the historical and biodiversity characteristics of the “Forest of Arden Special Landscape Area”.
-The area north of Rouncil Lane is on top of the hill and clearly visible from Kenilworth Castle. Housing would destroy the view from, and significantly impact the setting of, the Castle.
-The land once formed part of the Castle deer park. Housing would destroy the remaining earthworks and any other historical remains.
-The public right of way that connects southwest Kenilworth to the countryside would largely disappear.

Yes

ID sylw: 98280

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Daine Davis

Area is currently a disused airfield surrounded by industry and is af very little value as green belt. If there was ever a case to re-designate green belt, this is probably it. There are excellent existing road links and employment opportunities, although other infrastructure improvements would be needed (schools, doctors, etc

Yes

ID sylw: 98324

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Garry Rollason

The site has very good transport links. Is near to centres of population giving access to a workforce. Area is already an established commercial area. Relatively removed from residential areas.

No

ID sylw: 98471

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katie Walker

There has been enough development around the airport in recent years. Why threaten the continued use as an airport?

Yes

ID sylw: 98729

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 98737

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 99127

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Phelps

brownfield site

No

ID sylw: 99177

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Rawlings

There should not be any development on the Green Belt.

Yes

ID sylw: 99214

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Coventry City Council and Coventry Airport Ltd

Asiant : Mr Robert Barnes

Coventry City Council and Coventry Airport Ltd as owners and operators of the Airport support the inclusion within the Plan of location SG03 as a place to accommodate growth. This should be understood in the context of further comments made in relation to Draft Policy Direction 7 (indicating that it should be taken out of the Green Belt) and Draft Policy Directions 14 and 16 (considering the nature of any allocation there).

Yes

ID sylw: 99252

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Hasnaoui

Despite being designated greenbelt this is a disused airfield close to road, employment and infrastructure links making it an obvious potential development area.

Yes

ID sylw: 99368

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alison Hawkes

Yes as it has excellent transport links via road, rail and potentially air.

No

ID sylw: 99401

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

See previous comments

Yes

ID sylw: 99405

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Tibbles

Appears to be well serviced by existing Road Network, Transportation hubs, Healthcare facilities and Education establishments

Yes

ID sylw: 99505

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nicholas Sears

area heavily built up and plentiful road network