Yes

ID sylw: 98741

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 98824

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bryer Estates Ltd

Asiant : Mr Will Whitelock

This submission is made on behalf of Bryer Estates Ltd, in relation to their interests at land at Park Farm, Warwick (Site Ref. 57).
It is considered that Park Farm, Warwick is deliverable, available and suitable to deliver a high-quality mixed-use development that will significantly assist in meeting South Warwickshire’s identified housing and employment needs as well as any unmet needs arising from Coventry and from Greater Birmingham and the Black Country.

No

ID sylw: 98827

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catherine Horsfall

The local road network is already overloaded and struggles to cope when there is an accident or issue on the M40. Barford village is used as a rat run around the problems and issues on the main road.
Locating an industrial area here will increase pressure on the local road network even further making lorries and large wagons route through village roads where cars are routinely parked down one side of the road, making it hard to pass.
I strongly challenge the costings that the developer has put forward for the rebuild of the road junction.

No

ID sylw: 99033

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sally Ashley

Objection based on placing additional pressures on existing infrastructure which already cannot cope, increased traffic, noise and pollution, destruction and loss of ecology in an area which has already lost much due to major house building at The Asps, Europa Way and Gallows Hill, destruction of rural views and picturesque approach into Warwick town

Yes

ID sylw: 99124

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Jones

Development of an area not containing green belt land.
Size of development opportunity.

No

ID sylw: 99149

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Val Sassall

Understand how the Red House Farm proposal is attractive with funding of M40 junction proposals but coming south of the M40 with part of the site impinges on critical environments close to BARFORD.
The noise and additional traffic to Europa Way will cause worse traffic delays at this key clogged up point already.

No

ID sylw: 99192

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Rawlings

There will be not enough access to GP surgeries.
There will not be enough access to hospitals.
There will not be enough school places. The local schools are already at capacity and have no space for development.
The increase in traffic will create more wear and tear on the roads, cause longer delays getting into Leamington and put more strain on parking facilities in Leamington.

Yes

ID sylw: 99290

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Phelps

n/a

No

ID sylw: 99408

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

See previous comments

Yes

ID sylw: 99421

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Tibbles

Appears to be well serviced by existing Road Network, Transportation hubs, Healthcare facilities and Education establishments

Yes

ID sylw: 99676

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Sabrina Hasnaoui

Support of development on non green belt land. Access to M40 leading. Moderate sized site.

Yes

ID sylw: 99776

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

No

ID sylw: 99780

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Cooper

Local roads already far too busy to accommodate further development

Yes

ID sylw: 100030

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Evan Bailey

SG09 is surrounded by big roads so may as well be used for businesses.

Yes

ID sylw: 100036

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Wall

Development should prioritise brownfield sites over Green Belt land. Urban and previously developed areas already have infrastructure in place, reducing pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare. These sites are closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. Using brownfield land prevents environmental damage, protects biodiversity, and preserves historic landscapes. It also helps maintain community identity by preventing urban sprawl. Additionally, brownfield areas are often better suited for flood mitigation. By focusing on these locations, new housing can be delivered responsibly without harming the countryside or overburdening local services.

Yes

ID sylw: 100059

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil Brooker

If more houses are needed this Location is more suitable for development than others in the district.

Yes

ID sylw: 100278

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Deborah Carter

New development should focus on previously developed sites, not destroy protected Green Belt land. Urban and repurposed areas already have infrastructure in place, preventing additional strain on roads, schools, and healthcare. These locations are also closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. Using non-Green Belt land prevents irreversible environmental harm, safeguards biodiversity, and preserves important landscapes. It also protects communities from urban sprawl and helps to prevent flooding. By focusing on these sites, new housing can be delivered in a responsible way—without sacrificing the countryside or placing unbearable pressure on already stretched local services.

Yes

ID sylw: 100371

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Aimee Carter

New housing should be developed on land that has already been built on, not on protected Green Belt land. Urban areas and brownfield sites already have the infrastructure to support new developments, reducing the pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare.
Building in non-Green Belt areas also means:
• Less environmental damage and better protection for wildlife.
• More sustainable transport options, reducing long commutes and carbon emissions.
• Preventing towns and villages from merging and losing their unique identities.
• Reducing flood risks caused by overdevelopment.
Destroying the Green Belt isn’t the answer—there are much better options available.

No

ID sylw: 100585

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Campaign to Protect Rural England - Warwickshire

SG09 is land south of Europa Way. It is rural land between the Banbury Road (A425) and the M40. It is beyond the limit of housing development in the Harbury Lane/Europa Way spread, and is farmed land of good quality. It appears to be an option for employment land. Red House Farm would effectively disappear.
The WMSESS report on regional employment land potential has selected this location, though without any justification. It would not be easy for workers to reach and would depend on car access. As a location for B8 warehousing it would be wasteful of land.

Yes

ID sylw: 100588

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South

Support housing development on non-green belt land.

Yes

ID sylw: 100589

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South

Support housing development on non-green belt land.

Other

ID sylw: 101241

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough Commercial

Asiant : Delta Planning

Richborough Commercial notes that SG09 requires a new motorway junction to release the site for employment. As such, if deliverable (and that in itself has to be questioned), this will clearly be a growth option that is only deliverable in the latter stages of the plan period and would not be in a position to meet short- or medium-term needs.

No

ID sylw: 101313

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Charles Davies

This area is valuable agricultural land and its loss will irreparably harm the rural character of the area, creating urban sprawl. Building next to the motorway subjects residents to harmful noise and particulate pollution. The roads cannot support the extra traffic. Even now they are overloaded at peak times. Road widening and building will not alleviate this, since villages and towns (e.g. Barford (used as rat run) and into Warwick over bridge) are pinch-points. The development would harm the landscape and be to the detriment of residential amenity. Unnecessary, retrograde approach – urban development far sounder.

No

ID sylw: 101747

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Janet Neale

This area is already over populated and infrastructure cannot cope.
We cannot continue to grow areas that are already broken.

No

ID sylw: 101830

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Site SG09 – South of Europa Way would have major adverse impacts, including increased carbon footprint and waste, harm to listed buildings and registered parks, and loss of high-quality agricultural land. It contradicts the SWLP’s evidence-led approach by failing key sustainability criteria: it is open countryside, lacks public transport links, and relies on private cars. The site is not in an area of deprivation and does not align with national planning policy, failing NPPF para. 77 due to poor infrastructure and accessibility. While it provides housing/employment land, its development would not be sustainable or justified under the SWLP’s strategy.

Yes

ID sylw: 102185

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon

Non Green Belt, compliments existing employment areas. Well served by motorway connections.

No

ID sylw: 102390

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katie Davies

loss of valuable agricultural land, harm to rural character and residential amenity. Harmful noise and pollution to proposed residents. Roads incapable of supporting additional traffic - already overloaded. Villages, entry points to Warwick etc. cannot support this. Would encourage more rat runs through Barford.

Yes

ID sylw: 102571

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Andrews

Development on non-green belt land should be prioritised over development on green belt. Total housing needs can be met without developing on green belt so morally not right to remove green belt without exceptional cause.
These areas are better supported with existing infrastructure and transport network without requiring major investment on more remote, less connected areas.
The opportunity in terms of yield is higher in these areas so there is a duty to fulfil the housing needs in the most responsible way considering this and the green belt obligations.

Yes

ID sylw: 102703

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Liz Churchill

I prefer to see all non Green-belt sites being used.

Other

ID sylw: 102750

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Severn Trent Water

This development will likely require treatment at Warwick - Longbridge (STW) Treatment Works, this Wastewater Treatment Works has medium capacity and high environmental constraints. Due to the size of the development, it is recommended that network upgrades will be required, alongside hydraulic modelling and engagement with STW. Overall this development site is considered a medium/high risk location, there is some capacity however in order to accommodate growth, infrastructure upgrades will be required and we would need to work closely to understand build timelines, in order to plan accordingly.