Yes

ID sylw: 105553

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Hargie

SG09/SG10/SG11 because of the immediate connection to the M40 and as a logical continuation of the development of the land south of Leamington Spa and supported by the infrastructure already in place.

Yes

ID sylw: 105665

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Heynes

If substantial growth is to occur in Stratford, it should occur on the northern side due to better access to Stratford Parkway station, the strategic highway network, and existing employment. A relief road must be positioned on the southern side, linking the A34 with the A46, but proposals around the eastern side are not feasible. Additionally, growth should focus on new settlements near public transport interchanges, including railway stations and access to Birmingham Airport. Options around X1, X2, SG09, 10, 11, G1, SG13, 14, and B1 appear to be the most sensible.

No

ID sylw: 105680

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bernard Keavy

SG09 South of Europa Way - This will cause significant harm to the character of the landscape and will cause more traffic congestion to Warwick & Leamington Spa, also increasing the M40 urbanisation impact on the area.

No

ID sylw: 105975

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Alison Johnston

There is scant woodland which you can explore and enjoy in south Warwickshire. This is a lifeline for people living in south Leamington and Wellesbourne. Without this the quality of life in this area will deteriorate.

The only other options for walks are places like Charlecote park or Compton Verny, which both require payment, or private land which were not able to enjoy.

There are plenty of other sites in this area which can be developed without destroyed a cherished area.

While the plans are not to build on Oakley Wood, building right up to it will affect local wildlife and biodiversity, leading to more litter, more danger from traffic, light and air pollution.

This is should be an absolute no and surprised it was ever proposed

No

ID sylw: 106276

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Darnell

South of Europe Way – SG09 – OBJECT:
Significant harm to the character of the landscape and increasing traffic congestion to Warwick and Leamington Spa plus the M40. This area is heavily developed with planned houses already in the pipeline. The current road network in this area is inadequate with lengthy traffic jams during peak hours. The Leamington Spa shopping center is within this area. There are frequent reports on social media about the shopping center’s car park being gridlocked and it taking up to one hour to leave it. Any additional strategic growth in this area will further urbanise the area.

No

ID sylw: 106398

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Elliot Cooke

I strongly object to the proposed development sites X1, SG09, SG10, SG15, SG16, and the additional fields to the east and west of Sherbourne due to their adverse impact on infrastructure, environmental sustainability, village character, and traffic congestion. These proposals contradict the South Warwickshire Local Plan’s vision for sustainable, well-connected, and environmentally responsible development.

Yes

ID sylw: 106427

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Benjamin Lewitt

Objection2 Development on SG05The proposed development of SG05 would have severe negative impacts on local area.This land is designated as GreenBelt, intended2protect natural landscapes, prevent urban sprawl,&maintain clear separation between Lillington&Cubbington. Additionally,SG05 has poor access & an uneven terrain that is prone2significant flooding.
In contrast, SG09, SG10, SG11 are far more suitable alternatives. Located within 5miles of Cubbington, these sites lie outside the Green Belt, have better access to road networks,&do not suffer from flooding issues.
Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances, supported by clear&compelling evidence.There is no justification for changing these boundaries 2allow development onSG05.

No

ID sylw: 106548

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rachel Shuck

I object to the growth area SG19 due to the already stretched local schools, roads, traffic management issues and lack of planning.
Additionally the area is used extensively by local dog walkers and is an invaluable area of nature that should be protected.

No

ID sylw: 106729

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sue Beard

If some houses have to be built the designated sites X1, SG09 and SG10 would seem to be a much better proposition, it is not green belt and has better infrastructure, main roads and proximity to the M40.

Other

ID sylw: 106916

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Historic England

POTENTIAL OBJECTION: development of northern triangular-shaped parcel would harm the significance and setting of Warwick Castle RPG (GI), Warwick CA & Spiers Lodge LB (GII*), situated within the Park.

CONCERNS: development of parcel bounded by Warwick bypass (A452), Banbury Road (A452) & M40 also has the potential to cause harm to the above heritage assets.

Recommend: HIA prior to allocation. However, we would prefer the northern parcel not to be carried forward into the Reg 19 Plan.

Other

ID sylw: 107045

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: National Gas Transmission

Asiant : Avison Young

We have identified one or more proposed development sites as being crossed or in close proximity to National Gas Transmission assets.

Details of the sites affecting National Gas Transmission assets are provided below.

Gas Transmission Pipeline, route: CHURCHOVER TO WORMINGTON

Without appropriate acknowledgement of the National Gas Transmission assets present within the site, these policies should not be considered effective as they cannot be delivered as proposed; unencumbered by the constraints posed by the presence of National Gas Transmission infrastructure.

We propose that future Local Plan policies in respect of the affected proposed allocations and new settlements include a policy strand that incorporates wording to
the following effect:

“The development will demonstrate a clear strategy for responding to the National Gas Transmission high-pressure gas pipelines present within the site which provides evidence on how the National Gas Transmission Design Guide and Principles have been applied at
the masterplanning stage and how the impact of the assets has been reduced through good design.”

It is requested that this wording is either incorporated into site specific policies for the ten affected sites, or included within the general policy text if site-specific policies are not
incorporated in later versions of the emerging South Warwickshire Local Plan.

No

ID sylw: 107420

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Moreton Morrell Parish Council

Significant harm to the character of the landscape and increasing traffic congestion to Warwick and Leamington Spa plus the M40, further urbanisation of the area, lack of access to GP and educational services.

No

ID sylw: 107471

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Newbold Pacey & Ashorne Parish Council

Significant harm to the character of the landscape and increasing traffic congestion to Warwick and Leamington Spa plus the M40. This area is heavily developed with planned houses already in the pipeline. The current road network in this area is inadequate with lengthy traffic jams during peak hours. The Leamington Spa shopping center is within this area. There are frequent reports on social media about the shopping center’s car park being gridlocked and it taking up to one hour to leave it. Any additional strategic growth in this area will further urbanise the area.

No

ID sylw: 108299

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Haydn Cooper

I write in response to the Local Plan consultation and specifically to comment on proposed settlement X1, X2 and growth areas SG09 and SG10.
The proposals are in the wrong place for a number of reasons:
1. X1 and SG09 and SG10 It would be the first major development south of the M40 - which has acted as a correct boundary for Warwick urban sprawl and new development. Over time Warwick/Leamington development has merged the towns together and marched eastward towards Bishops Tachbrook. The proposed settlement X2 plus employment growth would further expand development around Bishops Tachbrook. The councils should not want to see this development spread south of the M40 boundary.

2.The roads of Wasperton Lane and Hareway Lane are single carriageway rural roads and would have to be widened, completely changing the local character and removing dozens of mature / ancient trees in the process.

3.Traffic entering Barford would increase tremendously and overwhelm the village from Wasperton Lane and Hareway Lane.

4.There are no existing train stations nearby and existing public transport infrastructure is non-existent.

5.Should it go ahead, the undeveloped gap between X1 and Barford would inevitably be filled in over time leading to a new mass urban area. If we look at Warwick / Leamington we can see evidence of this happening before.

6.The land has several shallow valleys and is patch worked with woods and spinneys including ancient trees. Local wildlife traverses from copse to wood etc and this would not be possible with thousands of houses there instead.

7.These valleys already have flooding problems from surface water drainage which would worsen with tarmac and developed surfaces preventing percolation

8. Proposals also exist for development north of Wellesbourne, Warwick University Wellesbourne campus expansion and a quarry outside Barford. These together would change this gateway to the Cotswolds for ever and be over development of this area.

9.This area around Barford is rural and picturesque and the gateway to the Cotswolds. Mass development here would ruin that for ever.

In conclusion X1, SG09 and SG10 are proposed in the wrong places and should not be permitted or on the shortlist in the local plan.

No

ID sylw: 108518

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Whitnash Town Council

Further urban sprawl is unacceptable.