No

ID sylw: 102852

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ellen Gardiner

The demand for new employment sites is recognised, but the overwhelming development of Greenfield land in this area is considered to be inappropriate and unjustifiable. It is not sustainable to continue developing Greenfield sites in rural areas at the rate that has been occurring in recent times.

No

ID sylw: 103042

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Charlotte Scott

The proposed developments will lead to merging of our parishes which is at odds with protecting and enhancing our environmental assets a key objective 12 in SWLP assets. Bishops Tachbrook would virtually be subsumed and this appears to be at odds with SWLPs Strategic Objective 12 - protecting and enhancing our environment assets

Yes

ID sylw: 103071

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Appleton

Whilst the aim is for people to live close to where they work and for Active Travel to be a priority, it must be acknowledged that people often choose to reside and work in different places. Commuting is the norm and the SWLP must accommodate this. Settlement expansion and locations of new settlements must be supported by transport infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 103172

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Giles Harrison-Hall

The proposed site is on good agricultural land. There is no sensible public transport connecting that area with urban centres. The area and proposed population is large enough to be a town. Any new development of such a size ought to be close enough to the railway either to use an existing station, or to justify a new station. To build away from stations will encourage the use of cars which ought to be considered as part of the change in carbon footprint.

Yes

ID sylw: 103184

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Pike

An area such as this , not green belt designated and close to major road infrastructure seems more appropriate.

No

ID sylw: 103206

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Giles Harrison-Hall

To develop this area would effectively be an enlargement of Leamington Spa to include Bishop’s Tachbrook. Given the current developments near Europa Way, it is likely that a significant proportion of inhabitants would have to drive a significant distance for employment which would prevent the development being sustainable in carbon zero terms.

Yes

ID sylw: 103267

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Keith Allan

If building of new houses is to go ahead then building on non-Green belt land is more appropriate

Yes

ID sylw: 103302

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Keith Allan

If the construction of new houses is to proceed, it is more appropriate to construct on non-Green Belt land.

Yes

ID sylw: 103475

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carol Jones

Support strategic growth locations on non-greenbelt land.

No

ID sylw: 103497

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sarah Shalgosky

This area is already hugely congested.

Yes

ID sylw: 103520

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Nicholas

Here there is more access to local amenities such as supermarkets, motorway, road and train routes.

No

ID sylw: 103573

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Scott

The proposed development will lead to merging of our parishes which is at odds with protecting and enhancing our environmental assets a key objective 12 in SWLP plan.

Yes

ID sylw: 103738

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steve Churchill

I believe that all new development should be made only on Non Green Belt or Brown Field sites.

No

ID sylw: 103985

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kay Haycock

Deliverability is impossible due to infrastructure deficits, with no clear plans to mitigate traffic congestion or environmental degradation.
Inconsistent with NPPF principles, particularly regarding environmental sustainability and preserving distinct settlement identities i.e., that of Bishop’s Tachbrook village.
Conclusion
SG09 should be reconsidered due to adverse environmental, heritage, and infrastructure impacts.

Yes

ID sylw: 103989

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Abigail Simkin

This would be a very good area to develop as the land is not being used and is not important recreational/public space land. There is good infrastructure and amenities.

Yes

ID sylw: 104073

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Waters

Near m40 and access to train travel. Existing employment in area

No

ID sylw: 104090

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Louis haycock

Deliverability is impossible due to infrastructure deficits, with no clear plans to mitigate traffic congestion or environmental degradation.
Inconsistent with NPPF principles, particularly regarding environmental sustainability and preserving distinct settlement identities i.e., that of Bishop’s Tachbrook village.
Conclusion
SG09 should be reconsidered due to adverse environmental, heritage, and infrastructure impacts.

No

ID sylw: 104106

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Louis haycock

Deliverability is impossible due to infrastructure deficits, with no clear plans to mitigate traffic congestion or environmental degradation.
Inconsistent with NPPF principles, particularly regarding environmental sustainability and preserving distinct settlement identities i.e., that of Bishop’s Tachbrook village.
Conclusion
SG09 should be reconsidered due to adverse environmental, heritage, and infrastructure impacts.

Yes

ID sylw: 104145

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jo Valentine Barker

Area has appropriate infrastructure

Yes

ID sylw: 104296

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Carl Bergstrom

good option

No

ID sylw: 104350

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Charlotte Moss

Banbury road already has tailbacks every morning up to the roundabout with Warwick bypass / europa way, this road would not be able to cope with the increased traffic from building on this site
Furthermore this is an area of great natural beauty and developing this area will be detrimental to the countryside, hedgerows and natural habitats here.
Barford and bishops tachbrook schools are already at capacity, where would any children go to school?

Yes

ID sylw: 104426

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Ward

I agree with the proposed strategic growth location SG09 because it directs development to non-greenbelt land, making use of existing infrastructure and reducing the need for new roads and utilities. This allows for necessary housing without harming rural landscapes, historic footpaths, or local heritage. Focusing growth in areas already equipped to support it is a more sustainable and sensible approach, ensuring that development happens where it fits best.

No

ID sylw: 104521

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Ailsa Chambers

The independent village characteristics of Bishops Tachbrook are under severe threat owing to the constant sprawl of development between the village and Leamington. It is not clear why this location has been selected over and above other options. The loss of prime agricultural land does not justify the proposal. We already experience traffic congestion as a result of previous developments and there are insufficient infrastructure plans to mitigate further population growth. The environmental loss of natural habitats from further development cannot be mitigated satisfactorily by any measure - too much has been lost already.

Other

ID sylw: 104546

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Dunning

YES ONLY IF the development is high density, linked with public transport and active travel infrastructure.

Do not build detached homes anywhere.
Painted bicycle gutters are NOT active travel infrastructure.
A bus is a bad public transport solution.

Yes

ID sylw: 104571

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kay Williams

This is not green belt land so it's okay.

Yes

ID sylw: 104619

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Dunning

Stop building sprawling car-dependent suburbia. You are killing people with these decisions. Cars kill people, stop making people have to get in their cars to get to places. Build high density walkable neighbourhoods with active travel infrastructure.

Paint is not cycling infrastructure.
Buses are bad public transport.
Don't build any detached houses.

Yes

ID sylw: 104651

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sally Newington

This would seem a good option, it’s close to the motorway with good road I fracture and most importantly it’s not destroying green belt

Yes

ID sylw: 104846

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Elizabeth Heath

This development does not take land out of greenbelt and therefore has a lower negative impact on biodiversity. It's also closer to existing infrastructure and services

Yes

ID sylw: 104930

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Charlotte Holme

This could be a suitable site for development given existing development in the area. As long as the infrastructure is put in place to cope with additional traffic, give people local services, schools, health services etc

No

ID sylw: 105226

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

South of Europe Way – SG09 – OBJECT: Significant harm to the character of the landscape and increasing traffic congestion to Warwick and Leamington Spa plus the M40, further urganisation of the area, lack of access to GP and educational services.