BASE HEADER
Strategic Growth Location SG14 Question
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89911
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacki Belchambers
Already being developed, there are job opportunities, road connectivity in place, less impacted on environment and preferable to green belt land development
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90004
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Fiona Macvie
The infrastructure of this area is relatively well placed to support new housing developments. As well as jobs in the local area existing road networks and potential rail network developments would cope better with an increase in population than the Stratford town infrastructure. Development here would result in less loss of greenbelt land and less urban sprawl.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90084
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson
Oakham Coppice LWS, River Avon LWS
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90140
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Maria Giblin
Would take pressure off Stratford. New settlement avoid urban sprawl.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90206
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Williams
This area already has good existing road connections, also would take pressure of the already overstretched Stratford upon Avon Town Centre & local roads that are already struggling in the A46 Birmingham road area .
Also minimise the impact on green belt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90227
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Giblin
New settlements can be driven by strategic opportunities rather than land availability. They would alleviate congestion pressure on Stratford and could meet all housing needs with minimal environmental impact, preserving greenbelt land. Additionally, new settlements help avoid urban sprawl, which strains existing infrastructure.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90386
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones
Having lived in this area for nearly 30 years, we have witnessed signifcant growth/expansion with jlr. Further development posible
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90429
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheetal Tailor
Reasons:
1. Good job opportunities
2. Good existing road connections
3. HS2 could offer links to other regions
4. Reduce congestion in Stratford upon Avon
5. Housing here likely to have least impact on environment and preserve greenbelt land
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90511
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jason Lupton
This location has connections to existing road infrastructure and nearby employment opportunities.
Potential rail links (Chiltern line and HS2) are within a short distance from the homes.
Congestion would be considered and allowed for during the early stages of development rather then retro-fitting into existing road networks.
Development here has the opportunity for extension and prevent urban sprawl in existing towns and protect important greenbelt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90543
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Gavin Simpson
The area has sufficient capacity to accept the additional inputs and can supply the new homes with employment opportunities.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90663
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Malcolm Fisk
I believe this location represents an appropriate use of brown and green belt land to develop a new settlement that can include all the necessary amenities needed without impacting on already overstretched towns like Stratford.
There are good links to existing roads available now, and future opportunity to utilise the nearby rail links , both affording access to local and commutable job opportunities
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90684
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Goodwin
There are excellent, high quality job opportunities particularly with JLR and Aston Martin on the doorstep along with excellent road connections including the M40, providing easy access is provided to local towns. This would support housing growth by strategic need and not just land availability. This site does not impact greenbelt land which should be preserved. It does not add to the urban sprawl and congestion of Stratford upon Avon.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90801
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Teresa Franczuk
More job opportunities near by.
Its closer to M40 better for commuting,
would take the traffic away from Stratford upon Avon
There areas would meet all building requirements, preserving our Green belt land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90848
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Emma Barber
As with SG13 I feel like this location is a strong choice to help reduce the congestion pressure on stratford and provide the infrastructure needed with the minimal amount of impact on our green spaces. There are already great existing road connections and job opportunities nearby.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90852
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr James Morris
The region boasts excellent job prospects and established road networks, with the possibility of a new Chiltern line railway station located just 2 miles away, potentially functioning as a parkway station. HS2 could offer rapid connections to major commuting hubs. New developments can be guided by strategic opportunities rather than land availability, reducing congestion on Stratford. These areas can fulfil all housing requirements with minimal environmental impact, safeguarding greenbelt land, and preventing urban sprawl, which burdens existing infrastructure.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90876
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Wadzanayi Mudzviti
Development of job opportunities.
New settlement will avoid urban which strains existing infrastructure.
Good existing road connections
Potential for new chiltern line railway station -only 2 miles from homes & could provide parkway station
HS2 could offer quick links to key commuting areas
New settlements can be driven by strategic opportunities not land availability
Would take the congestion pressure off Stratford
These areas could meet all housing needs which least impact on the environment preserving greenbelt land
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90893
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Lawrence Mukumbira
The proposed development will provide houses to cover demand for the area. It will also provide new job opportunities and new settlements that will driven by strategic opportunities instead of land availability. This would remove congestion pressures from Stratford especially on the Birmingham road and pressure on existing infrastructure. The development will also provide opportunities for new schools, hospitals, shopping centers and towns. HS2 could offer faster links to key communities and newer railway stations to cater for the demand
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91017
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Julian Brown
Agree - Hopefully can attract new technology businesses to the area given the vicinity to JLR
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91120
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs liz jackson
outside greenbelt
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91296
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Stuart Taylor
I support the SG14 site as it provides better infrastructure and sustainability. These locations offer excellent job opportunities, strong road connections, and the potential for a new Chiltern Line railway station, enhancing connectivity. With HS2 providing fast links to key employment areas, these sites align with strategic growth needs rather than just land availability. Developing new settlements here would relieve congestion in Stratford, protect the Green Belt, and ensure housing needs are met with minimal environmental impact. By preventing urban sprawl and avoiding strain on existing infrastructure, these sites represent a smarter, more sustainable approach to regional development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91354
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Norman Thomas
This proposal along the B4451 is unneccessary as there is already an excess of industrial development land on the JLR site (SG13).
The current landscape along the B4451 is open fields on one side and wooded environment on the other which would not benefit from being concreted over - this is in conflict with some of the "5 overarching principles" of the plan -
"a well designed and beautiful S.Warks" - industrial units - no.
"bio diverse and environmentally resilient S.Warks - industrial units - no.
Any development along the B4451 would render this a more dangerous road.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91357
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Godefroy
good employment options
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91423
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr
The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: Oakham Coppice LWS, River Avon LWS
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91461
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Donna Goodwin
With excellent, high-quality jobs on the doorstep with JLR and Aston Martin, this is a highly desirable growth location. Furthermore, with superb existing road connections including the M40, there is easy access to local towns including Banbury, Warwick and Leamington. This would support housing growth by strategic need and not just land availability. This site does not impact greenbelt land which should always be preserved. It does not add to the urban sprawl and congestion of Stratford upon Avon.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91755
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Nicholas Trigg
This development area is unnecessarily large on the eastern side of the motorway. The area around JLR and Aston Martin is understandable in that it already exists and it has good employment opportunities but on the east side of the M40 is country side and need not become developed. There is sufficient area on the west of the M40 to sustain commercial and residential development.
Also the east side of the motorway has already been developed as a large solar farm AND is visible from the Burton County Park. .
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91847
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Hanno Kirner
Good, as takes traffic out of Stratford, c good transport links, not an extension of Stratford into the countryside, plenty of companies and jobs nearby
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92133
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs cynthia bettany
The current road B4451 would not sustain the increase in large vehicles, light pollution of the surrounding woods would be an issue, affecting the the wildlife. Low lying areas of the location are prone to flooding, which will only increase if large area of tarmac/concrete are laid down. The few dwellings at Lower Spring farm would be surrounded by industrial development, with loss of privacy and overshadowing.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92184
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Isobel McLauchlin
I believe that using this land would avoid 'urban sprawl' of other existing towns and villages. Utilising this land would protect Greenbelt land and would help to take the awful congestion pressure off Stratford.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92242
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Hargreaves
I strongly object to the proposed development off Lighthorne Road near Kineton. This plan violates NPPF policies on sustainable development (para 8), protecting rural landscapes (para 174), and overloading local infrastructure (para 104). The roads cannot support the increased traffic, and essential services will be overwhelmed. This scale of development destroys rural character and contradicts the council’s duty to promote balanced, dispersed growth. Building here prioritizes developer profits over community needs and fails to meet sustainability tests. This must be rejected in favor of a better-planned, infrastructure-led approach.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92304
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr James Wilkinson
Inappropriate as no facilities and loss of countryside