BASE HEADER
Strategic Growth Location SG14 Question
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86498
Derbyniwyd: 27/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs C Dempster
spread out the development
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86512
Derbyniwyd: 27/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr William Pickford
The traffic network in SUA is seriously compromised .. Any increase in traffic causes congestion at the bottleneck Clopton Bridge Tiddington Road A439 Warwick Road . The Birmingham road since the traffic light installation at McDonalds is awful . The significant housebuild planned in Wellesbourne means the minor Tiddington Road will be overwhelmed .Most of the area surrounding Stratford is flood plain , where is the additional road infastructure ?? There are instances of speeds> 50 mph plus on Tiddington road to get to Wellesbourne/ Coventry via the back road . This is a minor road .
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86561
Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater
Already blighted by the M40 motorway and by HS2.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86598
Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Darrell Muffitt
Gaydon is a village which has seen some recent development which has been generally in keeping with the area. The proposals would appear to fundamentally change the look and feel of Gaydon and lose the focus of the existing settlement. I believe that plans should avoid another "Lighthorne" development out of keeping with what already exists.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86813
Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr GERALD KELLY
Many businesses already in the area so additional housing would be a bonus in this area.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87278
Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Helen Buttrick
This area is already being over developed - 5 years ago the whole area was fab land and green belt and the community is not able to cope with the increase in development. There are no new amenities in the current development - no doctor's surgery, no pub, no secondary school and this is detrimental both to the new arrivals as well as those who already live in the area
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87348
Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day
None
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87447
Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Massimo Frascella
The area is dedicated to farmland and never intended to be developed.
Negative consequences to existing people living in the area and huge loss of financial investment as assessed at survey that non development would ever happen
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87501
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris
Suitable land to add to existing houses with addition to employment
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87529
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Michaelina Jakala
I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure. This is a rural area and this will also disturb the natural habitat and green areas.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87995
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Quantrill
Not greenbelt
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88001
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill
Yes as not in greenbelt
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88174
Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris
SG14 is either already in or directly adjacent to a highly populated area. The road infrastructure is already in place
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88247
Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown
Yes
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88366
Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Sanders
Massive encroachment onto Green Belt.
Overdevelopment, too close to Gaydon development.
Destruction of view from Burto Dassett Ills County Park.
Impact on rural life and farming.
Security issues with Defence Munitions ( DM) Kineton local and foreign.
Destruction of wildlife by removal of habitat.
Lack of access to retail outlets and supermarkets.
Lack of access to schools, doctors and hospitals.
Lack of access to public transport and rail links.
Increased traffic on rural roads posing danger to pedestrians and cyclists.
Infrastructure disruption to water ,sewage and electricity supplies.
.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88504
Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Anita Sanders
Massive encroachment onto Green Belt.
Overdevelopment too close to Gaydon development.
Destruction of view from Burton Dassett Hills Country park.
impact on rural life and loss of farming.
Security issues with Defence Munitions (DM) Kington both lock and foreign.
Destruction of wildlife by removal of habitat.
Lack of access to retail outlets and supermarkets.
Lack of access to schools.
Lack of access to doctors and hospitals.
Lack of access to rail on public transport links
Increase traffic on rural roads posing danger to pedestrians and cyclists.
Infrastructure disruption, water, sewage, and electricity.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88631
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless
Close to employment and good road links
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88726
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Darren Quinney
The ongoing developments in an around Knightcote/Lighthorne/Gaydon and Kineton are having a detrimental effect with heavy traffic and delays due to the vast amount of builds over the past 5 years. In typical SDC behaviour its all about the money from land and build house after house. I have seen zero investment on infrastructure to support and no signs the council will do so moving forwards. It scares me how your constituency wastes local tax payers' money.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88732
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Darren Quinney
The ongoing developments in an around Knightcote/Lighthorne/Gaydon and Kineton are having a detrimental effect with heavy traffic and delays due to the vast amount of builds over the past 5 years. In typical WDC council behaviour its all about the money from land and build house after house. I have seen zero investment on infrastructure to support and no signs the council will do so moving forwards. It scares me how your constituency wastes local tax payers' money.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88914
Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Kate Lawton
A number of my neighbours have submitted a full comprehensive rationale for why we are firmly against the development of SG14. I purchased my property in December 2024 and the thought of living in the middle of an industrial park is truly horrible. The area has vast
environmental and historical features and there seems no rationale for building on green fields when brownfield sites could be used.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88959
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr Nigel Rock
We do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan. The sites within the cluster perform very badly on the objective scoring system and should be eliminated.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88961
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Goodyear
Any Commercial or Industrial Developement of this kind would have a seriously detremental impact on the quiet enjoyment of my property together with that of all my neighbours.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89191
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanna Hughes
The proposed development offers strong transport links, including good road connections, potential for a new Chiltern Line railway station, and HS2 access for faster commuting. It could reduce congestion in Stratford while meeting housing needs with minimal environmental impact. New settlements would prevent urban sprawl, preserving Green Belt land and protecting existing infrastructure. Strategic planning, rather than land availability, should guide development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89439
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)
Various flooding factors - sites perform very badly on the objective scoring system and are not in conformance with Strategic Objectives - adjacent to motorway junction and therefore promote car use and reliance on fossil fuels which clashes with overarching aim of the plan - biodiversity is not increased by building over open countryside and actively damages environmental assets.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89524
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton
Not green belt so do whatever you want (within reason please)
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89656
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Mike Heath
Completely unsuitable location as will potentially increase traffic between Southam and m40 on what is already a very busy country road with a difficult turning at Deppers Bridge.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89731
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Compton Verney
n/a
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89788
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Julian Sanders
Access to good road connections to the north and south of the area.
Local employment opportunities
Good rail links for those commuting further afield - Banbury, Oxford, London, Birmingham
Helps to the pressure off Stratford Upon Avon of increased traffic congestion, pollution and urban sprawl
Gives opportunity to build new schools, amenities and infrastructure
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89843
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Holly Whittaker
This location has good existing road connections as well as potential for the new Chiltern line railways station (only 2 miles from the proposed homes). The HS2 could also offer links here to key commuting areas.
This location would alleviate the pressure on Stratford's congestion which is already a problem for local residents, and would avoid urban sprawl which is straining existing infrastructure in Stratford.
This area, along with SG13, could contribute to meeting the housing needs required in Stratford District with the least environmental impact and help to preserve other greenbelt land that has more ecological or historical significance.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89849
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Stephen Browett
The local road infrastructure has much more capacity which could handle increased demand from new homes. As well as the road infrastructure, there is potential for new railway station to be introduced on the existing Chiltern line which would only be 2 miles from the development site.
Development on this land would satisfy housing needs while not needing to develop on green belt land.