BASE HEADER
Strategic Growth Location SG16 Question
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89694
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr john cooknell
This site for growth is situated on the wide flat floor of the Avon Valley and will be impacted by occasional flooding from the River Avon and its Tributaries.
The Level 1 SFRA technical evidence is only indicative a Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment should be carried out before this site is confirmed as a Strategic Growth location.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89732
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Compton Verney
n/a
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90086
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson
River Avon and tributaries LWS and Hampton Wood LWS, Grove Fields Lane LWS, Wasperton Manor Farm LWS, Hampton Lucy Escarpment LWS, Charlescote gravel pits and Thelsford brook LWS
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90387
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones
The Warwick Uni campus and surrounding areas, could offer an brownfield site for development. Furhter consdieratin needed of infrastrucutre.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90585
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Jacquey Parker
I disagree with all the development
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90625
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Ranner
Given the traffic levels on the A429, I have concern that a major development of this nature would require infrastructure capacity far in excess of what can already be catered for (Strategic objective 3). Given the restrictions already experienced by rural communities, this would be a major demand on power and telecommunications infrastructure which is already under capacity (strategic objective 11).
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90630
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Ranner
Given the traffic levels on the A429, I have concern that a major development of this nature would require infrastructure capacity far in excess of what can already be catered for (Strategic objective 3). Given the restrictions already experienced by rural communities, this would be a major demand on power and telecommunications infrastructure which is already under capacity (strategic objective 11).
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90704
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Averil Stewart
getting to Wellesbourne is already painful - roads here do not support good growth
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90779
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Malcolm Fisk
I believe the redevelopment of Wellesbourne airfield is an appropriate use of brown field land, less so the fields south of the Loxley Rd and those to the east of Wellesbourne.
The links to the existing road network are established and the size of the proposed parcel seems appropriate
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90785
Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Maxine Mayer
Part of his site (University Campus) for growth has previously been earmarked for an Innovation Centre and is welcomed. The University vision for the site is that of rural aesthetics, 25% of the site has b wen assessed as unsuitable for development due to the flood risk. This proposal suggests a big development opposite it and would ruin the university's vision. Also the University has concerns about traffic on the A429 and the site area across the road would be seriously impactful.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91019
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Julian Brown
Agree as per comments with SG15
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91059
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Linda Drury
Infra structure already struggling would have difficulty supporting this - roads, parking, medical facilities, schools, public transport, few local job opportunities, green spaces not included. Flooding risk increased and our Conservation areas.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91122
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs liz jackson
outside of greenbelt
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91319
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Caitlin Imray
I object to the houses being built in Barford. We already struggle with traffic, congestion and difficulties getting in and out of the village at busy times. There is not the infrastructure to support this! We are running out of green spaces which will affect the beautiful environment and there also a lot of flooding.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91426
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr
The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: River Avon and tributaries LWS and Hampton Wood LWS, Grove Fields Lane LWS, Wasperton Manor Farm LWS, Hampton Lucy Escarpment LWS, Charlescote gravel pits and Thelsford brook LWS
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91502
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Saunders
1. There is significant harm to the character of the landscape.
2. There is a significant increase in flood risk.
3. There is a lack of rail connectivity.
4. There is a loss of the best and most versatile farmland.
5. There is overdevelopment of Wellesbourne, which threatens its village status.
6. There is a lack of educational and health facilities.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91510
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council
Loss of landscape character. Lack of transport connectivity. The airfield development is contrary to other objectives in the SWLP. The proposed areas push the boundary of the village outwards and is contrary to the NP where development is preferred in north of the Dene. It is also contrary to the concept of a 20minute neighbourhood. Loss of recycling and gritting are to the detriment of whole of South Warwickshire. The parish has had a disproportionate amount of development over the last 12 years with no infrastructure provided to support it.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91808
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Maxine Mayer
Part of this group is the airfield. Current submitted plans have been assessed and show that if the runway is moved for warehousing then the flying operation won't be safe. It is also considered by the National Trust as having a detrimental impact on the listed grounds and house. This group will completely dominate the village and 'hem' in many residential properties. The A429/M40 J15 are severely congested at peak times. It is not near rail transport. Please see the statutory responses to the airfield planning application 24/03281/OUT
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91886
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs J Harrison
Infrastructure is already creaking - thousands more houses with quarry plans and HRI developments are going to make a horrendous collective impact
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91915
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Naomi Williams
My main objection to this plan is that Wellesbourne does not have the infrastructure to deal with this massive increase in people and buildings. Also The council already has 25 years worth of housing already approved, why is more needed?! To also add the following points:
Significant harm to the character of the landscape
Destruction of Green Belt land and Local Wildlife Sites
Flood risk
Loss of best farmland
Overdevelopment, threatening village status
Lack of educational and health facilities
Increased pollution from vehicles
Irreversible damage to the area's natural beauty
Significant threat to local wildlife and natural habitats
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91940
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr James OShea
This is a growing suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with. It is close to other infrastructure and road network links are within a short distance
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91986
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Bader
I am objecting as a current resident of Hammond Green. We moved to Wellesbourne 2 years ago for the village character, this proposed development will destroy the current village landscape, threatening the community identity.
The Green belt land surrounding the village has a massive impact on quality of life and mental health for our family and for all villagers. Increased traffic congestion through the village and the pollution increase will have a negetive affect on all residents in addition the current infrastructure in the village is under pressure already for the schools and medical facilties.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91989
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Georgina Hicks
There are plenty of other areas of green land you can build on
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91996
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Hobbs
Lack of rail connectivity. Lack of schools, doctors, dentists. Impact on the historic airfield. Depletion of good agricultural land. Impact on Wellesbourne village would affect its village status and it would become an urbanised sprawl. Wellesbourne has already taken more houses than necessary in the past few years.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92004
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Kevin Brown
This area has now been developed to a point where the local infrastructure can barely cope. The local school is oversubscribed, as is the dentist. The doctor is already struggling with the significantly increased local population. Road traffic is already a problem and will be exacerbated by development already planned for the Warwick University HRI facility and Wellesbourne airfield.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92031
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Hobbs
Lack of rail connectivity. Lack of schools doctors and dentists. Impact on the historic airfield. Depletion of good agricultural land. Impact on Wellesbourne village status, it would become an urbanised sprawl. Wellesbourne has taken more houses in recent years than was necessary. The SDC can demonstrate 24.65 years of housing land supply on developments that have already been approved, which is nearly five times the current 5 year requirement.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92052
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Harrison
The development will have a detrimental impact on the existing environment and communities. It will stretch existing facilities and infrastructure and negatively impact existing residents.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92084
Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs angela watkins
This suggested distribution park would create more traffic. The local traffic is already horrendous particularly in the mornings and afternoons. The Longbridge roundabout is frequently gridlocked as is the A429 going North and the M40 slipway up to Longbridge.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92131
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Jill Wilson
SG16 is currently a working viable airfield and should be kept that way.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92177
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Wilson
The infrastructure will not match the schooling, medical, transport,etc needs which are already under immense pressure.