No

ID sylw: 102067

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Osborne

I object to this the local infrastructure cannot cope. Severn Even the telecommunications network o2 vodafone has been bad since the last houses built in 2018 as they destroyed a mast for them

Other

ID sylw: 102377

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Wilby

This areas priority must be continued on enhance aviation activities

No

ID sylw: 102403

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katie Davies

loss of valuable agricultural land and irreperable harm to rural character of area. Roads cannot take more traffic. A429 and Longbridge overloaded at peak times. Damage to landscape archaeology, detrimental to residential amenity. Noise and air pollution. Loss of habitat,.

Yes

ID sylw: 102555

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Phoebe Withnall

SG16 is a more suitable site for development because it is outside the Green Belt, so it will not contribute to the loss of protected countryside and contribute to the degradation of south warwickshire's environment like many other sites.

No

ID sylw: 102584

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Abigail Haley

More homes are not needed in Wellesbourne. We are in danger of losing precious farmland that will never be able to be replaced. Families are already unable to get their kids into the local primary school, it takes ages to get a doctors appointment and it’s impossible to register as a new NHS patient at the dentist. There is a real danger of flooding if the land is built upon and thus development should be rejected.

Yes

ID sylw: 102585

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Andrews

Development on non-green belt land should be prioritised over development on green belt. Total housing needs can be met without developing on green belt so morally not right to remove green belt without exceptional cause.
These areas are better supported with existing infrastructure and transport network without requiring major investment on more remote, less connected areas.
The opportunity in terms of yield is higher in these areas so there is a duty to fulfil the housing needs in the most responsible way considering this and the green belt obligations.

No

ID sylw: 102615

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Marc Herring

We have already voiced representation for SG15. Our views are the same for SG16.

No

ID sylw: 102623

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Wellesbourne & Walton Flood Action Group

Five areas to the East of Wellesbourne are on land that drains into the River Dene, above the pinch point, BridgeSt Bridge
- Between Kineton Road and The River Dene
- To the East of Lowes Lane (2 areas)
- To the South of Walton Lane (2 areas)
Building on these areas will reduce the absorption of rainwater by the ground. Even with Sustainable Drainage Systems (Suds), runoff will still increase, and will greatly the flood risk.
The River Dene currently floods around 60 properties in major flood events.
These areas are not suitable for development.

No

ID sylw: 102736

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Louisa Smith

SG 15 makes more sense as this is closer to the M40, though additional infrastructure will need to be in place. I believe that Wellesbourne Airfield should remain an airfield and it is a site of significant historic importance. There simply is not the need for this site to be developed if SG15 or elements of, are going ahead. This area of Wellesbourne could create a bottleneck traffic wise and further development would have a significant impact on this.

No

ID sylw: 102808

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Severn Trent Water

This development will likely require treatment at Wellesbourne (STW) Treatment Works, this Wastewater Treatment works has very high capacity constraints and high environmental constraints. Due to the size of the development, it is recommended that network upgrades will be required, alongside hydraulic modelling and engagement with STW. As this site has very high capacity and environmental constraints, it is recommended to avoid this site. Overall this development site is considered a very high risk location.

Yes

ID sylw: 102923

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Asiant : Turley

Support for SG16 and additional site information

Yes

ID sylw: 102935

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne

Asiant : Turley

Richborough support the proposed growth location SG16 ‘South of Wellesbourne Group’, as this identifies Wellesbourne as a settlement that could support additional growth. It is however requested that the proposed growth location be expanded to include additional areas to the south of Wellesbourne, including land south of Wellesbourne Road, to determine whether a greater level of development could be accommodated in this area. This approach aligns with other proposed growth locations where the SWLP have identified potential sites which have yet to be put forward through the Call for Sites.

Yes

ID sylw: 103130

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Appleton

Whilst the aim is for people to live close to where they work and for Active Travel to be a priority, it must be acknowledged that people often choose to reside and work in different places. Commuting is the norm and the SWLP must accommodate this. Settlement expansion and locations of new settlements must be supported by transport infrastructure. Transport links around Wellesbourne need upgrading to accommodate further development.

No

ID sylw: 103199

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Campaign to Protect Rural England - Warwickshire

SG16 South of Wellesbourne: Wellesbourne has already expanded beyond its natural boundaries. What was a village has already grown beyond its natural extent. It is car-dependent with some but not much public transport. The two recent housing developments accessed off the A429 south of the original village are car-dependent and are beyond the bypass of the original village.
Development at Wellesbourne Airfield should be limited to existing sites where there are buildings. The actual airfield should not be reduced in size further.
Small infill sites within the older parts of Wellesbourne can deliver social housing to meet local need.

No

ID sylw: 103277

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Giles Harrison-Hall

This site is too far from the railway either to network. The Council would be encouraging more car use which ought to be taken into account in assessing the carbon footprint. The local roads would not cope with the additional traffic.

Yes

ID sylw: 103323

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Keith Allan

If the construction of new houses is to proceed, it is more appropriate to construct on non-Green Belt land.

No

ID sylw: 103422

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr ROLAND CHERRY

Wellesbourne is another village that has been transformed into a huge dormitory for commuters in recent years. To further exacerbate the ruination of the character of the village by yet more housing for people who will have to commute to work by car is inconsistent with the SWLP's aspiration to make South Warwickshire more beautiful with improved biodiversity. Houses need to be built close to where people can work (in or very near the larger towns and conurbations), not encouraging people to commute long distance on already overcrowded and poorly maintained roads. The country towns and villages must be preserved.

Yes

ID sylw: 103486

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carol Jones

Support strategic growth locations on non-greenbelt land.

No

ID sylw: 103531

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sarah Shalgosky

Impact on the following must be avoided River Avon and tributaries LWS and Hampton Wood LWS, Grove Fields Lane LWS, Wasperton Manor Farm LWS, Hampton Lucy Escarpment LWS, Charlescote gravel pits and Thelsford brook LWS, Ensure wildlife corridors are improved

Yes

ID sylw: 103577

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kevin Smith

Huge concerns regarding the flood risk that development to the south of the village will bring as the water run off will be greatly impacted.
Wellesbourne wood is ancient woodland and has varied flora and fauna and these should be protected from development causing disturbances to the ecological environment.
Increased traffic impacting on air pollution and congestion, there are already issues with congestion.
Health care is under pressure in the village further development will further exacerbate this.
Wellesbourne will lose its heart as a village and become a town losing its valuable sense of village community.

Yes

ID sylw: 103728

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Steve Churchill

I believe that all new development should be made only on Non Green Belt or Brown Field sites.

No

ID sylw: 103820

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nicola Loades

My family has lived in the beautiful historic village of Newbold Pacey for most of our lives. Critically, this is a Conservation Area
( Stratford DC initiated ). This proposal would put us in the middle of effectively an urban corridor between Wellesbourne and the M40 near Oakley Wood. This is an horrific prospect .
Regarding the expansion of housing to this proposed extent ; I understand that there are over 30,000 unoccupied residences in South Warwickshire. If this is anywhere near correct , it would be madness to build yet more huge new housing estates in this area !

No

ID sylw: 103891

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Diana Taulbut

SG16 would significantly impact the setting of Charlecote which is a significant tourist attraction (NT). The River Dene runs through it - flooding issues and of course it's a significant wildlife haven. Having previously saved Wellesbourne Airfield from development in a landmark case by SDC, it would be insanity to close it and build on it, as well as it being against national security and planning guidelines and detrimental to the future of aviation in this country.

No

ID sylw: 103902

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Mary Manandhar

The land around Wellesbourne Airfield is greenbelt, with biodiverse wildlife corridors and land that forms part of the Dene and Avon flood plains. It is not therefore suitable for housing and industry development. Better uses would be for community farms, orchards, community solar energy, rewilded green space, training sites for agriculture, horticulture and fruit orchards, much more in keeping with the rural landscape, local nature recovery, food security, health and well-being and flood and climate mitigation. It also offers scope for sustainable employment in the green sectors, better alternatives to transport/distribution hub use and more traffic.

No

ID sylw: 103944

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Yates

Depletion of farming land. Impact on the airfield. Too many houses. Traffic increase. Harm to character of the landscape. Lack of local and educational facilities.

Yes

ID sylw: 104049

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Tobias Cox

This site is the airfield which provides community enrichment to local residents who enjoy flying and also individuals who enjoy watching the planes.

There is a cafe which is a local community hub and revenue generation, losing this would have a negative impact locally.

No

ID sylw: 104195

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Charlotte Moss

I'm in Wasperton and already the A429 struggles with heavy traffic during rush hours, making it very difficult to enter/exit the village. This development would hugely increase traffic on the A429, making it impossible/unsafe to enter/exit Wasperton at peak times.
I also object for the reasons that this development would greatly damage the natural beauty of this area particularly being so close to historic villages eg Charlecote and the NT.
I object to the airfield being built on because it is a site of local enjoyment, locals meet at the cafe and watch planes - my kids love doing this.

No

ID sylw: 104232

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Donna Green

Its inclusion would have an adverse effect on Wellesbourne as a village. It would make Wellesbourne feel like a town. Wellesbourne has grown rapidly over the last few years. There are already stresses on the utilities (particularly water supply), school and healthcare facilities in the village. This proposal would have a materially adverse effect on the village, causing a loss of green spaces and reducing air quality and increasing demand on local infrastructure and facilities (including increasing traffic) without any corresponding benefit.

The inclusion of SG16 would, ultimately, lead to the loss of the allotments, which are an important facility.

Yes

ID sylw: 104313

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Carl Bergstrom

Great option

Other

ID sylw: 104558

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Dunning

YES ONLY IF the development is high density, linked with public transport and active travel infrastructure.

Do not build detached homes anywhere.
Painted bicycle gutters are NOT active travel infrastructure.
A bus is a bad public transport solution.