BASE HEADER

Strategic Growth Location SG24 Question

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 61 i 90 o 576

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86989

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr George Chapman

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I use the proposed area for walking, running, and cycling - it is a lovely part of the green belt which should not be disturbed.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87042

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Housing could be built here with its transport links

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87135

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

strongly oppose the construction of new houses in Hockley Heath because it would drastically alter the character of our small, close-knit village. Increased housing would bring more traffic, putting additional strain on our already congested roads and making it harder for residents to get around safely. The village’s green spaces and surrounding countryside, which are vital for wildlife and the well-being of the community, would be at risk of destruction. Furthermore, our local services—such as schools, medical facilities, and shops—are already stretched thin, and more development would only make it harder for them to meet demand.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87136

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

strongly oppose the construction of new houses in Hockley Heath because it would drastically alter the character of our small, close-knit village. Increased housing would bring more traffic, putting additional strain on our already congested roads and making it harder for residents to get around safely. The village’s green spaces and surrounding countryside, which are vital for wildlife and the well-being of the community, would be at risk of destruction. Furthermore, our local services—such as schools, medical facilities, and shops—are already stretched thin, and more development would only make it harder for them to meet demand.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87137

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

strongly oppose the construction of new houses in Hockley Heath because it would drastically alter the character of our small, close-knit village. Increased housing would bring more traffic, putting additional strain on our already congested roads and making it harder for residents to get around safely. The village’s green spaces and surrounding countryside, which are vital for wildlife and the well-being of the community, would be at risk of destruction. Furthermore, our local services—such as schools, medical facilities, and shops—are already stretched thin, and more development would only make it harder for them to meet demand.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87138

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

strongly oppose the construction of new houses in Hockley Heath because it would drastically alter the character of our small, close-knit village. Increased housing would bring more traffic, putting additional strain on our already congested roads and making it harder for residents to get around safely. The village’s green spaces and surrounding countryside, which are vital for wildlife and the well-being of the community, would be at risk of destruction. Furthermore, our local services—such as schools, medical facilities, and shops—are already stretched thin, and more development would only make it harder for them to meet demand.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87139

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

strongly oppose the construction of new houses in Hockley Heath because it would drastically alter the character of our small, close-knit village. Increased housing would bring more traffic, putting additional strain on our already congested roads and making it harder for residents to get around safely. The village’s green spaces and surrounding countryside, which are vital for wildlife and the well-being of the community, would be at risk of destruction. Furthermore, our local services—such as schools, medical facilities, and shops—are already stretched thin, and more development would only make it harder for them to meet demand.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87140

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

strongly oppose the construction of new houses in Hockley Heath because it would drastically alter the character of our small, close-knit village. Increased housing would bring more traffic, putting additional strain on our already congested roads and making it harder for residents to get around safely. The village’s green spaces and surrounding countryside, which are vital for wildlife and the well-being of the community, would be at risk of destruction. Furthermore, our local services—such as schools, medical facilities, and shops—are already stretched thin, and more development would only make it harder for them to meet demand.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87141

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

strongly oppose the construction of new houses in Hockley Heath because it would drastically alter the character of our small, close-knit village. Increased housing would bring more traffic, putting additional strain on our already congested roads and making it harder for residents to get around safely. The village’s green spaces and surrounding countryside, which are vital for wildlife and the well-being of the community, would be at risk of destruction. Furthermore, our local services—such as schools, medical facilities, and shops—are already stretched thin, and more development would only make it harder for them to meet demand.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87182

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Babs Gisborne-Land

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Destroying greenfield land shows no regard for the environment, existing wild life, air quality and well being of existing residents. In no way can this A2 be viewed as sustainable. Concrete, tar and bricks versus woods, fields and pockets of fresh air.

OTHER REPS SUBMITTED:

03/03/2025 via Web
Absolutely not as it would not meet 'a well connected Warwickshire' as the A34, M42 and M40 tend to be saturated in the rush hour/busy 24:7. SG24 cannot be 'biodiverse', Ch11, will be destroyed. No way can it be 'healthy, safe and inclusive' with its location away from hospitals that are closing and have over capacity, poor medical provison, education and transport links (an hourly bus to Stratford). Noise and pollution spreading from the vehicle routes mentioned, removal of 'trees, hedges and woodland' for housing all add to increasing the carbon footprint and loss of biodiversity, compromising current wildlife.

03/03/2025 via Web
SG24 is far too north of Stratford and Warwick and eats into farmland and woodland, that is currently used for leisure and sustains a wide range of birds and animals. Unfortunately it appears to go against the principles laid out in Chs 6,7, 9,10 and 11. Not only will it throttle the village, Hockley Heath environmentally with increased car fumes, it will worsen the already saturated medical, educational and refuse facilities. Hockley Heath suffers from traffic congestion, difficulties crossing A34, problems with power cuts and fluctuatng water supplies, flooding on the A34 and the appearance of sewage in some gardens.

24/02/2025 via Email
The SG24 plan, covering 137.20 hectares, will significantly impact Hockley Heath parish by causing loss of light, increased noise, and destruction of arable land and woodland, further straining already inadequate infrastructure. Local roads are overcrowded, and flooding issues persist. I am saddened by the lack of technical evidence concerning the site's location. It threatens wildlife habitats and the well-being of residents. The plans do not address biodiversity loss or climate change and will exacerbate existing problems. Additionally, the infrastructure cannot support increased housing, leading to a detrimental car-based economy and loss of agricultural land.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87244

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Allso

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Lack of facilities/doctors/school/post office
Lack of services/public transport/drains/water/sewers/gas/broadband
Flooding/Stratford Rd/SpringLane/School Rd
Pollution
Village community destroyed/Population increased four fold/SolihulMBC reviewing their plan
Solihull MBC having to support the extra demands to services schools etc
Destruction of wildlife habitats/trees/hedgerows
Loss of farmland/grazing land/crops
Loss of access to countryside/footpaths/green belt
Traffic increase on roads already too busy/lack of pavements/

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87362

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Sustainable development

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87513

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not agree with building on green belt land as their are plenty of options to build on non green belt land

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87737

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Aled Hughes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I live in Hockley Heath and am deeply concerned about the SG24 plan, which proposes to add over 2,000 houses, significantly increasing our population. There are insufficient local services, with no surgery, pharmacy, or adequate school facilities, and traffic is already heavy. I question whether you have communicated with Solihull MBC regarding this plan, as local objections seem to have been ignored. If this development proceeds, Hockley Heath will lose its tranquil village character due to the overwhelming demand on limited amenities and infrastructure. I urge reconsideration of this proposal.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87833

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Hotten

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There are no exceptional circumstances to warrant development in the green belt as there are sufficient strategic growth locations outside of the green belt.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87884

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nicholas Sears

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

i fear the creep from Hockley heath will spread and will spread to Lapworth ,de facto creating a new town destroying two communities without consent of the residents ..once this happens we will have lost our countryside for ever.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87899

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Lucy Burgess

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hockley Heath is a close knit village and should be kept that way, we have beautiful field views and animals and trees and these would all be destroyed if you build these houses. There are plenty of other places to build houses. The shops/doctors/dentists would not be able to cope with the increased population

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87917

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Wilson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Too much traffic we want our green fields kept as they are no gp and school already crammed

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88017

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

In greenbelt

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88018

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No as in greenbelt

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88076

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline Padget

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As a Green Belt Area, it should remain so. To develop on this particular site, would join up Hockley Heath with Dorridge & Lapworth, becoming one large conurbation. Hockley Heath doesn't have its own GP surgery, so residents of HH attend surgeries at either Lapworth & Dorridge, which are operating at full capacity. Lack of school places as HH doesn't have a senior school. The primary school only has capacity of 252 places. Services of water, electricity (which are already unstable) & gas are concerning, as is flooding. The current existing fields keep floodwaters from existing homes in the area.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88147

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Parry

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No objection.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88184

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Although this is a large development, it does have an extensive road network and would be in keeping with the current Solihull expansion.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88263

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support part development but not all the land shown in this map. Hockley Heath is ideal given its motorway links and business innovation hub would be good.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88307

Derbyniwyd: 15/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Claire Short

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The chosen areas are currently being farmed, used for pasture or planted with commercial trees. So used.
The area is prone to flooding . We live on the Stratford road and suffer from flooding. Severn Trent say large scale remedial work is required to resolve.
Recent huge developments over the border - Illshaw Heath/ Blythe Valley and Shirley . No schools or Doctors included in those. Putting huge stress on existing services.
Dangerous junctions at Old Warwick road / Statford road and School road without extra traffic.
Too much development . Maybe just one of the sites wold be reasonable.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88533

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs LINDA RICHES

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hockley Heath currently struggles from a lack of infrastructure to support even small additional developments. The village does not have additional health, schooling or community facilities to support a huge expansion which will turn the area from a semi rural village to a large housing estate with green areas minimised. A lack of green environment is bad for current and future residents. In addition, if housing is to be provided it needs to offer truly afforable housing for single people, blended families and older people. I suspect this will not be the case.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88576

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Brearley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Area makes sense for development. Traffic considerations are key, particularly entering and exiting both the coop car park, and the junction from the car garage.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88646

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

N/A

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88761

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Matthew Gittings

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly object to the proposal to build new houses in SG24 (Hockley Heath) for the following reasons:

1) The proposed site adjacent to Park View and the Aylesbury Road is green belt land. Residents in Hockley Heath including myself have historically purchased property in this location due to its rural nature. The proposed plans will destroy this.

2) The Stratford Road / Aylesbury Road junction is already gridlocked during peak times

3) The proposed plans will potentially depreciate the value of existing property. Will the council / government be compensating existing property owners in lieu of this?

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88764

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Andrea Fones

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I formally object to the proposed housing development in Hockley Heath, citing critical infrastructure failures, including an inadequate drainage system and deteriorating roads. Flooding is a persistent issue, with public spaces in a dire state. The proposed expansion lacks a reliable plan for infrastructure support, raising significant concerns about the impact on current residents and wildlife. The emotional toll of living under constant flood threat is profound, and I urge the council to prioritise urgent repairs before considering further development. Hockley Heath deserves investment in essential services, not reckless expansion.