No

ID sylw: 90593

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Angela Williamson

No exceptional circumstances to release land from Green Belt. Topography will make utility and infrastructure provision financially prohibitive, especially without unreasonable impact on existing landscape, community and residents. Roads currently designated as dangerous and already subject to lengthy and ongoing representation from residents to the council regarding volume and speed of traffic. Not an enterprise hub, residents would need to travel and commute out of area, putting increased pressure on already very busy local roads. Sewerage and flooding are also already issues, indicating drainage and sewers are unable to cope with increased demand.

Yes

ID sylw: 90643

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alice Smith

This site is the perfect site for inclusion in the SWLP preferred options given the existing road infrastructure and proximity to nearby towns.

No

ID sylw: 90844

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Shannon Moore

Our roads are already congested , breaking up with current traffic, many roads in this area are frequently flooded. Services are already overstretched. Housing already planned and agreed by neighbouring authorities are causing even greater problems on the roads around Wood End, Tamworth in Arden and Earlswood. The train station has limited scope - single line, no potential for taking much traffic off the roads. This area is somewhere for walkers, horse- riders, cyclists come to enjoy. The rural nature of the villages is being eroded.

Yes

ID sylw: 91058

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Yes, ideal as per previous comments - good location for housing and business due to location to infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 91126

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs liz jackson

within greenbelt

No

ID sylw: 91446

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: River Alne LWS, Round Wood and Long Wood LWS, Grove Wood PLWS and Grotton Hill Wood LWS

Yes

ID sylw: 91962

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James OShea

This is a location that is in close proximity to good highways and rail infrastructure and employment centres.

Yes

ID sylw: 92329

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Harbury Parish Council

not quite as good as A1 as further from the train station but still a suitable location

Yes

ID sylw: 92928

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Molloy

Punching a hole in the green belt for a new development is preferable to towns and villages sprawling into each other.

No

ID sylw: 93518

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bernard Davis

This area is far to small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. It is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"

Yes

ID sylw: 93708

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Bennett

The proximity to the motorways M40/M42 support this location, along with the existing railway station at Wood End. Housing developments alongside motorway corridors are already established elsewhere nationally and because of the motorway the countryside here, whilst valuable, is less pristine and less ecologically important than other sites under consideration. The site would also be convenient to commute to Birmingham and Solihull for employment

Yes

ID sylw: 94026

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr William Senior

Very well connected site. Ample room for development

Yes

ID sylw: 94577

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tanworth Educational Fund

Asiant : Hancock Town Planning

Hancock Town Planning Ltd represents the Tanworth Educational Foundation (TEF), which owns land assessed as Site 238 in the Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment. TEF supports the new settlement A2 and the inclusion of Site 238, highlighting its availability, proximity to sustainable transport options, and existing community facilities. The HELAA's constraint score for Site 238 is challenged, particularly regarding educational needs and agricultural use. TEF argues that the site has low visual sensitivity and suggests that the area near the electricity line can support biodiversity gains without reducing developable space.

Other

ID sylw: 94765

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

We have insufficient knowledge of the location from which to make an informed comment

No

ID sylw: 95100

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Rob Way

The proposed development site is unsuitable due to its undulating and sensitive landscape within the Green Belt, with significant ecological and historical value. The area lacks adequate infrastructure and utilities, making development financially prohibitive. Current infrastructure, including Wood End Station, is limited, offering only one train per hour and experiencing frequent flooding. The road network consists of country lanes prone to surface water flooding and congestion.

No

ID sylw: 95384

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Linda Synge

I wish to object to the proposed developments around our villages. I live in Kineton but have strong links to Tanworth-in-Arden and Wellesbourne. While I've seen new housing benefit local shops and communities, these developments would transform our villages into towns without the necessary services. The increased traffic, especially in Kineton, would create significant issues at narrow junctions. Additionally, the Labour Party's manifesto promised housing on brownfield sites, yet these proposals target green fields, which would permanently damage the natural environment. I urge a reconsideration of land around existing towns for housing, as South Warwickshire's villages should remain distinct.

Yes

ID sylw: 95456

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Better to put an isolated hole in the Green Belt near transport links than induce sprawl of larger towns towards each other.

No

ID sylw: 95529

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Allan Stewart

The land is clay and holds a very high water content for at least 3 months of the winter. Building on this land would have a considerable impact on the water table and run off during the winter months and/or periods of heavy rain.

Yes

ID sylw: 95532

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stoford Developments Ltd

Location has the potential for rail station connectivity. Additional land adj to the M42 could be allocated to serve strategic employment needs. Site A2 could also assist in meeting unmet housing needs from Redditch/Bromsgrove.

No

ID sylw: 95632

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanne Hotten

Unnecessary development on Green Belt land

No

ID sylw: 95634

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

The Government and local authorities should be developing policies to bring under-used existing dwellings (ABNBs, second homes, etc) into the housing market rather than developing on green belt and rural land.

Other

ID sylw: 96016

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: mr william tansey

Possibly - if no other land to the west of Redditch can be identified which sits outside of the greenbelt.

Yes

ID sylw: 96269

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Coughlan

This site is within traveling distance to Birmingham and Redditch where there are job opportunities and many amenities.

No

ID sylw: 96666

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Birch

I Object because it is Green Belt Land for Farming / Local nature / Hedges / Wood Land . This over Development . Infrastructure is total unsuitable for the increase in Population in that area .The traffic flow would increase to unmanageable levels on the present lanes in and around the local vicinities .On the A4177 into Warwick / Leamington / M40 . already at capacity in rush hours. New junctions would be required at the intersection B4439 / A4177 / Brownley Green Lane. Hatton Railway Station would require a Larger car park .New Schools ,

Other

ID sylw: 96776

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

No

ID sylw: 96819

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Le Page

Site within Green Belt

Yes

ID sylw: 96942

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

No

ID sylw: 97445

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Gaston-Ferrett

My comments are the same for Wood End and Tanworth.
In appropriate site, significant degradation of the environment, no infrastructure and would change the area beyond recognition.

Yes

ID sylw: 97841

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Good transport links

No

ID sylw: 98346

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Daine Davis

This area is far too small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. It is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"