BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Chwilio o’r newyddYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-42-Trees, Hedges and Woodland?
ID sylw: 101904
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Strongly in agreement. One hopes this is taken into account when selecting housing sites to be included in the SWLP
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-41 - Carbon Sinks and Sequestration?
ID sylw: 101905
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Policy not well enough described to comment at present
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-40 Green and Blue Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 101906
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction –39- Environmental Net Gain?
ID sylw: 101907
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-38 - Biodiversity Net Gain?
ID sylw: 101908
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
We strongly support exceeding the 10% Biodiversity Net Gain requirement to maximise ecological benefits. Biodiversity enhancements must be delivered near the original site to support local resilience and community well-being. The Anchitel Green development in Bishop’s Tachbrook highlights the risks of offsite mitigation, where biodiversity loss in the Parish was offset by gains in Stratford, creating an uneven distribution. In line with NPPF principles, biodiversity net gain should be secured where it is most needed—within or near the affected community—to maintain ecological balance and prevent biodiversity deserts.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
ID sylw: 101909
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-36 - Protection of Sites, Habitats and Species?
ID sylw: 101910
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree with reservations
Are there accepted definitions of what ‘locally important sites and assets’ are? If not the policy will be open to differing interpretations
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?
ID sylw: 101911
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-34-Vale of Evesham Control Zone?
ID sylw: 101913
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Can we have a Bishop’s Tachbrook HGV movement control zone like the Vale of Evesham?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight?
ID sylw: 101914
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
