BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Chwilio o’r newyddYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-32- Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Strategy?
ID sylw: 101915
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?
ID sylw: 101916
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Disagree;
We should not be engaging in social engineering by making car use harder, we should be making peoples lives easier not harder, restricting parking etc etc only drives unintended consequences of pavement parking, verge parking, increased congestion, frustration and a detriment to everybody.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-30- Health Impact Assessment for Major Development?
ID sylw: 101924
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-29-Pollution?
ID sylw: 101925
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
We need to make sure in reducing pollution we ensure the drains and sewage system is adequately updated to cope with additional demand from new homes before the homes are built to remove the reality of raw sewage and overflowing drains.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 28- Waterways?
ID sylw: 101926
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 27 Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets/ the Historic Environment?
ID sylw: 101928
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
ID sylw: 101929
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
Design codes to be approved by local Design Panel. The Design Panel will be permanent
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
ID sylw: 101930
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Disagree;
Pedestrians and cycles should be separated from vehicle movements, the safety of all road users should be prioritised in the hierarchy of pedestrians first, cyclists second and road users third, but the safety and convenience of all should be considered to make sure all travel infrastructure optimised for all, not one group at the expense of the others.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- K- Multifunctional Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)?
ID sylw: 101931
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree with reservations
SuDS pools are obviously necessary but should be placed inside the boundary of new development, not outside, therefore using more land. Any new SuDS ponds close to Tachbrook Country Park should not be included in the Country Park land but in the development land.
SuDs pools should also be placed well away from children’s play areas, unlike the developments off Europa Way, including the Sandpit Boulevard development, where the play equipment is located next to the SuDS pools.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- J- Reducing Flood Risk?
ID sylw: 101932
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Strongly agree
