Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Shipston Town Council search
New searchYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Healthy, Safe, and Inclusive South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 96546
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-30- Health Impact Assessment for Major Development?
Representation ID: 96547
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Yes, however a definition of what constitutes a major development that triggers a Health Impact Assessment Screening Report should be included.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-29-Pollution?
Representation ID: 96548
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 28- Waterways?
Representation ID: 96549
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
Representation ID: 96550
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Climate Resilient and Net Zero Carbon South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 96551
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Yes with the exception of sections 7.3, 7.4, 7.9, 7.10 and 7.11 which it is considered could be strengthened as commented on each section to protect existing development
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- K- Multifunctional Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)?
Representation ID: 96552
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
There are a number of recent SuDs installations which have been designed to be off-line and should only start to fill once a maximum flow in the site’s surface water network exceeds a threshold. Even in high rainfall periods these SuDs installations have not filled. Apart from the need to check that they have been built correctly consideration should be given to making all SuDs installations on-line.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- J- Reducing Flood Risk?
Representation ID: 96553
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
A definition is required for what constitutes a ‘major’ development within the policy. There needs to be a minimum number of dwellings specified for a Flood Risk Assessment to be required – small developments can cause flood issues to their neighbours and downstream if poorly designed. All development needs to demonstrate that they will not impact on existing development between them and the main rivers regardless of whether the proposed and existing development is within a flood risk area.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-H- Water Efficiency?
Representation ID: 96554
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy G- Climate Resilient Design?
Representation ID: 96555
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Agree
