Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Shipston Town Council search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG17 Question
Representation ID: 96536
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
SG17 should NOT be considered as a Strategic Growth location. It is remote from other growth areas and has none of the characteristics considered as necessary by the SWLP. It has no rail service adjacent and very limited bus connections to rail stations at Banbury, Moreton and Stratford. It is not close to any transport corridors such as the M40 and A46. Its economic future will rely on tourism and the associated special landscape areas of the Cotswolds and Feldons. As such these assets to its future must be carefully protected and not overdeveloped. Ref. Draft Policy Direction 48.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 96537
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Supportive of the proposals in the introduction. However, locations detailed in fig 6 & table 5 appear to be driven by Call for Sites data rather than by determining where growth is desirable and then researching land availability. For example growth is not desirable in SG17 as it does not fit any of the attributes of 'Growth Corridors'. The infrastructure is not capable of supporting the last ten years growth let alone future growth. Yet, as a large area of green field land has been offered for sites it seems as though this has driven its SG designation.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- I- Water Supply and Wastewater Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 96538
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
overview and background required
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Delivering Homes that Meet the Needs of all our communities chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 96539
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Subject to previous comments
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-43b- Registered Parks and Gardens?
Representation ID: 96540
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-40 Green and Blue Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 96541
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
Representation ID: 96542
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 96543
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?
Representation ID: 96544
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-34-Vale of Evesham Control Zone?
Representation ID: 96545
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
yes
