Whitnash East (South of Sydenham)

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 27 o 27

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 46199

Derbyniwyd: 01/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Horsley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is one of the remaining green spaces in Whitnash. Development has robbed Whitnash of its precious open spaces and its individual identity as community. Development has had an adverse impact on Whitnash - its village school identity; its long established village community; its congested narrow road network.The land at Whitnash East includes an ancient (Iron Age) settlement site that should not be abutted by houses. It is on an area known to flood, being part of the brook's flood plain in the dip of the valley. The brook is known to be fed by underground springs.

Testun llawn:

This is one of the remaining green spaces in Whitnash. Development has robbed Whitnash of its precio...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 46239

Derbyniwyd: 16/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Phillip Hickerton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There has been no change to this building plan what so ever, they still want to rip through Whitnash via Sydenham until they reach Bishops Tachbrook.Building this development will have a tragic negative impact on Whitnash causing an unnecessary urban sprawl.Local facilities such as schools, doctors, dentists etc in Whitnash are struggling to cope now even before this new build.The effect on the wildlife within this area will be detrimental, which has already been seen from the last development.All that is good about Whitnash will be stripped away forever.

Testun llawn:

There has been no change to this building plan what so ever, they still want to rip through Whitnash...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 46295

Derbyniwyd: 28/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Newton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Decreasing the permiability of the ground by building on this site will result in increased flow into the drainage brook downstream of where it deals with the surface water on the west side of the railway. This will cause the water to back up into Fieldgate Lane, resulting in flash flooding.

Testun llawn:

Due to local topology, all the surface water in the area between the Golf Club and the railway line ...

[dangos mwy]

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 46339

Derbyniwyd: 10/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Housing allocation here would be appropriate given the better transport links on this side of the urban area. The identification of sites to the south of Leamington as being appropriate is supported by their previous inclusion in the Core Strategy Preferred Options.

Testun llawn:

Housing allocation here would be appropriate given the better transport links on this side of the ur...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 46488

Derbyniwyd: 15/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr K Craven

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This large number of houses will put demands onroads, schools, and health facilites.
Where will the access to the site be?

Testun llawn:

This large number of houses will put demands onroads, schools, and health facilites.
Where will the ...

[dangos mwy]

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47007

Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Richborough Estates Ltd

Asiant : Turley Associates

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We welcome the inclusion of the Golf Lane/Fieldgate Lane site as an allocated housing site as set out by PO4. It will play a key role in achieving the plan's objectives, being significant in size but small enough to be delivered without the need for costly infrastructure works. It should, however, be noted that the site is 4 hectares in size, is unconstrained and is therefore more likely to have a development capacity in the region of 100-110 units (allowing for some on-site public open space and landscaping) rather than 90 units as set out in the associated table.

Testun llawn:

We welcome the inclusion of the Golf Lane/Fieldgate Lane site as an allocated housing site as set ou...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

250712_Final_CSPOreps.pdf (1.53 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47136

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah Shirley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This will cause too much traffic congestion and the local schools will not be able to cope with the amount of school places that they will be expected to provide.

Testun llawn:

This will cause too much traffic congestion and the local schools will not be able to cope with the ...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47195

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Taylor

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As the proposal remains basically the same so my previous objections accordingly still apply. The scope and nature are totally unacceptable both on aesthetic grounds and on the grounds of the impact on the local infrastructure.
Although Whitnash has developed from an ancient settlement into a small town over many years, it is still one which enjoys its own identity. However, overdevelopment of this site on this scale would irrevocably change our community to its detriment.

Testun llawn:

As the proposal remains basically the same so my previous objections accordingly still apply. The sc...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47227

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Adrian Litvinoff

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is depressing that land south of Sydenham has been identified for housing. This is in addition to the development of the site known as 'land south of St. Fremund's Way', itself a controversial and much-resented proposal that transgresses against an Area of Restraint . Many objections to the smaller development are based on the potential destruction of wildlife and environmental assets, and the inadequate access to the site. the revised application has made little effort to remedy these problems. The additional development now proposed, over three times larger, will compound these difficulties even further.

Testun llawn:

It is depressing that land south of Sydenham has been identified for housing. This is in addition to...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47314

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2012

Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd Homes Ltd and Northern Trust

Asiant : Framptons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objection to the proposed phasing of the proposed allocation at Sydenham. It is not appropriate to impose an arbitrary phasing restriction on their delivery which may simply serve to undermine the viability of a development. Reference to phasing should be deleted from the Local Plan. This is particularly relevant for Sydenham as it can be considered separately from the debate about whether the scale of Green Belt releases are justified north of Leamington.

Testun llawn:

Please see attachment in respect of Whitnash East (South of Sydenham), subject to objections about phasing

Atodiadau:

23 - 8777 Local Plan Reps Final.pdf (620.15 KB)
23 - 8777 Local Plan - Grove Farm Plan.pdf (1.13 MB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47518

Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Sean Deely

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This site should only be used if it is properly evidenced that building on rural land is unavoidable

Testun llawn:

This site should only be used if it is properly evidenced that building on rural land is unavoidable

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47686

Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Bolland

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to Whitnash East site.
Contrary to principles in Chapter 15 and NPPF sub-section 15.8.
Access would destroy traffic-free footpaths leading to network of countryside paths important for well-being and education.
Threat to wildlife and habitat.
Railway and higher land provide clear boundaries that need to be respected.
Not a healthy environment in which to live due to pollution.

Testun llawn:

Representation to LDF section PO4 relating to area described as 'On the edge of Warwick, Leamington ...

Representation to LDF section PO4 relating to area described as 'On the edge of Warwick, Leamington Spa & Whitnash, Whitnash East (South of Sydenham).

Representation

The proposals run counter to many planning principles laid down in Chapter 15 and particularly to the National Planning Policy Framework of sub-section 15.8; see the highlighted items below.

A majority of Whitnash residents live within ten minutes walk of Church Lane, currently the main access route to the area proposed for development. This is the only local green space where residents may walk and cycle in a safe and almost traffic-free environment. The bridleway to which Church Lane leads is the ancient track connecting Whitnash directly to Radford Semele and is thus an important part of the historic environment. Development of this site would completely destroy this unique feature.
This bridleway is much used by residents for general exercise well away from the bustle of the urban area and also for access to the popular Whitnash Brook and its adjacent Nature Reserve. For those wanting a longer walk, beyond the brook the bridleway links to a dense network of public footpaths, tracks and bridleways that are nowhere else found so close to the urban area. The proposed development would discourage walkers, cyclists and equestrians from using this valuable green space as they would have to pass through another long stretch of built-up area to reach open countryside.
Another important feature of this bridleway is that beyond the railway there opens up a very wide and attractive view of the surrounding countryside encompassing Radford Semele, Whitnash Brook, Crown Hill, the ridge on which Harbury stands and Chesterton Windmill. The footpath to Crown Hill runs off the bridleway and from this vantage point there are views to Leamington, Warwick, Hatton, Whitnash, Harbury, Chesterton Windmill and the Cotswolds. These views of our surrounding countryside are invaluable for the well-being of an increasingly urbanised population and would be severely compromised or lost completely should the proposals be put into effect. The network of paths, bridleways and tracks is of great value for educational purposes for, if used imaginatively, they enable local school children to appreciate their natural environment and to come into direct contact with both the stock rearing and arable aspects of local agriculture.
Development of cycle tracks and footpaths from Sydenham into this area together with the excellent public transport links between South Leamington and Whitnash will give residents from these parts of Leamington direct access to open countryside to the benefit of their well-being and will also promote social cohesion and inclusion. (see sub-section 13.1). As regards biodiversity, the area close to Whitnash has been host to a large brown hare population and the presence of otters in Whitnash Brook has been reported, their habitat being under threat should the proposed development take place.
It should be noted that the rising ground to the southern end of the Sydenham district and the railway line running through Whitnash provide clear boundaries to the urban areas and it is hoped that these limits will be respected despite much of the land in the area being in the hands of developers.
To these positive benefits of removing the area from the list of preferred sites for development must be added the negative one of including it. This relates to the tendency of the lower parts of the area to be shrouded in mist in the early hours of the morning and this, coupled with the carrying of emissions from diesel locomotives into this area by the prevailing winds, does not make for a healthy environment in which to build houses.
None of these threats to our green environment can be appreciated by study of maps and plans but only by treading the footpaths and byways that pass through this delightful landscape. It is hoped than this will be safeguarded for the enjoyment of present and future generations.

Change to Plan

In the first instance move the proposed development to Phase 3 to allow mature consideration of the above proposals by all interested parties and ultimately remove this area from the list of preferred options.
To compensate for the loss of potential housing, replace this preferred option by the highest in the list of those considered but which was excluded from the preferred option list. Alternatively, spread the housing around the area, including villages, by making a small increase to the individual allocations.

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 47771

Derbyniwyd: 06/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Stephens

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Will potentially have a huge impact on the environment in my local area.

Testun llawn:

Whitnash East (South of Sydenham)

This new local plan has just come to my attention this morning v...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 48085

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs E F Trafford

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to development at Whitnash East/South of Sydenham.
Impact on existing facilities/infrastructure.
Sydenham School recently enlarged to cope with existing children. Schools at capacity.
Commuting increases traffic on busy roads.
Green spaces already eroded.
Location 6 is of archaeological interest.

Testun llawn:

I object to the proposed housing development at Location 6 (Whitnash East/South of Sydenham) for the...

I object to the proposed housing development at Location 6 (Whitnash East/South of Sydenham) for the following reasons.
The serious impact this would have on the existing facilities and infrastructure.
Sydenham School has just recently been enlarged to enable it to cope with the children already in the catchment area. This does not take into account further housing development. Local schools, with the exception of Whitnash Combined where there are places available further up the school, are at capacity. When the Warwick Gates development was built I understand additional money was provided for the existing schools to be enlarged, however, this has not proved wholly satisfactory as there are instances where first and middle school children have not been placed at their local school but have to travel some distance to school. Whereas this would not be unusual for secondary school children it is not acceptable for younger children. There have also been occasions when children from the same family have not been able to attend the same school. Ideally local children should be given a place at their local school. When looking to enlarge schools in order to accommodate additional children it is clearly not sufficient to think in terms of classrooms but also playground size, playing field size, assembly hall size and cloakroom facilities.
In many cases the houses which have been built are not occupied by families working locally but people who then commute thus causing problems on already busy roads.
The green spaces surrounding Whitnash have already been eroded bit by bit. The area in Location 6 is one of archaeological interest and considerable charm.
It is for the above reasons that I strongly object to further housing development at Location 6.
Location 12 (Fieldgate Lane/Golf Lane, Whitnash.)
I object to housing development at Location 12 on the following grounds.
Golf Lane is already a very busy road with a number of residential roads feeding into it. Additional housing would only add to the problem. The local schools which are very popular are already at capacity.
Whilst I appreciate that the Council has to have a Local Plan in place it is my view that Whitnash has already had it's share of housing over the past years and that housing development in Location 12 is not in the interest of either retaining some of the character of the area or of the people already living in Whitnash.

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 48132

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2012

Ymatebydd: Nigel Briggs

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The maps concerned show development to include the West bank of Radford/Whitnash Brook. There is no indication of the extention of the wildlife reserve corridor. The absence of wildlife/green corridor does I feel contradict your sections on Green Infrastructure and The Historic Environment. It is well documented that the bank of Whitnash Brook contains archaeological remains dating back to the middle ages, as does it is thought the land itself.

Testun llawn:

Scanned Response Form

Atodiadau:

Scanned Response Form (2.05 MB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 48184

Derbyniwyd: 30/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Lt Colonel Ray Oakley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The plan identifies the access route through the realigned Campion School, which would be off the large roundabout near the Asda store. This is both a sensible and appropriate solution in terms of the location of the access route. However, a planning application is currently being considered which ignores the access criteria identified there. To realign the whole school may not be necessary and is possibly not financially viable. It is important that the location of the access route for this development via the school grounds is essential, to prevent traffic problems through Mill Pool Meadows Estate.

Testun llawn:

Scanned Response Form

Atodiadau:

Scanned Response Form (1.53 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 48314

Derbyniwyd: 08/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Butt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to the Whitnash East proposal for the following reasons:
* The site will generate traffic with only one access point
* Will increase the amount of peak traffic on Golf Lane due to pupils being dropped off
* Dropping off and picking up in Fieldgate Lane will be a significant hazard and danger to residents
*Loss of habitat for otters, hares, foxes, buzzards and other wildlife
*Could increase existing flood risk
* Will increase the pressure for primary school places
* Moving Campion school will cause increased travel and a loss of a community facility for the existing residents of Sydenham
* The character of Whitnash has already been scarred by recent new developments, other areas should share the development.

Testun llawn:

I have 2 main areas of objection to the recently announced preffered strategy

1) The presumption ...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 48881

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Whitnash Community Forum

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

* How was proposed number of new homes to be built reached?
* Will Campion School be relocated?
* Not fair to keep building homes in same places, in white belt. Why can't development take place around other settlements?
* Is there argument to take more of greenbelt so that towns like Whitnash can be spared?
* Proposed to build houses by Fieldgate Lane, yet there's already surface water drainage problem that will worsen when green space built on.
* What are plans to accommodate extra children? Schools cannot be extended further.
* Woodside Farm included in proposed sites but owner said not for sale.
* Why aren't some undeveloped commercial sites not being considered?
* Risk of coalescence with Radford Semele and Bishops Tachbrook.

Testun llawn:

* How was the proposed number of new homes to be built reached?
* Will Campion School be relocated?
...

[dangos mwy]

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49073

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Governors of Campion School

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

NB: Whilst this representation has been added as "support", it is noted that the reality is that the representation does not constitute either an objection or an expression of support.

The allocations are contraversial. Housing allocations will raise demand for school places with implications for Campion School.

Should the final decision be to go forward with this development, Campion school is prepared to work with the changes, in particular, to meet the challenges of growth, whilst being determined to retain a pupil centred ethos.

We wish to increase our role as a focus for facilities to support the whole community.

Testun llawn:

Response of the Governors of Campion School to the Warwick District Local Plan Preferred Options Con...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49369

Derbyniwyd: 16/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Gill Barker

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

My previous objection was to the possible use of Church Lane and the use of Campion School as a new access route, and that this site is already at saturation point and that still stands.
However, there appears to be no rented social housing accommodation where the greatest need is evident. Houses make money and buy to rent is a sound business proposition.
The Whitnash area has an unfair percentage of new build and the quality of life will suffer as a result.

Testun llawn:

Scanned form.

Atodiadau:

Scanned form. (1.75 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49666

Derbyniwyd: 17/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Martin & Kim Drew & Barnes

Nifer y bobl: 2

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This site forms part of a portfolio of sites for 3800 proposed homes, which extrapolates to 14-15,000 more people living south of Leamington and Warwick. These extra people will put a massive burden on the infrastructure such as roads/bridges to gain access to the Town Centres' and emergency services. The lack of infrastructure was a major objection to the last Preferred Option. If more housing is required there must be adequate infrastructure built in parallel. Historic infrastructure problems of poor water pressure, insufficient sewage, conjested road junctions, rat running and lack of school facilities, must not be repeated.

Testun llawn:

Following a presentation of WDC's Local Plan in Bishop's Tachbrook, I have several objections and su...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

Objections to local plan housing July 2012.docx (29.27 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49702

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No specific comments, but is it really required?

Testun llawn:

PO1 Preferred Option: Level of growth
I consider that the proposed level of housing growth of 555 h...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

New Local Plan consultation Murphy.docx (21.29 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49860

Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The site is potentially uneconomic to develop requiring substantial infrastructure costs (new road costing in excess of £18m). Only necessary to consider site if you support the Preferred Options housing projections. The Parish Council supports a substantially lower housing projection figure.

Testun llawn:

See Attachments

Atodiadau:

Response to WDC Executive Summary contents.doc (33.50 KB)
Response to Preferred Options main.doc (384.50 KB)
Response to WDC on preferred level of growth.doc (280.50 KB)
Draft Green Space Strategy for Warwick district 2012.doc (66.50 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50099

Derbyniwyd: 12/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Roger Speck

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The site is too extensive and should be reduced in size.
Brownfield sites should be developed instead.

Testun llawn:

See attached Response Form and Letter

Atodiadau:

Response Form and letter (1.39 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50139

Derbyniwyd: 28/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Janet White

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

A larg e proportion of the traffic from this area is likely to travel under the railway bridge at Fieldgate Lane going towards Heathcote, the M40, schools, the Town Centre and supermarkets. Golf Lane and Heathcote Road and the main road through Whitnash would not be able to cope with that amount of traffic.

Testun llawn:

Scanned representation

Atodiadau:

6809-R.pdf (2.22 MB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50345

Derbyniwyd: 25/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Instone

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Supports the development of the Whitnash East

Testun llawn:

scanned form

Atodiadau:

5100-R.pdf (1.75 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50779

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Kenneth McEwan

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The infrastructure could not cope with the number of houses planned.
There would be an inbalance with some areas provided for but others not having the correct amount of infrastructure.
Social behaviour could suffer with the creation of large estates.
It goes against vision for district.
Utilities would also be stretxhed espeically if an emegency occurred.
There would be increased pollution from increased traffic.

Green space needs preserving.

Testun llawn:

New Local Plan
...

[dangos mwy]