No

ID sylw: 94471

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Catherine Gilhooly

Adverse impact on heritage and conservation status of Charlecote Village. Disproportionate overdevelopment of a village. Environmental and landscape concerns. Limited infrastructure to support additional housing. Road access not suitable for increased traffic.

No

ID sylw: 94543

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

While these are not considered as a new settlement, the potential agglomeration size means that they may function in a similar way. With no fast connectivity such as rail, and with buses providing the only viable public transport to Stratford-upon-Avon, the effects on traffic in the town and approaches would be untenable. TTG do not support these locations without a proper traffic assessment and planned infrastructure improvements in advance of development.

Yes

ID sylw: 94548

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Steen

Not Green Belt

No

ID sylw: 94590

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Michael Thomas

I have concerns about the traffic and infrastructure issues in Wellesbourne, particularly with the proposed construction of thousands of new homes. Currently, parking and traffic congestion are significant problems, exacerbated by delivery vehicles and market days. If 5,000 new homes are built, it could lead to 40,000 additional vehicles, creating gridlock. Furthermore, I question how utilities and services can be expanded when existing providers struggle. There seems to be little consideration for sustainable energy solutions, like solar power. Additionally, there are conflicting plans regarding the future use of Wellesbourne Airfield, leaving the local community without constructive answers.

No

ID sylw: 94667

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Nick Hawkins

I oppose any further development in and around Wellesbourne, Charlote and Barford, particularly in Wellesbourne, for several reasons. Stratford DC is already exceeding its housing targets, and additional development would harm the rural character of the area and the environment. Transport links are overstretched, with busy roads and inadequate traffic management, especially during school times. Furthermore, Wellesbourne lacks sufficient facilities for residents, with an oversubscribed primary school and a medical centre that cannot accommodate a population increase. It is irresponsible to allow more housing without improving essential services.

Other

ID sylw: 94706

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Jackson

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 94731

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

We have insufficient knowledge of this location from which to make an informed comment

Other

ID sylw: 94755

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

SG15/SG16 - Wellesbourne Group
While these are not considered as a new settlement, the potential agglomeration size means that they may function in a similar way. With no fast connectivity such as rail, and with buses providing the only viable public transport to Stratford-upon-Avon, the effects on traffic in the town and approaches would be untenable. TTG do not support these locations without a proper traffic assessment and planned infrastructure improvements in advance of development.

No

ID sylw: 94820

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: mr william tansey

Including this area in conjunction with X1 and SG09 and SG10 risks subsuming Wellesbourne into Leamington

No

ID sylw: 95043

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Luca Cenciotti

As a resident of Wellesbourne I am concerned that any new development will only come in the form of new houses and new industrial sites or warehouses. There is already a lack of educational and health facilities in Wellesbourne, with Primary School, GP and Dentist practice being oversubscribed. The roads connecting Wellesbourne with the M40 are already heavily congested and there seems to be no proposed infrastructures improvement in the plan. I am also concerned about the irreversible damage to the natural habitat and threat to local wildlife.

No

ID sylw: 95066

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Ruth Dixon

There has already been too much development in this area and without the right infra-structure being put in

No

ID sylw: 95133

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Lauren Fowler

Doctors, dentist and school are already over subscribed. It’s ludicrous to even consider adding more houses to our village. Where does the wildlife go? What about drainage? Road usage? Keep the beautiful scenery rather than making it a concrete jungle like so many other places in this country.

No

ID sylw: 95375

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Linda Synge

I wish to object to the proposed developments around our villages. I live in Kineton but have strong links to Tanworth-in-Arden and Wellesbourne. While I've seen new housing benefit local shops and communities, these developments would transform our villages into towns without the necessary services. The increased traffic, especially in Kineton, would create significant issues at narrow junctions. Additionally, the Labour Party's manifesto promised housing on brownfield sites, yet these proposals target green fields, which would permanently damage the natural environment. I urge a reconsideration of land around existing towns for housing, as South Warwickshire's villages should remain distinct.

No

ID sylw: 95436

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Better that it is not Green Belt, not against this option. Would prefer spread housing allocation in this area around neighbouring villages to not over burden Wellesbourne village and reduce sprawl.

No

ID sylw: 95557

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Patricia Holliday

I think some of the areas close to Wellesbourne would be suitable using the airfield which is a brown field site, the area does have the infrastructure to cope with more development, but I do not agree with all this area especially in close proximity to the National Trust House, Charlecote hall. to over develop this area would ruin the pleasure and aspect of this area forever.

No

ID sylw: 95562

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

This potential development area is too large to be served by Wellesbourne's existing facilities

No

ID sylw: 95689

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miles McGarty

I object strongly to the proposed housing development in Strategic Growth Area SG15 and surrounding sites near Wellesbourne. I believe these plans are disproportionate and detrimental to the community, infrastructure, and character of the area. Key issues include inadequate education and healthcare services, transport challenges, and the risk of overdevelopment harming Wellesbourne's identity and environment. The consultation process is complex and lacks transparency. I urge the council to reconsider these proposals and adopt a more sustainable approach that prioritises infrastructure and community needs. I look forward to your response.

No

ID sylw: 95779

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Underwood

Development here would overwhelm all services and road infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 95923

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Rukmani Grace

I object as it is overwhelming the village and its resources in has in terms of schooling, medical, road facilities amongst others.

No

ID sylw: 95957

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Marshall

SG15 is rural, agricultural land, it's landscape is typical of South Warwickshire and should be protected from development. The cumulative effect of other development at SG16, the Wellesbourne Airfield, Wasperton Gravel pits. X1, the established solar site at Elms Farm Newbold Pacey and further proposed solar sites around Ashorne and Newbold Pacey turn the corridor created by the A422 and B4087 into urban/industrial swathe. This would link Wellesbourne to Warwick Leamington on the line of the M40. Contrary to the plans criteria and guidelines. The roads particularly in Wellesbourne and the B4087 are not adequate to support this development.

No

ID sylw: 96010

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stephen Bolton

What is happening to 'The Forest of Arden' and 'Leafy Warwickshire'?
This sort of mass house building in rural Warwickshire is beyond any joke, it is making of small village communities into parts of NEW townships, So they lose ALL identity of their existing community spirit and life.
If SG15 were to go ahead this would finish up the linking up of the townships of Warwick, Leamington & Whitnash with the now large village Wellesbourne. This can not be right!
If this were allowed to go ahead, problems for our existing roads, wildlife, Doctors surgeries.
Please reconsider these consultation areas.

No

ID sylw: 96020

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Marshall

SG15 is open agricultural land which is currently being farmed. it is representative of the countryside of South Warwickshire and should not be developed. The cumulative effect of SG15, SG16, X1, The Wellesbourne Airfield, Warwick University site, Wasperton Gravel Pits application and existing and proposed Solar Installations effectively joins Wellesbourne to Warwick/Leamington in one swathe of development. The A422 may just handle the associated trafic but Wellesbourne has numerous pinch points and the B4387 is notoriously dangerous, two HGV's cannot pass in the Conservation village of Newbold Pacey.
This would be classic overdevelopment of a rural environment.

No

ID sylw: 96076

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rosemary Collier

SG15 and SG16 would more than double the size of Wellesbourne and threaten village status. Most people from Wellesbourne must drive to work and to access other facilities - the A429 is already extremely busy - sustainability? What about capacity of schools, health services, sewage etc. The proposed sites sit in open countryside, with implications for archaeological sites and the historical landscape around Charlecote. A range of wild species use the land north of Wellesbourne; bats, great-crested newt, grass snake, hedgehog, brown hare and a diversity of bird species including red-listed corn bunting. There are several Local Wildlife Sites nearby.

Yes

ID sylw: 96193

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Sinclair

Non green belt development

Yes

ID sylw: 96229

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Pateman

Build housing on non-greenbelt land.

Other

ID sylw: 96239

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Michael Metcalfe

Development of SGs 15 and 16 around Wellesbourne, and/or SGs 9,10 and 11 to the South of Warwick would greatly increase traffic along the A249. Wasperton is an example of a small village whose viability depends entirely on a single access to and from the A249.
The attached document contains evidence that this access is already compromised at certain times, and this is expected to become worse if the proposed quarry is progressed. It is vital to consider the accumulating effect of the proposed developments on the viability of this and other villages.

Yes

ID sylw: 96261

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Madeline Eaton McShane

Non greenbelt

No

ID sylw: 96575

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Stewart

Over development in this location will cause excessive traffic though Tiddington Road into Stratford-upon-Avon and across the Clopton Bridge which is already heavily congested.

No

ID sylw: 96624

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Griffin

puts too much stress on local infrastructure, especially roads, most secondary pupils around these areas have to travel to school by bus or private cars thus putting more strain on the road network, public transport is virtually non-existent . Also local healthcare services will be overloaded, they are near enough at full capacity now. Schools both primary and secondary will be crammed full creating a worse learning environment for future generations.

No

ID sylw: 96753

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline Newton

I strongly object to the proposed South Warwickshire Local Plan because:

Proposed developments would significantly damage the character and beauty of our landscape.

Flood risk is another major concern, with flooding already an issue in the village

Lack of rail connectivity means residents would be forced to rely on cars, worsening traffic congestion and pollution. this is already a problem.

The scale of development threatens Wellesbourne’s village status.

No clear plan to provide additional schools or healthcare services, already full or stretched.

Developments will cause irreversible harm to the local area and the wellbeing of residents.