BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Warwickshire County Council
Chwilio o’r newyddOther
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG20 Question
ID sylw: 108884
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
No objections on mineral sterilisation grounds subject to prior extraction of sand and gravel and subject to:
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Site Waste Management Plan (a plan for reusing/recycling waste on site and avoiding off-site disposal to landfill),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Highways / Transport
There will be a need for detailed modelling to take place once there is an idea of numbers and more specific locations. The County Council will continue to work with the South Warwickshire Local Plan Team as thinking progresses.
Public transport availability can be assessed once further information is available about numbers and location.
Primary Education
Potential expansion of Bidford Primary School could support the delivery of an additional 300 homes. Anything higher than that will require new provision.
Secondary Education
Limited capacity at Alcester although this is at the Catholic Secondary School and this might not be seen as appropriate by some parents.
Work would be required to determine if Alcester Academy can be expanded. Likely to require significant build costs due to site constraints.
Possibility that growth at Bidford and Alcester could support the delivery of a new secondary offer. This would though need circa 5,000 new dwellings to make it viable.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG21 Question
ID sylw: 108885
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
OBJECT on possible mineral sterilisation grounds and subject to:
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Highways / Transport
There will be a need for detailed modelling to take place once there is an idea of numbers and more specific locations. The County Council will continue to work with the South Warwickshire Local Plan Team as thinking progresses.
Public transport availability can be assessed once further information is available about numbers and location.
Primary Education
No local availability or provision to expand.
Would require new provision – minimum of 1,000 new dwellings to support this. .
Secondary Education
Limited capacity at Alcester although this is at the Catholic Secondary School and this might not be seen as appropriate by some parents.
Work would be required to determine if Alcester Academy can be expanded. Likely to require significant build costs due to site constraints.
Possibility that growth at Bidford and Alcester could support the delivery of a new secondary offer. This would though need circa 5,000 new dwellings to make it viable.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG22 Question
ID sylw: 108886
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
No objections on mineral sterilisation grounds subject to prior extraction of sand and gravel and subject to:
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Waste Site Assessment (for assessing the extent to which an existing waste site/use/operation would be prejudiced) (The Slough),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Highways / Transport
There will be a need for detailed modelling to take place once there is an idea of numbers and more specific locations. The County Council will continue to work with the South Warwickshire Local Plan Team as thinking progresses.
Public transport availability can be assessed once further information is available about numbers and location.
Primary Education
Some capacity in existing provision.
Push back of Worcestershire children for future admissions.
This will depend on size of growth.
Secondary Education
Some capacity in existing provision.
Push back of Worcestershire children for future admissions.
This will depend on size of growth.
Studley High School keen to expand.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG23 Question
ID sylw: 108887
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
No objections on mineral sterilisation grounds subject to prior extraction of sand and gravel east of the railway line and subject to:
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Site Waste Management Plan (a plan for reusing/recycling waste on site and avoiding off-site disposal to landfill),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Highways / Transport
There will be a need for detailed modelling to take place once there is an idea of numbers and more specific locations. The County Council will continue to work with the South Warwickshire Local Plan Team as thinking progresses.
Public transport availability can be assessed once further information is available about numbers and location.
Primary Education
Some capacity in existing provision.
Could take an additional 300 homes.
Secondary Education
Expansion of Henley High School.
Currently no sixth form at the school.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG24 Question
ID sylw: 108888
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
No objections on mineral sterilisation grounds subject to the exclusion of land to the south and west of the village and subject to:
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Highways / Transport
There will be a need for detailed modelling to take place once there is an idea of numbers and more specific locations. The County Council will continue to work with the South Warwickshire Local Plan Team as thinking progresses.
Public transport availability can be assessed once further information is available about numbers and location.
Primary Education
Nearest Warwickshire primary schools are Lapworth and Tanworth in Arden.
Some out of area children currently on roll at both schools so some growth could be taken if future push back for out of area children. Could take circa 300 new dwellings.
Secondary Education
Could consider expansion of henley High School if required.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question A1
ID sylw: 108889
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
No objections on mineral sterilisation grounds subject to prior extraction of minerals and subject to
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Active Travel
There is no existing cycling infrastructure that connects this area to the key local centres of Redditch and South Birmingham or Dorridge. There is an existing network of quiet lanes and roads available for those confident enough to cycle with traffic to use within the rural area, but finding connecting low trafficked routes becomes more challenging in the proximity of existing urban areas where there is also a need to route across major roads including the A435 and M42. There is a good network of cycle routes within Redditch (approx. 4km) but limited current provision on the edge of the urban area including to the north east of the town which would provide the most direct connection to the new settlement. To the north, there is an existing network of cycle routes at Blythe Valley Park (approx. 5km) which connects into an expanding network of routes feeding to Solihull, Shirley and Birmingham. The Grand Union Canal (approx. 4.5km) runs from Hockley Heath towards south Solihull and the towpath could provide an option for meeting demands for cycling, however it is likely to need upgrading to meet the demands of utility/commuting cyclists alongside other users.
New traffic free routes would be required to connect to existing networks within the urban areas of Redditch, Birmingham via Blythe Valley Park and Dorridge. The Grand Union canal towpath would need to be upgraded to make it suitable for all year cycling should this be considered a potential alignment. A suitable connection and associated cycle parking facilities would also need to be provided to the most local railway station.
Key challenges relate to the length of connection required, a lack of space within the existing highway boundaries, the need to safely route across key transport corridors and deliver direct connections to existing urban cycling networks through built up areas all of which is likely to require significant amounts of third party land to be acquired. Our initial analysis therefore suggests this location will face significant deliverability and affordability challenges. Furthermore, the distance to service centres is likely to be at the extreme of what people could reasonably be expected to regularly cycle.
Rail
The site is in well-related to two stations on the Stratford to Birmingham (North Warwickshire) line, these being Danzey and Wood End. Train services are provided by West Midlands Trains with an hourly frequency in each direction between Stratford, Birmingham and Kidderminster. The travel time to Birmingham is around 40 minutes. The site is also located in reasonable proximity to Redditch, Dorridge and Whitlock’s End stations (6-7 miles away), all of which benefit from more frequent train services towards Birmingham as well as other destinations in the West Midlands.
There are some issues around seating capacity on certain peak-hour trains on the North Warwickshire line, although this is helped by the second train service each hour between Birmingham and Stratford which travels via Solihull and Dorridge.
Passenger facilities at both Danzey and Wood End are currently limited, reflecting their low footfall. Access by means other than a car to either station is currently challenging, and there is limited formal parking. There is an aspiration to electrify the Snow Hill lines including the North Warwickshire line and increase the train frequency between Stratford and Birmingham to two trains per hour via Henley-in-Arden.
Of the two stations in proximity to the site, Danzey offers greater potential for upgrade as part of a new settlement proposal. Although falling outside the boundary of the site, there appears to be land around the station which could be used to provide a transport interchange, space for secure cycle parking and an increased level of car parking. The current footbridge linking the two platforms would need to be upgraded to full ‘Access for All’ standards including lifts. Some significant improvements to the roads leading to Danzey station would be required.
On-board passenger count data from the Train Operator would be required to ascertain the level of overcrowding on current (peak-hour) services. The provision of the second train per-hour via Henley-in-Arden would be highly desirable to give a train frequency level that both encourages rail use and discourages trips being made towards Redditch and Dorridge to access other rail services. The modal share for rail trips would be strong towards southern and central Birmingham, but less strong towards other key areas such as Solihull and UK Central without driving to other stations or interchange within Birmingham.
The key infrastructure upgrade of Danzey station set out above should be both deliverable and affordable. The decisions around any train service improvement to provide a half-hourly service as well as electrification of the Snow Hill lines rest with DfT and the West Midlands Rail Executive. Whilst a decision to proceed with a new settlement option in this area would make a positive contribution towards the business case for these improvements, it is unlikely to be the deciding factor. It is recommended therefore that a proactive dialogue with WMRE be instigated should this settlement option proceed to the next stage of assessment.
Bus
There are no inter-urban bus routes which pass near or through the site. Local bus services are also limited in this area. Rail services on the North Warwickshire line (detailed above) provide the main public transport links for local residents.
A new high quality, frequent service between Redditch, Danzey Rail Station, Blythe Valley Business Park, Shirley and Solihull will be required to help meet demand from the new settlement. An upgrade of the existing Service 517/519 between Redditch, Tanworth-in-Arden, Shirley and Solihull is not considered appropriate due to the many communities it serves.
Provision of high quality bus stops with shelters, Real Time Information and raised kerbs, along with bus priority measures at key junctions on the route of the proposed inter-urban service and within the new settlement should be provided. This will include locations within the West Midlands Combined Authority area, therefore the involvement of Transport for the West Midlands (TfWM) and Solihull Council in the development of this route should be sought.
The proposed new inter-urban bus service and associated infrastructure improvements should be deliverable, affordable and viable in the long term if planned and promoted properly.
Highway (Strategic)
The site is located close to the A435, which provides direct access to the M42 at Junction 3. This gives access to the M5 (west), M6 (east and north) and M40 (east and south). The A435 is dual-carriageway standard either side of M42 Junction 3 and is designated as part of the Key Route Network (KRN) in the West Midlands and Major Road Network (MRN) in Worcestershire and Warwickshire, these being the most strategically significant local roads within these areas. The M5 (south) is also accessible from the A435 and the A46, albeit through a designated Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) within Studley.
The M5/M6/M42 Motorway Box distributes strategic traffic passing through, around and within the West Midlands conurbation. As such it carries very heavy traffic levels throughout the day and at weekends. Part of the M42 is covered by Active Traffic Management measures to help manage flows during peak periods of use and during incidents. Provision of Smart Motorway technology on other sections of the M42 was under consideration until the recent pause was instigated by the previous Conservative Government.
A new Junction 5A on the M42 is currently being constructed by National Highways as part of a committed scheme from its Road Investment Strategy Period 2 (2020- 25) programme. The aim of the scheme is to improve the operation of M42 Junction 6 near Birmingham Airport/NEC and the forthcoming HS2 Interchange Station.
Access to the SRN via the A435 is adequate, although a detailed assessment of its capacity and junction performance at M42 Junction 3, B4101, Gorcott Hill/A4023, on the A4189 corridor which passes through the villages of Ullenhall and Claverdon, A435/A4189 Dog Roundabout and adjacent A4189 Warwick Road/Alders Drive/Claybrook Drive Roundabout in Redditch Borough, A435 Washford Mill, A435 Barley Mow Roundabout, A435/A448 Bromsgrove Road in Studley, A435/B4089 Alcester Heath Roundabout, A46/A435/A422 Arrow Roundabout, A435/A46 Oversley Mill Roundabout and impact on the Studley AQMA will be required. In addition, a detailed assessment of the impact on community severance and road safety in Studley and Mappleborough Green will also be required.
M42 Junction 3 was subject to a modest upgrade in December 2019, with the aim of reducing congestion through the junction and on its approaches. Should this site go forward to further assessment, proactive engagement with National Highways will be required to assess the impact of a new settlement option on Junction 3, as well as Junction 2 (A441/Hopwood Services), Junction 4A (M40) and Junction 4 (A34/A3400). Engagement with Birmingham City Council and Worcestershire County Council in relation to the A435 KRN/MRN will also be required.
Any major improvements to the SRN or MRN required as a result of the assessment are likely to be costly and will need to be considered in light of other significant infrastructure requirements to understand overall viability. More modest improvements should be affordable and deliverable, assuming they can be accommodated within existing highway boundaries without the need for third-party land.
Highway (Local)
The site is reasonably well-related to the Local Road Network in terms of the B4101 and B4102, which provide links towards the A435 (west), A34 Shirley/Solihull (north) and A3400 Hockley Heath/Dorridge (east). Links towards the A3400 Stratford-upon- Avon and A4189 Warwick are poorer, requiring use of largely ‘C’ road lanes.
Existing traffic on local roads in this area is a combination of local trips and other medium distance traffic using routes to avoid congested routes and centres (e.g. Hockley Heath), access the SRN at M42 Junctions 3 and 4 and M40 Junction 16 or avoid the SRN when there is a problem on the Motorway Box (M5/M6/M42). This results in issues with rat-running and speeding, which impacts on local communities and causes congestion at local junctions.
A comprehensive assessment of the impact of a new settlement option in this area will be required to assess capacity and safety issues, which given its potential impacts should include involvement from Solihull Council and Worcestershire County Council. A bespoke route from the new settlement to the B4101/A435 will be required to protect local communities including those in the villages of Tanworth-in-Arden and Wood End, where provision of a bypass should be strongly considered. Use of existing (upgraded) roads should be considered where possible to avoid the need for a new bridge under/over the railway line as part of any scheme.
Investment in a bespoke route to link the new settlement with the B4101/A435 which minimises/avoids impacts on Tanworth-in-Arden and Wood End will be the key infrastructure requirement from an LRN perspective. This should be affordable and deliverable on the assumption that any route does not require a new crossing either under or over the railway line, and that third-party land outside the red-line boundary of the new settlement can be secured by the developer.
A package of local junction improvements will be required, including B4101/B4102 Wood End, B4102/A34 Shirley and B4101/A3400/B4439 Hockley Heath – all of which should be affordable within the overall IDP. Some third-party (non-highway) land may however be needed to deliver certain improvements, particularly where a new roundabout is required.
Education Impacts
Overall numbers would suggest the need for 1 new secondary school for 6,000 new dwellings and 2 new secondary schools for 10,000 new homes.
At primary we would suggest the need for 3 or 4 new primary schools for 6,000 new dwellings and between 5 and 7 new primary schools for 10,000 new dwellings.
The possibility of delivering all through schools to be considered, i.e. co-location of at least part of the primary offer with new secondary facilities.
There is an assumption that all new primary facilities will include early years facilities and Special Resource Provision facilities.
There is an assumption that all new secondary schools will provide for sixth form teaching on site and that there will also be a Specialist Resource Provision included.
Limited local primary capacity to take initial growth.
Henley High School is on a large site with opportunities for short term or longer-term expansion. Pupils will have to be transported but there is a good bus park facility at the school.
The fact that there is the equivalent of more than 1 form of entry made up of Solihull pupils gives scope for early development to be catered for without the need for additional provision.
Henley does not have a sixth form so pupils would need to travel to Stratford to access post 16 facilities. The County Council does not offer free transport for Post 16 students.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question A2
ID sylw: 108890
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
No objections on mineral sterilisation grounds subject to the exclusion of the land to the west of the railway line and subject to
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Site Waste Management Plan (a plan for reusing/recycling waste on site and avoiding off-site disposal to landfill),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Active Travel
There is no existing cycling infrastructure that connects this area to the key local centres of Redditch and south Birmingham or Dorridge. There is an existing network of quiet lanes of roads available for cyclists to use within the rural area, but finding connecting low trafficked routes becomes more challenging in the proximity of existing urban areas where there is also a need to route across major roads including the A435 and M42. There is a good network of cycle routes within Redditch (approx. 5km) but limited current provision on the edge of the urban area including to the north east of the town which would provide the most direct connection to the development area. To the north, there is an existing network of cycle routes at Blythe Valley Park (approx. 3.5km) which connects into cycle an expanding network of routes feeding to Solihull, Shirley and Birmingham. The Grand Union Canal (approx. 3km) runs from Hockley Heath towards south Solihull and the towpath could provide an option for meeting demands for cycling, however it is likely to need upgrading to meet the demands of utility/commuting cyclists alongside other users.
Within the site it may be possible to repurpose existing low trafficked roads/lanes for active travel. However, new traffic free routes would be required outside of the development to connect to existing networks within the urban areas of Redditch, Birmingham and Dorridge. The Grand Union canal towpath would need to be upgraded to make it suitable for all year cycling should this be considered a potential alignment. A suitable connection and associated cycle parking facilities would also need to be provided to the most local railway station.
Key challenges relate to the length of connection required, a lack of space within the existing highway boundaries, the need to safely route across key transport corridors and deliver direct connections to existing urban cycling networks through built up areas all of which is likely to require significant amounts of third party land to be acquired. Our initial analysis therefore suggests this location will face significant deliverability and affordability challenges. Furthermore, whilst the Blythe Valley Business Park is within a reasonable cycling distance (less than 5km) the distances to a wider range of services and facilities are likely to be reaching the extreme of what people could reasonably be expected to regularly cycle.
Rail
The site is in well-related to Wood End station on the Stratford to Birmingham (North Warwickshire) line. Train services are provided by West Midlands Trains with an hourly frequency in each direction between Stratford, Birmingham and Kidderminster. The travel time to Birmingham is around 40 minutes. The site is also located in reasonable proximity to Redditch, Dorridge and Whitlock’s End stations (6-7 miles away), all of which benefit from more frequent train services towards Birmingham as well as other destinations in the West Midlands.
There are some issues around seating capacity on certain peak-hour trains on the North Warwickshire line, although this is helped by the second train service each hour between Birmingham and Stratford which travels via Solihull and Dorridge.
Passenger facilities at Wood End are currently limited, reflecting its low footfall. Access by means other than a car to the station is currently challenging, and there is limited formal parking. There is an aspiration to electrify the Snow Hill lines including the North Warwickshire line and increase the train frequency between Stratford and Birmingham to two trains per hour via Henley-in-Arden.
Unfortunately, Wood End offers limited potential for upgrade as part of a new settlement proposal. It is difficult to see how any further car parking or transport interchange could be provided given surrounding land uses and the availability of land unless an adjacent property such as the Warwickshire Lad Public House were to be acquired. The current long pedestrian paths and stepped access to each platform along with the lack of footbridge linking the two platforms would need to be addressed through the provision of a full ‘Access for All’ standard bridge including lifts. Some improvements to the roads leading to Wood End station may be required.
On-board passenger count data from the Train Operator would be required to ascertain the level of overcrowding on current (peak-hour) services. The provision of the second train per-hour via Henley-in-Arden would be highly desirable to give a train frequency level that both encourages rail use and discourages trips being made towards Redditch and Dorridge to access other rail services. The modal share for rail trips would be strong towards southern and central Birmingham, but less strong towards other key areas such as Solihull and UK Central without driving to other stations or interchange within Birmingham.
The key infrastructure upgrade of Wood End station is unlikely to be deliverable due to the availability of land and surrounding uses unless third-party land can be acquired. The decisions around any train service improvement to provide a half- hourly service as well as electrification of the Snow Hill lines rest with DfT and the West Midlands Rail Executive. Whilst a decision to proceed with a new settlement option in this area would make a positive contribution towards the business case for these improvements, it is unlikely to be the deciding factor. It is recommended therefore that a proactive dialogue with WMRE be instigated should this settlement option proceed to the next stage of assessment.
Bus
There are no inter-urban bus routes which pass near or through the site. Local bus services are also limited in this area. Rail services on the North Warwickshire line provide the main public transport links for local residents.
A new high quality, frequent service between Redditch, Blythe Valley Business Park, Shirley and Solihull will be required to help meet demand from the new settlement. An upgrade of the existing Service 517/519 between Redditch, Tanworth-in-Arden, Shirley and Solihull is not considered appropriate due to the many communities it serves.
Provision of high quality bus stops with shelters, Real Time Information and raised kerbs, along with bus priority measures at key junctions on the route of the proposed inter-urban service and within the new settlement should be provided. This will include locations within the West Midlands Combined Authority area, therefore the involvement of Transport for the West Midlands (TfWM) and Solihull Council in the development of this route should be sought.
The proposed new inter-urban bus service and associated infrastructure improvements should be deliverable, affordable and viable in the long term if planned and promoted properly.
Highway (Strategic)
The site is located close to the A435, which provides direct access to the M42 at Junction 3. This gives access to the M5 (west), M6 (east and north) and M40 (east and south). The A435 is dual-carriageway standard either side of M42 Junction 3 and is designated as part of the Key Route Network (KRN) in the West Midlands and Major Road Network (MRN) in Worcestershire and Warwickshire, these being the most strategically significant local roads within these areas. The M5 (south) is also accessible from the A435 and the A46, albeit through a designated Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) within Studley.
The M5/M6/M42 Motorway Box distributes strategic traffic passing through, around and within the West Midlands conurbation. As such it carries very heavy traffic levels throughout the day and at weekends. Part of the M42 is covered by Active Traffic Management measures to help manage flows during peak periods of use and during incidents. Provision of Smart Motorway technology on other sections of the M42 was under consideration until the recent pause was instigated by the previous Government.
A new Junction 5A on the M42 is currently being constructed by National Highways as part of a committed scheme from its Road Investment Strategy Period 2 (2020- 25) programme. The aim of the scheme is to improve the operation of M42 Junction 6 near Birmingham Airport/NEC and the forthcoming HS2 Interchange Station.
Access to the SRN via the A435 is adequate, although a detailed assessment of its capacity and junction performance at M42 Junction 3, B4101, Gorcott Hill/A4023, on the A4189 corridor which passes through the villages of Ullenhall and Claverdon, A435/A4189 Dog Roundabout and adjacent A4189 Warwick Road/Alders Drive/Claybrook Drive Roundabout in Redditch Borough, A435 Washford Mill, A435 Barley Mow Roundabout, A435/A448 Bromsgrove Road in Studley, A435/B4089 Alcester Heath Roundabout, A46/A435/A422 Arrow Roundabout, A435/A46 Oversley Mill Roundabout and impact on the Studley AQMA will be required. In addition, a detailed assessment of the impact on community severance and road safety in Studley and Mappleborough Green will also be required.
M42 Junction 3 was subject to a modest upgrade in December 2019, with the aim of reducing congestion through the junction and on its approaches. Should this site go forward to further assessment, proactive engagement with National Highways will be required to assess the impact of a new settlement option on Junction 3, as well as Junction 2 (A441/Hopwood Services), Junction 4A (M40) and Junction 4 (A34/A3400). Engagement with Birmingham City Council and Worcestershire County Council in relation to the A435 KRN/MRN will also be required.
Any major improvements to the SRN or MRN required as a result of the assessment are likely to be costly and will need to be considered in light of other significant infrastructure requirements to understand overall viability. More modest improvements should be affordable and deliverable, assuming they can be accommodated within existing highway boundaries without the need for third-party land.
Highway (Local)
The site is reasonably well-related to the Local Road Network in terms of the B4101 and B4102, which provide links towards the A435 (west), A34 Shirley/Solihull (north) and A3400 Hockley Heath/Dorridge (east). Links towards the A3400 Stratford-upon- Avon and A4189 Warwick are less good, requiring use of largely ‘C’ road lanes.
Existing traffic on local roads in this area is a combination of local trips and other medium distance traffic using routes to avoid congested routes and centres (e.g. Hockley Heath), access the SRN at M42 Junctions 3 and 4 and M40 Junction 16 or avoid the SRN when there is a problem on the Motorway Box (M5/M6/M42). This results in issues with rat-running and speeding, which impacts on local communities and causes congestion at local junctions.
A comprehensive assessment of the impact of a new settlement option in this area will be required to assess capacity and safety issues, which given its potential impacts should include involvement from Solihull Council and Worcestershire County Council. An upgrade of the B4101 from the new settlement to the A435 will be required to protect local communities including those in the villages of Tanworth-in- Arden and Wood End, where provision of a bypass should be strongly considered.
Use of existing (upgraded) roads should be considered where possible to avoid the need for a new bridge under/over the railway line as part of any scheme.
Investment in an upgrade of the B4101 to link the new settlement with the A435 which minimises/avoids impacts on Tanworth-in-Arden and Wood End will be the key infrastructure requirement from an LRN perspective. This should be achievable through a new alignment for the B4101 through the development, the key challenges (and cost) being the need for a crossing over the railway line and how the route should link back into the existing B4101/A435 junction, which will almost certainly require third-party land.
A package of local junction improvements will be required, including B4101/B4102 Wood End, B4102/A34 Shirley and B4101/A3400/B4439 Hockley Heath – all of which should be affordable within the overall IDP. Some third-party (non-highway) land may however be needed to deliver certain improvements, particularly where a new roundabout is required.
Education
The strategic education impacts will be the same as for Site A1.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question B1
ID sylw: 108891
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
No objections on mineral sterilisation grounds subject to the exclusion of the land south of the railway line and subject to:
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Site Waste Management Plan (a plan for reusing/recycling waste on site and avoiding off-site disposal to landfill),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Active Travel
The primary active travel route will be to Warwick. There is an existing shared use footway/cycleway that runs adjacent to the A425 Birmingham Road between Hatton Park and Wedgnock Lane on the northern edge of Warwick. This route is narrow and does not meet current design standards. The route currently has uncontrolled crossings over the A46 slip roads which can be difficult to cross, however a scheme to implement toucan crossings on the slip roads is expected to be delivered and will improve the attractiveness of this route. The Grand Union Canal provides a link between the development site and the northern edge of Warwick including Warwick Parkway and has an unbound towpath of varying widths and condition. The Hatton Park to Wedgnock Lane cycle route and canal towpath stop on the northern side of Warwick and cyclists currently need to return to the carriageway to reach destinations to the south of this such as the town centre and other major commercial and employment centres. A network of bridleways provides connections between Hatton Park and Kenilworth, however these routes are of varying condition and do not support year round utility or commuting cycling trips.
The canal towpath would need to be upgraded (widened, surface improvements and lighting) to make it suitable for all year round cycling trips. Consideration would also need to be given to how safety concerns associated with a lack of natural surveillance could be overcome. A connection would also need to be provided to the south to connect to Warwick town centre and provide onward routing to key destinations within the town, however it is unclear how this can be delivered within existing highway constraints.
The existing Birmingham Road cycle route would need to be upgraded to LTN1/20 standards to increase capacity and encourage usage. Ideally this should be a segregated facility with appropriate buffer from the carriageway, however a shared use cycleway/footway may be appropriate given the relatively low numbers of pedestrians anticipated to use it. The route would need to be extended to the north from the Charringworth Drive roundabout junction to the development site. A key challenge here is the extent of the gradient between Hatton Park and Hatton with the road climbing approximately 25m over a distance of 540m which will be challenging for many and likely be a barrier to cycling. Consideration would also need to be given safety aspects associated with the speed cyclists descending this hill would accumulate. A connection would also need to be provided to the south between Wedgnock Lane and Warwick town centre to provide onward routing to key destinations within the town, however it is unclear how this can be delivered within existing highway constraints. The bridleways to Kenilworth would need to be upgraded to support year round cycling trips.
Potentially, however further work would be required to confirm this. It is unclear whether the canal towpath could be upgraded to be suitable for all year round cycling since this is likely to require third party land, impact on ecology and require the support of the Canals and Rivers Trust. It seems unlikely that this would be fully lit or be subject to a winter maintenance regime which would limit its attractiveness for year round trips. Upgrading and extending the Birmingham Road cycle route is also likely to require third party land and the removal of vegetation to create the space required for a LTN1/20 compliant facility. There is not currently a feasible design to provide a direct cycling connection to Warwick town centre from the northern side of the town and this is essential to enable a full range of trips to be completed by active modes. Finally, at 5km Warwick town centre is at the upper end of distance that many would consider reasonable to cycle for regular trips. Key employment destinations at Warwick Technology Park and Heathcote to the south of the town centre are farther away although Department for Transport guidance suggests cycling has the capability to replace car trips of up to 10km in length.
Rail
The site is located near two stations on the Leamington Spa to Birmingham (Chiltern) line, these being Hatton and Warwick Parkway. Train services are principally provided by Chiltern Railways. Warwick Parkway has a half-hourly frequency in each direction between London Marylebone and Birmingham Moor Street/Snow Hill, with some services extended to/from Stourbridge Junction in the peaks. The Birmingham to London services calls at Hatton every two hours. There is also a two-hourly stopping service from Leamington Spa to Birmingham which calls at Hatton and Warwick Parkway. A two-hourly service between Stratford and Leamington Spa calls at Hatton but not Warwick Parkway. The travel time to Birmingham is around 25-30 minutes and to Stratford is around 20 minutes.
The main issue on the rail network in this area is the lack of any substantial capacity to increase service frequencies much beyond their current level, due to a combination of passenger and freight services on the Chiltern Line. As well as those services outlined above there is a Cross Country service each hour which uses the line, but which does not call at any stations between Birmingham and Leamington Spa. The corridor is also heavily used for freight, most notably intermodal services to/from the deep sea ports at Southampton. A potential reconfiguration of some local services is currently being explored by WMRE, looking at how an hourly Birmingham to Leamington Spa and Stratford-upon-Avon to Leamington Spa service could be delivered – both of which would serve Hatton and Warwick Parkway. There is likely to be a need however to provide certain track and signaling improvements at Leamington Spa to allow these services to operate.
Warwick Parkway is very well served in terms of parking, transport interchange and passenger facilities, with scope to develop these further, although the land on the western side of the site which could be used for additional car parking falls within the Green Belt. Further decking could be an option if this were to be an obstacle. Additional active travel provision and bus links from the new settlement site to Warwick Parkway would be an essential requirement if a significant upgrade of Hatton station (in terms of both facilities and service frequency) cannot be delivered.
Hatton station would require substantial upgrading if it were to be the focus of rail provision to support a new settlement option in this area. The station has limited parking and would require expansion. The roads leading to it are country lanes with limited scope for improvement. A residents parking scheme would be needed to manage parking in Hatton village around the station to deter on-street parking by rail users. Active travel improvements to allow people to walk and cycle to the station would be required, along with cycle parking and an ‘Access for All’ footbridge with lifts. Opportunities to bring buses into the station forecourt would be limited due to the nature of the roads in the area and the available space, so a wider consideration of public transport interchange options would need to be undertaken.
Rail services at Warwick Parkway would not require much amendment, other than to ensure local services to/from Leamington Spa and Stratford-upon-Avon call there. Rail services at Hatton would require a substantial upgrade to at least an hourly (ideally half-hourly) service between Leamington Spa and Birmingham and between Stratford-upon-Avon and Leamington Spa. This will require proactive engagement and negotiation with the West Midlands Rail Executive and train operators.
The scale of the infrastructure requirements at Hatton and Warwick Parkway are considered affordable but with some significant challenges in relation to deliverability, most notably around car parking provision and the necessary track and signal enhancements at Leamington Spa station to accommodate increased train service levels. Further work will be needed to understand how new or enhanced rail services, particularly to serve Hatton, will be delivered contractually including any necessary subsidy payments by a developer. As noted above, most of the land around Warwick Parkway is designated as Green Belt, so it may be prudent for WDC/SDC to consider removing some land there at the same time as the new settlement allocation (should it go ahead) to facilitate the delivery of additional station parking.
Bus
There are no inter-urban bus routes which pass near or through the site. Local bus services are also limited in this area. Rail services on the Chiltern Line provide the main public transport links for local residents.
A new service between the new settlement and Warwick Town Centre, possibly as an extension of Service X17 (Kenilworth-Leamington-Warwick) should be considered.
Provision of high quality bus stops with shelters, Real Time Information and raised kerbs, along with bus priority measures at key junctions on the new inter-urban service or existing X17 route (if extended) and within the new settlement should be provided.
The extension of the existing X17 service or proposed new inter-urban bus service and associated infrastructure improvements should be deliverable, affordable and viable in the long term if planned and promoted properly.
Highway (Strategic)
The site is well-located in terms of access to the SRN, with the A4177 feeding directly to the A46 at Stanks west of Warwick, which in turn provides access to the M6/M69/M1 (north), M40 (south) and M40/M42/M5 (west/south west). The A4177 also links to the A452 MRN/KRN at Balsall Common (and onwards to M6 Junction 4) and the A4141 at Knowle towards M42 Junction 5 and Solihull.
The A46/A425/A4177 Stanks junction has recently been upgraded to provide additional capacity along with much improved active travel provision. This junction has an important interface with the Old Budbrooke Road, which provides access to Warwick Parkway station. Even with the recent improvements in this area, these junctions remain extremely busy particularly at peak times.
M40 Junction 15 (Longbridge) is a strategically significant junction where the motorway network interfaces with the SRN (A46) and the A429 towards Warwick and Cirencester. Despite major improvements having been implemented, the junction continues to operate at or near capacity, and a combination of wider committed/planned growth in South Coventry, Warwick, Leamington Spa, Kenilworth, Wellesbourne and Stratford and a potential new settlement option in this area will have a cumulative impact which is likely to result in significant congestion and traffic re-routing on to less appropriate routes such as through Warwick and Leamington Spa town centre and into surrounding rural communities (e.g. Hampton Magna/Hampton-on-the-Hill). The A46/B4463 junction at Sherbourne immediately south of M40 Junction 15 is also unlikely to be able to cope with these cumulative demands, which in turn is likely to result in traffic rerouting through Warwick town centre.
The interdependencies between the SRN and LRN detailed above will require mitigation from a new settlement option in this area as well as other major growth proposals across the SWLP area to ensure that strategic and local traffic uses the most appropriate routes. As such, further improvements to the A46 Stanks junction and M40 Junction 15 are likely to be needed, albeit with the costs apportioned according to impact (as has been implemented by WCC and CCC in relation to M6 Junction 3 improvements). Previous Local Plan Strategic Transport Assessment work in this area has highlighted link capacity issues on the A46 between the M40 and Gaveston (Leek Wootton) which will also need investigating. This will require detailed modelling as part of the wider SWLP Spatial Strategy as it emerges and engagement with National Highways. Consideration to the interface with M40 Junctions 13 and 14 will be required, including the opportunity to rationalise them into a single junction accessed from Grey’s Mallory as part of the emerging Red House Farm proposals. An assessment with the existing two junction arrangement would also be required given the timescales involved in delivering a single motorway junction (10+ years).
Timely, proactive engagement with National Highways regarding the assessment of potential issues at A46 Stanks and M40 Junctions 13-15 and possible improvement measures should ensure they will be acceptable. Discussions will be required regarding cost apportionment and trigger points for payments. Deliverability issues may be problematic if third-party (non-highway) land is required for any improvements at these junctions. A more regionally significant improvement at M40 Junction 15 which will be required to go through the Government’s Road Investment Strategy (RIS) process could result in uncertainty over both funding and timing. Once again, early engagement with National Highways should help the relevant parties understand these issues.
Until modelling work is conducted in relation to a new settlement option in this area as well as cumulatively with the wider SWLP Spatial Strategy, it is not possible to say whether the necessary strategic highway improvements are either deliverable or affordable. It is hoped that with a strategy based on apportionment, the costs specific to this site would become much clearer. The proximity of this option to the SRN is however likely to mean that it will need to shoulder a significant proportion of the mitigation costs.
Highway (Local)
The site is reasonably well-related to the LRN in terms of the A4177 which provides access towards the A46 and Warwick (east), Knowle/Solihull (west) and Balsall Common (north), and the B4439 which links Warwick with Hockley Heath. The A4189 Warwick to Henley-in-Arden/Redditch road is located to the south of the site.
Traffic levels on the A4177 towards Warwick in the AM peak are heavy, with a reciprocal movement towards Knowle/Solihull/Balsall Common in the PM peak. This has an impact on traffic wishing to access Warwick Parkway via Old Budbrooke Road. There is limited scope for providing significant additional capacity in this corridor and its side roads.
There is little residual capacity within and around Warwick town centre, so any substantial additional demand is unlikely to be accommodated on the network. This will inevitably result in rat-running on peripheral routes, many of which are not designed to cope with high levels of traffic such as through Hampton Magna and Hampton-on-the-Hill and routes towards Leek Wootton and Beausale/Kenilworth. Other minor roads in the area such as Ugly Bridge Road, Dark Lane, Station Road, Pinley Road and Norton Curlieu Lane are country lanes and therefore unsuitable to carry significant traffic. The lack of right-turning facilities along the A4177 also causes traffic to build up quickly, which would be exacerbated by growth in this area. Apart from the B4439 which diverges from the A4177 near Hatton Locks, the roads around Hatton village, Little Shrewley, Shrewley, Pinley Green and Beausale are country lanes with numerous junctions that are not designed to carry large volumes of traffic.
The Leamington Spa to Birmingham rail line and Grand Union Canal provide a significant form of severance between the various parcels of land which constitute the new settlement option, with any existing crossings likely to be inadequate for the scale of growth envisaged across the area. This will be a costly issue to properly address, involving negotiation with Network Rail and the Canals & Rivers Trust.
As noted above, a careful strategy will need to be adopted to ensure strategic and local traffic continues to use the most appropriate routes in the area. This will require modelling to fully understand the impacts of the proposed new settlement and the wider growth impacts on this area. Likely mitigation will be needed on the A4177 corridor, within Warwick (e.g. Wedgnock Lane/Greville Road), as well as a comprehensive package of local junction improvements including A4177/B4439, A4177/A4141 Five Ways, B4439/The Green/Dark Lane, B4439/Mill Lane/Station Road, A4189/Norton Curlieu Lane and A4189/Dark Lane.
Impacts on Warwick and Leamington Spa town centres will need to be assessed, including consideration of the emerging ‘Mini-Holland’ and other roadspace reallocation/active travel schemes within both town centres.
As noted above, there are likely to be cost and deliverability issues to address the severance caused by the railway line and canal. Other mitigation/improvement should be broadly deliverable and affordable, subject to agreeing the scope of assessment and identification of any third-party (non-highway) land which is required.
Education Impacts
Overall numbers would suggest the need for 1 new secondary school for 6,000 new dwellings and 2 new secondary schools for 10,000 new homes. It is likely that we would also look for 2 new secondary schools for 8,000 dwellings but we could also consider just one large school.
At primary we would suggest the need for 3 or 4 new primary schools for 6,000 new dwellings, between 4 and 6 new primary schools for 8,000 new dwellings and between 5 and 7 new primary schools for 10,000 new dwellings.
The possibility of delivering all through schools to be considered, i.e. co-location of at least part of the primary offer with new secondary facilities.
There is an assumption that all new primary facilities will include early years facilities and Special Resource Provision facilities.
There is an assumption that all new secondary schools will provide for sixth form teaching on site and that there will also be a Specialist Resource Provision included.
There could be some capacity available at Budbrooke Primary School to take initial growth.
There is also some capacity at Aylesford for the initial growth.
Need to consider the home to school transport implications prior to delivery of on site provision.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question C1
ID sylw: 108892
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
No objections on mineral sterilisation subject to prior extraction of minerals and subject to
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Site Waste Management Plan (a plan for reusing/recycling waste on site and avoiding off-site disposal to landfill),
• Soil Management Plan (a plan to manage all soils on site during construction)
Active Travel
There is no existing cycling infrastructure that connects this area to the key local centres of Dorridge (approx. 4km) and south Birmingham. via the Blythe Valley Park employment site (approx. 6km). There is an existing network of cycle routes at Blythe Valley Park (approx. 6km) which connects into cycle an expanding network of routes feeding to Solihull, Shirley and Birmingham. Destinations beyond Blythe Valley Park are likely to be at the extreme of distances people could reasonably be expected to regularly cycle. The Grand Union Canal provides a potential cycling connection towards south Solihull and could potentially form part of a route to Blythe Valley Park, however the towpath would need to be upgraded to make it suitable for all year round cycling for utility/commuting trips and this does not connect directly to services or facilities. This site has no other cycling connections to urban areas although there is a network of low trafficked rural roads and lanes that have potential to be used for some cycling trips by cyclists comfortable with cycling in traffic. It becomes more difficult to find low trafficked on-road routes closer to urban areas.
There is extremely limited off-road cycling infrastructure in Dorridge.
New off-road cycling routes would be required to connect to both Dorridge and Blythe Valley Park. The Grand Union Canal would need to be upgraded to make it suitable for all year round utility/commuting cycling trips and provides limited connectivity benefits.
Key challenges relate to the length of connection required, a lack of space within the existing highway boundaries, the need to safely route across key transport corridors and deliver direct connections to existing urban cycling networks through built up areas all of which is likely to require significant amounts of third party land to be acquired. Our initial analysis therefore suggests this location will face significant deliverability and affordability challenges. The services, facilities and employment opportunities are relatively limited at Dorridge and Blythe Valley Park which are the most local centres. Upgrading the Grand Union Canal towpath would need the support of the Canals and Rivers Trust.
The site is well-related to the rail network in terms of Lapworth station which is located on the Birmingham to Leamington Spa (Chiltern) line. The station is currently served by a two-hourly stopping service operated by Chiltern Railways. West Midlands Trains hourly service between Stratford, Birmingham and Kidderminster (via Dorridge) also call at the station. The travel time to Birmingham and Stratford- upon-Avon is around 20 minutes in each direction.
The main issue on the rail network in this area is the lack of any substantial capacity to increase service frequencies much beyond their current level, due to a combination of passenger and freight services. As well as those services outlined above there is a Cross Country service each hour which uses the line but which does not call at any stations between Birmingham and Leamington Spa. The corridor is also heavily used for freight, most notably intermodal services to/from the deep sea ports at Southampton. A potential reconfiguration of some local services is currently being explored by WMRE, looking at how an hourly Birmingham to Leamington service could be delivered which would call at Lapworth. There is likely to be a need however to provide certain track and signaling improvements at Leamington to allow these services to operate.
Lapworth station would require substantial upgrading if it were to be the focus of rail provision to support a new settlement option in this area. The station has limited parking, with little obvious scope for expansion. The roads leading to it are a mixture of country lanes and residential roads with limited scope for improvement. Measures would be needed to manage parking in Kingswood village around the station to deter on-street parking by rail users. Active travel improvements to allow people to walk and cycle to the station would be required, along with cycle parking and an ‘Access for All’ footbridge with lifts. Opportunities to bring buses into the station forecourt would be limited due to the nature of the roads in the area and the available space.
Rail services at Lapworth would benefit from the proposed upgrade to at least an hourly service between Leamington and Birmingham. This will require ongoing engagement and negotiation with the West Midlands Rail Executive and train operators.
The scale of the infrastructure requirements at Lapworth is affordable but with some significant challenges in relation to deliverability, most notably around the provision of parking. Further work is needed to understand how new or enhanced rail services to serve Lapworth will be delivered contractually and in terms of any subsidy payments by a developer.
Bus
There are no inter-urban bus routes which pass near or through the site. Local bus services are also limited in this area. Rail services on the Chiltern line provide the main public transport links for local residents.
A new high quality, frequent service between Hockley Heath, Lapworth Rail Station, Shrewley Common, Warwick Parkway, Warwick and Leamington Spa will be required to help meet demand from the new settlement. An upgrade of the existing Service 510/511/513/514 which operate over parts of this corridor is not considered appropriate due to the many communities they serve and the nature of the country lanes which the bus takes.
Provision of high quality bus stops with shelters, Real Time Information and raised kerbs, along with bus priority measures at key junctions on the route of the proposed inter-urban service and within the new settlement should be provided. This will include locations within the West Midlands Combined Authority area, therefore the involvement of Transport for the West Midlands (TfWM) and Solihull Council in the development of this route should be sought.
The proposed new inter-urban bus service and associated infrastructure improvements should be deliverable, affordable and viable in the long term if planned and promoted properly.
Highway (Strategic)
The site is poorly related to the SRN. M40 Junction 16, which is accessed via the B4439 and A3400 is located to the west of the site, but only has west-facing slips. This arrangement was provided specifically to protect traffic from rat-running through Hockley Heath between M42 Junction 4 (Monkspath) and M40 Junction 16. M42 Junction 4 is approximately 6 miles away and can be accessed from the site via the B4439 and A3400.
The limited access to the M40 at Junction 16 is a constraint to certain strategic movements from this area, specifically towards Warwick and Leamington Spa.
The M5/M6/M42 Motorway Box distributes strategic traffic passing through, around and within the West Midlands conurbation. As such it carries very heavy traffic levels throughout the day and at weekends. Part of the M42 is covered by Active Traffic Management measures to help manage flows during peak periods of use and during incidents. Provision of Smart Motorway technology on other sections of the M42 was under consideration until the recent pause was instigated by the previous Government.
A new Junction 5A on the M42 is currently being constructed by National Highways as part of a committed scheme from its Road Investment Strategy Period 2 (2020- 25) programme. The aim of the scheme is to improve the operation of M42 Junction 6 near Birmingham Airport/NEC and the forthcoming HS2 Interchange Station.
Improvements to the B4439 and A3400 to allow better access to the M40 and M42 will be required, although these will have impacts on Hockley Heath and the staggered junction arrangement between the A3400 and B4439/B4101. An assessment of impacts on M42 Junction 4 and the access to Blythe Valley Business Park will be required, with the timely engagement of National Highways. A wider assessment incorporating Junction 3A (M40/M42), Junction 5 (A41/A4141) and Junction 5A/6 (A45) may also be required to identify further mitigation.
An upgrade of M40 Junction 16 to provide an all-movements junction may be promoted by a developer but is unlikely to be supported by either National Highways, Solihull Council or Warwickshire County Council due to concerns over traffic re- routing away from the SRN, onto the A3400 and through the village of Hockley Heath.
Timely, proactive engagement with National Highways regarding the assessment of potential issues at M42 Junction 4 and the wider corridor and possible improvement measures should ensure they will be acceptable. Deliverability issues may be problematic if third-party (non-highway) land is required for any improvements at these junctions.
Highway (Local)
The site has reasonable access to the LRN, the main routes being the B4439 which passes through the site and links Warwick with Hockley Heath and South Birmingham, the A4141/A4177 which links Warwick with Knowle, Dorridge and Solihull and the A3400 which links Stratford-upon-Avon with Hockley Heath and South Birmingham.
Both the A4141/A4177 and A3400 were trunk routes (A41/A34) prior to the opening of the M40 in the early 1990’s, but neither are of a particularly high standard. They do however provide access to the motorway network (M40 Junction 16 and M42 Junctions 4 and 5). The B4439 is a cross-country route which links the A4177 (Hatton Locks) with the A3400 (Hockley Heath), which both cause queuing in peak periods due to their configuration and heavy mainline flows.
The low bridge in Kingswood village where the B4439 passes under the Birmingham to Leamington rail line is a constraint for certain vehicles due to its height restriction of 3.7m/12ft 3in. This could have implications for the construction of a new settlement in this area if it were to proceed.
The scope for improvements to the LRN in this area is limited. An alignment for the A3400 Hockley Heath Bypass was previously protected by Solihull Council, but this ceased around 2017/18. Improvements are likely to focus on the B4439, A3400 and A4141/A4177, as well as individual junctions such as the A4177/B4439 Hatton Locks and A3400/B4439/B4101 Hockley Heath – although whether these will be sufficient to mitigate the impacts of a new settlement in this area will need to be confirmed through detailed modelling, with the involvement of Solihull Council.
There is unlikely to be any appetite from Warwickshire County Council to improve the B4439 low railway bridge at Kingswood, as by doing so it may serve to attract larger vehicles from South Birmingham and Redditch to use the route to access the M40 at Junction 15 (Warwick). There are also likely to be engineering challenges in lowering the carriageway associated with water and flooding.
Modest improvements to the alignment of the B4439, A3400, A4141/A4177 and associated junctions noted above should be both deliverable and affordable, although third-party land may need to be secured. Any potential resurrection of the Hockley Heath Bypass would need to be discussed with Solihull Council and Warwickshire County Council. The cost of this scheme if it were to fall entirely on the new settlement may not affordable or deliverable, as it falls outside the indicative land boundary of the new settlement.
Education Impacts
Overall numbers would suggest the need for 1 new secondary school for 6,000 new dwellings and 2 new secondary schools for 10,000 new homes.
At primary we would suggest the need for 3 or 4 new primary schools for 6,000 new dwellings and between 5 and 7 new primary schools for 10,000 new dwellings.
The possibility of delivering all through schools to be considered, i.e. co-location of at least part of the primary offer with new secondary facilities.
There is an assumption that all new primary facilities will include early years facilities and Special Resource Provision facilities.
There is an assumption that all new secondary schools will provide for sixth form teaching on site and that there will also be a Specialist Resource Provision included.
No local capacity to take initial growth. Home to school transport implications.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question E1
ID sylw: 108893
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council
Minerals and Waste
OBJECT to the Loss of Stratford Car Breakers at Long Marston (ELV site).
No objections on mineral sterilisation grounds subject to prior extraction of sand and gravel in the northern area and subject to:
• Minerals Assessment Report (for assessing the possible impact on mineral resources and determining whether prior extraction is achievable),
• Materials Management Report (for assessing the sourcing and use of construction materials including the availability of on-site materials for reuse/recycling),
• Waste Site Assessment (for assessing the extent to which an existing waste site/use/operation would be prejudiced),
Site Waste Management Plan (a plan for reusing/recycling waste on site and avoiding off-site disposal to landfill)
Active Travel
The site connects to the Stratford Greenway, a multi-user corridor on a former railway line which provides an attractive off-road cycle facility between Station Road Long Marston and the southern edge of Stratford-upon-Avon (approx. 7.5km). The route is unlit and of varying quality although part of the it has recently been resurfaced using developer contributions. The Stratford Greenway forms part of National Cycle Route 5 which continues south on low trafficked roads to Shipston- on-Stour and Route 41 which continues south to Honeybourne and connects with Route 442 to Mickleton and Chipping Campden. There is existing cycling infrastructure within the initial phases of the Long Marston Airfield site and within the Meon Vale development. Provision within Stratford-upon-Avon is of varying quality but includes connections towards the town centre and educational establishments as well as the railway station on Alcester Road.
The Stratford Greenway will need to be upgraded to provide a high quality and consistent connection to Stratford-upon-Avon. In order to maximise usage and encourage all year round utility and commuting cycling journeys consideration would need lighting and a winter maintenance regime. Consideration would also need to be given to safety concerns associated with a lack of natural surveillance. Connections within Stratford-upon-Avon would need to be enhanced in terms of the quality of existing provision and to provide missing links to deliver attractive cycling connectivity to the town centre and destinations to the north of Stratford-upon-Avon.
Potentially. The Stratford Greenway is owned by Warwickshire County Council and there are feasible options to improve the cycling network with Stratford-upon-Avon. However, at 8.5km Stratford-upon-Avon town centre and railway station is beyond the distance many people will consider reasonable to cycle for everyday journeys although within the 10km distance for which Department for Transport guidance suggests cycling has the capability to replace car trips.
Rail
The site currently has reasonable proximity to the rail network being located approximately 5 miles from Honeybourne station on the North Cotswold Line, although the roads leading to the station are country lanes and unsuitable for large traffic volumes. Services are provided by Great Western Railway, linking Hereford and Worcester with Oxford, Didcot Parkway and London Paddington. Current train frequencies are hourly in both directions, although certain services omit calling at Honeybourne. The site also lies around 7 miles from Stratford-upon-Avon station and 8 miles from Stratford Parkway station, both of which are served by West Midlands Trains with a half-hourly service to Birmingham and Kidderminster/Worcester (one via Henley-in-Arden and one via Dorridge), and Chiltern Railways with a service every two hours to Leamington Spa.
The Long Marston Rail Innovation Centre on the former MoD site is owned by Porterbrook and served by a branch line from Honeybourne using part of the former rail line to Stratford-upon-Avon as far as Long Marston. The site is used for rail- related Research & Development incorporating 3.5km of internal test track, as well as secure storage of off-lease locomotives and rolling stock.
Although the North Cotswold Line was subject to an upgrade in 2011/12, the remaining single-line sections between Evesham, Pershore and Norton Junction (Worcester) and Charlbury and Wolvercote Junction (Oxford) currently limit the ability for a half-hourly service to be provided between Worcester and London. The North Cotswold Line Taskforce is developing a business case for such an improvement.
The Honeybourne to Long Marston branch line sees regular use by test trains and movements associated with secure storage to/from the Long Marston Rail Innovation Centre, typically 3-4 times per week. Any use of the branch for passenger services would need to accommodate these trains, most of which take place during the day.
There is scope at Honeybourne for a bay platform given the passive provision made by the rail industry for a future extension of the Gloucestershire and Warwickshire Railway from Broadway.
There are limited issues with the Birmingham to Stratford rail line via Henley-in- Arden, with a future aspiration for electrification of the Snow Hill lines and an additional service to provide a half-hourly frequency. The line between Bearley Junction and Hatton (via Claverdon) is capacity constrained due to it being single track throughout with no passing points.
A potential reconfiguration of some local services is currently being explored by WMRE, looking at how an hourly Stratford to Leamington service could be delivered which would serve Stratford Town and Stratford Parkway stations. There is likely to be a need to provide certain track and signaling improvements at Leamington to allow this service to operate.
There are four options for how the new settlement could be served by rail:
(1) Provide improved access to the existing Honeybourne station on the North Cotswold Line by public transport and cycle;
(2) Provide a new station at Long Marston served by a branch line service from Honeybourne, either using conventional heavy or light rail technology. The Long Marston Airfield SPD has identified some potential land within the development for a station; alternatively, a station could be located west of Station Road;
(3) Provide improved access to the existing Stratford Town and Stratford Parkway stations on the North Warwickshire line by public transport and cycle; or
(4) Reopen the former Stratford to Honeybourne rail line, with a station at Long Marston to serve the new settlement.
Although a number of these options have been studied in detail in relation to the current Long Marston Airfield Strategic Allocation, there is currently limited rail industry support.
Options (1) and (3) set out above would not require any upgrade in service frequency, although the aspirations for a half-hourly Stratford to Birmingham (via Henley) service and an hourly Stratford to Leamington service would be beneficial if delivered. Options (2) and (4) would require either a new or extended service to be provided, the revenue risk for which would fall on the Government.
The costs for delivering Options (1) and (3) set out above should be deliverable and affordable in the context of a new settlement in this area, particularly with the proposed extension of the site to accommodate a larger number of dwellings.
Unfortunately, the cost of Options (2) and (4) in terms of both capital infrastructure and operating (revenue) costs will be unaffordable to a developer being well in excess of £150m. There remain significant engineering challenges in reopening the former rail line for the section north of the Racecourse, particularly where the A4390 Seven Meadows Road has been built over the formation and at the Evesham Place roundabout. Part of the formation has also been built over by the Industrial Estate off Station Road, Long Marston.
Bus
There are no inter-urban bus routes which pass near or through the site. There are several local bus services in the area which provide reasonable access to local villages within Warwickshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire, and to the nearby towns of Shipston-on-Stour, Chipping Campden, Broadway and Moreton-in-Marsh, most of which look towards Stratford-upon-Avon. Improved frequency of service will be required on these routes. Services between Stratford-upon-Avon, Clifford Chambers, Meon Vale and Lower Quinton operate at a higher frequency.
A new high quality, frequent service between Honeybourne Rail Station, Long Marston, Meon Vale, Stratford-upon-Avon and Leamington Spa will be required to help meet demand from the new settlement. An upgrade or amalgamation of existing services to provide this new route should be considered in the first instance. This will require discussion/agreement with the operator. Honeybourne station area will require some upgrading to provide quality interchange facilities.
Provision of high quality bus stops with shelters, Real Time Information and raised kerbs, along with bus priority measures at key junctions on the route of the proposed inter-urban service and within the new settlement should be provided. This may include locations within the administrative areas of Worcestershire and Gloucestershire, therefore the involvement of the two County Councils in the development of this route should be sought.
The proposed new inter-urban bus service and associated infrastructure improvements should be deliverable, affordable and viable in the long term if planned and promoted properly.
Highway (Strategic)
The site is poorly related to the SRN, being located approximately 8 miles from the A46 Stratford Bypass and 13 miles from M40 Junction 15 at Warwick (via the B4632, A3400, A439 and A46). There are no MRN designated routes in this area.
There are peak-hour capacity/congestion issues with the three A46 Stratford Junctions at Marraway (A439), Bishopton (A3400) and Wildmoor (A422). There are also road safety issues particularly at side road junctions on the A46 between A46/A435 Oversley Mill Roundabout and A46 Wildmoor Roundabout. The eastern section between Stratford-upon-Avon and Red Hill is a poorly aligned single carriageway which includes the Billesley Crossroads junction which has a poor safety record. The western section between Red Hill and Alcester is a wide single carriageway which often leads to overtaking of slow moving vehicles when it is not safe to do so.
M40 Junction 15 (Longbridge) is a strategically significant junction where the motorway network interfaces with the SRN (A46) and the A429 towards Warwick and Cirencester. Despite major improvements having been implemented, the junction continues to operate at or near capacity, and a combination of wider committed/planned growth in South Coventry, Warwick, Leamington Spa, Kenilworth, Wellesbourne and Stratford will have a cumulative impact which is likely to result in significant congestion and traffic re-routing on to less appropriate routes such as through Warwick and Leamington Spa town centre and into surrounding rural communities (e.g. Hampton Magna/Hampton-on-the-Hill). The A46/B4463 junction at Sherbourne immediately south of M40 Junction 15 is also unlikely to be able to cope with these cumulative demands, which in turn is likely to result in traffic rerouting through Warwick town centre.
Work undertaken in relation to the existing Long Marston Airfield Strategic Allocation has highlighted impacts on the A46 from the interface with the West of Shottery Relief Road at Wildmoor. It is therefore highly likely that a larger allocation at Long Marston Airfield will require at least the same or possibly a greater level of strategic infrastructure and mitigation on the A46 SRN and at M40 Junction 15.
Assessment of impacts arising from an expanded allocation at Long Marston Airfield will need to be assessed through detailed modelling with input from National Highways. Impacts at M40 Junction 15 will need to be evaluated in the context of cumulative growth proposals across the wider SWLP area, with an apportionment strategy linked to financial contributions.
Until the scale of any SRN mitigation is identified it is difficult to provide an indication of affordability, but either way there are likely to be challenges given the wider infrastructure needs of the site when considered in the round. There may be some deliverability issues if the detail of SRN mitigation falls outside the highway boundary, necessitating third-party owned land to be acquired.
Highway (Local)
There is limited LRN in the area of the potential new settlement, the only route of any significance being the B4632 Stratford to Broadway and Cheltenham Spa road. This is connected to Stratford town via the A3400 Shipston Road and A4390 Seven Meadows Road from the roundabout near the Rosebird Centre.
The B4632 was previously a trunk route (A46) prior to the opening of the M40 in the early 1990’s, but it is not of a particularly high standard.
The two river crossings provided by Clopton Bridge and the A4390 Seven Meadows Road are a significant constraint to traffic movements within and across Stratford.
This combined with the steady growth of the town and its popular tourist attractions lead to a congested network throughout the day and at weekends. This serves to constrain any significant growth coming forward south of the river without major new highway infrastructure.
Work undertaken in relation to the existing Long Marston Airfield Strategic Allocation has highlighted the requirement for a new link road (SWRR) to be provided from the site to Stratford-upon-Avon, interfacing with the recently constructed West of Shottery Relief Road to the A46 at Wildmoor. This would have consisted of a new link from the A3400 and B4632 north of Clifford Chambers to the south and west of the Racecourse, interfacing with the B439 at Bordon Hill. Any expanded site at Long Marston Airfield would certainly require a greater level of infrastructure than the currently promoted SWRR, possibly on an alternative alignment and with additional mitigation required on the wider highway network of the town at known pinch points. The detail of this would require scoping before being assessed with detailed modelling. Previous Strategic Transport Assessment work has also identified potential link capacity issues on the B4632 Campden Road arising from the existing strategic allocation at LMA which is also likely to require remediation.
The scale of funding required for the SWRR to support the existing Long Marston Airfield Strategic Allocation has already been demonstrated to fall well beyond the affordability of the developer alone. Bids have been submitted for public funding to support the delivery of the road, which to date have not been successful. The need for a potentially more significant highway intervention as well as additional mitigation on the B4632 Campden Road and within Stratford itself suggests that affordability will remain an issue with an expanded new settlement site at Long Marston Airfield. Deliverability challenges will remain similar to the current position, whereby a developer will need to acquire third-party land to be able to deliver the necessary mitigation.
The scale of infrastructure required to unlock any significant housing growth south of the river is likely to require Central Government funding to provide the necessary third river crossing and a strategic highway link to either the east or west of the town. This could not only help unlock major growth but could also help achieve a wider set of place-making outcomes within Stratford town centre.
Education Impacts
The existing allocation of 3,500 requires the delivery of 2 new primary schools and 1 new secondary school.
An additional 2,500 homes would suggest the provision of an additional primary school. The additional secondary numbers will support the viability of the secondary school proposed within the 3.500 allocation.
An additional 6,500 would suggest the need for an additional 3 primary schools and an additional secondary school.
There is an assumption that all new primary facilities will include early years facilities and Special Resource Provision facilities.
There is an assumption that all new secondary schools will provide for sixth form teaching on site and that there will also be a Specialist Resource Provision included.
It should be noted that there is an on-site primary school linked to an outline application currently with Stratford District for consideration.
Shipston High School is the priority area school. However, this has already been subject to an expansion and work is currently taking place to consider further expansion.
Shipston does not have a sixth form.
Stratford School is the next nearest school and has been subject to numerous expansions to cater for the significant growth in housing in the Stratford area. Neither Shipston nor Stratford could take additional numbers.
If the secondary school linked to the 3,500 homes comes forward it will struggle without additional numbers.
Further growth, i.e. beyond 3,500 will bring stability to the provision of school places within the area.