PO8: Economy

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 31 i 60 o 179

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 48990

Derbyniwyd: 16/10/2012

Ymatebydd: Friends of the Earth

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Development based on a supposed need for economic growth. Growth per se is unnecessary and unsustainable for a stable economy.
Less land is needed to provide similar numbers of jobs. The figures suggest that there is little need to allocate more employment land.
B1 uses require smaller buildings for the same floorspace as B2 and B8 uses. Has this been allowed for?
Gateway: development and investment should be concentrated on the regeneration of urban centres - there are suitable brownfield sites in Coventry where development could be located rather in the Green Belt. Support paragraph 8.21 that 'further work is needed to clarify this figure in relation to more up to date economic and demographic projections and to examine the impact of potential development at the Coventry and Warwickshire Gateway site'

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau:

1113 Leam FoE Local Plan response final.pdf (366.27 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49078

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2012

Ymatebydd: University of Warwick

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The University has previously made representations to remove the Campus known as 'Central Campus West' within the boundary of Warwick District from the greenbelt. It is considered that the Campus should be removed from the greenbelt in the new local plan to establish a secure long term boundary at the edge of the University. Objects to 5th bullet point of PO8 as MDS designation for the University is not appropriate. Instead the designation of the site (outside the greenbelt) should be mentioned elsewhere in the policy. If the campus remains in the greenbelt the University requests further discussion with the District Council to provide assurances that its approach towards MDS designation remains appropriate. Paragraph 8.24 should be rewritten to reflect that the university is not a B Class employment use to which the employment land supply figures should relate. Plan should recognise the contribution of the University to delivering employment growth and supporting knowledge based industries but not providing the employment land supply.

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau:

120731 Warwick Local Plan representations.pdf (262.15 KB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49126

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support loation of employment land close to Warwick Technology Park subject to suggested alternative location for park and ride

Testun llawn:

See attachment

Atodiadau:

7331 Land255.pdf (8.51 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49160

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Jockey Club Racecourses

Asiant : Barton Wilmore

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Rcaecourse plays an importnat roile in the District as a leisure and recreational facility and this should be recognised in the Local Plan. At present there is no site specific policy for the Racecourse.

Testun llawn:

See attachment

Atodiadau:

1161 18441 A3 MJ 12 07 27 Let WDC New Local Plan Reps.pdf (834.64 KB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49188

Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012

Ymatebydd: The Sundial Group and Gleeson Developments

Nifer y bobl: 2

Asiant : Savills (L&P) Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support the principle of allocating part of the land at Kenilworth for employment uses. The land closest to the A46 junction is the most suitable location for such development, to benefit from the locational advantage and reduce traffic flows through the town.

However, further B1 Employment Land could be provided at Woodside Training Centre

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau:

5133 L 120722 RL Preferred Options Reps.pdf (138.35 KB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49222

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support use of green belt for expanded employment opportunites on well designed business parks at Stoneleigh and University. Little housing nearby but public bus service and road access exists.

Testun llawn:

Providing sustainable levels of growth :
The levels of growth envisioned are not sustainable- in tha...

[dangos mwy]

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49321

Derbyniwyd: 11/07/2012

Ymatebydd: G R Planning Consultancy Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Extant B1 consent at Station Approach, not included as available employment land, as support for residential use across all land to north of station which will secure best value. If this cannot be achieved however, B1 next best and most acceptable land use. Need therefore to maintain existing B1 commitment, the consent for which it is intended to renew in 2013.
Would support amendment to allocated former goods yard for employmnet (B1) and housing under PO4.

Testun llawn:

I act on behalf of BRB (Residuary) Ltd the owners of the Former Goods Yard on Station Approach in Le...

I act on behalf of BRB (Residuary) Ltd the owners of the Former Goods Yard on Station Approach in Leamington Spa. My clients objections to the Warwick Local Plan (WLP) are set out below.
1. Background to BRB (Residuary) Ltd Objections
As you know the Former Goods Yard on Station Approach benefits from an extant planning consent for B1 development (planning reference: W06/1058). This development was promoted in conjunction with Network Rail who own the land abutting the existing railway line. The outline planning permission for the B1 scheme was issued on the 28th April 2010 and was the culmination of 10 years of my client's hard efforts to actively promote and bring forward this site for development.
The consent provides for 8,047sqm (86,629sqft) of B1 (Office) floorspace on a 2.3 hectare site. It also includes the complete upgrading of Station Approach and other costly off-site highway improvements which can only be secured with the agreement of adjoining landowners (including the Council as owners of Station Approach) and through the additional funding generated by the redevelopment of the Former Quick's Garage site. Even though my clients and adjoining landowners reached agreement in 2008/2009 over the funding of the Station Approach upgrade and other highway improvements, the Council's decisions to consistently resist a residential led scheme on the Former Quick's site effectively put a stop to this comprehensive scheme and led to the break-up of the consortium of landowners that were a party to that agreement.
On numerous occasions my clients have made it very clear to the Council that without the ability to jointly fund the extensive highway works (with the developers of the Former Quick's site) any form of development on the Former Goods Yard site would be commercially unviable and could not proceed on its own. This position was reaffirmed in our representations to the Core Strategy Preferred Options and in my letter dated the 19th August 2009 (a copy of this letter can be provided if required).
More recently, my clients objected to the hybrid application on the Former Ford Foundry site (planning reference W10/1310) on the grounds that it represented a unique opportunity to bring forward the comprehensive regeneration of the whole of the Station Area (my letters dated the 15th December 2010 and 17th February 2011 refer). In particular, that it provided the mechanism to secure the relocation of Stagecoach to the Former Ford Car Park site thus opening up the way for the land to the north of the Station to come forward for residential development. Our objections concluded that if the Council failed to take a pro-active approach then not only would this opportunity be lost but it was also likely to mean that the Council's policy objectives for regenerating the whole of the Station Area were unlikely to be met in the foreseeable future. The Council proceeded to grant planning permission for the hybrid application in August 2011 without any provisions or commitment to relocate the Stagecoach Depot.
The Council have recently, through the Deputy Chief Executive, instigated discussions to bring forward a co-ordinated approach for the land north of the Station. Whilst my clients were not invited to the original meeting in May this year (but did outline their position in a letter to the Deputy Chief Executive dated the 30th April 2012 - a copy of which can be provided if required), my clients have since then agreed to partly fund in conjunction with other landowners (including the Council) a Scoping Study of the development potential of this land on which tenders are currently being sought. This Study will also consider the development potential with the Stagecoach Depot remaining in situ on its current site.
As I explained in my telephone discussions with the LDF Team this background is of considerable importance in understanding my clients objections to the WLP as currently drafted.
2. Objection to Housing Provisions & Policy PO4
During my discussions with the LDF Team Officers confirmed that neither my clients site nor any of the land north of the Station was allocated in the WLP for housing. Although the Station land is shown on the accompanying 'Maps' as 'Development Sites' Officers confirmed that this was an error. The latter appears consistent with the wording of policy PO4 in that it does not refer to the land at Station Approach. Officers confirmed that the latter was due to the fact that this land is regarded as a 'commitment'.
Paragraph 7.20 of the WLP in setting out the housing requirements to 2029 confirms that some of the required provision has already been accounted for in 'committed' and 'windfall' sites. The latter relates to small sites and the former to "sites which had planning approval for housing" as at the 1st April 2011. None of the land at Station Approach has planning permission for housing and in line with the definition in paragraph 7.20 it cannot therefore be a 'commitment'. The land at Station Approach is of course covered by the Station Area Planning & Development Brief (2008 Brief), adopted by the Council in September 2008. However, this simply confirms that B1 (Business) and residential development will be supported in this location, including residential development across the whole of the site, the latter subject to the relocation of the Stagecoach Depot. The Brief does not, however, form part of the Development Plan in that it is not a Supplementary Planning Document prepared in accord with, at the time, PPS12, undermining the weight that can therefore be attached to it.
The 2012 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) includes the land at Station Approach as a 'Potentially Suitable Urban Site' ('Site Ref L35'), but again does not refer to it or treat it as a 'commitment'. It also confirms that its availability is subject to an alternative location for the Bus (Stagecoach) Garage been found and suggests it could provide approximately 150 units by 2019 - 2024.
My clients supported in principle the 2008 Brief's promotion of residential development on their site. They continue to remain fully supportive of residential development in this location, but as this is not a 'commitment' my clients are firmly of the view that the WLP must be amended to:
 Allocate the land at Station Approach for housing through policy PO4, and
 Allocate a suitable and viable site for the relocation of the Stagecoach Depot
Paragraphs 150 -182 (inclusive) of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) confirm that Council's must be realistic in seeking to bring forward land for development and should only allocate sites that can be 'delivered' within the Plan period. At present, the land at Station Approach is not a 'commitment' and there are no proposals even in the 2008 Brief to bring forward this land for residential development. The 2008 Brief and 2012 SHLAA both suggest that the land can only be developed comprehensively for residential use following the relocation of the Stagecoach Depot.
The WLP clearly provides the opportunity to not only promote and bring forward the land at Station Approach for residential development through its allocation under policy PO4, but also the allocation of a separate site to accommodate the relocated Stagecoach Depot (subject to the findings of the proposed Scoping Study referred to earlier). This approach is consistent with that recommended by my clients in their response to the draft Core Strategy (see my letter dated the 19th August 2009). The arguments and justification put forward at the time remain, but take on greater significance given that the new Local Plan format now seeks to address and provide for all future 'allocations' or development 'needs', rather than being restricted to bringing forward strategic growth locations as was the case with the draft Core Strategy. The Stagecoach allocation would need to be supported by a commitment from the Council to use, if necessary, its CPO powers, either to secure the provision of the new site or Stagecoach's relocation from their existing site (again subject to the findings of the proposed Scoping Study).
3. Objection to Employment Provisions & Policy PO8
During my discussions with the LDF Team Officers confirmed that my clients site and specifically their extant B1 consent was not included in the 'supply' of available ('committed') employment land. This is reaffirmed in the 'evidence base' for the WLP, the 2011 Employment Land Supply. Table 1 of the latter confirms that the Station Goods Yard should be excluded from the 'supply' as the 2008 Brief supports residential development across all the land to north of the Station.
In discussing this issue with the LDF Team it was agreed that I should explain my clients long term aspirations for their landholdings. In doing so it's important to firstly understand the role and purpose of my clients, BRB (Residuary) Ltd. The Company was formed following the split up and sale of British Rail in 1993. It was given the role of discharging the remaining functions of the British Railways Board. The Company is owned by the Government and reports to the Department of Transport. It is responsible for a variety of functions including the disposal of remaining land (and buildings) surplus to the needs of the operational railways. The land at Station Approach is not required for future railway purposes and my clients have therefore sought to promote and then market the land with the benefit of planning permission as the Company is required to achieve best value for any land that it disposes of.
The B1 consent was therefore obtained by my clients in order to market and sell their site. However, as I explained above the failure of the consortium of landowners that was put together in 2008/2009 (through the Council's refusal of various applications for residential led development on the Former Quick's Garage site) combined with the economic recession (and collapse of the B1 market) has meant that it has simply not been possible for my clients to dispose of the site.
A residential development (once the market has improved) is likely to secure best value for the site, but it appears that this can only be delivered through the relocation of the Stagecoach Depot. If the latter cannot be achieved and no other options come forward in the proposed Scoping Study, then B1 development clearly represents the best and most acceptable alternative land use for the site which, subject to securing a viable scheme in conjunction with adjoining landowners, could also secure best value for my clients and the Government. It is important therefore that my clients interests and options are fully protected and hence the need to maintain the existing B1 'commitment' (my clients intend to renew their B1 consent as it expires in early 2013 and will shortly enter into pre-application discussions with the Council to achieve this).
In relation to the WLP, my clients would support amendments that sought to allocate the Former Goods Yard (and adjoining Network Rail land) for employment (B1) and housing. This could be done under policy PO4 which I note includes sites allocated for housing and mixed-use developments, including employment. This 'dual' allocation would be consistent with the 2008 Brief which as I confirmed supported the development of this land either for housing or B1 (Business) Use. The WLP should also seek to allocate a site for the relocation of the Stagecoach Depot subject of course to the findings of the proposed Scoping Study, as this Study will also assess the potential for residential and/or mixed-use development on all the land north of the Station with the Depot (Bus Garage) remaining in situ on its current site.
I would of course be pleased to discuss these objections further with you in order to resolve my clients concerns and secure appropriate changes to the WLP before it progresses to the Submission stage.

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

Warwick Local Plan BRB (Residuary) Ltd Response Form.pdf (148.09 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49339

Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Sackville Developments

Asiant : Sackville Developments

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

"Market signals" have not been taken in to account. Tournament Fileds employment Land has been marketed extensively but is not attractive.
The Gateway proposals will change demand for emloyment - this should be taken into account.
Emphasis for offices is inTown Centres due to ability to attract staff.
Early deivery of housing sites is a difficulty in the District. the eastern half of Tournament Fields could quickly deliver 196-260 dwellings. It relates well to adjoining uses.
The remaining employment land should not be restricted to B1,B2, B8 and could be used for other employment generating uses.

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau:

3184 03 - 8696 Response Form.pdf (143.44 KB)
3184 20120803141306.pdf (652.71 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49343

Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr J Lucas

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gateway jobs said to be coming from out of the area. Only generates wealth for those who invest heavily.
Do not want growth for the sake of growth. Encourage small businesses to thrive -reduce business rates in town centres.

Testun llawn:

Attached letter

Atodiadau:

Letter (88.93 KB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49370

Derbyniwyd: 13/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Coventry & Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The productivity of the Coventry and Warwickshire economy has been falling steadily over the past 5 / 6 years due to lack of growing businesses, below average diffusion and take up of innovation across the local economy, lack of higher level skills particularly in the centre and north of the subregion, weak agglomeration effects of the core urban area probably exacerbated by poor north / south transport connectivity and lack of growth of higher value, knowledge intensive industries.

The district has seen growth in higher value knowledge intensive industries over the past 10 years and the LEP supports and encourages further growth in these sectors. The University of Warwick which is part located within Warwick District makes a significant contribution to the subregional economy and the LEP supports continued development of the campus as set out in the Masterplan agreed by the Council.

Supports objective 1 of the plan as set out in paragraph 4.10 and the economy issues in 8.6 are noted and considered consistent with the LEP 5 year plan.

The LEP is pleased that there is a close working relationship with the business community to understand their needs. The LEP is committed to the identification of a site of regional importance for employment to serve the needs of Coventry and Warwickshire and has indicated the Gateway Site as its preferred site. The LEP acknowledges that the plan gives a committment to exploring the case for this site.

Is pleased that the opportunity to attract new investment and jobs is not likely to be restricted by inadequate provision of new employment land to meet the needs of the district. In support of the Councils flexible approach in PO8 wishes to emphasise the importance of providing the right locational requirements for businesses. Suggests a wider definition of economic development should be provided in PO8 to include employment opportunities which fall outside B class uses.

Testun llawn:

Full submission attached

Atodiadau:

CWLEP Reps to Warwick Local Plan Final submission (3).doc (46.50 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49375

Derbyniwyd: 30/07/2012

Ymatebydd: La Salle Investments

Asiant : Harris Lamb

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Supports the recognition in bullet point 5 of PO8 that support will be provided for appropriate development in the identified major developed sites in the greenbelt. In order for the emerging plan to be consistent with the NPPF reference to Major Developed Sites should be replaced with reference to Previously Developed Sites. Considers however that a specific policy should be included in the plan to guide the development of Stoneleigh Park as follows:

Development will be permitted at Stoneleigh Park which provides the following uses:
* Exhibitions
* Showground
* Rural Business Innovation Park
* National Equine Centre
* Other Equine and Vetinary Uses
* Livestock facilities
* Education and Learning
* Research
* Sustainability and Energy
* Hotel and Conference Facilities
* Visitor Centre
* Camping Facilities
* Ancillary Leisure, Retail and Catering
* Other uses, activities and Infrastructure would support the function of the park.

This would reflect the requirements of the NPPF and the outline planning application.

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau:

5130-R.pdf (2.00 MB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49388

Derbyniwyd: 08/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Commercial Estate Group and the McGregor Family

Nifer y bobl: 2

Asiant : Broadway Malyan

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support allocation of employment land north of Leamington. This is consistent with the NPPF. Blackdown is an appropriate location for this being adjacent to the A452. This allocation would help ensure business needs are met and would address employment deficit in the north of Leamington. Employment and a park and ride along with residential would contribute towards the creation of sustainable, mixed communities.

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau:

7390 Warwick DC Submitted CS PO Rep.pdf (4.30 MB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49400

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: NFU

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The NFU welcomes policy that enables growth of rural businesses and supports the diversification of the rural economy.

Testun llawn:

Thank you for giving the NFU West Midlands Region the opportunity to comment on the Preferred Option...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

Warwick DC Local plan preferred options Consultation July2012.docx (30.96 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49429

Derbyniwyd: 19/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Steve Williams

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

BPC object (supported by almost 100 residents in writing)to the gateway proposal for the following reasons:
- The proposal is contrary to the greenbelt protection policies as set out in the NPPF and will also destroy the village character.
- The environmental effects of the gateway have not been fully considered, including the 24/7 HGV operations.
- The proposal will impact on highways proposals (Tollbar Island).
- The smart card system lacks detail and is potentially unworkable.
- Closing Bubbenhall Road and Rowley Road will destroy the many local rural businesses which thrive in Baginton Parish.
- The provision of a new road west of the runway - could pave the way for future runway expansion.
- There are other preferable large-scale employment sites that have not been fully considered.
- There is 23 hectares of business development land proposed within WDC boundaries separate to that of the Gateway.
- The jobs number is misleading and inaccurate - with 4000 of the jobs north of the A45 (Coventry) and many jobs will not be newly created. The plan should only reference jobs in the WDC area.

Testun llawn:

Thank you for your email of 1st June 2012 re the above subject. The Councillors of Baginton Parish C...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

Baginton_Housing_Letter.pdf (2.43 MB)
Baginton_Rep_with_appendices.pdf (839.99 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49590

Derbyniwyd: 20/06/2012

Ymatebydd: Mr Steven Wallsgrove

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Employment commitment at Tournament Fields should be shown on plans as continuing employment and made clear form of employment.
If older employment sites go for housing, they should be identified on plans, if only as symbol.

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau:

3701-R.pdf (95.87 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49682

Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lynn Hunt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support in principle but for reasoins outlined under objection to PO4, object to land at North Milverton and Blackdown being used for employment..

Need to ensure proposals do not lead to more people trvelling from oytside the District and from the south of the Town to employment in the north as this will increase traffic problems.

Better to build on the established employment base in the south of the town. and between A46 and A429 to the north of Warwick.

Testun llawn:

Scanned representation

Atodiadau:

6959-R.pdf (3.65 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49715

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Employment need only be provided/attracted to match our population. The previous stage of the consultation gave a clear indication that the majority were preferring to accept lower growth rates of housing, employment and infrastructure. That choice must be selected and a focus on consolidation rather than growth should be the watchword. The Gateway project may still materialise and this will make extra demands as some of the jobs will no doubt be attractive to our residents in addition to bringing in new workers. Provision should be made for housing local to that site and not for such workers to be subsumed into the wider WDC area.

Testun llawn:

PO1 Preferred Option: Level of growth
I consider that the proposed level of housing growth of 555 h...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

New Local Plan consultation Murphy.docx (21.29 KB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49772

Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Coventry & Warwickshire Development Partnership

Asiant : Oxalis Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support the Local Plan's intention to explore the case for the Gateway site being identified as a site of regional importance.

Recognise the need to demonstrate very special circumstances for green belt release. The case for this will be made in a planning application and consquently the application and the Local Plan are expected to progress in parallel allowing the Gateway to be assessed as part of the overall development strategy.

Testun llawn:

Scanned representation

Atodiadau:

6458-R.pdf (349.02 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49804

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Drs Mandy Barnett & Patrick James

Nifer y bobl: 2

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Proposals for employment withinthe preferred options sites adds to the destruction of the green belt. Better alernatives exist on various brownfield sites and on other vacant sites such as Tournament Fields; Portobelloe Office development; North Lodge on Kenilworth Rd; Bath Place; the Council's own offices; Holly Walk and Dale Street.

There are numerous other buildings.

Testun llawn:

Scanned representation

Atodiadau:

6255-R.pdf (1.48 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49895

Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Comments regarding employment issues:

- We need to be flexible to take advantage of new initiatives;
- Lack of demand for some employment sites (Gallaghers) - why plan for more when this is not required;
- Land should be used more efficiently - particularly industrial sites;
- Many people travel significant distances to work;
- Benefits to Warwickshire of The Gateway project are limited;
- Flexibility required in rural areas - maybe home-work units might be a limited solution.

Testun llawn:

See Attachments

Atodiadau:

Response to WDC Executive Summary contents.doc (33.50 KB)
Response to Preferred Options main.doc (384.50 KB)
Response to WDC on preferred level of growth.doc (280.50 KB)
Draft Green Space Strategy for Warwick district 2012.doc (66.50 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49918

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Dan Robbins

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The porposed new areas of employment are not justifed - esepcially in the green belt. There are already many better sites available with better access to established infrastructure. The small number of job being created does not justify green belt take up and there is not gurantee the these employment sites will be "full" (eg Court Street Arches).

If employment land fallsvacant it can lead to year of delapidation. - brand new buildings/sites exacerbate this. So the Council should make best use of what it already as before llocating more employment land.

Testun llawn:

Scanned representation

Atodiadau:

6241-R.pdf (5.84 MB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 49953

Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2012

Ymatebydd: Barwood

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is noted that the Council propose to consider allocating a 'proportion' of the site south of Gallows Hill for employment. The provision of mixed use development is supported although clearly further clarification is required on the definition of 'a proportion'.

Testun llawn:

On behalf of Barwood Strategic Land LLP and the landowners we write in support of their
respective i...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

Warwick DC PO Response Form.pdf (205.32 KB)
120727SD Barwood Consultation Response Warwick DC Local Plan PO.pdf (108.08 KB)
120727SD Cover Ltr Warwick DC Local Plan PO Reps.pdf (165.63 KB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50004

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sandra Barnwell

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support this, but buildings shoud be no higher than the height of an ordinary house.

Testun llawn:

Attached

Atodiadau:

6925.2-R.pdf (1.87 MB)
6925-R.pdf (7.69 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50112

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Lasalle Investment Management

Asiant : Harris Lamb

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Supports the reference in PO8 to Stoneleigh Park. However, reference to such sites as "Major Developed Sites" should be removed because NPPF now refers to such sites as "previously developed" sites.
Supports reference in para 8.25 to Stoneleigh Park and the benefits it brings to the local economy.
However, a specific policy on Stoneleigh Park should be included in the Plan. This would define the area, preferably the Local Plan Major Developed Site area, and set out the different uses which would be appropriate on the site. It would reflect new guidance on previously developed sites in the Green Belt in NPPF and the outline planning permission.

Testun llawn:

See scanned letter and response forms

Atodiadau:

Letter and response form (513.12 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50215

Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Ms Nicola Hunt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support in principle but for reasons outlined under objection to PO4, object to land at North Milverton and Blackdown being used for employment..

Need to ensure proposals do not lead to more people travelling from outside the District and from the south of the Town to employment in the north as this will increase traffic problems.

Better to build on the established employment base in the south of the town. and between A46 and A429 to the north of Warwick.

Testun llawn:

Scanned representation

Atodiadau:

6961-R.pdf (1.53 MB)
Detailed Letter (3.65 MB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50245

Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Lenco Investments

Asiant : RPS Planning & Development

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Supports the Council's priorities to ensure availability of a wide range of employment land, and the recognition of the importance of working with Coventry and Warwickshire sub-region in respect of the Gateway Scheme at Coventry Airport as a location of importance for employment and
regeneration.

This policy should also include reference to the need to deliver appropriate housing and facilities in this location to compliment this growth to the south of Coventry and support the increase in population locating to the area for the employment opportunities which will be provided.
Additional housing development also provides jobs during construction, contributing to economic growth.

This is another reason for the Council to increase housing delivery in accordance with the ONS Household Projections for the District.

Therefore, Lenco's site at Baginton is a sustainable location for growth, adjacent to the proposed
Airport expansion, and can accommodate up to 1,000 dwellings to assist in the regeneration of the
area.

Testun llawn:

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 RPS Planning and Development (RPS) has been instructed by Lenco Investments (Lenc...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

JBB7597.C0414.Warwick Local Plan PO Reps.18.07.12.doc.pdf (907.19 KB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50318

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Whitnash Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We support the principles of PO8.

Testun llawn:

Whitnash Town Council respond to each of the Preferred Options in turn, and
make comments in respect...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

WDC - Whitnash Town Councils Response to WDC Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation 27th July 2012 (2).pdf (35.97 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50319

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Whitnash Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We reiterate our concern that appropriate levels of employment land should be provided, in the right places, and this should constitute a balanced portfolio of sites to meet as wide a variety of needs and demands as possible.

Testun llawn:

Whitnash Town Council respond to each of the Preferred Options in turn, and
make comments in respect...

[dangos mwy]

Atodiadau:

WDC - Whitnash Town Councils Response to WDC Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation 27th July 2012 (2).pdf (35.97 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50499

Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Hancock Town Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Wishes to object to the non allocation of its land (site adjacent to Campbell House, Stratford Road, Warwick) for commercial development. There are two main concerns relating the the Council's SHLAA report:
Cordon Sanitaire - the odour nuisance with the sewage works has significantly improved over the last few years, with commercial development possibly taking the form of outdoor storage and any ancillary office accommodation could be designed to be an 'air tight' sealed box with non-opening windows and air conditioning. Current commercial uses on site have been there for many years without dispute or conflict with the sewage works.
Flood risk - the site overwhelmingly lies within flood zone 1 - the area of lowest flood risk - whilst the very eastern tip of the site might lie within Flood Zone 3A, this part of the site would be undeveloped.
The site is well screened and low key commercial use of the whole site could allow for a comprehensive high quality development.

Testun llawn:

See Attachment

Atodiadau:

reps on draft Local Plan re land at Campbell House.pdf (1.60 MB)

Cefnogi

Preferred Options

ID sylw: 50597

Derbyniwyd: 19/07/2012

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Public Health and South Warwickshire Clinical Commisioning Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Supports the plan to ensure availability of a wide range of employment land, as the recent recession has resulted in many redundancies across the county which impacts on mental health and wellbeing, therefore any opportunity to attract inward investment, particularly "green investment" and employment to the district will be welcomed. Any large developments, such as the Coventry & Warwickshire Gateway site should consider incorporating cycle routes, measured miles and green gym equipment to allow employees to integrate physical activity more into their daily lives.
Aligns with public health indicator 'Improving the wider determinants of health' and NICE guidance 'Four commonly used methods to increase physical activity (PH2), 'prevention of cardiovascular disease (PH25)', 'Physical activity and the environment (PH8)' and 'Mental wellbeing and older people (PH16)'.

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau:

PH SWCCG Consultation Feedback to WDC Local Plan V2.doc (185.50 KB)