BASE HEADER
H53 - Hatton Park - Brownley Green Lane
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69298
Derbyniwyd: 17/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Judith Coker
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Access to site too narrow for heavy traffic during construction (Barcheston Drive / Brownley Green Lane).
Access from village hall is very steep.
to provide sufficient road infrastructure to counteract this more land would be needed.
This site should not be included in the plan.
Existing children's play area would become unsafe as close to access road.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69299
Derbyniwyd: 17/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr. Ian Coker
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Site should not be included.
Barcheston Drive and Brownley Green Lane too narrow for construction traffic.
Access from village hall car park very steep - providing sufficient infrastructure would need additional land.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69302
Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Miss Michelle Boyle
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Object to proposal: -
- inadequate access for construction traffic
- inadequate local facilities
- local roads already congested - increased likelihood of road traffic accidents
- adverse impact on safety of children's play area
- inadequate site access
- loss of open space and increase in traffic will adversely affect amenity of area.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69304
Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Barrett
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Object to proposal: -
- local plan has not identified level of infrastructure needed to support new housing (e.g. new schools, health facilities and road infrastructure)
- adverse impact on safety of children's play area adjacent to access road and increased traffic
- environmentally unsustainable site - poor infrastructure will necessitate additional car use contrary to NPPF
- adverse impact of construction traffic on residential amenity
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69305
Derbyniwyd: 17/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr. Graham Baker
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Object to proposals: -
- roads too narrow for construction traffic
- adverse impact on local facilities e.g. village hall, parking, play areas and orchard
- children's play areas would become dangerous
- additional congestion would be generated
- serious road safety problems would be exacerbated
- Housing need projections based on a data blip and not necessarily accurate
- loss of green belt not justified by special circumstances
- environmentally unsustainable - lacks public transport
- additional local infrastructure and services requirements not identified
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69306
Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr. Jagdish Bains
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Local infrastructure does not support additional housing - lack of school places, shops, public transport.
Playground adjacent to road junction for new estate would be highly dangerous, especially due to site gradient.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69308
Derbyniwyd: 17/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Sarah Bacon
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Object to proposal: -
- serious implications for pedestrian and road safety
- new building will increase traffic both during and after construction
- estate roads are busy enough and further adverse impact on buses
- roads not suitable for construction traffic
- adverse impact on safety of play areas
- access poorly located and congested
- increased congestion on local roads
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69309
Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Julie Bacchus
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Object to proposals: -
- Barcheston Drive too narrow for construction traffic
- adverse impact on village hall, play / sport areas
- danger to children
- additional congestion
- many houses on Chase Meadow - local residents don't support more
See attached
Cefnogi
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69423
Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Nigel Gough Associates Ltd
Mod 16, para 2.81 and Mod 19 Policies Map
2.1.1 Our clients support, in principle, the release of their land edged red for housing
Identified as H53 'Hatton Park, Brownley Green Lane' for an estimated 55 dwellings (page 34 of the Table of Proposed Modifications)
2.1.2 If formally Adopted our Clients will immediately seek to bring the land forward for development
1. Background
1.1 Our clients, the Burman family, are the freehold owners of the land edged red on the plan attached
1.2 We have previously made representations on the emerging Warwick District Local Plan on behalf of the Burman family
1.3 The proposals for additional Main Modifications to this District Local Plan, were issued dated January 2016, and for which there is a closing date of Friday 22 April 2016 (by 4:45pm) for receipt by Warwick DC of representations.
1.4 We set out below those representations
2. Representations - Support
Mod 16, para 2.81 and Mod 19 Policies Map
2.1.1 Our clients support, in principle, the release of their land edged red for housing
Identified as H53 'Hatton Park, Brownley Green Lane' for an estimated 55 dwellings (page 34 of the Table of Proposed Modifications)
2.1.2 If formally Adopted our Clients will immediately seek to bring the land forward for development
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69454
Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Wilkie
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Green belt boundaries should only be changed in exceptional circumstances and is not justified in this case.
Hatton Park should not be considered a "growth village" as it does not have amenities such as schools and doctors that are required to justify changing the green belt boundary.
Poor / dangerous access to site
Adverse impact on local amenities
Lack of services / facilities, including school capacity
Increased traffic on already busy road
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69474
Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Nicholas Dale Goodman
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
- Barcheston Drive too narrow for construction traffic
- Danger to pedestrians.
- access via village hall carpark steep; to provide sufficient infrastructure to counteract gradient additional land would need to be acquired.
- Children's play area would become dangerous next to access road.
- wider road infrastructure will struggle to support additional traffic
- increase accident risks
- housing need projections based on inaccurate information
- no justification for loss of green belt
- environmentally unsustainable - lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use.
- infrastructure needed to support development not identified in plan.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69500
Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Cresswell
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Object to H53. The H53 should be removed for the following reasons:
It is in an unsustainable location for the proposed number of units
It contains highways access issues which would affect the operation and sustainability of the village hall/children's play area
This change of use of green belt land will set a precedent for expansion around Hatton Park
The land identified is inappropriate for housing as there is insufficient infrastructure and it would fail to comply with the NPPF. It prevents the countryside from encroachment and would permanently change the open character of Hatton Park.
It is likely that any future development proposal on this land would be considered unsound on the basis that it does not meet the test for 'exceptional circumstances' criteria to be applied when changing the status of green belt land.
I am writing to object to the suggested additional housing allocation at Hatton Park, known as H53. I request that the H53 site is removed from the draft Local Plan for the following reasons.
- - the site is in an unsustainable location for the proposed number of units
- - it contains highways access issues which would affect the operation and sustainability of the village hall and children's play area
- -it provides the potential that this change of use of green belt land will open potential for further infilling and expansion around the Hatton Park development
The land identified for H53 is inappropriate for housing development as there is insufficient infrastructure provided, and it would fail to comply with a number of stipulations in the National Planning Policy Framework which prevent the countryside from encroachment, specifically that it would permanently change the open character of Hatton Park.
It is likely that any future development proposal on this land would be considered unsound on the basis that it does not meet the test for 'exceptional circumstances' criteria to be applied when changing the status of green belt land.
I propose that H53 remain as agricultural land and the site should be substituted in preference for a similar number of properties to be located within the H28 site, which is contained in the previous draft of the Local Plan and is considered more appropriate as a development site.
The existing plan for the H28 site has arbitrary boundary which does not maximise the full capacity of the fields. It is my proposal that the line of the boundary defined by Warwick District Council is extended to abut the edge of the efields in order to accommodate an additional numbers of properties.
Furthermore, I understand the land at Oaklands Farm on the other side of the Birmingham Road is no longer viable for consideration as a gypsy and traveller site and may be put forward as a potential for development land for rural housing. I would support such a proposal, given the importance of meeting this particular need, and that this site could also provide a more sustainable alternative to the H53 proposal.
I therefore conclude that H53 must be removed from the draft Local Plan prior to full publication.
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69520
Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Katherine Upton
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Access via Barcheston Drive seems far too dangerous & hazardous. This road is very narrow and the local bus has enough trouble getting around Hatton Park. It is ridiculous to think that heavy lorries and site traffic will be able to navigate the bollards in the centre of this drive.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69521
Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr. Barry Williams
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Barcheston Drive cannot cope with heavy plant traffic and it would be unsafe for local residents and children who go to the park.
-The access to the site is too steep and right next to a children's play area which is unsafe.
- Birmingham road is already congested and this route into Warwick is very busy at rush hour. The wider infrastructure needs working.
- The loss of the children's play area and basketball park is not in the residents' interests, as a minimum these will become 'no go' areas as they will be next to a building site.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69523
Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Jude Williams
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Barcheston Drive is not suitable for big heavy trucks as the road is narrow and double parked.
-Barcheston drive is used by children walking to the school, bus stop which would make it dangerous to walk on path.
-The building site is next to the park and would be dangerous for the children to play near the building site.
-The village hall, park and orchard are the only recreational area for children and families to play safely.
-The access to the site is not safe and doesn't provide suitable road infrastructure to cater for the workmen and vehicles needed.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69524
Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr D Wheeler
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-The local roads and estate would be too congested for construction traffic and could impact on the bus route and add extra traffic to the already busy Birmingham road.
-The services to the estate already seem stretched , so adding these extra dwellings would necessitate additional works to support them in the long term.
-The impact on the village hall seems significant this area acts as a natural surface water drain and could increase flooding as found in other areas where land has been developed.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69525
Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Ruth Wheeler
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Barcheston drive struggles with buses so it will be very difficult for heavy construction vehicles coming onto Hatton Park during the construction phase. There has been a lot of spent on village hall car park and this facility is now in jeopardy due to the new houses requiring access. The wide infrastructure is a major concern as Birmingham Road is congested in morning due to traffic. The services to the estate already seem stretched to capacity (water/internet).
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69549
Derbyniwyd: 17/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr. Alexander Howe
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
Barcheston Drive is too narrow for construction traffic.
The proposed access is very steeps and mitigating this will impact on the village hall, play area, orchard and parking. In particularly he play area would become dangerous . Further afield Birmingham Road will is already congested and will become worse and safety concerns will be worse. Given uncertainty surrounding the housing projections, there are questions about whether the exceptional circumstance for green belt release can be justified.
The site is unsustainable and the lack of local infrastructure will require additional car journeys. The Local Plan does not identify the infrastructure needed to support the level of development proposed.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69551
Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Alka Groves
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Local infrastructure cannot support additional housing and traffic.
-WDC should be identifying brownfield sites and not green belt.
-Dangerous for kids to have construction site near their play area.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69553
Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Goode
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
The site is unsuitable environmentally as lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use and does not comply with the National Planning Policy Frameworks requirement to secure sustainable development.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69554
Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Cheryl Goode
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
- Roads will struggle to cope with additional traffic
- Will place unacceptable pressure on existing local services and facilities
Housing need forecasts are based on a blip in demand and are not needed
No special circumstances to support development
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69556
Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Fay Foster
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
The site is difficult to access . the local amenities and infrastructure cannot support the proposed development
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69557
Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr. David Foster
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Greenbelt should not be available for residential development.
-Birmingham road is not suitable for heavy trucks, plant and equipment.
-Additional houses will impact severely on the existing and limited local amenities.
-Addition in traffic will be more dangerous.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69558
Derbyniwyd: 17/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr. Christopher Fenwick
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Objection towards building of houses.
-Local infrastructure will not be able to support the additional traffic.
-Birmingham road is already busy, had accidents, fatalities due to the congestion.
-Housing projects on greenbelt are based on a blip in demand and not valid, hence housing may not be needed.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69560
Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Miss Vanessa Evans
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Barcheston Drive is too narrow for lorry and heavy plant movements.
-Proposed access from the village hall car park is very steep, in order to provide sufficient infrastructure to counteract the steep gradient additional land above that highlighted in the proposal would need to be acquired.
-Children's play area would become dangerous as it would be next to an access road.
-The wider infrastructure will struggle to support the additional traffic and also will increase the risk of accidents.
-Site is unsuitable environmentally as the lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use.
-Necessary infrastructure needed to support the additional houses is not identified in the local plan.
Housing need based on a blip in demand and growth will not necessarily follow the same trajectory, hence fewer houses than forecast
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69565
Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Dove
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Hatton park cannot handle the heavy traffic.
-The proposed development would have a detrimental impact on local facilities-village hall and playground and the playground would be left next to an access road.
-Local amenities could not handle the additional pressure of development, and water pressure is already insufficient.
-Local schools and roads cannot cope with extra demand.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69566
Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Angela Dove
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
- Barcheston Drive too narrow for construction traffic
- Danger to pedestrians
- access via village hall carpark steep; providing sufficient infrastructure to counteract gradient would require additional land
- Children's play area dangerous next to access road.
- wider road infrastructure will struggle to support additional traffic
- increase accident risks
- housing need projections based on inaccurate information
- green belt loss unjustified
- environmentally unsustainable; lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use.
- infrastructure needed to support development not identified in plan.
- water pumping station already beyond capacity; fails regularly to supply existing houses.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69570
Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs. Ayesha Dikko
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Barcheston Drive is too narrow for lorry and heavy plant movements.
-Proposed access from the village hall car park is very steep, in order to provide sufficient infrastructure to counteract the steep gradient additional land above that highlighted in the proposal would need to be acquired.
-Children's play area would become dangerous as it would be next to an access road.
-The wider infrastructure will struggle to support the additional traffic and also will increase the risk of accidents.
-Site is unsuitable environmentally as the lack of local infrastructure requires additional car use.
-Necessary infrastructure needed to support the additional houses is not identified in the local plan.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69578
Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mr Malcolm Cook
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
- local roads too narrow for heavy vehicles.
- unsafe access to site
- development will increase number of cars adversely affect road safety for children and pedestrians
- access via village hall car park will use up large proportion of green belt due to steepness.
- development will increase pressure on existing local schools, doctors and the Birmingham Road.
See attached
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 69585
Derbyniwyd: 16/04/2016
Ymatebydd: mr mark betker
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi
-Barcheston drive lacks the suitable infrastructure to support the application.
-The local infrastructure is currently stressed and will not be able to support any further development.
-The extra traffic would cause even more serious traffic on Birmingham road.
-Local amenities. shops, schools, transport are not suitable and could not absorb additional development.
This allocation would be an encroachment into the green belt.
See attached