Yes

ID sylw: 105055

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Matthew Shilvock

Pathlow is ideally located with two railway stations, good bus transport and good truck and other road networks to both Birmingham, Coventry and Warwick/Leamington and the wider west midlands. There are also train to London. This area is desperate for more housing and the land at pathlow would make a great settlement

No

ID sylw: 105128

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Tony Moon

I am totally against the proposal to bury Bearley and surrounding villages under 6800 new houses.

It is too much and will destroy the environment for miles around.

Take the pressure off the housing need by getting rid of the illegal immigrants and stop the flood of more.

No

ID sylw: 105138

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Walsh-Waring

As a local resident I would like to formally object to this proposal , as it appears to be ill conceived and unnecessary

It should also be noted that several members of the council have [Redacted].

The development itself does not appear to have properly considered the impact on the existing local communities, or the effect on the wildlife in the area.

There appears to be no confirmed improvements and consideration of the impact on the area in question in respect of the additional infrastructure that would be required to accommodate and maintain an increase in population of this size, Potentially between 12 and 24,000 individuals.

The land concerned is marshy, low lying and subject to flooding

Finally I have noticed that in and around Stratford , there are a number of disused brownfield sites and it is these that should be developed first before any Greenbelt development is even considered, whilst I appreciate that this is not as attractive to property developers! However as responsible local councillors and their representatives , it is your job to manage these sites and develop them first, before considering reducing the amount of land available to grow the food that the population needs.

No

ID sylw: 105201

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Paul Ellwood

Strong Objection:
I cannot see any need/requirement/grounds for the 5 potential new settlements in the green belt of A1, A2, C1, B1 and BW. I am opposed to all 5 on due the need for environmental protection, lack of sustainable development and lack of infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 105253

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I object to the proposed development at Bearley and Wilmcote for several planning reasons that contravene local and national planning policies. It would significantly harm the heritage assets of Mary Arden’s House, negatively affect the landscape character, and lead to loss of Green Belt. Existing flood issues in Bearley would worsen, increasing water problems. Additionally, the proposal would greatly increase vehicle movements on the A3400 without necessary road improvements, and the infrequent rail service would not effectively serve residents. Overall, the development lacks design and distinctiveness.

No

ID sylw: 105297

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jennifer Clarke

As a resident and landowner at Pathlow, I oppose the proposed new settlement at Wilmcote/Bearley. This development threatens prime green belt land, will harm local biodiversity, and negatively impact the historic character of Wilmcote and Mary Arden's House. The increased traffic would overwhelm existing infrastructure, leading to congestion and safety issues. Additionally, there is no adequate provision for education, healthcare, or utilities to support such a large-scale development. Overall, this proposal would destroy the unique countryside lifestyle we cherish and is unjustifiable in this area.

No

ID sylw: 105367

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Julia Barnard

I do not agree with the approach laid out in the draft policy, I do not support the proposals nor the proposed Strategic Growth location new settlement for the following reasons:

It is catastrophic development in the green belt currently used for farming

The land on either side of the A34 between Pathlow and Bearley has always flooded as it evidenced regularly by the flooding of the A34 itself

The present infrastructure cannot handle sewage, water supply, road access, traffic, etc etc, the list is endless

The A34 is currently grid locked daily with traffic queuing whilst trying to get through Henley in Arden and into Stratford at the Bishopton island. This will be exacerbated beyond belief.

Finally, this draft policy is ill conceived, not sustainable and does not comply with the Governments Sustainability policy.

No

ID sylw: 105412

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richard Hoskin

I express my concerns about the proposed development in Wilmcote and Bearley, as I believe it will negatively impact the area and Stratford. I oppose the construction of 6,700 homes due to existing congestion, inadequate infrastructure, and insufficient job opportunities. The current road network is already strained, and I worry that this development would exacerbate pollution and traffic issues. Additionally, the local railway and transport facilities are not equipped to handle the influx of residents. I also oppose any loss of green spaces and habitat, which are vital for the area's character.

No

ID sylw: 105413

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stephen and Annette Howell

I object to the proposed development of 6,700 houses at Bearley and Wilmcote, as it violates the Core Strategy 2011-2031. This development would harm local heritage, particularly Mary Arden's house, and destroy the village's character through urban sprawl. The area already faces flooding issues due to poor drainage on heavy clay soil. Increased traffic on the busy A3400 would exacerbate congestion, making Stratford's road system chaotic. Alternative sites with better infrastructure and no heritage concerns such as Hatton, south of Kingswood, Long Marston Airfield, South of Leamington Spa/Whitnash, and west of B455 Fosse Way should be considered to protect our villages and prevent further traffic and flooding problems.

No

ID sylw: 105430

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Louise Warr

I wish to emphasise my objections regarding the Wilmcote area due to its existing flood risk, which I believe Stratford District Council has already recognised in other documents. I find it concerning that the South Warwickshire Local Plan proposes over 6,700 houses, which would exacerbate surface water run-off and overwhelm local infrastructure, including roads and drainage systems. This situation could lead to increased insurance costs for current and future residents. I advocate for smaller, well-planned developments that preserve the village character, and ensure safety without overwhelming local resources.

No

ID sylw: 105471

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ingrid Everson

I am a resident of Wilmcote and I strongly oppose the inclusion of the proposed settlement at BW in the SWLP. The negative impacts on the environment and local heritage far outweigh any potential benefits. The settlement would undermine the Green Belt, merging existing villages and harming their unique character. Additionally, the transport infrastructure is inadequate, with heavy congestion expected on already busy roads. The impact on tourism, agriculture, and local ecology, including the SSSI at Bearley Bushes, further necessitates rejecting this proposal.

No

ID sylw: 105509

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Carol Jones

have lived here in Aston Cantlow for 2 years now and I think the proposal of the houses to be built in Wilmcote will spoil the local area, not only will it put more pressure on the eco system but the roads, the dentists, the doctors, the shops, the local flooding problems, and also create too many homes in such a local area of beauty. I think the houses shouldn’t be built and they should re consider the plans.

It’s not welcome in the surrounding area.

No

ID sylw: 105517

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Felicity Harer

I live in Snitterfield and have concerns about the building plans in Bearley. While I support appropriate development, I worry about the impact on the local character, road safety, flooding, school capacity, medical care, green belt, cycle routes, and public transport. The proposed development could harm the historic villages and increase traffic issues, especially around schools. Additionally, there is a need for more medical provisions and better transport links. I object to the current proposal but would consider supporting a revised plan that addresses these concerns. Please confirm receipt of this email.

No

ID sylw: 105527

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Pebston Thomas

I am expressing my concerns about the proposed developments in the Local Plan for Bearley and Wilmcote. Living in Wootton Wawen, I find it shocking to consider 6,700 homes in this green belt area, which would harm the countryside and wildlife. The local infrastructure cannot support such a large increase in population, as evidenced by the current strain on health services and traffic congestion in Stratford. If this development proceeds, it would negatively affect every village nearby, leading to lower house prices and increased pressure on local services. I strongly object to this development.

No

ID sylw: 105535

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Paul Edmondson

I would like to register my objections and concerns about the proposed development of 6,700 homes at Bearly and Wilmcote.
The site proposed is registered greenbelt which the development would turn into what would effectively be a suburb of Stratford-upon-Avon. The important countryside around Wilmcote - and, importantly - the heritage site of Mary Arden's House - would be lost forever, and be ruined by noise and traffic pollution. The canal tow-path and the public amenity it offers would also irrevocably suffer.
I am an Associate Minister in The Church of England and often serve in the parish of Wilmcote. I know the people of the parish do not want this development, and I am therefore sending you my concerns alongside theirs.

Yes

ID sylw: 105570

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Hargie

BW is well supported by transport access to the main A3400 running through the site to the A46 and has two existing railway stations at Wilmcote and Bearley with connections to Birmingham/Stratford-upon-Avon. The site is very accessible to Stratford-upon-Avon with all the available healthcare, retail, leisure and employment facilities.

No

ID sylw: 105624

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Eileen Edwards

BW – Land at Bearley and Wilmcote –capacity 6480 homes: OBJECT for the following material planning reasons which are not policy compliant to the Core Strategy 2011 – 2031.

1) Significant harm to the heritage assets and values of Mary Arden’s House in Wilmcote

2) Significant harm caused to the character of the landscape

3) Impact and significant harm and loss to the Green Belt

4) Existing and extensive flood issues in Bearley would exacerbate the flood risk causing significant water issues and insurmountable surface water runoff

5) Significant increase in the number of vehicle movements on the busy A3400 without improved road infrastructure. The infrequent rail service at Bearley negates residents from using this branch line. The existence of a railway station does not equate to an efficient train service with no direct connection to Birmingham or Coventry. The proposal to split the town with the A3400 running through it reflects a contrived development and would lack both design and distinctiveness for a new town.

No

ID sylw: 105639

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fiona Flear

As a lifelong resident of South Warwickshire, I have witnessed significant changes and understand the need for more housing. However, I question the proposed volume and type of development, particularly in relation to Green Belt land, without sufficient exploration of brownfield sites and empty properties. The area faces numerous challenges, including overcrowded roads, limited healthcare, and a lack of employment opportunities. I believe that developments like BW would irreparably harm the rural character of Wilmcote, Bearley, and Pathlow. If SG18 were also allowed development would spread to remaining villages until the whole area up to Alcester becomes a conurbation. Large developments often do not meet the initially promised required infrastructure and low-cost housing.

No

ID sylw: 105808

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Coombes

I object to 6480 homes at site BW as it is not policy compliant as per the adopted 106 Core Strategy. The development will lead to significant harm to the heritage assets, character of the landscape areas. It will lead to loss of greenbelt and there are existing and extensive flooding issues. The development will lead to significant increase in vehicles on the road and put strain on the rail network. Before any development to take place it should be supported by hospitals, GP surgeries, dental surgeries and schools along with sewage treatment plan.
I found the online "Have your say" section difficult to navigate.

No

ID sylw: 105809

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kathryn Coombes

I object to 6480 homes at site BW as it is not policy compliant as per the adopted 106 Core Strategy. The development will lead to significant harm to the heritage assets, character of the landscape areas. It will lead to loss of greenbelt and there are existing and extensive flooding issues. The development will lead to significant increase in vehicles on the road and put strain on the rail network. Before any development to take place it should be supported by hospitals, GP surgeries, dental surgeries and schools along with sewage treatment plan.
I found the online "Have your say" section difficult to navigate.

No

ID sylw: 105810

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Roy Coombes

I object to 6480 homes at site BW as it is not policy compliant as per the adopted 106 Core Strategy. The development will lead to significant harm to the heritage assets, character of the landscape areas. It will lead to loss of greenbelt and there are existing and extensive flooding issues. The development will lead to significant increase in vehicles on the road and put strain on the rail network. Before any development to take place it should be supported by hospitals, GP surgeries, dental surgeries and schools along with sewage treatment plan.
I found the online "Have your say" section difficult to navigate.

No

ID sylw: 105812

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Nick Drabble

There is inadequate infrastructure to support the development of 6,700 homes. The area is prime agricultural land and exiting brownfield sites should be prioritised. Due to rural location the residents will be forced to use the car increasing road traffic and sir pollution. New development residents will be forced to use Bearley Road and through Smiths Lane in Snitterfield, passing the primary school and the residential centre of the village. In addition Gospel Oak Lane as a cut through to the A46 northbound and Featherbed Lane through Wilmcote for those heading West will become commuter routes. Ingon Lane with its poor turnout into Warwick Road southbound will also have intensified traffic. None of the above roads are suitable for traffic intensification and all have special hazards increasing risk. In addition the existing junctions of Gospel Oak Lane and Kings Lane either side of the de-restricted A46 already represent a significant accident risk and any intensification their use should be avoided.

No

ID sylw: 105859

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Browett

The determining factor of proximity of the site to the railway station is wrong as the railway is single track, trains don't run during peak hours and car parking at station is limited to 4 vehicles.
The new development will lead to traffic congestion on A46 and A3400 and will be detrimental to residents of Snitterfield.
The land is a green belt and is used to grow agricultural crops. The land at this greenbelt location is unsuitable for development.
The proposal include the land that has been earmarked for tree planting.
The proposal for a medium size town needs to be supported by adequate infrastructure including schools, shops and medical facilities.

No

ID sylw: 105866

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Louise Warr

I believe Wilmcote is already listed as high-risk for flooding by Stratford District Council so cannot understand why the South Warwickshire Local Plan ignoring this and proposing 6,700+ houses.

As we know- more houses = more concrete, more surface water run-off not only in Wilmcote, Pathlow and Bearley but down into Stratford itself

I understand that Wilmcote train station bridge already has subsidence from a lack of drainage and the increase in traffic through the village. The roads in and out of Stratford will be overwhelmed with the houses planned. The whole south Warwickshire area infrastructure can’t cope

Drainage systems all over will be overwhelmed, increasing flood risks, this will lead to Insurance costs rising for existing residents in the area, and the new ones buying these ill thought out homes.
People need to live somewhere but smaller, well planned developments enabling the security and safety of our local villages maintaining the village feel and not overwhelming the roads and infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 105875

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Holly Coombes

I object to BW being included in the SWLP as it will cause significant harm to heritage assets including Mary Arden's House and to the character and landscape in the area. The green belt will be lost forever. There are existing extensive flooding issues which will be made worse with new development. There will be significant increase in the number of vehicles on the already busy A3400. The rail service is infrequent and does not appeal to commuters. The infrastructure including hospitals, GP and dental surgeries, schools, waste and water treatment plants are at capacity and will not be able to support the proposed housing growth.

No

ID sylw: 105880

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mike Wallis

I object to BW being included due to following reasons:
Increased road usage on the Birmingham road, effecting an already congested route into the centre of stratford upon avon
Increased road usage on the Birmingham road, going through small villages such as Wootton Wawen, and small towns like Henley in arden
Loss of arable land for the future sustainability of the country
No suitable train station or local facilities for this level of housing

No

ID sylw: 105904

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alexander Spadavecchia

O object to BW being included in the SWLP as it will lead to loss of greenbelt, protected hedgerows, trees and will have a detrimental impact on the biodiversity and the local environment. The ;loss of open green space will be detrimental to people's overall health and wellbeing. The historic character of the area will be lost. The roads will not be able to cope with traffic. There is lack of doctor's, dentists and schools. More cars and homes will increase pollution. There are no local employment opportunities. For these points I support that a more suitable site is chosen. One which has existing infrastructure, employment opportunities, and doesn't negatively impact a site that has such diverse wildlife habitats.

No

ID sylw: 105912

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rebecca Watt

I am a resident of Aston Cantlow and I am greatly concerned about flooding in our village becoming worse as a result of the proposed development.
I am a full time carer for my father and fear that the times that we are totally cut off will increase as a result of the above, putting him at risk.
Traffic, loss of green belt, damage to heritage sites are all huge concerns as are the ability to police such issues.
I object most strongly to the development going ahead.

No

ID sylw: 105927

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Lucy Titcomb

One of my concerns, having used the train from Wilmcote to Birmingham Snow Hill for many years to commute to work, is the limited service on this line.
This mode of transport will not suit many commuters to Birmingham and they will probably resort to their cars and access the M40 via the A46.

A concern of the residents of Snitterfield is their access to the A46. There are two obvious routes:
- via the village of Snitterfield in which traffic calming measures have been introduced or
- via Gospel Oak Lane where no such measures exist and cars already race along this road at very high speeds.

The considerable danger to residents of Snitterfield from the additional road use must be taken into account when considering this option.

No

ID sylw: 105928

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Professor Ewan Fernie

I write both as a long-term resident of Wilmcote and in my professional capacity as Chair, Professor and Fellow of Shakespeare Studies at the Shakespeare Institute of the University of Birmingham: the world’s most important and renowned centre for the study of Shakespeare’s life, time and works. I feel it is my duty in both respects to emphasise the irreparable damage which the enormous proposed housing development would do to the historic environment of what is, quite literally, Shakespeare’s motherland. Shakespeare’s mother, Mary Arden, lived in the handsome farmhouse in the middle of the village. His father, John Shakespeare, ‘married up’ so their son, William, had particular reason to be proud of his maternal heritage. That he was especially proud of it is signalled by the fact that he mentions the village in one of his plays, The Taming of the Shrew, a work which is not coincidentally full of references to animal and country life. What makes Shakespeare’s reference to Wilmcote even more striking is that he does not specifically mention Stratford-upon-Avon in any of his works.