BASE HEADER

Strategic Growth Location SG07 Question

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 31 i 60 o 304

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89337

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Martin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not feel that more building is needed in this area, specifically the proposal of turning Wedgnock Farm into a massive industrial estate (SG07). Traffic is already problematic in the areas around the Birmingham Road - the area becomes gridlocked when issues arise on the M40/A46 and Warwick and surrounding villages become a rat run for vehicles. Building on greenbelt should be avoided as there is plenty of other land available that is more suitable and closer to roads more able to cope with the extra traffic.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89369

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kelly Burnett Nicholl

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not support the reclassification of this land for industrial use.

Detrimental to wildlife populations and biodiversity. Removing woodlands & hedgerows has an Impacts climate change.

Detrimental to farming industry.

reducing green rural spaces is detrimental to health and wellbeing. Walking, cycling and running are all leisure activities that take part on these lands. Tourism is a factor as people do visit on the basis that you can walk, cycle and run through these rural areas enroute to attractions like Hatton locks, Warwick and kenilworth.

Ruins character of area.

Takes away my home.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89516

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Green belt land, avoid wherever possible.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89587

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Martin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I disagree with the proposal to use land at Wedgnock Park Farm (SG07). I strongly object to the use of green belt land, especially when there are other options available that aren't. We need to consider the environmental impact and not allow green belt to be used just to get a solution delivered more quickly. Road access to SG07 would have to make use of the already congested Birmingham Road and the A46 whereas options have better access to the M40.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89607

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Stella Moore

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is only a small site with difficult access and is not suitable for further development.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89620

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Smith

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is greenbelt land and is clearly creating sprawl of Warwick into the protected greenbelt land - merging into Hatton Park and potentially merging the new town on B1 (which should also not go ahead for the same reasons). This all goes against the terms setout with the 5 x points to protect greenbelt land as stated within the NPPF

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89704

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Bamford

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is an area of greenbelt . The effect of extending the urban area of Warwick to adjoin Hatton Park is a blot on the landscape. It is simply not necessary . The effect of traffic onto the already congested A46 and Warwick Town centre will be harmful to the environment and cause even more difficulty for local people. There are plenty of alternative sites available. In addition the plan will cause harm to the existing wildlife which cannot be replaced with a narrow "green corridor"

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89760

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Dodd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Whilst ultimately more employment opportunities are good for the residents of South Warwickshire, I fear that unless there is a greater investment in public transport, this employment area may be a car only option, making it less sustainable, particularly with the increasing effects of climate change and the necessary adaptations needed within the Warwick District area.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 89864

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Claire Whittaker

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The traffic would make this site impossible for people to move around. It is green belt land (when there are plenty of non-green belt sites available), ruining the countryside.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90161

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hugh Darwen

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not agree with the idea of an industrial park in this area. It would effectively extend the town of Warwick to include Hatton Park. The A4177 leading to Stanks roundabout already gets frequently clogged up with traffic. The significant increase in construction and commercial traffic would have a severe impact on local traffic heading for Warwick town centre and Leamington Spa.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90165

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Clare Hopkinson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

In the 1970's Lord Redcliffe Maude re-organised all the County boarders in order to protect farm land by enforcing a Green Belt around cities. Wedgnock Park Farm Employment Group plans to be an Industrial site. Surely it makes more sense t put these on brown field sites on the outskirts of large cities such as coventry or Birmingham.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90173

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Fox

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Located directly on the A46 corridor - provides ease of access both to the M40 and into Coventry, as well as being close to Warwick Parkway for commuters to either Birmingham / Oxford or London.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90188

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gerardo Montoya

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly oppose the proposed developments in SG07 for several reasons. First, the area around the Hatton Arms Pub, where I live, was designated as protected, preventing me from extending my home—rules that should apply universally. Second, local infrastructure is inadequate; the Birmingham Road is already congested, worsened by previous developments. Warwick’s narrow, historic streets cannot handle additional traffic. Third, the environmental impact is severe, with threats to wildlife and the green belt. Lastly, essential services like water, power, and schools are already strained, and further expansion will cause significant disruption and potential system failure.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90322

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Elisabeth Darwen

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not agree with this site being considered as a strategic growth location. It borders the A4177 and if developed would result in continuous development from Hatton Park up to the edge of Warwick. It is within the Green Belt which is supposed to prevent this sort of urban sprawl. In addition construction and commercial traffic would be adding to the traffic on the A4177 which at this point close to Stanks Roundabout is often heavily congested. When problems arise on the M40 (which they do quite frequently) the region becomes gridlocked.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90376

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Spedding

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The reasons for opposing the development of an industrial estate, with the possibility of further housing, at SG07 Wedgenock Park Farm duplicate all those put forward in respect of the proposed housing development at B1 Hatton, as follows:

Encroachment on green belt land
The proposed industrial development at SG07 Wedgenock Park Farm would encroach on green belt land, allowing a significant sprawl of the built up area into the countryside. This in turn would further result in the loss of productive farmland, which is vital for future food security, and would have a detrimental effect on biodiversity, animal habitats and protected species.
Roads
The same arguments apply for the proposed SG07 development as they do for B1 Hatton housing development, i.e., that the current road structure is totally inadequate to cope with the increased traffic which would result, and that investment in major upgrades would be necessary before any such development could even be considered. The number of HGVs potentially entering such a site would result in further traffic gridlock, pollution and the need for increased road maintenance.
Significant government funding would be required to ensure that the necessary infrastructure was planned and in place in anticipation for such a development, together with consideration to be given beforehand for upgrading services such as sewerage, water, electricity, communications, etc.
Conclusion
The development of a significantly large industrial site on the outskirts of Warwick would seriously jeopardise the character of Warwick as an historic town, which could have an impact on its current attraction and viability as a tourist venue.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90381

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Having lived in this area for nearly 30 years, given proxmiity to other mixed business/residential, this would be an extension. Good infrastructure

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90538

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Bothamley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Use of prime agricultural land within the greenbelt for development
There are alternative sites available as noted within the plan that are not Greenbelt
The significant detrimental impact to the local road network and local communities
The increased pollution resulting
The significant detrimental impact to the local environment
The local train network is not suitable for the home owners the housing is targeted at and is generally unsuitable for most working people so any perceived benefit is inaccurate

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90579

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Warwick Town Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Constitutes overdevelopment, not enough proper infrastructure on small rural roads to cope with existing traffic, needs better public transport links to reduce number of vehicles coming into Warwick, should include local centres and facilities such as shops and community centres

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90765

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr N Ledger

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

WORTHY OF CONSIDERATION

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90781

Derbyniwyd: 01/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jonathon Smith

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As a resident of Hatton Park, I strongly object to the proposed development on site ID 692, known as Hatton Hill. This development threatens to disrupt cherished public rights of way and walking paths that are vital for recreation and community health. It would also significantly alter the natural landscape, compromising scenic views and tranquility. Access to green spaces is crucial for residents' well-being, and the development contradicts sustainable living principles by reducing walking routes. I urge the planning committee to reconsider, as preserving these paths is essential for our community's character and quality of life.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 90987

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Canal & River Trust

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Canal & River Trust asks that any proposed allocation of Site SG07 considers the canal and takes account of its proximity and the potential impact that development could have on its character, setting, physical infrastructure, heritage significance and biodiversity value. We welcome the opportunity for further discussion if you intend to proceed with the allocation of this site.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91005

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Agree. Good location and area for access to core infrastructure - main roads, motorway and rail network. Could actually see this site to be bigger than what is proposed - scale to develop further and maybe reduce other more sensitive locations.
Provided we are not destroying good quality and productive grade 2/3 land then ok in GB.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91440

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposal will affect the following Local Wildlife Sites: River Avon LWS and Budbrooke Farm woodlands LWS and Warwick Cemetery LWS.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91454

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Jenkinson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The build plans do not evidence sufficient sustainability ambitions, they permanently obliterate the green belt, fragile local wildlife and productive farmland. Local infrastructure is unsuitable for significantly more trunk traffic both during build and during the life of the development, even with further development; road and traffic network including M40 Longbridge roundabout and much more. Where is the evidence that there is enough forecast economic growth for this development?

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91492

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Beth Palmer

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This appears to link in to an existing developed/developing area with good transport links

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91577

Derbyniwyd: 01/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Steven Bottrill

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly object to the proposed development of 8,000 homes in Hatton. The additional traffic from 16,000 cars, coupled with inadequate infrastructure, will lead to chaos and gridlock. Local services, including Warwick hospital, cannot support the increased population, and there are concerns about the rise in antisocial behaviour linked to social housing. The proposal threatens the rural appeal of Hatton, threatening economic decline and loss of productive farmland. Furthermore, it would disrupt wildlife habitats and corridors. While I acknowledge the need for housing, alternative non-green belt sites should be considered.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91595

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Diane Bird

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development on site SG07. This area is quality green belt, with no exceptional circumstances justifying its removal. The expected job creation from warehousing does not outweigh the loss of agricultural land and jobs or the negative impact on wildlife and residential areas. The infrastructure is inadequate to handle increased traffic, particularly on the A4177. I urge consideration of the alternative site SG09, which is more suitable. I hope my concerns will be noted in the consultation process.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91816

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Helen Alexander

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Concern re additional traffic at an already very busy junction for commuters and school bus routes. Existing route up Birmingham Road towards Hatton Park can’t cope currently and the impact of this development along with plans for extra housing would significantly impact rush hour traffic in this area.
Already difficult to get off the A46 at Stanks island if travelling south and turning right heading to the Birmingham Road with normal rush hour traffic. Queues are often backing up along the A46 slip road.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91839

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nicola Mason

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The A46 and Birmingham Road A4177 would not be able to take the extra traffic involved in this location. As things are the are comes to a standstill weekly if not more frequently due to any interference in traffic flow towards Coventry or the M40 junction

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 91936

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Wilson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am against this due to: the loss of the green belt and merging of Warwick with Hatton; the adjacent highway not being able to cope with additional traffic; the impact on the rural character of the area and loss of the well used public footpath enjoyed for its location in green space.