No

ID sylw: 103939

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Olivia McCullough

As a local resident I do not support the proposals to build additional houses and an industrial estate around Hatton as it the roads couldn't cope with the traffic, our countryside will be destroyed and there is not the infrastructure of schools, shops, doctors to support anywhere near the numbers proposed.

No

ID sylw: 103947

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Maddy Gralak

There is no consideration for the lack of local infrastructure to support the development. It will destroy thousands of acres of valuable farmland which will directly impact our food security as a nation. The building is on green belt land with no consideration for the wild belt. The infrastructure in Warwick can barely support the residences at the moment - let alone any more. The area would become gridlocked and impassable.

No

ID sylw: 104045

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Jenny Curtis

This sight is precious green belt which once destroyed cannot be recovered. The wildlife and ecostructure will be irrevocably decimated. The noise, air and environmental pollution is not acceptable. The road infrastructure cannot support this development. The disruption to existing routes will be intolerable and who will pay for the necessary improvements? The integrity of this county and its heritage is being wantonly eroded.

Yes

ID sylw: 104065

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Waters

Good employment opportunities and transport links A46

No

ID sylw: 104107

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carol Wheatley

I do not agree with the proposal in view of the major upgrade to the road network required and the new bridge required over the canal and the years of roadworks and disruption this will cause. The traffic is Warwick is already heavy and this would cause deadlock in the town centre.

No

ID sylw: 104206

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

No

ID sylw: 104365

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Harvey Mole

I object to SG07 – Wedgnock Park Farm Employment because the proposed development contradicts sustainable planning principles. It fails to prioritize brownfield land, lacks justification for Green Belt development, and does not demonstrate clear market demand for additional employment land. The proposal encourages ribbon development, contributing to urban sprawl, and contradicts national and local policies aiming to protect the Green Belt and promote compact growth.

No

ID sylw: 104405

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Susan Heap

I do not agree and object to the development. There will be a detrimental impact to the environment as this area is Green Belt land containing ancient woodland and hedgerows. The land has been identified as already causing a flooding risk to properties. The road network A46/M40/A4177 cannot cope with the existing traffic levels and weather conditions despite recent improvement projects. Significant increase of traffic through Leamington and Warwick will worsen the current congestion and adversely affect business and livelihoods. The development in my opinion is contrary to the ambition of the south warwickshire plan for enhancing the local area.

Other

ID sylw: 104544

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Dunning

YES ONLY IF the development is high density, linked with public transport and active travel infrastructure.

Do not build detached homes anywhere.
Painted bicycle gutters are NOT active travel infrastructure.
A bus is a bad public transport solution.

No

ID sylw: 104548

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kay Williams

This is green belt land! We must not build on green belt land while there are other options available!

No

ID sylw: 104588

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Amy Bambridge

My objections centre around the potential impacts on biodiversity, as well as concerns about the ability of the local infrastructure (roads, hospitals and rail connections) to absorb the increase in numbers of people.

Yes

ID sylw: 104616

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Dunning

Stop building sprawling car-dependent suburbia. You are killing people with these decisions. Cars kill people, stop making people have to get in their cars to get to places. Build high density walkable neighbourhoods with active travel infrastructure.

Paint is not cycling infrastructure.
Buses are bad public transport.
Don't build any detached houses.

No

ID sylw: 104769

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Parker

My concerns are environmental, look at the flooding of the A46 in a few months ago, where does the council think the rain water will go if not absorbed on the over 1000 acres of green belt they want to build on. The Birmingham rd chaos we’ve all lived through this last year proves that there is no capacity for more vehicles, especially Lorrys and we don’t want more rds here, Warwick council have built everywhere it really must stop, badly built overpriced houses, there’s minimal amenities available at Hatton park and a constant threat of more building

No

ID sylw: 104811

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Louise Brierley

This development will result in a loss of countryside, natural habitat and will cause massive environmental destruction.
It will bring extra air pollution from heavy goods vehicles accessing the site, again causing environmental damage. This site should NOT be considered for inclusion within the plan, due to the devastating impact it will have on the local area. This area cannot withstand the extra traffic from heavy goods vehicles on a daily basis.

No

ID sylw: 104916

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Charlotte Holme

This is green belt land and should not be built on

No

ID sylw: 104957

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Jennifer Smith

Highly detrimental to the individual and separate identities of Warwick town and rural West Warwick. Large adverse impact on biodiversity including ancient hedgerows, coppices, wildlife and plant life. Impact on transport system would be detrimental to the quality of life of local residents and those travelling through. Avoidable urban sprawl. It would be a grave mistake to join Warwick town and rural West Warwick areas - it is not just the loss of green belt, it is a much worse loss of the character of the region.

No

ID sylw: 105061

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sarah Geraghty

I strongly oppose the proposed development at site SG07 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. My concerns include the strain on local infrastructure, leading to congestion and increased demand for services. The environmental impact is significant, threatening local wildlife and habitats. Site SG07 is vital for Green Belt protection, and its development would compromise this. Additionally, poor public transport access raises sustainability issues, increasing reliance on cars. Finally, the scale of new homes would disrupt community character. I urge the planning committee to reconsider this site and explore more suitable alternatives.

No

ID sylw: 105062

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rob Geragthy

I oppose the proposed development at site SG07 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan due to several concerns. The site is vital for maintaining the Green Belt, and development would compromise its function. It lacks sustainability, with limited transport access, leading to increased reliance on cars. The construction threatens local wildlife and habitats, and the existing infrastructure cannot support the addition of 6,000 homes, risking congestion and reduced services. Furthermore, the development would disrupt the community character. I urge the planning committee to reconsider this site and seek more suitable locations.

No

ID sylw: 105098

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrew Lock

The significant increase in commercial transport due to the increased volume of lorries servicing this proposed development would drastically increase pollution, affect air quality and cause further traffic chaos and gridlock into the already struggling Warwick Town Centre and back to
the A46, as well as causing increased out of hours disturbance
• There is a further flood risk, due to intense development
• The rail links are too far away to be an effective alternative transport
option.

No

ID sylw: 105122

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Gary Davison

I object to the proposals for approximately 8000 houses in Hatton and Hatton Green, particularly concerning sites near my property at [redacted]. The development would encroach on Green Belt land without justification, setting a dangerous precedent. The existing A4177 cannot handle increased traffic, and proposed site entrances are unsafe. Local infrastructure is inadequate for new homes, and the development would harm the area's character and residential amenities. Additionally, essential public services would be overstretched, and with declining birthrates and slow housing sales, I urge consideration of brownfield sites instead.

No

ID sylw: 105154

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Dawson

I object to the plans for areas B1 and SG07 due to their impact on Hampton Magna and Hatton Park, as well as Warwick. The focus on housing and industrial development overlooks the urgent need for improved infrastructure to manage increased traffic. Birmingham Road is already congested, affecting smaller lanes that aren't designed for heavy use. Additionally, local facilities, including GP surgeries and Warwick Hospital, will be overwhelmed. The hospital's parking issues need to be addressed in the local plan, potentially through increased parking or park and ride solutions.

No

ID sylw: 105158

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Dunn

Sirs,

I wish to strongly object to the proposed building of 8000(!) houses around Hatton.

The local roads cannot possibly cope with such a vast increase in the numbers of vehicles heading into Warwick or Solihull, as well as the water and sewage requirements, and everything else that goes alongside such a vast expansion. Our roads are already a disgrace, and the turmoil caused for over 12 months just altering a short stretch of road by Hatton Park bodes very ill if your plans go ahead.

This is in addition to the terrible loss of green belt and farmland, necessary for current locals' mental health as well as the wildlife living on and around these beautiful fields.

You are [redacted] our countryside - again!

No

ID sylw: 105175

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Keith Duffell

I am deeply concerned about the proposal to build over 8,000 new homes on green belt land due to its potential impact on local infrastructure. The existing road network is inadequate for the expected increase in traffic, which would lead to gridlock and longer commute times. Furthermore, essential services like schools and healthcare facilities are already at capacity, with no plans for expansion. Environmentally, this development would threaten green spaces and wildlife habitats, exacerbating urban sprawl. Given the negative experiences from previous developments, I believe this proposal should be rejected in favour of sustainable alternatives.

No

ID sylw: 105184

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Lisa Griffiths

I object to the proposal for over 8,000 new homes on green belt land, as it will worsen traffic congestion, particularly into Warwick, where roads are already strained. The local train service from Hatton Station is inadequate for such an influx, lacking parking and frequent trains. I advocate for using brownfield sites in Warwickshire's town centres instead, converting underused spaces to reduce car reliance and support local businesses. This approach would alleviate transportation pressure and foster sustainable, vibrant communities. I urge reconsideration of this proposal and focus on revitalising urban areas.

No

ID sylw: 105195

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: R Birla

South Warwickshire's housing needs can be met without encroaching on green belt land, as the Local Plan identifies sufficient capacity in Strategic Growth Locations and New Settlements for 36,500 dwellings. I argue that SG06 is not a sustainable location due to its distance from transport hubs, which promotes car use instead. Additionally, SG06 contributes to all five purposes of Green Belt land and the Green Belt Review is flawed. Development would also threaten high-quality agricultural land, which is crucial for food security. Previous Inspector findings reinforce the need to maintain the Green Belt's integrity and local biodiversity.

Other

ID sylw: 105224

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Wedgnock Park Farm – SG07 – NO OBJECTION

No

ID sylw: 105267

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrew Dyer

I object to the plans for Industrial and Commercial Units at Stanks Island and Wedgnock Park Farm, which will destroy protected Green Belt land. This development threatens biodiversity, increases pollution, and contradicts climate goals and local planning policies. The Green Belt is meant to prevent urban sprawl, and the proposal fails to meet the necessary criteria as alternative brownfield sites exist. Additionally, it could worsen food security by reducing prime farmland. Approving this development would set a dangerous precedent for further Green Belt loss. I urge you to consider my objection.

No

ID sylw: 105433

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Robin Phipps

I object as the infrastructure can't cope.

Yes

ID sylw: 105552

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Hargie

SG01/SG02/SG03/SG07 because of very close transport proximity to the main trunk roads A45/A46.

No

ID sylw: 105718

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs D Hill

Register of objection for planning permission - SG07 - Commercial land

This is an area that I have walked with a friend over many years and we enjoy the unspoilt countryside under consideration for commercial use. Please consider the following objections.

I believe that the noise and light pollution will have a detrimental impact on the area. I believe that commercial use will cause more traffic, larger vehicles on the surrounding area causing more traffic, more hazards of larger vehicles. The area is not suitable for commercial use and should be retained as it is.