Yes

ID sylw: 100023

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Brown

The proposed allocation(s) (ref. 409 & 510), especially 510, would present a development that would be wholly out of keeping with the nature of the surrounding area and village. The development of this land would also fail to meet any of the exceptions listed in paragraph 154 of the NPPF as well as the ‘golden rules’ under paragraph 156 of the same document relating to release of green belt land for development. Finally, the existing infrastructure would be substantially below that required to support such development, including the road network, public transport service, and utilities.

Yes

ID sylw: 100049

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Tremble

Site refid 650 (behind Appleby Close) will negatively effect all of Appleby Close. The access point is already a dangerous junction and we worry about our children's safety when crossing the road. We regularly use the public footpaths going round and though this site and are concerned about the impact on the population of rare Yellow Hammer birds that nest in the hedgerow on the north boundary of the site. Yellow Hammer populations are in decline and are now on the conservation concern red list.

No

ID sylw: 100063

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Hill

Site 757, strongly object to this type of development. Reasons for objection. Flooding concerns, noise pollution and light pollution. Additional traffic passing through with speeding concerns already present in the village. With all the suggested sites, I'd like to know how the search and rescue would cope when the village is cut off by Flooding with a potential Additional 300-400 houses +/-700 people. I don't see this village being a nice area if this type of development happens. Also this area is a wildlife conservation area shown by picture attached.

No

ID sylw: 100080

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

na

Other

ID sylw: 100085

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Susan Harrison

Where will all the jobs come from? This will support the decimation of farming and agriculture. Increasing population will mean more travel to where jobs are & improving travel infrastructure will not mitigate

Yes

ID sylw: 100089

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: E Innes

REFID 95 Land at Old Budbrooke Road, Hampton Magna. Inappropriate development of green belt. Detrimental impact on local residents with insufficient infrastructure, doctors/shops/school, to support new homes. Existing homes already struggle with water supply and drainage. Significant negative impact from further traffic on narrow roads, significant risk of crashes. Adverse impact on hedges/trees/habitats including surrounding area which is not suitable for construction traffic. Character of existing village will be diminished. Previous planning applications for this site have always been rejected so inclusion now after a change of ownership could result in legal action and investigation of impropriety.

No

ID sylw: 100100

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Hill

Strongly object to this development, same reasons as for all sites 620, 757, 133 and 650. Flooding will be increased, traffic though the village (speeding concerns), noise and light pollution, the impact on residents and wildlife. The development of the village of this scale is morally wrong and those making these decisions should look at other sites prior to this like the old school by the tennis courts in alcester as an example been left empty for years, not taking green land for poor quality housing .

Yes

ID sylw: 100116

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: E Innes

REFID 233 Land to North of Hampton Magna. Character of existing village will be diminished. Inappropriate development of green belt. Insufficient infrastructure, doctors/shops/school, to support new homes with detrimental impact on local residents with. Existing homes already struggle with water supply and drainage. Significant negative impact from further traffic on narrow roads, significant risk of crashes. Adverse impact on hedges/trees/habitats including surrounding area which is not suitable for construction traffic. Site has drainage and surface water issues. Will be visually unappealing from St Micheals.

Yes

ID sylw: 100143

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: E Innes

REFID 715 Land southeast of Hampton Magna. Inappropriate development of green belt. Area includes flooding already and development will increase flooding including on A46. Insufficient infrastructure, doctors/shops/school, to support new homes with detrimental impact on local residents. Existing homes already struggle with water supply and drainage. Significant negative impact from traffic on narrow roads. Adverse impact on hedges/trees/habitats including surrounding area which is not suitable for construction traffic. Character of existing village will be lost.

Yes

ID sylw: 100144

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: E Innes

REFID 573 Land East of Hampton Magna. Inappropriate development of green belt. Area includes flooding already and development will increase flooding including on A46. Insufficient infrastructure, doctors/shops/school, to support new homes with detrimental impact on local residents. Existing homes already struggle with water supply and drainage. Significant negative impact from traffic on narrow roads. Adverse impact on hedges/trees/habitats including surrounding area which is not suitable for construction traffic. Character of existing village will be lost.

Yes

ID sylw: 100174

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: E Innes

REFID 621 Grange Farm Budbrooke. Inappropriate development of green belt. Area includes flooding already and development will increase flooding. Insufficient infrastructure, doctors/shops/school, to support new homes with detrimental impact on local residents. Existing homes already struggle with water supply and drainage. Significant negative impact from traffic on narrow roads. Adverse impact on hedges/trees/habitats including surrounding area which is not suitable for construction traffic. Site creates corridor of development that changes the character of whole area from rural to urban stretching from Warwick to proposed new town at site B1.

Yes

ID sylw: 100189

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: E Innes

REFID 119 Part Grange Farm Budbrooke. Inappropriate development of green belt. Area includes flooding already and development will increase flooding – in turn this could cause issues with subsidence to trainline and flooding of canal. Insufficient infrastructure, with detrimental impact on local residents. Significant negative impact from traffic on narrow roads. Adverse impact on hedges/trees/habitats including surrounding area which is not suitable for construction traffic, access extremely limited. Site creates corridor of development that changes the character of whole area from rural to urban stretching from Warwick to proposed new town at site B1.

Yes

ID sylw: 100209

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Matthew Sumerling

SG20 objection
• Developments are in open countryside in an elevated area
• High visual impact
• Situated in Grade 1 & 2 agricultural land currently actively farmed
• The school in Temple Grafton is already at capacity.
• There is no local secondary school within 2km walking distance and Alcester Academy is already over-subscribed.
• The roads are narrow and very busy especially past the TG school.
• A46 is already at capacity.
• No gas mains.
• Regular power cuts, sometimes several a day
• Limited mains sewerage
• Limited bus services

Yes

ID sylw: 100216

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

REFID 95.
Regular crashes on Old Budbrooke Road. This is actually two crash sites next to each other on north side.
Old Budbrooke Road is too narrow to accommodate extra traffic from housing development.
Old Budbrooke Road cannot accommodate the extra traffic.
Old Budbrooke Road floods regularly.
These roads are not designed to be main routes.

Yes

ID sylw: 100220

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: E Innes

REFID 245 Land at Warwick Parkway Train Station, Warwick. Inappropriate development of green belt. Insufficient infrastructure, doctors/schools/nurseries/etc, with detrimental impact on local residents. Significant negative impact from traffic on A4177. Adverse impact on hedges/trees/habitats. Site connects several distinct locals creating urban sprawl. New dwellings will be out of character and visually unattractive in the context of existing greenbelt – also visible from green corridor of canal and towpath. Area already suffers from some flooding that will be made worse. Access to Warwick will slow reducing trade footfall. Insufficient train capacity from local station that cannot be increased inline with demand

Yes

ID sylw: 100237

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

RIFID 233 - development in this area places too much stress on local infrastructure. The new houses in Hampton Magna have already resulted in water pressure being increased, which is blowing all the pipes. Ask Severn Trent! The road networks will not cope with more traffic

Yes

ID sylw: 100247

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Great Alne Parish Council

RefID133 Land off Spernal Lane

We feel that development would be inappropriate for reasons stated below. Nonetheless, should development be approved, a mixture of types and sizes of homes is required, including bungalows, with significant proportion affordable.

Reasons for objection:
• Green Belt
• Narrowness of Access Road
• Private Land Abutment
• Road Safety:
- Several Access Points within 200m,
- Speeding on Spernal Lane
- Volume and type of traffic
- Pedestrian Access into Village
• Surface Water % on Land and Spernal Lane, greater than HELAA B assessment
• Transport score challenged.

Other

ID sylw: 100259

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

RIFID 233
Regular crashes on Old Budbrooke Road. This is actually two crash sites next to each other on north side.
Old Budbrooke Road is too narrow to accommodate extra traffic from housing development.
As a resident that walks my dog here daily the passing (speeding) traffic is terrifying.
Old Budbrooke Road cannot accommodate the extra traffic.
Old Budbrooke Road floods regularly.
These roads are not designed to be main routes.

No

ID sylw: 100260

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

RIFID 145 - local infrastructure cannot cope with more houses in this area

No

ID sylw: 100266

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

RIFID 621 - water mains are all bursting over Hampton Magna as a result of Severn Trent increasing the pressure for houses already recently built. Local roads will not cope

No

ID sylw: 100271

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

RIFID 55 - Hampton Magna has spent the last 3 years of having housing developments added to the village (and they are still not finished). Allowing more planning means residents face a perpetual disruption. Outside my house has been like a trust stop. Enough!!

No

ID sylw: 100276

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

RIFID 715 - the schools in Hampton magna have already had an inflow of students as a result of new houses. Allowing even more overwhelms the system. Any overflow will have to travel out to alternatives

No

ID sylw: 100284

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

RIFID 573 - The local doctor surgery cannot cope with an inflow of extra houses. Hampton Magna has already had 2 new estates built around it. This puts too much pressure on local services

No

ID sylw: 100294

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Rogers

RIFID 44 - local roads cannot cope with the building of so many new houses here. This would create a rat run on Old Budbrooke Road, which is a dangerous road already

Yes

ID sylw: 100611

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Thomas Lachlan

We strongly object to the proposed development on Site 712 due to severe highway safety risks along Church Lane, a narrow, pavement-free route heavily used by schoolchildren walking to Barford St Peter’s School. Increased traffic, particularly construction vehicles, would endanger pedestrians. Additionally, the site lies within the Conservation Area, harming the historic character of Church Lane and nearby listed buildings. Development would also destroy mature trees and important habitats, conflicting with environmental policies. Finally, the site is unsuitable under local planning policies, with flood risks to nearby homes and clear non-compliance with Barford’s Neighbourhood Development Plan.

Yes

ID sylw: 100612

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Lucinda Lacey

I object to the proposed development on Site 712, having serious concerns over access, pedestrian safety, conservation, environmental harm, flood risk, and policy non-compliance. Church Lane is unsuitable for increased traffic, particularly endangering schoolchildren. The development would harm the Barford Conservation Area, damage historic properties, and disrupt important wildlife habitats. Increased flood risk due to inadequate drainage is another major issue. The proposal violates key Warwick and Barford planning policies, including those protecting heritage, character, and ecology. Given these impacts, I urge Warwick District Council to refuse the application to safeguard Barford’s safety, heritage, and environment.

Yes

ID sylw: 100655

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs katie Innes

Rear of Grove Croft, Hampton on the Hill, CV35 8RJ (Ref ID 51)
Development of this site will impact negatively on the rural character of the area. It's size is disproportionate to the size of the existing residential hamlet. Water supply issues, including sudden loss of water, burst pipes and other problems relating to the age of the water infrastructure make this site unsuitable for residential development becasue it will exacerbate the existing problems associated with sub standard water supply. The development will increase traffic in the area.

Other

ID sylw: 100662

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Woolf

Increase in carbon to build proposed housing and increase in vehicles (electric or internal combustion) - 'climate resistant and Net Zero Carbon' not satisfied.
The number of proposed houses and red brick construction - 'well designed and beautiful' not satisfied
Increased population, minimal police, no fire station or waste tip - 'healthy and safe' not satisfied
Increased population, minimal bus service, rural infrastructure - 'well connected' not satisfied
Removal of field, hedgerows, significant loss of habitat and likelihood of greatly exceeding the capacity of River Stour - 'biodiverse and environmentally resilient' not satisfied

Yes

ID sylw: 100672

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Jones

Ref: HELAA Preferred sites listed to the south and south-east of Leek Wootton by The Warwickshire and adjacent to the A46. Being involved with the LW Village Plan these 2 preferred sites far exceed what was proposed in The Plan. The map itself also does not show the new development by Cala Homes on the Warwickshire Police land. These 77 new homes in this small rural village. Why has this not been taken into account? Overall the sites around LW connect it to Kenilworth and Warwick. This completely compromises this rural village status.

Yes

ID sylw: 100673

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs barbara jones

Ref 573

village access is via 3 roads the main road being a single lane under the railway bridge. This gets congested at busy times ,extra houses and cars it would cause even more issues. This road is also prone to flooding , therefore more houses would make the issue worse.
• The air pollution from the extra traffic
• major impact on the greenbelt less wildlife
• loss of views from bridleway on field 573
The Dr’s surgery and school wouldn't meet needs
• extra drainage issue as pipe work inadequate
• More regular power , broadband issues.