Yes

ID sylw: 92956

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Hartwright

Land off School Road (refid 620)

I have concerns over this site
1. Road safety - access is a proposed accident blackspot, access is a 3 way junction on blind brow, cars frequently speed in this area, c 3643 vehicles use this junction daily, to gain access to the footpath you would need to cross the 3 way junction.
2. Surface water flooding - this area frequently floods in heavy rain
3. Flood Plain - this site is extremely close to the flood plain
8. Lack of public transport

Yes

ID sylw: 92960

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Hartwright

Land to East of Spernal Lane and Appebly Close (refid 650)

I have concerns about this site due to:

1. Road Safety: Spernal Lane Access, large number of access points within 100m, Proximity to B4089 Junction, Proximity to Listed Building (Mother Huff Cap), Speeding, Volume and type of traffic - c1000 vehicles per day use this road, limited pedestrian Access into Village
2. Surface Water significant Highway Flooding from land run off
- Manor Court Ditch significant land drainage watercourse
3. There are 8 Listed buildings within 800m
4. A STW Adopted Rainwater Sewer crosses the Site

Yes

ID sylw: 92964

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Amanda Hartwright

Land Adjacent to B4089 (refid 757)

I have concerns about using this site:
1. Road Safety:
-Access to Site potentially within 50mph Zone
- Speeding - 45% of traffic speed - Avg speed 37mph
- Volume and type of traffic - 2892 vehicles a day use this road
- Pedestrian Access into Village - busy road to cross
2. Surface Water - land frequently floods
3. There is Potential WCC Land frontage
4. Lack of primary and secondary school places in catchment
5. 3 Listed buildings within 800m
6. STW Pumping Station on site

Yes

ID sylw: 92968

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Wilson

Ref ID: 233. Any development in this area would destroy the character of the medieval village of Budbrooke and should be a conservation area. The medieval fishponds which are an important habitat for wildlife would also be affected.
Ref ID: 95. Any development in this area would destroy the character of the medieval village of Budbrooke and should be a conservation area.

Yes

ID sylw: 93021

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nichole South

Sites proposed are to create new settlements in long Marston, Gaydon and Brierley. Where infrastructure can be put in place. SG01 SG13 E1 F1

Yes

ID sylw: 93083

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cathy Kennedy

Fundamental issues with this site, starting with inaccurate designation (not an unmanaged greenfield site), the ecology of the site being hugely underestimated, the conservation value understated, the access being highly unsuitable, issues with services, the flood potential for houses below the site unmentioned and going against Warwick Local Plan policies and Barford Neighbourhood Development Plan policies

Yes

ID sylw: 93170

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

SWALLOWFIELD refid 235
Site impacts the Canal Conservation Area to the East and the deep railway cutting in the West. The land is low-lying and the water-table is high. This is a risk that would lead to a disproportionate cost to mitigate. Also, the land would be at high risk of flooding from a breach of the canal embankment.
Any development on this land would push a wedge of development between Baddesley Clinton and Packwood NT properties to the detriment of strategic objectives 8 & 9.
Rising Lane is too narrow for access to a fully built development on Swallowfield.

Yes

ID sylw: 93178

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

Land at Station Lane, Kingswood refid514
The land detrimentally impinges on the Canal Conservation Area.
It regularly floods and is an essential contributor to flood relief.
Access to Station Lane is dangerous due to bends, visibility, on street parking and narrowness.

Yes

ID sylw: 93181

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Checkley

The development of the areas identified as part of SG17 would have a detrimental impact on the area for the following reasons:
1. Detrimental impact upon residential amenity – there is already poor access to infrastructure such as GP surgeries, retail provision, schools, and employment opportunities. Additional housing in SG17 would place an unacceptable burden on Shipston on Stour.
2. Impact on traffic and highways – the road network surrounding the potential SG17 growth location is insufficient. Specifically Shoulderway Lane (site ref 173) and Fell Mill Lane (site ref 148) are small rural roads with poor access to the regional road network. The existing rural roads bordering the SG17 locations are well used leisure routes for pedestrians and cyclists.
3. Drainage and flooding – many of the areas within SG17 are prone to drainage and flooding problems, especially the area to the west of Fell Mill Lane (site ref 148) which regularly floods extensively. To consider building homes on this area would be very ill advised. Additionally, the extra development to the area of SG17 off Shoulderway Lane (site ref 173) would risk causing surface water drainage impacts to existing housing on London Road due to the increased amount of impermeable surface area in place of previously permeable green field land.
4. Electrical capacity in Shipston is unlikely to be sufficient for such an influx of new homes which would likely require EV charging and capacity to support air source heat pumps as low carbon heating.
5. Carbon emissions – development on the scale implied by SG17 will result in a significant rise in carbon emissions both from the use of homes and from the transport requirements of residents. There is no rail connection and public transport is scant suggesting road traffic emissions would soar.
6. Impact on the environment – development within SG17 would lead to the loss of valuable and well used green space and amenity areas such as the recently established River Stour walk.
7. Employment opportunities – there are very few employment opportunities in Shipston which suggests additional residential development within the town would mean Shipston increasingly would become a dormitory town which would only benefit in a minor way from such an influx of new residents.

Yes

ID sylw: 93191

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

Land at Station Lane, Kingswood refid 622
the land detrimentally impacts the Canal Conservation Area.
The access onto Station Lane is dangerous due to bends that affect visibility. on street parking and school drop offs.

Yes

ID sylw: 93194

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

Mill Lane, Kingswood refid 53
The access onto Mill Lane is on a dangerous bend and there is barely enough space for two cars to pass.
A development on this site would not be continuous with the existing development up Mill Lane and contribute to the sprawl of Lapworth/Kingswood.
The site has a pond and a variety of plants and trees and would be a serious loss of biodiversity.

Yes

ID sylw: 93197

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

Land adjacent Rose Cottage refid 205

Access for construction traffic and households is a MAJOR obstacle to development.

The landscape is rich in local ecology and would be a significant loss of biodiversity if it were developed.

Yes

ID sylw: 93198

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

The Tan House, Old Warwick Road, Lapworth refid 88

This site has MAJOR access issues for construction and household traffic. There would be a significant loss of woodland and biodiversity.

Yes

ID sylw: 93203

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

The Boot, Old Warwick Road, Lapworth, B94 6JU refid 513
The site is used for leisure and creates employment for local young people which would be lost if the site was developed. The public House has been a success story for over 30 years and is in itself a Lapworth attraction.
The development would be seen from the North bank of the canal and would be intrusive in the open countryside landscape.
There would be a particular ecology loss owing to its proximity to the canal.

Yes

ID sylw: 93213

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

All the sites identified in Kingswood/Lapworth reference id 235, 169, 514, 622, 53, 205, 88, 513 are all situated in the Green Belt. Loss of the Green Belt around the existing settlement would be detrimental to the current 'containment' within the village boundary and stops sprawl.
All the sites would represent a significant loss of biodiversity.
The school capacity would be woefully inadequate for infant and junior children. All 11+ children would have to be bussed many miles to Henley, Warwick or Knowle.
The reliability of the electricity supply is poor because most of the cabling is above ground.

Yes

ID sylw: 93214

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Raymond Joyce

Site refs 235, 169, 514, 622, 53, 205, 88, 513 GENERAL COMMENTS
Lapworth's infrastructure is at the limit.
The GP surgery is currently at capacity.
The B4439 is already busy and speeding through Lapworth is a constant danger.
The train station only has 16 car park spaces.
The railway line is already at capacity and trains are infrequent.

Yes

ID sylw: 93271

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

749 - Part of Elliotts Fm BARFORD
This site is unsuitable and has previously been rejected as a G&T settlement
It includes the "west ham" of the River Avon and a significant part of the site is subject to flooding as shown on the Floodplain maps.
As a residential site it would be separated from all Barford village facilities by the A429 and would not provide sustainable ACTIVE TRAVEL - there would be total car dependency and therefore fail to meet Strategic objectives.
Access could only be from the A429 - a road already with significant safety issues and fatalities.

Yes

ID sylw: 93272

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

749 - Pt of Elliotts Farm - EASTERN PORTION - this is a land-locked triangle with only limited "ransom strip" access.
Its proximity to Barford Bypass make it a poor choice, even if access could be secured.
Currently used as a sheep paddock - in a rural setting, let's keep it that way?

Yes

ID sylw: 93274

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

712 - Land EAST of Church Lane, Barford
UNSUITABLE land locked site with a very limited access on site and a very difficult site access over very narrow Church Lane, which serves Barford Playing Fields and Barford School and consequent highway risks.
The land abuts heritage assets including Listed Bldgs and is in the Barford Conservation Area
The site includes a Public Footpath (W103), a large marl pit pond and many old trees

Yes

ID sylw: 93275

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Site 15 - N of Wasperton Lane Barford
Not suitable - this land is ISOLATED and separated from the Barford settlement and its facilities
Access would be from the narrow and surprisingly busy Wasperton Lane with consequential issues.

Yes

ID sylw: 93276

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Site 172 - East of Wellesbourne Rd, BARFORD
This is valuable and productive agricultural land which should be retained.
Mineral safeguarding area and adjacent to a proposed mineral quarry
There is no immediate local need as demonstrated by the 2024 Housing Needs Survey which demonstrated a need which will be more than met by permissions already granted.
If this site were approved then it would exacerbate the traffic problems at Barford Bypass junctions and require significant improvements.

Yes

ID sylw: 93277

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Site 184 - Wasperton Rd. WASPERTON
Unsuitable site
PP already refused and Appeal dismissed.
The inspector described "open countryside" not to be lost...
Impact on Wasperton Conservation Area
No local need shown by the 2024 Housing Needs Survey

Yes

ID sylw: 93278

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Sites 201 and 196 SHERBOURNE - East of Vicarage Lane and between Vicarage Lane and Watery Lane.
Sherbourne has minimal facilities - already deficient water supplies and overloaded drainage.
Impact on the Sherbourne Conservation Area
Very narrow highways with no pavements and limited streetlighting.
Nearest schools and shops are much too far away at Barford and SW Warwick - well in excess of 20 minutes walk and also separated by the busy A429

Other

ID sylw: 93319

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

Sites near Lapworth/Kingswood/Rowington: 53, 88, 115, 169, 205, 235, 514, 610, 649, 677, 738, 761

All suffer from the same issues as C1-poor railway capacity and train coverage, limited station parking, heritage land. Local infrastructure including road network (narrow canal bridges, so expensive to expand) already struggling, so a sequence of small developments with minimal infrastructure contributions would add pressure but no solutions.

Yes

ID sylw: 93320

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

Sites near Burton Green/Coventry: site ids 32, 34, 54, 102, 215, 228, 604, 724

Small sites near Burton Green and in the Coventry-Kenilworth gap. This region is a narrow piece of Green Belt separating the two conurbations, and is one of only two broad areas in Warwick district highlighted as strongly contributing to the green belt purposes in the latest Green Belt review. The latest NPPF, while weakening Green Belt protections, leaves the purpose B “to prevent neighbouring towns merging” as a key purpose of the Green Belt, which applies strongly in this location.

Other

ID sylw: 93343

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Pearce

The proposed development at Little Hallend Farm, Blunts Green (ref ID: 737) is unsuitable due to Highway constraints, environmental impact and infrastructure strain. Hall End Road is a single track road only accessible via another single track road with a 4.1m railway bridge, restricting larger vehicle access.
The area serves equestrian facilities and a veterinary practice, increasing safety risks.
The site is Green Belt, contravening NPPF Paragraphs 142-144. Local schools and healthcare are at capacity. The proposal threatens biodiversity, increases flood risk, failing Stratford upon Avon Core strategy Policies CS.1, CS.5 and CS.26.
We request its removal from the plan.

Yes

ID sylw: 93362

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Watts

Site 712 - land on the east side of Church Lane Barford’
Access to this site is solely possible from Church Lane posing a major threat to pedestrians on the existing footpath along which the access to the site would have to run. Children, carers and adults accessing the play-area and school would be endangered. Church Lane cannot be widened or made suitable for this proposal.
It's partly a conservation area and a wild life haven.
It is a burden to the village infrastructure which is already stretched to the limit eg school, traffic congestion, parking, and services.

Yes

ID sylw: 93372

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr geoff marston

The Council should be using the most up to date Local Wildlife Site layer available. I feel that a substantial number of precious local Wildlife Sites would be negatively impacted (listed in detailed response)

Yes

ID sylw: 93411

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Adam Clegg

Land South of Chichester Lane, Hampton Magna REFID: 55.
I oppose this site as it will break up purpose built landscaped land, trees and hedges which are part of the green belt. It is unsustainable to continue taking land out of the green belt to hit sustainability targets. It will lead to loss of privacy as our homes will be overlooked, contributing to reduction of light and creating unwanted noise and smell.
There were previously water and sewerage issues on the Hampton Trove site so building here would only exacerbate these problems.

Yes

ID sylw: 93414

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

94 – Land North Of Ashward House, Norton Lindsey, Warwickshire - OBJECT
48 – Land to the North and East of Cotswold House, Wolverton Road, Norton Lindsey - OBJECT
192 – Land to the east of Curlieu Lane Norton Lindsey - OBJECT